In message
<[log in to unmask]>, at
13:52:19 on Fri, 10 Jun 2005, "Lewis, Chris G." <[log in to unmask]>
writes
>Could it not be said that the company's transfer of the letter to the
>clinic/hospital was exempt under the "prevention and detection of
>crime" head? The chap's clearly playing hooky from work, and is
>therefore stealing money from them, and they're trying to get proof?
Surely: playing hooky isn't a crime (of theft or anything else). It's a
civil matter (breach of contract).
--
Roland Perry
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at : -
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
Any queries about sending or receiving message please send to the list owner
[log in to unmask]
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|