Dear Jack, Alan, Je Khan, Edward and everyone
Thank you for such a considered response Jack.
I am still feeling disconnected about the things you are saying though, and
unhappily. There are a variety points, which I have written about and then
deleted, because it doesn't feel to be at the heart of it. Something isn't
meeting for me.... So I wait with interest to see the new postings... It
feels as if something is shifting for a few of us and that is exciting.
Just wanted to say "thank you".
Warmest
Susie
On 22/2/07 9:24 AM, "Jack Whitehead" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Just a word of thanks for the quality of your questions and responses
> over the past 5 months. Last September I did not know how to
> distinguish the knowledge created by practitioner-researchers as
> world leading, internationally excellent, internationally recognised
> and nationally recognised in terms of its originality, significance
> and rigour. Now I can. My capacity to do this has been realised
> through responding to the quality of contributions to the e-seminar.
> To avoid a long posting in the archive you can access my
> understanding of the distinctions and how these have emerged through
> responding and reflecting on your postings, at:
>
> http://www.jackwhitehead.com/jack/jwesemstandards.htm
>
> Love Jack.
|