Thanks Alan, for refreshing my memory with your details on mycelium and
mycelial networks
.. now I am chasing an elusive ... wondering to what extent my engagement
here represents something akin to 'natural inclusional', or whether, in the
articulation of the idea of 'abductive thinking/reasoning/processes', I am
helping 'solidify' something akin to 'disintegrating channels of
communication' by insisting on (coercive) 'a fixed web of joined up dots'.
Dianne
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Rayner" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: Being inclusive... an example...
> Dear All,
>
> "Alan will love this mushroom connection!"
>
> Well, yes and no, actually.
>
> When speaking of connectedness, I think there is a need to understand the
> radical difference between a versatile 'flow network' of emerging,
> branching, fusing and disintegrating channels of communication, and a
> fixed
> web of joined up dots. This relates to Marie's non-coercive, natural
> inclusional, understanding of 'respectful connectedness'in which 'each is
> variably open to others' energetic influence'. There is a subtle but
> fundamental distinction between the living logics of natural
> inclusionality, and the abstract notion of connective inclusivity.
>
> See attached chapter from 'Inclusional Nature' (2006).
>
> Warmest
>
> Alan
>
>
> --On 30 April 2010 18:50 +1000 Dianne Allen <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
>> ?
>>
>> Chris, Alan will love this mushroom connection! Dianne
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Christiaan Thomas Johannes De Beer
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 6:30 PM
>> Subject: Re: Being inclusive... an example...
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear Aga
>>
>>
>>
>> I think that initially there might be thoughts of an ?ultimate
>> inspiration? but the more I make, the more I realise that it is about
>> the network that is being built with the occasional rhizome that produces
>> the mushroom when conditions are right.
|