JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ADMIN-EO Archives


ADMIN-EO Archives

ADMIN-EO Archives


ADMIN-EO@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ADMIN-EO Home

ADMIN-EO Home

ADMIN-EO  2002

ADMIN-EO 2002

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: reporting racial incidents

From:

Virginia Wainwright <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

HE Administrators equal opportunities list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 13 May 2002 15:06:24 +0100

Content-Type:

Text/Plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

Text/Plain (216 lines)

Dear Mannie

This guidance is most helpful.
We have included the MacPherson definition of racist incident in our
developing Race Equality Policy, and will need to develop appropriate
procedures around this - further advice on such matters would be
appreciated.

However, I feel that adopting the MacPherson definition of instiutional
racism may be problematic, as I understand that some groups find the
inclusion of the term 'unwitting' in the latter part of the
definition as applied to prejudice, ignorance, thoughtlessness and
racist stereotyping,  controversial. Do you have any comments on this
point?

Clearly this is not about letting semantics get in the way of changing
the instiutional cultures; I would like to feel that the definition of
institutional racism used in our policies is one that people,
particularly those from under-represented groups, can identify as
useful and meaningful.

I would welcome your thoughts on this.

Regards,

Virginia

On Thu, 9 May 2002 15:41:27 +0100 Emmanuell Kusemamuriwo
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Dear Nick,
>
> In response to your question:
>
> Everyone within the UK comes under the statutory expectations of the
> Race
> Relations Act 1976 and all institutions are responsible and liable, for
> what
> happens to all people within that institution. The institution is
> therefore
> fully liable under the Act, directly or indirectly, by commission or by
> omission, for any racism that occurs within it.
>
> Under the RRAA General Duty's three elements, named public institutions,
> (schools and HEIs included) have certain statutory expectations, through
> their Specific Duties, to ensure that they are functioning within the
> requirements of the RRAA. The first of the three General Duty elements,
> to
> which all the named public bodies need to have due regard, is "
> eliminate
> unlawful racial discrimination "
>
> Without quoting the other two, I would say that if the racist incident
> that
> you allege, is investigated, as it should, and is found, then it
> transgresses all three elements of the General Duty and appropriate
> action
> needs to be taken under the Race equality Policy and anti-racist
> procedure
> that the institution should have, under the Act.
>
> This also illustrates very obviously, why institutions, as part of their
> commitment to turning their worthy policy words into meaningful action,
> need
> to:
>
> Adopt the McPherson definition of both Institutional Racism and a Racist
> Incident and make sure that they have in their Action/Implementation
> Plans,
> procedures, processes and mechanisms that take account of what must be
> done,
> when and by whom, when the McPherson definitions are applied to the
> relevant
> functions of the institution.
>
> Institutional roles and responsibilities must be clearly spelt out and
> defined, in the institutions' anti-racist procedures, in order to enable
> those who are responsible to deal effectively with reported racist
> incidents
> while encouraging those who might feel there is an incident to report,
> to
> feel confident enough to come forward, knowing that issues will be dealt
> with in an appropriate manner. This was the main reason why the Act was
> amended in the first place and institutions will need to do at least
> this
> bare minimum, in order to begin to formulate the employment and service
> provision practices that the RRAA template will enable us to implement.
>
> Schools, like HEIs have now got a positive duty that the RRAA places on
> them
> to deal with all forms of unlawful racial discrimination that anyone
> within
> the institution might suffer. It is also their legal responsibility to
> make
> sure that everything possible is being done to ensure that the
> institution
> is discharging of its responsibilities under the act. Definition,
> communication, consultation, monitoring, assessment and review based on
> these statutory responsibilities are also part of the liability that is
> on
> all institutions.
>
> I might also add that the RRAA also places a responsibility on all
> institutions to ensure that in all their procured partnership functions,
> they are liable to ensure that any partner institution is functioning as
> appropriately as it should, under the Act's statutory requirements.
> Failure
> on the part of the partner institution will bring liability to bear on
> the
> procuring institution.
>
> In the case you are referring to Nick, if your colleague is from Exeter
> university, then it is your institution's statutory responsibility to
> ensure
> that the school in question does the right thing by adequately
> investigating
> this particular incident and come up with relatively appropriate
> findings
> that can then be satisfactorily actioned to adequately support the
> victim
> (both present and potential) while effectively dealing with the
> perpetrator,
> if the incident occurred. In this way, both institutions will be seen to
> implement their commitment to the General Duty requirements, in working
> towards best practice for all.
>
> I hope this answers your query but more importantly links to both the
> letter
> and the spirit of the RRAA, in order to ensure that institutions are
> doing
> what the aim of the Inquiry into the murder of Stephen Lawrence was all
> about, i.e. to make sure that all our institutions are doing their best
> for
> all those who they employ and serve, regardless of their backgrounds.
>
> Any comments, suggestions, queries and any other issues arising, are
> most
> welcome.
>
> Regards
> Mannie
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Mannie Kusemamuriwo
> Policy Adviser: Ethnicity & Cultural Diversity
> Equality Challenge Unit
> 3rd Floor, 4 Tavistock Place
> London  WC1H 9RA
>
> Tel 020 7520 7060
> Fax 020 7520 7069
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick Givens [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 09 May 2002 10:41
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: reporting racial incidents
>
>
> Hi,
> A colleague has been subjected to verbal racial abuse whle visiting a
> local
> school.
>
> I know that schools are obliged (or at least strongly advised) to report
> racial incidents in which the target is a pupil. I think this grew out
> of a
> Stephen Lawrence Inquiry recommendation, but I am not sure about the
> legal
> basis. As an example, Devon LEA has an on-line form for this reporting
> (http://www.devon.gov.uk/dcs/a/anti-racism/     in case you are
> interested).
>
> Staff from University schools of Education do a great deal of
> partnership
> work on school premises. Do any of you know whether schools are obliged
> to
> report racial incidents that were directed at ADULTS (e.g as pertinent
> to
> us, adults visiting a school in a professional capacity)?
>
> Nick Givens
> Lecturer in Education,
> School of Education,
> University of Exeter,
> Heavitree Road,
> Exeter,
> EX1 2LU,
> England.
> tel     (44) 1392 264869
> fax     (44) 1392 264792

----------------------
Virginia M Wainwright
Equal Opportunities Officer
King's College London
James Clerk Maxwell Building
57 Waterloo Road
London SE1 8WA
020 7848 3399
[log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager