JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LDHEN Archives


LDHEN Archives

LDHEN Archives


LDHEN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LDHEN Home

LDHEN Home

LDHEN  March 2009

LDHEN March 2009

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: reflexive v reflective

From:

"Malone, Cathy" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Malone, Cathy

Date:

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:25:11 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (76 lines)

On the general topic of reflection I really enjoyed this presentation (here's the abstract below) 

________________Evidence of Personal Development Planning in Assessed Student Writing
Hilary Nesi
Personal Development Planning (PDP) is intended to enable young people to ‘reflect on their own learning, performance and/or achievement’ and ‘plan for their personal, educational and career development’ (Higher Education Academy, 2005). Reflective writing tasks are one way of encouraging PDP, but problems arise when such writing is subjected to assessment. Students may feel that acknowledgement of genuine deficits and personal inadequacies will jeopardize their academic and professional careers; moreover genuine reflection may touch on problems outside the students’ personal control, such as poor teaching and inadequate resources. This paper presents findings from functional analysis of reflective writing elements in the British Academic Written English (BAWE) corpus, a collection of about 3000 good quality university student assignments, distributed fairly evenly across four broad disciplinary groupings and four levels of study. Students from 13 out of the 34 contributing departments submitted to the corpus assignments we classed as ‘reflective recounts’ (telling the story of their personal and educational development over a period of time) or ‘self-evaluations’ (discussing their suitability for a particular role or career). Other assignments in the corpus belonging primarily to other genres (e.g. discussion essays, model evaluations, literature reviews) include a reflective element, often bolted on at the beginning or end of the main body of writing. This paper identifies the contexts for reflection in the corpus, and, drawing on Hunston & Thompson (2000), discusses the representation of value-systems in such writing, and the extent to which the reflective elements demonstrate genuine reflective practice, contributing to the aims of PDP. It also considers what advice writing tutors might offer students in terms of the expression of personal stance, and the possible conflict between personal reflection and traditional methods of academic enquiry.
References
Higher Education Academy (2005) PDP update: policy and practice http://www.ukcle.ac.uk/resources/pdp/varnava.html
Hunston, S and Thompson, G (eds.) (2000) Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.________________________

at last year's Writing Development in HE conference.
The full presentation is available @  http://www.writenow.ac.uk/wdhe/presentation/NesiH.pdf

I found this and Hunston & Thompson (see below) a really good starting point when working with a Radiotherapist this year introducing reflective writing for first years & MSc students. 
While I found these texts gave me a way in, I think the students found examples of professional reflections written by staff to be most useful - second years ended up asking for copies. 

Reflective writing linked to PDP seems to occur across nearly all the professional courses here so I was intrigued to see the recent appearance of 

Applied Research Group: English Language in the Professions and in Higher Education (ELPHE) http://www.coventry.ac.uk/elphe

This looks like an interesting extension of BAWE (British Academic Written English) corpus research.

Cathy Malone 
Sheffield Hallam

 


From: learning development in higher education network [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Hilsdon [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 4:58 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: reflexive v reflective

… and if Stevie, an educationalist, has experienced such problems on an MA, what must it be like for our undergrads …?  A few years ago I had so many nursing students coming to see me to ask how to ‘do’ critical reflection that I undertook a small research study in an attempt interpret what was going on. The main findings I came to were that a) there was widespread confusion among the students about what reflection ‘really’ is (much of which centred around issues of writing conventions such as the dreaded pronoun use) , and b) such unclarity or contradictoriness around the criteria for assessment of reflection that it was not uncommon for students to fabricate their reflections .. defeating somewhat (though perhaps not entirely) the object of undertaking a reflective task!

If anyone wants to read it, let me know – or you can find it in the Journal of Practice Teaching in Health and Social Work 6(1) pp 57-70 Hilsdon, J. 2006 “Re-Thinking Reflection.”

John

From: learning development in higher education network [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Farrell, Stevie
Sent: 25 March 2009 12:38
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: reflexive v reflective

Hi Margaret

As a tutor and student I find your review very accurate and useful.

I've had many years now of successful writing in academic life and therefore until now, the idea that reflective writing could be so problematic was something I didn't think of as widespread.  I have just been on the receiving end of an MA assignment that was 'reflective'.  Having done this kind of assignment all through my PGCE I was therefore shocked to read that on this occasion, mine was too informal.  Having managed the balance between academic/reflective very well in the past - and being part of a team who write and teach about reflective writing - I feel like I'm wandering in a conceptual maze regarding reflection....it seems, especially by this discussion, that reflection means many things to many people.  I wonder then, how we students can match a criteria that isn't in the actual written details?

This is not intended as a insult or an attack on the lecturers concerned.  I hold them in very high esteem and the course is an incredibly well structured and delivered one, with academic staff who really know their subjects and are very responsive to calls for support.  It is rather, highlighting how concepts of reflective, reflexive etc are causing problems through their nature of being open to different perceptions.

My grade was very good, but I worked extremely hard, felt I'd guaged the quality of my work accurately, and did expect more.  And more importantly, I know now that I have to find out what is meant by this term before I submit any further work.  It's been an 'eye opener' for me.

Stevie
________________________________
From: learning development in higher education network on behalf of Margaret Herrington 634
Sent: Wed 25/03/2009 12:10
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: reflexive v reflective

Isn't it interesting how the confusing use of terminology in HE curricula usually lands on Learning Development or 'Support' staff doorsteps? These terms are not easily interchangeable. Reflective covers a multitude of interpretations in HE at the moment. Some staff still ask students to 'reflect' without any kind of clear contextual definition,rationale, scaffold or scope.I lost count of the numbers of students I saw for whom this loose use of terminology was the main problem they had with writing assignments

Reflexive, too, is rarely explained outside particular disciplines...and appears to be defined differently too.?
For me it is the explicit recognition of the presence and role of self ( with all that entails) in investigation and interpretation. As already noted this has particular value in research activities...not as a compensation for the absence of 'scientific method' but because interpretation of 'data' is governed by who is doing it- their histories and present stories. Researchers working reflexively recognise and acknowledge this. If readers of research are to make judgements about the new knowledge generated they need to know what has led to particular interpretations. Though especially important in qualitative research it is also vital in quantitative work (how quantitative data is sought and handled is not simply a technical matter)

Also, having worked in teacher education, I think reflexivity is helpful to new teachers in interpreting what is happening within their practice. ...and this is where reflective practice pops up again. It is possible to find bits of reflexivity within reflective pieces!

Margaret


Dr M Herrington
Visiting Professor of Education
University of Wolverhampton
0116 2597361
To view the terms under which this email is distributed, please go to http://disclaimer.leedsmet.ac.uk/email.htm

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager