JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ADMIN-EO Archives


ADMIN-EO Archives

ADMIN-EO Archives


ADMIN-EO@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ADMIN-EO Home

ADMIN-EO Home

ADMIN-EO  June 2007

ADMIN-EO June 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Data analysis for impact assessment: summary of responses

From:

Fiona McPhail <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

HE Administrators equal opportunities list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:00:00 GMT

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

Dear Katya,



One of my colleagues is an expert in this area. Please contact me off line if we can be helpful.



Best wishes,



Fiona

---

Sent via BlackBerry



-----Original Message-----

From: Katya Hosking <[log in to unmask]>

Date:         Wed, 27 Jun 2007 09:57:46 

To:[log in to unmask]

Subject: Data analysis for impact assessment: summary of responses



Dear all,



Responses to my question about data analysis lead me to ask another: In preparing for impact assessment do you have, or have access to, someone with expertise in statistics or data analysis?



Here is a summary of responses (my original email is at the bottom).  Progress ranges from not-yet-started to finished-and-published, but at some universities people are definitely finding it difficult to extract the relevant data from their internal systems.  From informal exchanges, one problem seems to be that the section or department within the university which manages the database sometimes sees itself as a gatekeeper, and unless that section is convinced of the need for E&D monitoring it will not facilitate it.  Another problem seems to be lack of knowledge about databases and statistics resulting in a lot of false starts, or discussion about the relevant fields, before the right data emerges.  



1. Two universities had not yet begun tackling student data.  One added that they had had no problems extracting data from the staff system.



2. For UG admissions, one university purchases the UCAS conversion data set which can be downloaded periodically.



3. "At xxxx impact assessment is carried out by the Department that holds central responsibility for the policy (as opposed to those responsible for implementing it), following training and with support from the Staff and/or Student Equality and Diversity Adviser.  The lead assessor for the Assessment Policy is the Senior Assistant Registrar (Recruitment and Admissions). 



"I have just received a first draft IA of our Admissions Policy.  The data used for this was applications data held on the university admissions database.  This predominantly relates to undergraduate & PGCE applications only, but does also include some postgrad applications info.  With the help of a statistician the assessor has looked at applications to offers (conditional & unconditional) by gender, age, disability and ethnicity. The statistician carried out a chi square test of association on the faculty data to identify whether or not there was an association between offer rates and demographic characteristic. Consideration was also given to looking at who has applied to study at the university, but it was decided that this was more relevant to the Widening Participation Policy than the Admissions Policy.



"As far as I'm aware the raw data wasn't difficult to get hold of (I deal with staff data only, but I gather that our student data system is fairly good).   However, there is the issue that no info was available

on most postgraduate applications meaning that there's a potential gap in the draft IA.  



"The IA has not yet been finalised, but the limits of statistical analysis are acknowledged within the draft, particularly in relation to difficulties with small variances and to statistical significance findings within a large sample. Attention is also drawn to the need to compare university data with national benchmarks of educational attainment/HE participation, in order to put any findings into the national context."



4. "I have also started to ask some questions around the information that we have on the students that apply to us and have also been told that the data may not be readily available.  I deal mainly with staff issues but also increasingly with students so it something that I will need to pick up on.  So no real answer to your questions but just to let you know you are not alone."  



5. "In undertaking our initial data collection work on this we have used both internal data (essentially the enrolment data for first year students as of 1.12.07) which is generated from our internal student record system, but a more substantial analysis of the admissions process was undertaken from data from UCAS (I understand that this is supplied on CD to all university admissions officers annually in about February, for the previous years admissions process year).  This included data on applications, offers and acceptances (but not on all equality variables)."  This university has published the relevant reports and also the initial screenings.



6. "We have had no difficulties in getting the relevant data from our student records system. We have looked at ethnicity, gender, disability and age.  Age was the most difficult area because of very small numbers in the older age groups.



"A number of people have been involved in analysing the data including the Head of our disabled student support services and our Impact Assessment Co-ordinator. We have been able to identify areas where there are statistically significant differences and this information will be used when addressing policy and practice."



Best wishes,

Katya



>>> Katya Hosking <[log in to unmask]> 13/06/2007 11:29:14 >>>

Dear all,



We're currently conducting an impact assessment of admissions, and it has proved surprisingly difficult to extract and analyse the relevant data from the student information management system.  There seem to be various reasons for this, some of them technical ones which I don't pretend to understand.  I'm wondering whether this is a common experience across the sector, or whether it is something to do with our particular information management systems.



Questions:

What (quantitative) data have you been able to analyse for use in impact assessments?

Has it been difficult to get hold of the raw data, that is, to extract it from the system?

Who has been responsible for analysing it, and have they encountered any major problems?



I'd be very interested to hear your answers, and will compile a summary for the list if anything useful emerges!



Best wishes,

Katya



_______________________________________________

Katya Hosking  (029) 2087 9218

Accessible Curriculum Officer

Registry, Cardiff University

30-36 Newport Road, Cardiff CF24 0DE

www.cardiff.ac.uk/learning/themes/access/index.html



Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager