Re- I would then welcome
suggestions on the resources might be improved.
I would completely redo this section of ActionResearch.net
I would delete anything about inclusionality and would replace it with
resources that problematise and look critically on things like the
different meanings, implications and theories of dialogue,
co-enquiries, dialectical qualitative transformation, reflection, the
meanings, theories and implications of dialectics, the history of
dialectics from Plato to post-Marx and the different approaches of
dialectics, autoethnography, narrative enquiry, poetic language,
education for dialogue, democracy and pluralism, the problems with
action and practitioner research and reflection, the problems with
language and linguistic assertions, Dewey, Freire, Marxist methodology.
There is so much and I have a lot of personal resources to contribute.
As it is you, you may wish to look for resources that problematise and
look critically at visual narratives.
The important thing is to have esources that problematise
methodologies, innovations and ideas. And not claim to have an
'inclusional logic' that you cannot verbalise but hope the youtube
clips can explain it nonverbally as your resource section presently
states in the resources to supervised PhD candidates from Decemberc
and October 2006. This is not good enough.
You have to delete this section and completely redo it.
Quoting Jack Whitehead <[log in to unmask]>:
>
> On 23 Sep 2011, at 11:25, Lawrence Martin Olivier wrote:
>
>> Hi Marie
>>
>> A paper by Peter Taylor (Curtin University, Australia) I also
>> enjoyed, may interest you and others, thought would slot in here.
>>
>> Lawrence
>>
>
> Many thanks Lawrence for this paper by Peter - I think that it
> provides a most valuable analysis. I've written to Peter to ask if I
> can make it available from my web-site and to my masters and
> doctoral students.
>
> Over the next week I'm updating the 'Doctoral and Masters
> Supervisions and References' in http://www.actionresearch.net and
> hope to include Peter's analysis. I'll send round the url to the
> updated resources as soon as I've done it and would then welcome
> suggestions on the resources might be improved.
>
> Love Jack.
>
>
>
|