Brian,
It is the language of suggestion: I would...
A suggests to B when B asks for responses. It is an authentic and
wellthought-through response and the basis of my PhD thesis. B can do
whatever he/she wants with this suggestion that was asked for.
I explained in my PhD in great length why I am making this suggestion,
with the dialectical point of improving LET.
Quoting Brian wakeman <[log in to unmask]>:
> Hello Alan,
>
> You say:
>
> "You have to delete this section and completely redo it".
>
> Isn't this the language of power, not invitation?
>
> When we click on to Jack's site or this discussion site we know the
> paradigms and approaches they favour.
> We may not wholly agree with all we read, but take and learn what we can.
> There is space for folks like me who approach AR and values from
> slightly different perspectives.
>
> I for one have benefited enormously from these conversations, and
> pass it on to students.
> I have found Jack generous in his willingness to share his learning,
> and web of contacts.
>
> I'm sure Jack will welcome additions to the resources.
>
> Regards,
> Brian
> From: Alon Serper <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Monday, 26 September 2011, 13:57
> Subject: Re: Loving Wisdom in Explanations of Educational Influence
> - developing a cooperative enquiry?
>
> Re- I would then welcome
> suggestions on the resources might be improved.
>
> I would completely redo this section of ActionResearch.net
>
> I would delete anything about inclusionality and would replace it
> with resources that problematise and look critically on things like
> the different meanings, implications and theories of dialogue,
> co-enquiries, dialectical qualitative transformation, reflection,
> the meanings, theories and implications of dialectics, the history
> of dialectics from Plato to post-Marx and the different approaches
> of dialectics, autoethnography, narrative enquiry, poetic language,
> education for dialogue, democracy and pluralism, the problems with
> action and practitioner research and reflection, the problems with
> language and linguistic assertions, Dewey, Freire, Marxist
> methodology.
>
> There is so much and I have a lot of personal resources to contribute.
>
> As it is you, you may wish to look for resources that problematise
> and look critically at visual narratives.
>
> The important thing is to have esources that problematise
> methodologies, innovations and ideas. And not claim to have an
> 'inclusional logic' that you cannot verbalise but hope the youtube
> clips can explain it nonverbally as your resource section presently
> states in the resources to supervised PhD candidates from Decemberc
> and October 2006. This is not good enough.
>
> You have to delete this section and completely redo it.
>
>
> Quoting Jack Whitehead <[log in to unmask]>:
>
>>
>> On 23 Sep 2011, at 11:25, Lawrence Martin Olivier wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Marie
>>>
>>> A paper by Peter Taylor (Curtin University, Australia) I also
>>> enjoyed, may interest you and others, thought would slot in here.
>>>
>>> Lawrence
>>>
>>
>> Many thanks Lawrence for this paper by Peter - I think that it
>> provides a most valuable analysis. I've written to Peter to ask if
>> I can make it available from my web-site and to my masters and
>> doctoral students.
>>
>> Over the next week I'm updating the 'Doctoral and Masters
>> Supervisions and References' in http://www.actionresearch.net and
>> hope to include Peter's analysis. I'll send round the url to the
>> updated resources as soon as I've done it and would then welcome
>> suggestions on the resources might be improved.
>>
>> Love Jack.
>>
>>
>>
|