Hi Sarah
Luckily, my heuristics is based on my self-improvement and self-development
- evaluating and assessing my well-being, self-gratification, self-respect
and ontological security through looking at my self-disappointment, personal
non-gratification and malaise. As contributing fulfills me. As the ethics
fulfills. As the exclusively aesthetic does not fulfil me as an ontological
essence. It can work as a valid contribution. I create this heuristics
as a means to conceive and study human existence as an ontologist and constructing
crtical psychologist.
Luckily after a previous thesis in theoretical/Philosophical psychology and
Philosophy - I no longer need to looke at this type of philosophy as my
scope. All I need to do is convey my intended improvement, the way I intend
to improve my ontology, to carry it out and discuss how it is done, as a
heuristics.
Alon
>-- Original Message --
>Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:33:06 +0100
>Reply-To: Sarah Fletcher <[log in to unmask]>
>From: Sarah Fletcher <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Re: relevant laing on scientific evaluation
>To: [log in to unmask]
>
>
>Is the outside constituted by the inside of the outside - in addition to
>the
>interaction with the outside of others' insides? I am reflecting also on
>the
>notion of 'role', Alon, as I engage with interest in your writing on the
>list
>So if one adopts the role say of a researcher and also of a teacher where
>the
>ontological values may be quite different - is this one outside of one inside
>or a multiplicitous outside and inside, which is elected (ie as roles) or
>not?
>
>My doctoral thesis focuses on the tri-multiplicity of myself as a professional
>educator - as teacher, mentor and researcher and how my ownontological values
>conflate but sometimes, apparently at least, contradict one another. It
is
>a
>self-study action research account of how I have come to be a research mentor.
>
>Now if my outside as a multiplicitous educator is constituted by my inside
>as
>someone seeking to Nurture Courage to Be (after Tillich) and actualisation
>(after Maslow)is my outside not also constituted by my interaction with
the
>outsides of the pupils, teacher researchers and others with whom I do research
>('with' is a more accurate description than saying others I do research
'on')
>and thence by interaction with their insides which are manifested as outsides?
>
>All this before breakfast on a Saturday morning!
>Have a good weekend everyone,
>Sarah
>
>Quoting Alon Serper <[log in to unmask]>:
>
>> The conclusions from my Ontological study is that the outside is in the
>> inside because the inside is all I have with no exist (huis clos). The
>> outside is because of the inside who is responsible for the outside.
It
>> is still me who is trying to go outside me to go inside. The inside is
>> perhaps not enough but is all I have.
>>
>> The ouside reflects on my inside as the inside reflects on itself. But
>> the outside cannor reflect on itself. The inside cannot escape itself.
>>
>> Alon
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:09:55 +0100, Sarah Fletcher
>> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> >Hi Alon -
>> >
>> >I'm sure you know this. In case others aren't familar with it, I thought
>> I'd
>> >send. I'd love to see Alon Rayner's depiction of this inside-outside
in
>> oils.
>> >
>> >One is inside
>> >then outside what one has been inside
>> >One feels empty
>> >because there is nothing inside oneself
>> >One tries to get inside oneself
>> >that inside of the outside
>> >once one tries to get oneself inside what
>> >one is outside:
>> >to eat and to be eaten
>> >to have the outside inside and to be
>> >inside the outside
>> >
>> >But this is not enough. One is trying to get
>> >the inside of what one is outside inside, and to
>> >get iside the outside. But one does not get
>> >inside the outside by getting the outside inside
>> >for;
>> >although one is full inside of the inside of the outside
>> >one is on the outside of one's own inside
>> >and by getting inside the outside
>> >while one is on the inside
>> >even the inside of the outside is outside
>> >and inside oneself there is still nothing
>> >There never has been anything else
>> >and there never will be
>> >
>> >Laing, R.D. (1972) 'Knots' Harmondsworth, Penguin Books, p. 83
>> >
>> >Thought for the week? Don't work too hard,
>> >Warm regards,
>> >Sarah
>> >
>> >http://www.TeacherResearch.net
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >Quoting Alon Serper <[log in to unmask]>:
>> >
>> >> And another quote from Laing - The Bird of Paradise
>> >>
>> >> if this I that is the wherewith and whereby is not anything that I
know,
>> >> then it is no thing - nothing.
>> >>
>>
___________________________________________________________
Book yourself something to look forward to in 2005.
Cheap flights - http://www.tiscali.co.uk/travel/flights/
Bargain holidays - http://www.tiscali.co.uk/travel/holidays/
|