JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LDHEN Archives


LDHEN Archives

LDHEN Archives


LDHEN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LDHEN Home

LDHEN Home

LDHEN  October 2011

LDHEN October 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: University-wide referencing systems

From:

"Freeman, Sally" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Freeman, Sally

Date:

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:20:07 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (77 lines)

I work at NTU as a Dyslexia Specialist where yes there is a university wide policy. However, it continues to be an extremely thorny issue for the students I work with as lecturers continue to have their 'own preferred way'.

Regards,
Sally Freeman
Dyslexia Specialist

-----Original Message-----
From: learning development in higher education network [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Colin Bryson
Sent: 25 October 2011 07:16
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: University-wide referencing systems

This issue brings out the different cultures in universities. At my former university where the power lay in the centre (which is good and bad) there was much stronger emphasis on aligning around one referencing system. Yes it was loosely called Harvard but we had a universal guide issued by the Library which was supplemented but not altered by schools. Ed might update us if this had changed.
However at my present it would be anathema to many academics to do anything but to follow their idiosyncrasy and so we get variation even within the same subject and at least 12 different approaches. There is no central direction at all. As in other aspects the system is supplier led (the staff choose) rather than demand led (what might less confusing and good for the students). Yes there can be virtues in students learning a variety of approaches but it is not good when students might be penalised 15% or more because a particular module leader had their own specific approach - and penalties are idiosyncratic too. This undermines student faith in the fairness of assessment and is a bit of nightmare for those studying multiple subjects...
Colin Bryson
Director of the Combined Honours Centre
Level G Daysh Building
Newcastle University

http://raise-network.ning.com/

0191 222 6389
________________________________________
From: learning development in higher education network [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of McMorrow, Martin [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 25 October 2011 04:48
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: University-wide referencing systems

I'd be interested to know if you do find any institutions which have introduced single referencing systems across the board. I suspect it would be quite rare, given the depth of attachment on the part of different colleges / faculties to specific referencing styles and the tendency to avoid interference in issues of disciplinary knowledge / conventions. It's not a battle that I'd choose to enter into.

Where I work - at Massey University in New Zealand - the College of Business has managed to adopt APA, despite the wide range of disciplines in the College. But other colleges / faculties don't have a general policy across their component schools and overall there is a similar range to that found at Leeds. There is not only variation regarding the standard style, but also variation in how strictly the standard is enforced. Psychology, for instance, is, I think, pretty high in the attachment scale - ie correct referencing / citation matters and it's APA or bust.

I think the main difficulty arises in 'elective' papers which students take outside their major - and with degree subjects that are inherently interdisciplinary. Ideally, there ought to be a bit of leeway - and I think that it often does happen (eg when a business student takes a history paper as an elective, I think, on the whole, they can get away with clunky old APA, rather than the elegant Oxford style favoured by the School of History).

So, I feel that there may be more traction to be gained in terms of implementation - ie transparency, tolerance, consistency (between lecturers / within a school / at a given level of study),

Martin McMorrow
ATLAANZ, New Zealand



-----Original Message-----
From: learning development in higher education network [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Dan Pullinger
Sent: Friday, 21 October 2011 10:59 p.m.
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: University-wide referencing systems

*Apologies for cross posting*

Dear All,

My colleague Michelle Schneider and I are interested to hear of any examples of Higher Education institutions adopting a University-wide referencing system for their undergraduates and taught postgraduates.

At the University of Leeds, at least eight different referencing styles are used by different schools across the institution, with many more variants of these styles adopted by individual tutors. There is currently no central responsibility for providing consistent guidance and support for referencing; the level of supporting information provided to students and staff by individual departments varies considerably.

We are considering recommending that Leeds adopts a University-wide referencing system. We'd be grateful to receive any examples of institutions where a similar approach has been adopted, plus any information on the benefits and pitfalls that have subsequently been experienced.

If you're able to help, please email Michelle and myself directly: [log in to unmask] and [log in to unmask]

Many thanks,

Dan

Dan Pullinger
Faculty Team Librarian
(Science and Engineering)
Edward Boyle Library
University of Leeds
LS2 9JT

T (0113) 343 5574
F (0113) 343 5539
W http://library.leeds.ac.uk/people/pullinger-d.htm

Consider the environment. Please don't print this email unless you really need to.
DISCLAIMER: This email is intended solely for the addressee. It may contain private and confidential information. If you are not the intended addressee, please take no action based on it nor show a copy to anyone. In this case, please reply to this email to highlight the error. Opinions and information in this email that do not relate to the official business of Nottingham Trent University shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by the University. Nottingham Trent University has taken steps to ensure that this email and any attachments are virus-free, but we do advise that the recipient should check that the email and its attachments are actually virus free. This is in keeping with good computing practice.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager