|
|
|
Size
|
Re: Email is a wonderful medium
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:37:41 +0000 |
211 lines |
Re: Email is a wonderful medium
|
Roland Perry |
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:41:16 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: Email is a wonderful medium
|
Chris Bayliss |
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:09:51 +0000 |
157 lines |
Re: Email is a wonderful medium
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:04:44 +0000 |
179 lines |
Re: Email is a wonderful medium
|
Andrew Charlesworth |
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:44:31 +0000 |
129 lines |
Re: Email is a wonderful medium
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:27:43 +0000 |
295 lines |
Re: Email is a wonderful medium
|
Tim Trent |
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:04:04 +0000 |
181 lines |
Re: Email is a wonderful medium
|
cathy brode |
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:56:03 +0000 |
307 lines |
Re: Email is a wonderful medium
|
Ben Plouviez |
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:15:00 -0000 |
158 lines |
Re: Email is a wonderful medium
|
Jethro R Binks |
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:06:49 +0000 |
48 lines |
Email is a wonderful medium
|
Tim Trent |
Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:51:22 +0000 |
154 lines |
Re: census data question
|
chris pounder |
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:51:28 -0000 |
71 lines |
Re: census data question
|
[log in to unmask] |
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:14:52 +0000 |
139 lines |
Re: census data question
|
Broom, Doreen |
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:07:11 -0000 |
774 lines |
Re: census data question
|
Simon Howarth |
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:06:56 -0000 |
907 lines |
Re: census data question
|
Simon Howarth |
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:00:57 -0000 |
101 lines |
Re: census data question
|
Wiper, Carl |
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:47:27 +0000 |
683 lines |
Re: census data question
|
[log in to unmask] |
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:33:07 +0000 |
332 lines |
Re: Is it personal data and should I release it?
|
Mark van Harmelen |
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:40:08 +0000 |
169 lines |
Re: census data question
|
Broadfoot, Kevin |
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:20:04 -0000 |
179 lines |
Re: census data question
|
Carter, Antoinette (Global IS) |
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:12:00 -0000 |
117 lines |
Re: census data question
|
Broadfoot, Kevin |
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:59:25 -0000 |
158 lines |
Re: Is it personal data and should I release it?
|
Donald Henderson |
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:39:14 -0000 |
522 lines |
census data question
|
[log in to unmask] |
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:32:29 +0000 |
41 lines |
Is it personal data and should I release it?
|
Cotterill, Steve |
Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:25:20 -0000 |
315 lines |
Re: Health questionnaires ?
|
Carter, Antoinette (Global IS) |
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:35:21 -0000 |
117 lines |
Re: Health questionnaires ?
|
Phil Bradshaw |
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:28:02 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: Health questionnaires ?
|
Jon Dunster |
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:07:25 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: When an SAR is not an SAR
|
Tim Trent |
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:04:18 +0000 |
167 lines |
Re: When an SAR is not an SAR
|
Tim Trent |
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:51:33 +0000 |
617 lines |
Re: When an SAR is not an SAR
|
Broom, Doreen |
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:49:48 -0000 |
281 lines |
Re: When an SAR is not an SAR
|
Simon Richardson |
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:03:08 +0000 |
223 lines |
Re: When an SAR is not an SAR
|
Tim Trent |
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:47:16 +0000 |
414 lines |
Re: Section 11 rights at work
|
Bradshaw, Phillip |
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:11:04 -0000 |
455 lines |
Re: Section 11 rights at work
|
Peter Mead |
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:54:16 -0000 |
551 lines |
Re: Section 11 rights at work
|
Matthew Cooper |
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:35:41 -0000 |
191 lines |
Re: Section 11 rights at work
|
Bradshaw, Phillip |
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:10:33 -0000 |
95 lines |
Re: Section 11 rights at work
|
Roland Perry |
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:25:56 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: Section 11 rights at work
|
Matthew Cooper |
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:14:02 -0000 |
781 lines |
Re: Section 11 rights at work
|
Paul Ticher |
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:09:57 -0000 |
101 lines |
Re: Section 11 rights at work
|
Bradshaw, Phillip |
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:07:11 -0000 |
292 lines |
Section 11 rights at work
|
Carter, Antoinette (Global IS) |
Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:39:51 -0000 |
155 lines |
Re: Proofs supplied for a SAR by a Third Party
|
Giles, Kevin |
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:33:49 -0000 |
157 lines |
Re: Proofs supplied for a SAR by a Third Party
|
Carter, Antoinette (Global IS) |
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:43:00 -0000 |
748 lines |
Re: Proofs supplied for a SAR by a Third Party
|
Tim Trent |
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:34:17 +0000 |
376 lines |
Re: Proofs supplied for a SAR by a Third Party
|
Watts, Clare (C.) |
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:24:31 -0000 |
405 lines |
Re: Proofs supplied for a SAR by a Third Party
|
Tim Trent |
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:00:02 +0000 |
162 lines |
Proofs supplied for a SAR by a Third Party
|
Clare Watts |
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:57:16 +0000 |
70 lines |
Re: Information Commissioner changes tack on da ta sharing bill
|
Scourfield, Brenda |
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:35:51 -0000 |
250 lines |
Re: Information Commissioner changes tack on da ta sharing bill
|
Giles, Kevin |
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:16:56 -0000 |
920 lines |
Re: Information Commissioner changes tack on da ta sharing bill
|
Bailey, Trish |
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:16:46 -0000 |
120 lines |
Re: Information Commissioner changes tack on da ta sharing bill
|
Scourfield, Brenda |
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:13:18 -0000 |
99 lines |
Seminar on Sensitive Data: Perceptions and Implications - 6 March 2009 (afternoon only)
|
Peter Shepherd |
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:16:57 -0000 |
410 lines |
Re: Health questionnaires ?
|
Tim Trent |
Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:21:06 +0000 |
268 lines |
Health questionnaires ?
|
Jon Dunster |
Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:27:46 +0000 |
43 lines |
Re: Facebook U Turn
|
Marchini, Renzo |
Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:14:16 -0500 |
112 lines |
Re: Facebook U Turn
|
Tim Trent |
Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:26:41 +0000 |
250 lines |
Facebook U Turn
|
Ibrahim Hasan |
Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:06:27 +0000 |
46 lines |
Vacancy - Information Management Officer
|
Leoni, Rudi |
Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:39:49 +0000 |
69 lines |
Re: Section 29 Exemptions
|
Chris Brogan |
Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:27:57 -0000 |
172 lines |
Information Commissioner changes tack on data sharing bill
|
chris pounder |
Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:29:27 -0000 |
46 lines |
Re: New FSA rules on fax machines.....
|
Pat Walshe |
Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:55:30 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: New FSA rules on fax machines.....
|
Pat Walshe |
Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:09:46 +0000 |
35 lines |
New FSA rules on fax machines.....
|
Clare Watts |
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:54:47 +0000 |
49 lines |
Re: Paper submission deadline extended: MULTICONF-09
|
Tim Trent |
Sat, 14 Feb 2009 16:31:54 +0000 |
136 lines |
Re: Government standards for encrypted websites
|
Dr. Su Beesley |
Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:40:25 +0000 |
87 lines |
Re: Government standards for encrypted websites
|
Tim Trent |
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:33:05 +0000 |
247 lines |
Re: Government standards for encrypted websites
|
Andrew Cormack |
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:16:18 -0000 |
61 lines |
Re: Government standards for encrypted websites
|
Tim Trent |
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:11:46 +0000 |
579 lines |
Re: Government standards for encrypted websites
|
Scourfield, Brenda |
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:31:20 -0000 |
305 lines |
Re: Government standards for encrypted websites
|
Simon Howarth |
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:04:33 -0000 |
479 lines |
Re: Government standards for encrypted websites
|
Tim Trent |
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:38:16 +0000 |
524 lines |
Re: Government standards for encrypted websites
|
Tim Trent |
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:27:11 +0000 |
354 lines |
Re: Mandatory Minimum Measures'
|
chris pounder |
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:43:15 -0000 |
734 lines |
Re: Mandatory Minimum Measures'
|
Simon Howarth |
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:06:19 -0000 |
485 lines |
Government standards for encrypted websites
|
Henley, Lee |
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:51:24 -0000 |
188 lines |
Re: When an SAR is not an SAR
|
Bradshaw, Phillip |
Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:07:24 -0000 |
259 lines |
Re: When an SAR is not an SAR
|
Tim Trent |
Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:44:51 +0000 |
201 lines |
Re: When an SAR is not an SAR
|
Tim Trent |
Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:41:26 +0000 |
271 lines |
Mandatory Minimum Measures’
|
cathy brode |
Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:33:57 +0000 |
117 lines |
Re: When an SAR is not an SAR
|
Simon Richardson |
Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:28:07 +0000 |
38 lines |
Re: When an SAR is not an SAR
|
chris pounder |
Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:41:55 -0000 |
81 lines |
Re: When an SAR is not an SAR
|
Simon Richardson |
Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:35:35 +0000 |
79 lines |
Re: When an SAR is not an SAR
|
Pat Walshe |
Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:32:11 +0000 |
46 lines |
Re: Information Commissioner's staff talk sense
|
Roland Perry |
Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:22:20 +0000 |
43 lines |
Re: Information Commissioner's staff talk sense
|
Roland Perry |
Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:18:37 +0000 |
70 lines |
Re: When an SAR is not an SAR
|
Jethro R Binks |
Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:10:57 +0000 |
41 lines |
A Different kind of remote working
|
Clare Watts |
Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:26:52 +0000 |
81 lines |
Re: When an SAR is not an SAR
|
Phil Bradshaw |
Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:01:16 +0000 |
69 lines |
A different kind of remote working
|
Clare Watts |
Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:19:38 +0000 |
77 lines |
A different kind of remote working
|
Clare Watts |
Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:18:20 +0000 |
77 lines |
Re: When an SAR is not an SAR
|
Simon Richardson |
Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:53:02 +0000 |
63 lines |
Re: Section 29 Exemptions
|
Simon Richardson |
Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:26:40 +0000 |
144 lines |
[POSSIBLE SPAM] Government plans travel database
|
Robert (Bob) Waixel |
Sun, 8 Feb 2009 16:10:19 +0000 |
115 lines |
Re: Surveillance State
|
[log in to unmask] |
Sun, 8 Feb 2009 12:50:01 +0100 |
92 lines |
Surveillance Society report
|
chris pounder |
Sat, 7 Feb 2009 11:24:54 -0000 |
34 lines |
Re: Surveillance State
|
Robert Streeter |
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 17:39:19 +0000 |
32 lines |
Surveillance State
|
Ibrahim Hasan |
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:42:27 +0000 |
47 lines |
Re: Reason for leaving - dismissal
|
Roland Perry |
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:12:21 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: Reason for leaving - dismissal
|
Healy, Susan |
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:41:48 -0000 |
53 lines |
Re: Reason for leaving - dismissal
|
Roland Perry |
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:11:05 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: Reason for leaving - dismissal
|
Tim Trent |
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:24:05 +0000 |
206 lines |
Re: Reason for leaving - dismissal
|
Roland Perry |
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:11:17 +0000 |
51 lines |
Re: Reason for leaving - dismissal
|
Bradshaw, Phillip |
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:02:22 -0000 |
185 lines |
Re: Reason for leaving - dismissal
|
Tim Trent |
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:55:13 +0000 |
781 lines |
Re: Reason for leaving - dismissal
|
Bradshaw, Phillip |
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:39:48 -0000 |
469 lines |
Re: Reason for leaving - dismissal
|
J.S.M.Whitaker |
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:46:18 -0000 |
61 lines |
Re: Reason for leaving - dismissal
|
Marchini, Renzo |
Thu, 5 Feb 2009 02:23:42 -0500 |
440 lines |
Re: Reason for leaving - dismissal
|
Tim Trent |
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 18:25:43 +0000 |
213 lines |
Reason for leaving - dismissal
|
Graeme Hawley |
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:42:44 +0000 |
58 lines |
Re: Information Commissioner's staff talk sense
|
Paul Ticher |
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:39:24 -0000 |
63 lines |
Re: Information Commissioner's staff talk sense
|
Bailey, Trish |
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:22:35 -0000 |
171 lines |
commercial use of the list
|
Tim Trent |
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:54:47 +0000 |
156 lines |
Re: Information Commissioner's staff talk sense
|
J.S.M.Whitaker |
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:42:14 -0000 |
193 lines |
40% off for Records Management conference
|
Hetty |
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:34:06 +0000 |
121 lines |
Re: Email SARs and the Junk Filter
|
Scourfield, Brenda |
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:48:12 -0000 |
355 lines |
FW: [data-protection] Information Commissioner's staff talk sense
|
Jane Bartlett |
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:28:21 -0000 |
201 lines |
Re: Email SARs and the Junk Filter
|
Bradshaw, Phillip |
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:27:12 -0000 |
571 lines |
Re: Email SARs and the Junk Filter
|
Tim Turner |
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:18:26 -0000 |
377 lines |
Re: UCU Requests for External Examiner Names and Institutions
|
David Hirst |
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:15:47 +0000 |
98 lines |
Email SARs and the Junk Filter
|
Tim Trent |
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:08:10 +0000 |
125 lines |
Re: Information Commissioner's staff talk sense
|
Paul Ticher |
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:37:08 -0000 |
139 lines |
Re: Information Commissioner's staff talk sense
|
Bradshaw, Phillip |
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:29:01 -0000 |
92 lines |
Re: Information Commissioner's staff talk sense
|
Tim Trent |
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:19:17 +0000 |
237 lines |
Re: When an SAR is not an SAR
|
Tim Trent |
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:10:37 +0000 |
914 lines |
Information Commissioner's staff talk sense
|
Paul Ticher |
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:52:48 -0000 |
39 lines |
Junk mail?
|
chris pounder |
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:46:10 -0000 |
877 lines |
Re: When an SAR is not an SAR
|
Broom, Doreen |
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:32:53 -0000 |
883 lines |
When an SAR is not an SAR
|
Tim Trent |
Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:11:40 +0000 |
393 lines |
CSA request - thanks
|
Sarah Wickham |
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:57:29 +0000 |
141 lines |
Re: Data protection issues when creating a new organisation
|
Donald Henderson |
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:48:56 -0000 |
397 lines |
Retention of spoilt Birth/Death/Marriage Certificates
|
Gill Wood |
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:40:59 +0000 |
43 lines |
Re: Data protection issues when creating a new organisation
|
Tim Turner |
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:03:46 -0000 |
411 lines |
Data protection issues when creating a new organisation
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:51:32 +0000 |
157 lines |
Re: Does anyone still remember the Crematorium?
|
Broom, Doreen |
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:23:25 -0000 |
668 lines |
Re: Does anyone still remember the Crematorium?
|
Tim Trent |
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:13:04 +0000 |
231 lines |
Re: Does anyone still remember the Crematorium?
|
Tim Trent |
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:09:36 +0000 |
237 lines |
Re: Does anyone still remember the Crematorium?
|
Lawrence Serewicz |
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:48:40 +0000 |
512 lines |
Re: Does anyone still remember the Crematorium?
|
Tim Turner |
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:45:37 -0000 |
634 lines |
Re: Does anyone still remember the Crematorium?
|
Griffiths, Ian |
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:41:56 -0000 |
697 lines |
Privacy professional facing criminal charges
|
[log in to unmask] |
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:09:58 +0100 |
56 lines |
Re: Does anyone still remember the Crematorium?
|
Tim Trent |
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:40:39 +0000 |
259 lines |
Resources
|
Henley, Lee |
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:01:19 -0000 |
202 lines |
Re: Does anyone still remember the Crematorium?
|
Griffiths, Ian |
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:45:15 -0000 |
165 lines |
Does anyone still remember the Crematorium?
|
Tim Trent |
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:44:27 +0000 |
265 lines |
DIGITAL LIVES RESEARCH CONFERENCE 2009
|
Lynn Young |
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:38:55 +0000 |
118 lines |
Section 29 Exemptions
|
Chris Brogan |
Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:54:22 -0000 |
477 lines |