Hi,
Yes. I am never sure we reach the point of being solid. But I am
particularly anxious about this paper because of the nature of its
evidence. I am sure we will get into this in the next section of
the discussion.
This paper developed, as many written by practitioners do, out of some
observations made in the course of my ordinary work. I didn't consider
it RESEARCH for a very long time. Yet I think what I noticed and the
PROCESS I followed to explore my observations is very valid as research
and in fact points out a sort of model for practitioner research which
can be very useful, potentially even important. But questions like
"What is valid evidence? ' become important with such processes. And
what is to be done about human subjects review processes when one
doesn't realize one has done a piece of research until afterwards?
Harriet
|