JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LDHEN Archives


LDHEN Archives

LDHEN Archives


LDHEN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LDHEN Home

LDHEN Home

LDHEN  September 2009

LDHEN September 2009

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Evaluation Project

From:

Becka Currant <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Becka Currant <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 4 Sep 2009 09:50:51 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (151 lines)

Thanks for sharing what you have done David, I think we might copy some of that! Would you be willing to share the questionnaires?!

I agree also that this is a crucial area and it would be good to pool resources/approaches to be able to benchmark what we do and how we do it as we all face the inevitable questions of "how have you increased retention?"!

Becka

Becka Currant
Dean of Students
University  of Bradford
Tel: 01274 236821
Mob: 07917 241214 or 1739 internally


-----Original Message-----
From: learning development in higher education network [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Bowers
Sent: 04 September 2009 09:36
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Evaluation Project

Absolutely spot on, Julia!

Please (please) can this generate a good response from the LDHEN and
related communities? 

From this end, I can only contribute a small drop into this ocean:

1) Last year we decided to directly email a brief questionnaire, at 4
points in the year (end Oct, end Dec, end Mar, end May), to all students
who had used our Learning Development drop-in sessions during the
previous 2 months. (For context - we run around 30 hours of open-access
drop-ins and 15 hours of tutor-led topic-based workshops each week. We
only offer individual one-to-ones if there is a specific need, by
appointment). We felt that this more regular issue, rather than waiting
for an end-of-year survey, would capture it more freshly in the
students' mind. We didn't mind the "risk" of regular users being
captured more than once. I can't say the rate of return was as good as
we hoped - around 40% - we put this down to students not regularly
accessing their uni email account. And (of course?) it was likely to be
only the grateful/ensthusiastic students who replied.....

2) We also included a question along the lines of "has the support
resulted in a noticeable improvement in the quality of your work?" and a
question along the lines of "would you say the support has helped keep
you on the course whereas otherwise you might have considered leaving?"
Pretty non-scientific, but as Julia notes, this is the nitty gritty that
grabs the attention! We too got a surprising amount of affirmatives.


David Bowers,
Head of Learning Development,
University Campus Suffolk,
Neptune Quay,
Ipswich,
IP4 1QJ,
United Kingdom.

Tel: 01473 296339
Fax: 01473 343696 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: learning development in higher education network
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Julia Braham
Sent: 03 September 2009 18:06
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Evaluation Project

Hello,
This is an interesting question and very timely. There has been some
discussion on the lists over summer about 'impact evaluation of study
support' and evaluation of learning to learn modules, but the response
to Nick Hooper's call in June suggests that we are all still skirting
around this question. 
For some reason we rarely begin an academic year at Leeds thinking
strategically about evaluation - it is usually towards the end of the
year when we try to make sure we have captured plenty of 'how was it for
you' evidence to populate annual reports. Our evaluation mechanisms seem
relatively simplistic and still focus on questionnaires given to
students attending workshops and drop ins. We have tried to find out
from students the extent to which attending workshops may have helped
them change their practice, and what they found useful (or not) about
the workshop and use their responses to adapt our delivery - if they are
consistent enough!
A few years ago we distributed an end of year evaluation to students who
had attended our drop in sessions. One question asked if students felt
that attending drop in sessions had encouraged them to remain on their
course. The responses to this were significant enough to convert into
FTEs and inserted into a report that argued that our drop in facility
had maintained x amount of income for the university. The extent to
which this figure was quoted (and not interrogated) was surprising.
When we launch a new learning resource or website, we usually run focus
groups to capture impressions and again, take account of responses in
resource development.   We ask different questions and seek different
answers depending on who needs to use the information our evaluation
provides us with. We know that our students want to see the continuation
of one to one drop in sessions and that they find them effective, but
others ask questions about their cost effectiveness.      
I would suggest, by the responses to the email question, that may other
institutions are the same as us. We know that learning development is an
activity that is difficult to evaluate and we all seem to be unsure how
to grasp the nettle to produce meaningful and reliable data (whatever
that is), and then know how best to use the information that it
provides.  
Does anyone feel that they are using more sophisticated evaluation
mechanisms? Are there any more innovative example of current evaluation
practice being used? It will be interesting to see the outcome of the
Queens project, but I can see why the Project Leaders would benefit from
a clearer understanding of what we are all currently doing to evaluate
our delivery.

Julia Braham
Senior Academic Skills Adviser
Skills@Library
University of Leeds

________________________________________
From: learning development in higher education network
[[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Paula Moran [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 17 August 2009 14:25
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Evaluation Project - Small Grant Funding

Hi
Project DEVELOPMENT OF A GENERIC EVALUATION PLAN AND EVALUATION TOOLS
FOR LEARNING DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY

We are currently working on our literature review for the above project
and after initial discussions on our first draft with our mentor we
think it would be very beneficial to include a section that scopes
current practice within the LDHEN network.
I would be very grateful if you would be willing to provide me with
information on the rationale and/or practice you use for learning
development activities.
Also it would be useful if you could highlight what you have experienced
as most effective and any issues you have experienced in the area of
evaluation of learning activities which may include one-to-one
provision, workshops and resources.

Any feedback on the above or other information you think would be
relevant will be much appreciated.

Best wishes

Paula


University Campus Suffolk is one the UK’s newest higher education institutions and officially opened on 1 August 2007. The main campus is located in Ipswich with centres in Bury St Edmunds, Great Yarmouth, Lowestoft and Otley. The new Waterfront building in Ipswich opened in September 2008.  Visit www.ucs.ac.uk for further details.

University Campus Suffolk (UCS) is the trading name of University Campus Suffolk Ltd, a company registered in England & Wales, registered number 5078498, registered office Waterfront Building, Neptune Quay, Ipswich, IP4 1QJ

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager