JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ADMIN-EO Archives


ADMIN-EO Archives

ADMIN-EO Archives


ADMIN-EO@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ADMIN-EO Home

ADMIN-EO Home

ADMIN-EO  June 2007

ADMIN-EO June 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Establishment of chaplaincy facilities for faith groups

From:

Anne Mwangi <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

HE Administrators equal opportunities list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:36:46 +0100

Content-Type:

multipart/mixed

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (181 lines) , text/plain (4 lines)

Hi Paul,
I have been thinking about  this one for a while and the only thing I
can suggest is that 'humanist' students like others can self organise
into their own group and the university provide facilities for them to
meet in. If you have multi-faith facilities, then this can be made
accessible to all groups. The issue with chaplaincies/other faith
leaders  is that they are not actually employed by universities
(although I cannot be sure about this in regards to other universities).
Their own faith groups make them available for the university and pay
their salaries, and the university provides facilities within which they
can operate. In my university, the faith groups actually provide their
own facilities for respective chaplaincies.
I would be interested to hear what happens in other institutions. 

Regards

Anne 

-----Original Message-----
From: HE Administrators equal opportunities list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Paul Browne
Sent: 27 June 2007 10:14
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Establishment of chaplaincy facilities for faith groups

Good morning.

This is my first time using this forum. I hope you can assist me.

The Registrar has asked me to bring forward proposals in regard to the
recognition of students holding Humanist Beliefs and the provision of a
chaplaincy for them.

Has anyone tackled this challenge?

Has anyone drawn up guidelines for the establishment of a chaplaincy
service?

I would be delighted to hear from them.

Please contact me by e-mail at [log in to unmask] or ring 02890971045.

Thank you.

Paul Browne
Equal Opportunities Manager
Queen's University Belfast.


-----Original Message-----
From: HE Administrators equal opportunities list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Katya Hosking
Sent: 27 June 2007 09:58
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Data analysis for impact assessment: summary of responses

Dear all,

Responses to my question about data analysis lead me to ask another: In
preparing for impact assessment do you have, or have access to, someone
with expertise in statistics or data analysis?

Here is a summary of responses (my original email is at the bottom).
Progress ranges from not-yet-started to finished-and-published, but at
some universities people are definitely finding it difficult to extract
the relevant data from their internal systems.  From informal exchanges,
one problem seems to be that the section or department within the
university which manages the database sometimes sees itself as a
gatekeeper, and unless that section is convinced of the need for E&D
monitoring it will not facilitate it.  Another problem seems to be lack
of knowledge about databases and statistics resulting in a lot of false
starts, or discussion about the relevant fields, before the right data
emerges.  

1. Two universities had not yet begun tackling student data.  One added
that they had had no problems extracting data from the staff system.

2. For UG admissions, one university purchases the UCAS conversion data
set which can be downloaded periodically.

3. "At xxxx impact assessment is carried out by the Department that
holds central responsibility for the policy (as opposed to those
responsible for implementing it), following training and with support
from the Staff and/or Student Equality and Diversity Adviser.  The lead
assessor for the Assessment Policy is the Senior Assistant Registrar
(Recruitment and Admissions). 

"I have just received a first draft IA of our Admissions Policy.  The
data used for this was applications data held on the university
admissions database.  This predominantly relates to undergraduate & PGCE
applications only, but does also include some postgrad applications
info.  With the help of a statistician the assessor has looked at
applications to offers (conditional & unconditional) by gender, age,
disability and ethnicity. The statistician carried out a chi square test
of association on the faculty data to identify whether or not there was
an association between offer rates and demographic characteristic.
Consideration was also given to looking at who has applied to study at
the university, but it was decided that this was more relevant to the
Widening Participation Policy than the Admissions Policy.

"As far as I'm aware the raw data wasn't difficult to get hold of (I
deal with staff data only, but I gather that our student data system is
fairly
good).   However, there is the issue that no info was available
on most postgraduate applications meaning that there's a potential gap
in the draft IA.  

"The IA has not yet been finalised, but the limits of statistical
analysis are acknowledged within the draft, particularly in relation to
difficulties with small variances and to statistical significance
findings within a large sample. Attention is also drawn to the need to
compare university data with national benchmarks of educational
attainment/HE participation, in order to put any findings into the
national context."

4. "I have also started to ask some questions around the information
that we have on the students that apply to us and have also been told
that the data may not be readily available.  I deal mainly with staff
issues but also increasingly with students so it something that I will
need to pick up on.
So no real answer to your questions but just to let you know you are not
alone."  

5. "In undertaking our initial data collection work on this we have used
both internal data (essentially the enrolment data for first year
students as of 1.12.07) which is generated from our internal student
record system, but a more substantial analysis of the admissions process
was undertaken from data from UCAS (I understand that this is supplied
on CD to all university admissions officers annually in about February,
for the previous years admissions process year).  This included data on
applications, offers and acceptances (but not on all equality
variables)."  This university has published the relevant reports and
also the initial screenings.

6. "We have had no difficulties in getting the relevant data from our
student records system. We have looked at ethnicity, gender, disability
and age.  Age was the most difficult area because of very small numbers
in the older age groups.

"A number of people have been involved in analysing the data including
the Head of our disabled student support services and our Impact
Assessment Co-ordinator. We have been able to identify areas where there
are statistically significant differences and this information will be
used when addressing policy and practice."

Best wishes,
Katya

>>> Katya Hosking <[log in to unmask]> 13/06/2007 11:29:14 >>>
Dear all,

We're currently conducting an impact assessment of admissions, and it
has proved surprisingly difficult to extract and analyse the relevant
data from the student information management system.  There seem to be
various reasons for this, some of them technical ones which I don't
pretend to understand.
I'm wondering whether this is a common experience across the sector, or
whether it is something to do with our particular information management
systems.

Questions:
What (quantitative) data have you been able to analyse for use in impact
assessments?
Has it been difficult to get hold of the raw data, that is, to extract
it from the system?
Who has been responsible for analysing it, and have they encountered any
major problems?

I'd be very interested to hear your answers, and will compile a summary
for the list if anything useful emerges!

Best wishes,
Katya

_______________________________________________
Katya Hosking  (029) 2087 9218
Accessible Curriculum Officer
Registry, Cardiff University
30-36 Newport Road, Cardiff CF24 0DE
www.cardiff.ac.uk/learning/themes/access/index.html


***************************************************************************************** To view the terms under which this email is distributed, please go to http://www.hull.ac.uk/legal/email_disclaimer.html *****************************************************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager