JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ADMIN-EO Archives


ADMIN-EO Archives

ADMIN-EO Archives


ADMIN-EO@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ADMIN-EO Home

ADMIN-EO Home

ADMIN-EO  March 2012

ADMIN-EO March 2012

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Disability by Association and expenses?

From:

Pamela Graham <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

HE Administrators equal opportunities list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:08:49 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (58 lines)

Hi Rebecca and all who responded.
Helpful replies.
Pamela

________________________________
From: HE Administrators equal opportunities list [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Rebecca Wormald [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 23 March 2012 12:23
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Disability by Association and expenses?

Hi,

My view / interpretation below –

There is no ‘disability by association’.  The Equality Act refers to ‘discrimination by association’ ie where a person is treated less favourably because of their association with a disabled person.

A duty to make reasonable adjustments in the work context would only apply to a disabled employee.  There is no duty to make a ‘reasonable adjustment’ in relation to a carer for a disabled person.  You would, however, need to ensure you were not treating the person any less favourably on account of their association with a disabled person.  Eg if you would normally reimburse employees with caring responsibilities that would otherwise prevent their attendance at a conference eg normal childcare costs, then you should not treat this person any less favourably because they are caring for a disabled person. You are not required to make a ‘reasonable adjustment’ for an employee who is not himself disabled.

As you’re probably aware, the leading case on discrimination by association is Coleman v Attridge Law. In this case, the claimant (Coleman) was the main carer for her disabled child and was treated less favourably in respect of her request for flexible working than other colleagues who also had caring responsibilities and had been granted flexible working.  She was not asking for a ‘reasonable adjustment’ – she was just asking to be  treated no less favourably than other colleagues.  It was found that she had been discriminated against because of her association with her disabled child and the Equality Act was intended to address this type of discrimination.

You can always choose to make a payment in these circumstances but the Equality Act does not require you to do so.  You would also need to be mindful of any precedents created for other employees with caring responsibilities.

Rebecca Wormald
HR Partner – Employee Relations
People and Organisational Development

DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY
T: +44 (0) 116 257 7364
M: +44 (0)758 415 9564
E: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
W: dmu.ac.uk

From: HE Administrators equal opportunities list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Pamela Graham
Sent: 22 March 2012 13:04
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Disability by Association and expenses?

Dear Equality colleagues

We have a member of our academic staff whose spouse has advanced MS and cannot be left unattended.  The result is that the academic cannot attend a conference unless the spouse is provided with respite care, at a cost of around £100 per day.  We are discussing whether it would be reasonable for that care to be reimbursed/paid for by the University as his employer. This would be on the grounds of it being  a reasonable adjustment for someone who is experiencing disability by association.

We have asked  HMRC who said that “the costs are not covered by an HMRC income tax exemption nor can we claim that they are incurred in the performance of the duties of an employee’s employment”. So it would not go through the expenses system without tax free. I wonder if they have considered the implications of the Equality Act?

Does anyone have experience of this sort of query? Any suggestions?

Many thanks

Pamela
Pamela Graham
Equality and Diversity Adviser (Wednesday, Thursday, Friday)
+44(0)191 222 5974
www.ncl.ac.uk/hr/<http://www.ncl.ac.uk/hr/>

Newcastle University
King's Gate
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE1 7RU

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager