JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


2005


View:

Show Author | Hide Author

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Most Recent First

Size

Re: Extraordinary UK Court Ruling on Spam

Tim Trent

Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:06:40 -0000

152 lines

Re: Extraordinary UK Court Ruling on Spam

Roland Perry

Thu, 29 Dec 2005 11:29:00 +0000

178 lines

Re: Extraordinary UK Court Ruling on Spam

Tim Trent

Thu, 29 Dec 2005 09:59:59 -0000

184 lines

Re: Extraordinary UK Court Ruling on Spam

Roland Perry

Wed, 28 Dec 2005 19:06:59 +0000

123 lines

Re: Extraordinary UK Court Ruling on Spam

Tim Trent

Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:20:44 -0000

128 lines

Re: Extraordinary UK Court Ruling on Spam

Roland Perry

Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:51:16 +0000

53 lines

Extraordinary UK Court Ruling on Spam

Tim Trent

Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:30:30 -0000

67 lines

Direct Marketing - Article Series

Lisa Souza

Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:40:05 -0000

68 lines

Re: When does processing become Unfair?

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Fri, 23 Dec 2005 13:42:58 -0000

136 lines

Article 29 WP processing of location data

Ian Welton

Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:46:08 -0000

39 lines

Re: When does processing become Unfair?

Tim Trent

Fri, 23 Dec 2005 09:10:00 -0000

138 lines

Re: When does processing become Unfair?

Peter Dinsdale

Fri, 23 Dec 2005 09:00:40 +0000

118 lines

When does processing become Unfair?

Tim Trent

Fri, 23 Dec 2005 08:44:22 -0000

84 lines

Re: And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Ian Welton

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:08:55 -0000

208 lines

Re: And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 15:24:17 +0000

137 lines

Re: And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Tim Trent

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 14:17:39 -0000

49 lines

Re: And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Ian Welton

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 13:21:21 -0000

82 lines

Re: And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Tim Trent

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 12:31:59 -0000

87 lines

Re: And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Jethro R Binks

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 12:13:32 +0000

54 lines

Re: And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 12:00:24 +0000

154 lines

Re: And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Jethro R Binks

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:51:23 +0000

53 lines

Re: And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Tim Trent

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:43:28 -0000

119 lines

Re: And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:32:10 +0000

69 lines

Did we cover the Sony incident?

Tim Trent

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 09:23:26 -0000

63 lines

Re: And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Tim Trent

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 08:59:24 -0000

123 lines

And what is the UKIC's stance here??

Tim Trent

Thu, 22 Dec 2005 08:40:24 -0000

68 lines

Seasonal Greetings

David Wyatt

Wed, 21 Dec 2005 23:52:11 -0000

27 lines

Re: Employee Numbers

David Wyatt

Wed, 21 Dec 2005 23:48:15 -0000

103 lines

Re: Employee Numbers

Tim Trent

Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:38:41 -0000

81 lines

Employee Numbers

Sophie Pilkington

Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:04:00 +0000

48 lines

Festive Greetings

Justice, Sally

Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:11:39 -0000

45 lines

Re: Computer Misuse Act fine

David Wyatt

Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:55:30 -0000

87 lines

NZ Herald Content Link sent by Tim Trent

Tim Trent

Fri, 16 Dec 2005 22:12:21 +1300

35 lines

First UK BCR

Tim Trent

Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:21:10 -0000

66 lines

Anyone know what actually happened?

Tim Trent

Fri, 16 Dec 2005 09:00:56 -0000

57 lines

Computer Misuse Act fine

Simon Howarth

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 13:29:01 -0000

33 lines

Re: Call Centre Staff

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:57:29 -0000

90 lines

Re: Call Centre Staff

Wilson, Stephen

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:56:51 -0000

118 lines

Re: Call Centre Staff

Roland Perry

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:52:00 +0000

36 lines

Re: Request for a file location...

Simon Howarth

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:31:46 -0000

140 lines

Re: Request for a file location...

David Powell

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:27:53 +0000

283 lines

Re: Request for a file location...

datap

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:24:50 +0000

109 lines

Re: Request for a file location...

Clementine Amawo

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:17:51 -0000

90 lines

Request for a file location...

Simon Howarth

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:59:57 -0000

35 lines

Re: Call Centre Staff

Tim Trent

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:52:04 -0000

264 lines

Re: Call Centre Staff

Carl Johnson

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 08:59:55 +0000

221 lines

Re: Call Centre Staff

Julian Curmi

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:32:04 +0100

621 lines

Re: Call Centre Staff

Tim Trent

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 08:17:51 -0000

192 lines

Re: Call Centre Staff

Julian Curmi

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 08:07:59 +0100

414 lines

Re: Call Centre Staff

Tim Trent

Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:04:12 -0000

89 lines

Call Centre Staff

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 14 Dec 2005 15:33:25 -0000

55 lines

Re: Passenger data-new purpose

Tim Trent

Wed, 14 Dec 2005 09:28:25 -0000

127 lines

Passenger data-new purpose

DREW Nic

Wed, 14 Dec 2005 08:53:01 -0000

92 lines

Call centre query

Ian Welton

Tue, 13 Dec 2005 14:06:02 -0000

59 lines

Re: Housing Act

Paul Ferguson

Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:44:18 +0000

83 lines

Re: Housing Act

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:15:12 -0000

89 lines

Housing Act

Brenda Scourfield

Tue, 13 Dec 2005 10:35:34 +0000

32 lines

Re: Personal data on invoices

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 13 Dec 2005 10:15:58 -0000

107 lines

Personal data on invoices

Brenda Scourfield

Mon, 12 Dec 2005 16:28:02 +0000

30 lines

Re: Buy buy

Paul Ticher

Mon, 12 Dec 2005 10:26:32 -0000

254 lines

Re: Buy buy

Justice, Sally

Mon, 12 Dec 2005 09:34:40 -0000

217 lines

Re: Business cards - Friday question

Tim Trent

Sat, 10 Dec 2005 13:36:39 -0000

140 lines

Buy buy

<>

Sat, 10 Dec 2005 03:34:48 EST

162 lines

Re: Bye bye

David Wyatt

Sat, 10 Dec 2005 02:06:55 -0000

116 lines

Re: Business cards - Friday question

Paul Ticher

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 18:08:25 -0000

84 lines

Re: Bye bye, buy buy

<>

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 13:04:31 EST

47 lines

Re: Business cards - Friday question

Ibrahim Hasan

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 17:09:15 -0000

81 lines

Business cards - Friday question

Mags McGinley

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 16:12:34 +0000

41 lines

Re: Bye bye

Tim Trent

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 10:40:49 -0000

166 lines

Secondary Legislation (Education)

Jackie Leesons

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 10:24:32 +0000

34 lines

Bye Bye

Brenda Scourfield

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:38:52 +0000

28 lines

Re: Bye bye

Tim Trent

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:29:10 -0000

132 lines

Re: Bye bye

Chris Brogan

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:21:47 -0000

122 lines

Re: Bye bye

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:07:34 -0000

125 lines

Re: Bye bye

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 08:55:59 -0000

98 lines

Re: Bye bye

Paul Dodgson

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 08:38:35 -0000

140 lines

Re: Bye bye

Charles Christacopoulos

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 00:43:32 +0000

77 lines

Bye bye

<>

Thu, 8 Dec 2005 17:43:17 EST

70 lines

Re: Request from Government office for NI numbers

J.S.M.Whitaker

Thu, 8 Dec 2005 17:54:24 -0000

76 lines

Re: Fair Processing Notices

Paul Dodgson

Thu, 8 Dec 2005 16:14:30 -0000

129 lines

Re: NEW ICO Guidance Note

Tim Trent

Thu, 8 Dec 2005 10:48:11 -0000

64 lines

NEW ICO Guidance Note

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:27:18 -0000

41 lines

Re: Request from Government office for NI numbers

Tim Trent

Thu, 8 Dec 2005 08:19:32 -0000

79 lines

Re: Request from Government office for NI numbers

DREW Nic

Thu, 8 Dec 2005 08:17:40 -0000

126 lines

Request from Government office for NI numbers

Teresa Gudge

Thu, 8 Dec 2005 07:13:36 +0000

46 lines

Re: Fair Processing Notices

Tim Trent

Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:48:38 -0000

91 lines

Re: Fair Processing Notices

Simon Howarth

Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:38:23 -0000

75 lines

Fair Processing Notices

Gillian Whichelo

Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:25:59 -0000

32 lines

Re: Access to children's records

Paul Ticher

Wed, 7 Dec 2005 08:51:24 -0000

76 lines

Information Governance Manager Role - Teesside.

Simon Howarth

Tue, 6 Dec 2005 17:26:24 -0000

87 lines

Re: Access to children's records

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Mon, 5 Dec 2005 14:43:17 -0000

52 lines

Access to children's records

Brenda Scourfield

Mon, 5 Dec 2005 14:10:36 +0000

24 lines

Disclosures

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 5 Dec 2005 12:15:16 -0000

54 lines

FW: [data-protection] Is it a data processor?

Duncan Smith

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 14:51:38 -0000

184 lines

Re: Names in online archival finding aids

Iain Harrison

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 11:52:48 +0000

92 lines

Re: Names in online archival finding aids

Tim Trent

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 11:47:05 -0000

101 lines

Names in online archival finding aids

Vicky West

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 11:05:30 +0000

39 lines

Re: House of Lords ends Durant's data protection saga

Ian Welton

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 10:02:46 -0000

150 lines

Re: House of Lords ends Durant's data protection saga

Ian Welton

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 10:02:46 -0000

130 lines

Re: Is it a data processor?

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 09:53:51 -0000

130 lines

Software companies

Brenda Scourfield

Fri, 2 Dec 2005 08:58:06 +0000

27 lines

Re: Is it a data processor?

<>

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 13:45:46 EST

85 lines

Re: Partnerships against crime

Chris Brogan

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 17:06:05 -0000

44 lines

Re: Is it a data processor?

Tim Trent

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 16:40:25 -0000

96 lines

Is it a data processor?

Hilary Lawrenson

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 16:34:09 +0000

59 lines

Re: Post-script - House of Lords ends Durant's data protection saga

Tim Trent

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:10:52 -0000

184 lines

Post-script - House of Lords ends Durant's data protection saga

Pounder Chris

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:04:03 -0000

155 lines

Re: House of Lords ends Durant's data protection saga

<>

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 05:22:51 EST

64 lines

Re: House of Lords ends Durant's data protection saga

Tim Trent

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 08:32:36 -0000

97 lines

Re: House of Lords ends Durant's data protection saga

<>

Thu, 1 Dec 2005 03:20:35 EST

70 lines

Re: House of Lords ends Durant's data protection saga

Tim Trent

Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:02:50 -0000

86 lines

House of Lords ends Durant's data protection saga

Pounder Chris

Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:58:34 -0000

60 lines

Suspending mail from JISCmail lists over Xmas

Justice, Sally

Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:34:54 -0000

52 lines

Re: Disclosure of statistical information on staff addresses

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 15:12:40 -0000

195 lines

Re: Disclosure of statistical information on staff addresses

Hitches, John F

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:19:59 -0000

68 lines

Re: Disclosure of statistical information on staff addresses

Wilson, Stephen

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:33:22 -0000

185 lines

Re: Disclosure of statistical information on staff addresses

Julie Gibbs

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:31:48 -0000

122 lines

Re: Disclosure of statistical information on staff addresses

<>

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 07:19:55 EST

75 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

<>

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 07:15:10 EST

65 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Roland Perry

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:57:02 +0000

34 lines

Disclosure of statistical information on staff addresses

Gillian Whichelo

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:54:49 -0000

44 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Tim Trent

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:03:38 -0000

126 lines

Issue of birth certificates

GRAHAM Susan

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 10:44:24 -0000

41 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

J.S.M.Whitaker

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 10:29:53 -0000

103 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Christopher Spray

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 10:19:15 -0000

76 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Jethro R Binks

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 09:52:06 +0000

47 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

<>

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 04:50:58 EST

64 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Chris Bayliss

Fri, 25 Nov 2005 08:47:14 +0000

46 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Lewis, Chris G.

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 16:21:19 -0000

96 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:50:36 -0000

221 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Roland Perry

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:42:29 +0000

36 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:36:17 -0000

216 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Tim Trent

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 14:49:05 -0000

60 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Roland Perry

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 14:43:24 +0000

35 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

J.S.M.Whitaker

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 14:33:52 -0000

159 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Hilary Lawrenson

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 14:32:18 +0000

164 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Roland Perry

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 14:10:11 +0000

41 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Tim Trent

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 14:03:08 -0000

144 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 13:48:44 -0000

122 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Su Goulding

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 13:43:01 -0000

64 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Tim Trent

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:54:31 -0000

72 lines

Re: Issue of birth certifications

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:53:30 -0000

93 lines

Re: UKIC Gets Tough.... Allegedly

Tim Trent

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:43:57 -0000

96 lines

UKIC Gets Tough.... Allegedly

Tim Trent

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:25:55 -0000

68 lines

Issue of birth certifications

Kathryn Billings

Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:24:53 +0000

39 lines

Re: Does being dad trump the DPA?

Roland Perry

Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:40:38 +0000

39 lines

Re: Does being dad trump the DPA?

Kirsty Gray

Wed, 23 Nov 2005 12:34:55 +0000

51 lines

Re: Request for sight of personnel records

Anne Gadsden

Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:00:40 +0000

134 lines

Re: Request for sight of personnel records

Mary Liddell

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 19:04:27 -0000

64 lines

Re: Does being dad trump the DPA?

Roland Perry

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:26:53 +0000

80 lines

Re: Does being dad trump the DPA?

Kirsty Gray

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 16:21:35 +0000

53 lines

FW: [data-protection] Request for sight of personnel records

John Hughes

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 13:37:33 -0000

307 lines

Re: Request for sight of personnel records

Antoinette Carter

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:18:29 -0000

256 lines

Re: Request for sight of personnel records

Paul Ticher

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:07:27 -0000

230 lines

Re: Retired Heads' Contact Details

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:47:02 -0000

91 lines

Re: Request for sight of personnel records

<>

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 05:34:33 EST

62 lines

Re: Request for sight of personnel records

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:03:59 -0000

198 lines

Re: Request for sight of personnel records

Paul Ticher

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 09:34:58 -0000

128 lines

Re: Request for sight of personnel records

<>

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 04:24:02 EST

76 lines

Re: Request for sight of personnel records

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 22 Nov 2005 09:18:53 -0000

88 lines

Re: Request for sight of personnel records

Paul Ticher

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:58:36 -0000

71 lines

Retired Heads' Contact Details

Jackie Leesons

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:19:55 +0000

29 lines

Request for sight of personnel records

Lucy Fincham

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:35:47 +0000

27 lines

[log in to unmask]

Ian Welton

Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:31:02 -0000

150 lines

Is Google Likely to break EEA laws over this?

Tim Trent

Fri, 18 Nov 2005 23:24:27 -0000

88 lines

Does being dad trump the DPA?

Roland Perry

Fri, 18 Nov 2005 12:42:13 +0000

64 lines

Freedom of Information (FOI) Act 2000: the first six months:

Justice, Sally

Fri, 18 Nov 2005 09:35:23 -0000

91 lines

Re: Reopening the "Backups" discussion

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 19:45:00 -0000

224 lines

Re: Reopening the "Backups" discussion

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 19:42:06 -0000

198 lines

Re: Durant in the House of Lords after all

Ian Welton

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 17:27:22 -0000

123 lines

Reopening the "Backups" discussion

<>

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 12:07:06 EST

81 lines

Re: Reopening the "Backups" discussion

Doug Colyer

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 17:01:37 -0000

208 lines

Re: Reopening the "Backups" discussion

Tim Trent

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 16:47:53 -0000

181 lines

Re: Reopening the "Backups" discussion

Duncan Smith

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 16:39:21 -0000

154 lines

Durant in the House of Lords after all

Pounder Chris

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 15:46:00 -0000

80 lines

Re: Durant in the House of Lords after all

Tim Trent

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 15:16:46 -0000

85 lines

Re: Durant in the House of Lords after all

Ian Welton

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 14:50:48 -0000

58 lines

Re: Durant in the House of Lords after all

<>

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:44:16 EST

59 lines

Re: Durant in the House of Lords after all

Tim Trent

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 14:38:40 -0000

183 lines

Re: Reopening the "Backups" discussion

<>

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:37:12 EST

87 lines

Re: Durant in the House of Lords after all

Antoinette Carter

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 14:25:29 -0000

161 lines

UKIC's Speech. Sony's Disaster

Tim Trent

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 14:24:12 -0000

102 lines

Correction: British Library , Records Manager

Richard Burillo

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 13:27:18 +0000

27 lines

Was that a recruitment agent?

Tim Trent

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 12:02:35 -0000

66 lines

Recent posting of Records Manager job opportunity with British Library

Richard Burillo

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 10:52:43 +0000

31 lines

Re: Reopening the "Backups" discussion

Duncan Smith

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:49:14 -0000

151 lines

Re: Reopening the "Backups" discussion

Simon Howarth

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:06:15 -0000

126 lines

Re: Durant in the House of Lords after all

Tinsley, Chris

Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:02:49 -0000

138 lines

Re: Durant in the House of Lords after all

Tim Trent

Wed, 16 Nov 2005 18:26:42 -0000

91 lines

Re: Reopening the "Backups" discussion

Duncan Smith

Wed, 16 Nov 2005 18:17:05 -0000

90 lines

Durant in the House of Lords after all

Pounder Chris

Wed, 16 Nov 2005 16:59:21 -0000

60 lines

Re: Reopening the "Backups" discussion

Ken Allen

Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:18:51 +0000

35 lines

Re: Details of next years DP courses and dates

Adrian Chase

Wed, 16 Nov 2005 09:39:20 +0000

154 lines

Details of next years DP courses and dates

Pounder Chris

Tue, 15 Nov 2005 22:01:12 -0000

54 lines

Reopening the "Backups" discussion

Tim Trent

Tue, 15 Nov 2005 14:07:24 -0000

62 lines

Third pillar data protection regime????

Jo Archer

Tue, 15 Nov 2005 09:16:37 -0000

69 lines

Re: References

Tim Trent

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 16:37:07 -0000

63 lines

Re: References

Roland Perry

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 16:24:08 +0000

35 lines

Re: References

Tim Trent

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 16:11:32 -0000

79 lines

Re: References

Roland Perry

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 16:03:00 +0000

43 lines

Re: Ride share companion question

Ian Welton

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:57:22 -0000

103 lines

Re: References

Tim Trent

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:21:09 -0000

83 lines

Re: References

Roland Perry

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:12:41 +0000

38 lines

Re: References

Tim Trent

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:06:00 -0000

65 lines

Re: References

Roland Perry

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:02:12 +0000

38 lines

Re: References

Tim Trent

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:50:57 -0000

80 lines

Re: References

C.Oppenheim

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:48:30 -0000

99 lines

Re: References

Roland Perry

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:36:52 +0000

54 lines

Re: References

Tim Trent

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:25:51 -0000

62 lines

Re: References

Roland Perry

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:21:37 +0000

38 lines

Re: Ride share companion question

Tim Trent

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 13:59:06 -0000

100 lines

Ride share companion question

Lawrence Serewicz

Mon, 14 Nov 2005 13:51:16 +0000

63 lines

Re: References

<>

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 12:20:52 EST

71 lines

Re: References

Ian Welton

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:36:30 -0000

87 lines

Re: References

Hitches, John F

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 13:55:47 -0000

36 lines

Re: References

<>

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:21:30 EST

74 lines

Re: Business Cards

Ekin Caglar

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 12:44:07 -0000

134 lines

Re: References

Gerry Dane

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 12:14:14 -0000

74 lines

Re: References

Hitches, John F

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:41:51 -0000

42 lines

Re: References

Edwina Withe

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:41:44 +0000

180 lines

Re: References

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 11:35:25 -0000

132 lines

Re: References

<>

Fri, 11 Nov 2005 06:11:07 EST

101 lines

Re: References

Ian Welton

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 21:04:17 -0000

88 lines

Re: Business Cards

Tim Trent

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:47:00 -0000

110 lines

Re: Business Cards

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:15:56 -0000

92 lines

Re: References

Graham Hadfield

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:54:55 +0000

31 lines

BSI Data Protection Workshop

Tim Trent

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:23:17 -0000

68 lines

Re: References

Tim Trent

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:16:05 -0000

365 lines

Re: References

Ian Welton

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:12:49 -0000

317 lines

Business Cards

Richard Frost

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:00:50 +0000

28 lines

Re: References

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:51:22 -0000

293 lines

Re: Friday question on telephone numbers

Tim Trent

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 12:10:26 -0000

81 lines

Friday question on telephone numbers

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 12:01:53 +0000

58 lines

Re: References

DREW Nic

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:40:10 -0000

255 lines

Re: References

Tim Trent

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:21:26 -0000

165 lines

Re: References

Hilary Lawrenson

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:12:55 +0000

141 lines

Re: References

Tim Trent

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:57:41 -0000

69 lines

References

Casillas, Mojgan

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:55:58 -0000

43 lines

Intranet disclaimers

datap

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:14:20 +0000

67 lines

B&NES Council - Records Manager Position

Amanda Osborne

Wed, 9 Nov 2005 15:28:10 -0000

84 lines

British Library - Record Manager/Archivist Position

Karen Beck

Wed, 9 Nov 2005 14:49:48 +0000

62 lines

2nd Annual FOI Conference & Workshop Series

Lisa Souza

Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:15:19 -0000

60 lines

Re: E-mail disclaimers

Graham Hadfield

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:24:03 +0000

27 lines

E-mail disclaimers

Ian Welton

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:09:45 -0000

79 lines

Re: Data controller or not??

Graham Hadfield

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:02:16 +0000

27 lines

Re: Data controller or not??

<>

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 06:42:24 EST

98 lines

Re: Data controller or not??

Graham Hadfield

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:56:36 +0000

45 lines

Re: Data controller or not??

<>

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 04:25:18 EST

62 lines

Re: Data controller or not??

Graham Hadfield

Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:41:52 +0000

35 lines

Re: Data controller or not??

Roland Perry

Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:14:19 +0000

43 lines

Re: Data controller or not??

Antoinette Carter

Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:09:45 -0000

75 lines

Re: Data controller or not??

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:05:28 +0000

45 lines

Re: Data controller or not??

Antoinette Carter

Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:51:36 -0000

68 lines

Re: Data controller or not??

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:39:17 -0000

73 lines

FW: [data-protection] Council Tax secondary use - any progress?

Alan Stead

Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:06:40 -0000

97 lines

Data controller or not??

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:28:40 +0000

40 lines

Re: Council Tax secondary use - any progress?

Graham Hadfield

Fri, 4 Nov 2005 14:38:16 +0000

53 lines

Re: Council Tax secondary use - any progress?

Lightowlers, Paul

Fri, 4 Nov 2005 10:47:57 -0000

44 lines

Council Tax secondary use - any progress?

Graham Hadfield

Fri, 4 Nov 2005 10:10:56 +0000

29 lines

Assistant Records Manager (Part-Time) Vacancy at the University of Edinburgh

GRAHAM Susan

Fri, 4 Nov 2005 09:17:12 -0000

58 lines

Re: NI Numbers for CTAX change of Circs.

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 3 Nov 2005 12:43:13 -0000

109 lines

Re: Release of info about a student

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS)

Thu, 3 Nov 2005 12:10:50 +0000

75 lines

Release of info about a student

Justice, Sally

Thu, 3 Nov 2005 11:21:30 -0000

36 lines

NI Numbers for CTAX change of Circs.

Fiona Musgrave

Thu, 3 Nov 2005 10:54:41 +0000

47 lines

Personal Information/Not

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 2 Nov 2005 13:52:21 -0000

60 lines

Evidence of ethical approval.

Pat Gannon-Leary

Mon, 31 Oct 2005 15:24:41 +0000

36 lines

Re: Academic Research - Police Held Information

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS)

Mon, 31 Oct 2005 14:48:14 +0000

94 lines

Academic Research - Police Held Information

Michael Doherty

Mon, 31 Oct 2005 12:22:45 +0000

51 lines

Using the mail list for DP matters

Justice, Sally

Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:34:11 +0100

52 lines

Re: Spoof domains (was: If you are willing I need a little help)

Ekin Caglar

Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:45:11 +0100

70 lines

Re: ICO Email Alerts

Tim Trent

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 17:36:52 +0100

215 lines

Re: ICO Email Alerts

Martin Hoskins

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:14:52 +0100

182 lines

Re: ICO Email Alerts

Simon Howarth

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:03:31 +0100

102 lines

Spoof domains (was: If you are willing I need a little help)

<>

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:09:20 EDT

37 lines

Re: Planning File

Roland Perry

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:54:46 +0100

36 lines

Re: Planning File

Tinsley, Chris

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:41:24 +0100

252 lines

Surveillance Law Bulletin Board

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:24:23 +0100

46 lines

Re: Planning File

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:05:05 +0100

305 lines

Re: Planning File

Antoinette Carter

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:00:38 +0100

256 lines

Re: Planning File

Edwina Withe

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:52:02 +0100

129 lines

ICO Email Alerts

DREW Nic

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:45:23 +0100

78 lines

Re: Planning File

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:23:23 +0100

250 lines

Re: Planning File

Tim Trent

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:21:23 +0100

221 lines

Re: Planning File

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:15:47 +0100

194 lines

Re: If you are willing I need a little help

Roland Perry

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:08:03 +0100

37 lines

Re: Planning File

Tim Trent

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:00:33 +0100

138 lines

Planning File

Sara-Jane Newbon

Wed, 26 Oct 2005 10:48:51 +0100

83 lines

Re: If you are willing I need a little help

Tinsley, Chris

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 15:36:16 +0100

371 lines

Re: malicious email, DP or FOI

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:37:53 +0100

418 lines

Re: malicious email, DP or FOI

Tim Trent

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:30:03 +0100

358 lines

Re: If you are willing I need a little help

Tim Trent

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:28:16 +0100

323 lines

Re: If you are willing I need a little help

Simon Howarth

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:24:52 +0100

308 lines

Re: If you are willing I need a little help

Simon Howarth

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:21:02 +0100

274 lines

Re: If you are willing I need a little help

Tim Trent

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:19:24 +0100

260 lines

Re: If you are willing I need a little help

Caroline Dominey

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:15:05 +0100

238 lines

Re: malicious email, DP or FOI

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:06:09 +0100

341 lines

Re: malicious email, DP or FOI

Tim Trent

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 12:50:28 +0100

329 lines

Re: malicious email, DP or FOI

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 12:45:25 +0100

310 lines

Re: malicious email, DP or FOI

Tim Trent

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 12:36:00 +0100

306 lines

Re: malicious email, DP or FOI

Tim Trent

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 12:21:29 +0100

282 lines

Re: malicious email, DP or FOI

Simon Howarth

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 12:12:35 +0100

308 lines

Re: If you are willing I need a little help

Simon Howarth

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:41:15 +0100

197 lines

Re: malicious email, DP or FOI

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:40:19 +0100

284 lines

malicious email, DP or FOI

PETER SELENIC

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:34:51 +0100

258 lines

Re: malicious email, DP or FOI

Paul Ticher

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:25:03 +0100

216 lines

Re: malicious email, DP or FOI

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:15:35 +0100

179 lines

Re: malicious email, DP or FOI

PETER SELENIC

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:11:52 +0100

154 lines

Re: malicious email, DP or FOI

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:10:05 +0100

167 lines

Re: malicious email, DP or FOI

Tim Trent

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:05:08 +0100

110 lines

Re: malicious email, DP or FOI

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 10:47:21 +0100

128 lines

malicious email, DP or FOI

PETER SELENIC

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 10:31:53 +0100

67 lines

Re: Secondary Use of Council Tax Data - Customer First

Alan Stead

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 09:00:10 +0100

176 lines

Re: Secondary Use of Council Tax Data - Customer First

Alan Stead

Tue, 25 Oct 2005 08:56:40 +0100

104 lines

Re: If you are willing I need a little help

Tim Trent

Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:30:03 +0100

139 lines

Re: If you are willing I need a little help

Ian Welton

Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:25:00 +0100

112 lines

If you are willing I need a little help

Tim Trent

Mon, 24 Oct 2005 14:45:06 +0100

74 lines

Re: web application access control: follow-up

Paul Ticher

Mon, 24 Oct 2005 13:12:33 +0100

142 lines

Re: Self abuse reporting

Ian Welton

Sat, 22 Oct 2005 12:31:05 +0100

353 lines

Re: Self abuse reporting

Tim Trent

Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:35:51 +0100

259 lines

Re: Self abuse reporting

Lewis, Chris G.

Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:26:08 +0100

191 lines

Re: Self abuse reporting

Tim Trent

Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:17:33 +0100

183 lines

Re: Self abuse reporting

Lewis, Chris G.

Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:15:34 +0100

19 lines

Re: Self abuse reporting

Lynzie Gadd

Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:00:32 +0100

147 lines

Re: Self abuse reporting

Tim Trent

Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:07:43 +0100

115 lines

Self abuse reporting

Fiona Musgrave

Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:47:42 +0100

64 lines

web application access control: follow-up

S McCain

Fri, 21 Oct 2005 10:46:30 +0100

73 lines

Re: Bad Bank DP

Julian Curmi

Fri, 21 Oct 2005 08:32:52 +0200

530 lines

Re: Bad Bank DP

Jethro R Binks

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 21:15:49 +0100

61 lines

Re: Bad Bank DP

Tim Trent

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 21:04:22 +0100

140 lines

Re: Bad Bank DP

Roland Perry

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:27:21 +0100

49 lines

Re: Bad Bank DP

Roland Perry

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:27:16 +0100

53 lines

Re: Bad Bank DP

Fiona Musgrave

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:41:23 +0100

179 lines

Re: Bad Bank DP

Simon Howarth

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:15:29 +0100

147 lines

Re: Bad Bank DP

Donald Henderson

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:06:12 +0100

119 lines

Re: Bad Bank DP

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 14:57:40 +0100

114 lines

Re: Bad Bank DP

Lisa Braund

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 14:50:35 +0100

115 lines

Bad Bank DP

Ibrahim Hasan

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 14:36:02 +0100

59 lines

Records Manager post - University of Portsmouth

Samantha Hill

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 10:15:25 +0100

42 lines

National Association of DP & FOI Officers Annual Conference

Edwina Withe

Wed, 19 Oct 2005 10:55:06 +0100

54 lines

Information & Records Manager - vacancy

Lynn Evans

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 15:17:19 +0100

74 lines

Re: Secondary Use of Council Tax Data - Customer First

Julie Gibbs

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 15:11:58 +0100

127 lines

Re: Secondary Use of Council Tax Data - Customer First

Lightowlers, Paul

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 15:10:23 +0100

71 lines

Job Opportunity in Essex

Sarah Streetley

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 15:06:06 +0100

48 lines

Re: Secondary Use of Council Tax Data - Customer First

Donald Henderson

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:30:53 +0100

104 lines

Secondary Use of Council Tax Data - Customer First

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:25:23 +0100

52 lines

Act Now newsletter

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 11:05:10 +0100

40 lines

Re: Durant ends his data protection battle

Tim Turner

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 09:43:37 +0100

142 lines

Consent forms

Pat Gannon-Leary

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 09:37:47 +0100

27 lines

Re: CCTV

<>

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 04:15:43 EDT

62 lines

CCTV

Sara-Jane Newbon

Tue, 18 Oct 2005 08:47:59 +0100

60 lines

Re: Durant ends his data protection battle

Tim Trent

Mon, 17 Oct 2005 22:05:12 +0100

86 lines

Re: data protection code of practice for records managers and archivists - revised draft issued for comment

Tim Trent

Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:38:53 +0100

158 lines

data protection code of practice for records managers and archivists - revised draft issued for comment

Alan Stead

Mon, 17 Oct 2005 09:01:28 +0100

132 lines

Re: Schools, Parents, Teachers, Divorces, Solicitors

Tim Trent

Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:39:33 +0100

29 lines

Leaving the list

Scourfield, Brenda

Thu, 13 Oct 2005 15:06:34 +0100

24 lines

Re: DPA 1984

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:37:52 +0100

96 lines

Re: DPA 1984

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:34:18 +0100

72 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Kirsty Gray

Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:26:33 +0100

46 lines

DPA 1984

Edwina Withe

Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:20:58 +0100

36 lines

Address books in collections

Graeme Hawley

Thu, 13 Oct 2005 12:46:38 +0100

59 lines

Re: Schools, Parents, Teachers, Divorces, Solicitors

S McCain

Thu, 13 Oct 2005 11:18:45 +0100

116 lines

Re: Connexions consent

<>

Thu, 13 Oct 2005 04:53:19 EDT

55 lines

Re: Schools, Parents, Teachers, Divorces, Solic itors

Bownes David (CEX)

Thu, 13 Oct 2005 08:10:23 +0100

117 lines

Re: Schools, Parents, Teachers, Divorces, Solicitors

Roland Perry

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 20:34:15 +0100

61 lines

Re: Schools, Parents, Teachers, Divorces, Solicitors

Tim Trent

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 20:15:54 +0100

78 lines

Re: Schools, Parents, Teachers, Divorces, Solicitors

Roland Perry

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 20:08:11 +0100

38 lines

Re: Durant ends his data protection battle

Ian Welton

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 19:45:08 +0100

196 lines

Schools, Parents, Teachers, Divorces, Solicitors

Tim Trent

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 19:13:42 +0100

76 lines

Re: Durant ends his data protection battle

Tim Trent

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 18:23:51 +0100

165 lines

Re: Durant ends his data protection battle

Pounder Chris

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 18:16:04 +0100

144 lines

Re: Durant ends his data protection battle

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 17:43:07 +0100

114 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 17:32:48 +0100

194 lines

Durant ends his data protection battle

Pounder Chris

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:48:31 +0100

58 lines

Re: Notice to staff

Ian Welton

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:02:10 +0100

105 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Edwina Withe

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:38:36 +0100

92 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Tim Turner

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:55:02 +0100

116 lines

Re: Connexions consent

<>

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 09:53:47 EDT

71 lines

Re: Notice to staff

<>

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 09:45:04 EDT

61 lines

Re: Notice to staff

Tim Trent

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:44:37 +0100

149 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Roland Perry

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:39:46 +0100

43 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Simon Howarth

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:39:01 +0100

140 lines

Re: Notice to staff

Simon Howarth

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:37:04 +0100

124 lines

Re: Notice to staff

Roland Perry

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:36:00 +0100

40 lines

Re: Notice to staff

Duncan James

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:35:30 +0100

158 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Roland Perry

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:33:39 +0100

37 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Roland Perry

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:31:37 +0100

63 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

<>

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 09:31:29 EDT

85 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Lightowlers, Paul

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:30:03 +0100

101 lines

Re: Notice to staff

Tim Trent

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:25:54 +0100

84 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Tim Turner

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:25:00 +0100

171 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Roland Perry

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:24:13 +0100

52 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Tim Trent

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:23:13 +0100

78 lines

Re: Notice to staff

Ian Welton

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:20:42 +0100

142 lines

Re: Notice to staff

Roland Perry

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:17:02 +0100

36 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Lawrence Serewicz

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:15:30 +0100

44 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Gibson, Martin

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:11:39 +0100

127 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Simon Howarth

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:08:49 +0100

78 lines

Re: Notice to staff

Chris Bayliss

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:04:15 +0100

35 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Tim Turner

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:04:13 +0100

75 lines

Re: Notice to staff

George Ross

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:57:32 +0100

35 lines

Re: Notice to staff

Lewis, Chris G.

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:57:12 +0100

131 lines

Re: Notice to staff

Duncan James

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:50:42 +0100

107 lines

Re: Connexions consent

Tim Trent

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:41:50 +0100

74 lines

Re: Notice to staff

Roland Perry

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:40:15 +0100

40 lines

Connexions consent

Roland Perry

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:35:39 +0100

38 lines

Re: Notice to staff

Duncan James

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:33:23 +0100

174 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Ian Welton

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:26:13 +0100

165 lines

Re: Notice to staff

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:21:01 +0100

107 lines

Notice to staff

Duncan James

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:58:13 +0100

53 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Lynzie Gadd, Examinations

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:23:27 +0100

106 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Tim Trent

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:13:54 +0100

187 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Simon Howarth

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:08:08 +0100

135 lines

Accurate data?

<>

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 06:54:39 EDT

36 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

<>

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 06:51:51 EDT

72 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Simon Howarth

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:39:56 +0100

203 lines

Re: DP Breach

Tim Trent

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:39:38 +0100

242 lines

Re: DP Breach

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:39:15 +0100

242 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Simon Howarth

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:37:57 +0100

157 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Caroline Dominey

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:36:23 +0100

155 lines

Re: DP Breach

Simon Howarth

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:35:33 +0100

214 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Lynzie Gadd, Examinations

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:30:11 +0100

112 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Tim Trent

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:29:15 +0100

186 lines

Re: DP Breach

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:28:44 +0100

176 lines

Re: DP Breach

Tim Turner

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:24:20 +0100

103 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Caroline Dominey

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:23:18 +0100

157 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:20:35 +0100

164 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Tim Trent

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 11:11:18 +0100

111 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

<>

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 05:43:17 EDT

98 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Simon Howarth

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 10:06:00 +0100

77 lines

DP Breach

Casillas, Mojgan

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 09:56:47 +0100

61 lines

Re: The new "Command Confirmations"

Hilary Lawrenson

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 09:23:29 +0100

139 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Hitches, John F

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 09:15:03 +0100

53 lines

Re: Recovering Debt

Tim Trent

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 08:54:34 +0100

139 lines

Recovering Debt

Caroline Dominey

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 08:49:02 +0100

64 lines

Re: Consent

<>

Mon, 10 Oct 2005 05:11:59 EDT

70 lines

The new "Command Confirmations"

Tim Trent

Mon, 10 Oct 2005 07:47:25 +0100

64 lines

Re: Consent

Christopher Spray

Sat, 8 Oct 2005 21:14:16 +0100

117 lines

whistleblowing

Su Goulding

Fri, 7 Oct 2005 17:13:21 +0100

71 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Repeat request

Tim Trent

Fri, 7 Oct 2005 16:39:47 +0100

156 lines

FW: [data-protection] Repeat request

Justice, Sally

Fri, 7 Oct 2005 16:32:46 +0100

133 lines

Re: Repeat request

Justice, Sally

Fri, 7 Oct 2005 15:58:20 +0100

79 lines

Re: "Public Blog" on Data Protection

Tim Trent

Fri, 7 Oct 2005 14:13:36 +0100

97 lines

Re: "Public Blog" on Data Protection

Ian Welton

Fri, 7 Oct 2005 13:43:00 +0100

47 lines

Re: Who holds the info

Andrew Charlesworth

Thu, 6 Oct 2005 23:24:57 +0100

134 lines

"Public Blog" on Data Protection

Tim Trent

Thu, 6 Oct 2005 18:48:04 +0100

71 lines

Re: Who holds the info

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 6 Oct 2005 14:43:42 +0100

115 lines

Re: Consent

<>

Thu, 6 Oct 2005 04:45:37 EDT

74 lines

Re: Consent

Tim Turner

Thu, 6 Oct 2005 09:18:50 +0100

126 lines

Re: Consent

DREW Nic

Thu, 6 Oct 2005 09:08:57 +0100

116 lines

Re: Consent

Simon Howarth

Thu, 6 Oct 2005 09:05:24 +0100

85 lines

Consent

Casillas, Mojgan

Thu, 6 Oct 2005 09:01:02 +0100

51 lines

Who holds the info

Mandi Barron

Wed, 5 Oct 2005 15:32:22 +0100

61 lines

Data Controller/Data Processor

Chris Brogan

Wed, 5 Oct 2005 12:40:39 +0100

98 lines

Student use of personal data

Pat Gannon-Leary

Wed, 5 Oct 2005 10:37:22 +0100

34 lines

Re: Republic of Ireland's Data Protection Act

Les Kingstone

Tue, 4 Oct 2005 09:10:37 +0100

54 lines

data protection code of practice for records managers and archivists - revised draft issued for comment

Healy, Susan

Tue, 4 Oct 2005 09:07:09 +0100

81 lines

NAIM

Paul Dodgson

Mon, 3 Oct 2005 14:20:25 +0100

29 lines

Plagiarism detection software

Mandi Barron

Mon, 3 Oct 2005 13:46:54 +0100

76 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Roland Perry

Mon, 3 Oct 2005 12:27:35 +0100

91 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Simon Howarth

Mon, 3 Oct 2005 10:13:23 +0100

108 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Paul Ticher

Mon, 3 Oct 2005 10:02:26 +0100

102 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Roland Perry

Sat, 1 Oct 2005 13:47:42 +0100

37 lines

Re: Republic of Ireland's Data Protection Act

David Wyatt

Sat, 1 Oct 2005 00:45:16 +0100

70 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Charles Prescott

Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:52:58 -0400

92 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Fri, 30 Sep 2005 22:33:02 +0100

55 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Roland Perry

Fri, 30 Sep 2005 21:33:44 +0100

52 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Paul Ticher

Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:26:58 +0100

109 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Ian Welton

Fri, 30 Sep 2005 16:48:31 +0100

110 lines

Re: Republic of Ireland's Data Protection Act

Iain Harrison

Fri, 30 Sep 2005 15:52:26 +0100

68 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Roland Perry

Fri, 30 Sep 2005 15:50:48 +0100

59 lines

Republic of Ireland's Data Protection Act

Sophie Pilkington

Fri, 30 Sep 2005 15:33:36 +0100

31 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Andrea Simmons

Fri, 30 Sep 2005 01:09:56 +0100

78 lines

Re: Consensus, please. Happy Friday.

Tim Trent

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:07:47 +0100

123 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 16:16:24 +0100

79 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Ian Welton

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 14:37:59 +0100

155 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Ian Welton

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 14:37:59 +0100

135 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Chris Bayliss

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 14:29:46 +0100

69 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

<>

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:22:00 EDT

41 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Chris Catton

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 12:58:52 +0100

103 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Simon Howarth

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 12:40:06 +0100

53 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Charles Prescott

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 07:23:07 -0400

108 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Simon Howarth

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:50:23 +0100

106 lines

Re: Marketing to be opt-in?

Simon Howarth

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:46:14 +0100

125 lines

Marketing to be opt-in?

Paul Ticher

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 10:25:52 +0100

53 lines

Re: Data Protection Fair processing Notices

Ken Allen

Thu, 29 Sep 2005 09:30:24 +0100

32 lines

Re: Mini Experts

<>

Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:34:51 EDT

26 lines

Re: Mini Experts

Simon Howarth

Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:31:23 +0100

50 lines

Re: Mini Experts

Ekin Caglar

Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:27:10 +0100

93 lines

Re: Mini Experts

Tim Trent

Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:24:02 +0100

62 lines

Re: Mini Experts

Lawrence Serewicz

Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:21:14 +0100

47 lines

Mini Experts

Tim Trent

Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:14:22 +0100

68 lines

Re: Data Protection Fair processing Notices

Julie Gibbs

Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:12:29 +0100

142 lines

Re: DPA implications of telephone conversation recording

Martin Hoskins

Wed, 28 Sep 2005 15:58:13 +0100

121 lines

DPA implications of telephone conversation recording

Joshua McKim

Wed, 28 Sep 2005 15:51:58 +0100

66 lines

CLINCAL RECORDS LEAD - New Post

Simon Howarth

Wed, 28 Sep 2005 15:45:54 +0100

56 lines

Data Protection Fair processing Notices

Tim Salmon

Wed, 28 Sep 2005 15:37:36 +0100

45 lines

Re: R4 FOI programme this evening...

Su Goulding

Tue, 27 Sep 2005 17:23:00 +0100

121 lines

R4 FOI programme this evening...

Su Goulding

Tue, 27 Sep 2005 17:11:29 +0100

65 lines

Re: Representation of the People Regulations 2001 (reg 35)

<>

Tue, 27 Sep 2005 11:38:49 EDT

91 lines

Re: Representation of the People Regulations 2001 (reg 35)

Edwina Withe

Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:12:32 +0100

141 lines

Representation of the People Regulations 2001 (reg 35)

Steel, Rachael

Tue, 27 Sep 2005 14:52:03 +0100

91 lines

ADV - Data Protection and Employee Data seminar

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 27 Sep 2005 10:22:59 +0100

49 lines

Re: Advise

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Mon, 26 Sep 2005 11:22:21 +0100

93 lines

Re: Advise

Mary Liddell

Mon, 26 Sep 2005 10:27:17 +0100

90 lines

Advise

Helen Bartram

Mon, 26 Sep 2005 10:24:31 +0100

61 lines

web application access control - HE Sector

S McCain

Fri, 23 Sep 2005 16:26:49 +0100

66 lines

Consensus, please. Happy Friday.

Tim Trent

Fri, 23 Sep 2005 15:39:11 +0100

80 lines

A bit of DP, a bit of FOI

datap

Fri, 23 Sep 2005 12:59:10 +0100

66 lines

Re: The Montreux Declaration

Tim Trent

Fri, 23 Sep 2005 08:46:34 +0100

95 lines

The Montreux Declaration

Lisa Braund

Fri, 23 Sep 2005 07:51:37 +0100

65 lines

Re: Data and Information Governance

Tim Trent

Thu, 22 Sep 2005 14:54:35 +0100

41 lines

Data and Information Governance

Hetty Sun

Thu, 22 Sep 2005 14:41:36 +0100

67 lines

Re: Retention of recorded phone conversations

Tim Trent

Thu, 22 Sep 2005 10:12:17 +0100

117 lines

Re: Jamster! - update

datap

Thu, 22 Sep 2005 09:19:36 +0100

132 lines

Retention of recorded phone conversations

Joshua McKim

Thu, 22 Sep 2005 09:17:28 +0100

55 lines

Re: Jamster! - update

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Thu, 22 Sep 2005 09:07:06 +0100

103 lines

Jamster! - update

Su Goulding

Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:19:16 +0100

76 lines

EU Proposals for retention of communications data - press release 21/09

Su Goulding

Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:59:58 +0100

77 lines

Re: Charging for confirmation of exam results

Simon Howarth

Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:03:56 +0100

101 lines

CRM and customers not giving permission

Julie Gibbs

Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:58:36 +0100

35 lines

Re: Charging for confirmation of exam results

Charles Christacopoulos

Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:41:43 +0100

65 lines

Charging for confirmation of exam results

Pat Gannon-Leary

Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:15:19 +0100

37 lines

Email Archiving

Jackie Leesons

Mon, 19 Sep 2005 15:38:18 +0100

35 lines

Re: Recording Telephone Calls

Simon Howarth

Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:07:18 +0100

68 lines

Re: Recording Telephone Calls

Roland Perry

Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:20:59 +0100

36 lines

Re: Recording Telephone Calls

PETER SELENIC

Fri, 16 Sep 2005 15:55:48 +0100

150 lines

Re: Recording Telephone Calls

<>

Fri, 16 Sep 2005 09:50:38 EDT

62 lines

Re: Recording Telephone Calls

Hitches, John F

Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:21:29 +0100

54 lines

High volume of FOI requests for personal data and other information

Pounder Chris

Fri, 16 Sep 2005 13:36:29 +0100

84 lines

Re: Recording Telephone Calls

Ibrahim Hasan

Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:33:06 +0100

90 lines

Re: Recording Telephone Calls

George Ross

Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:28:11 +0100

38 lines

Re: Recording Telephone Calls

Lisa Braund

Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:27:44 +0100

118 lines

Re: Recording Telephone Calls

Tim Turner

Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:24:09 +0100

77 lines

Recording Telephone Calls

Edwina Withe

Fri, 16 Sep 2005 12:19:23 +0100

37 lines

Re: Mobile Phone "Scam" Warning - Perhaps not a scam after all !!

David Wyatt

Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:25:38 +0100

343 lines

Re: Mobile Phone "Scam" Warning - Perhaps not a scam after all !!

iamAID Limited

Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:01:32 +0100

83 lines

Re: Data Audit

Simon Howarth

Thu, 15 Sep 2005 11:00:58 +0100

54 lines

Data Audit

Casillas, Mojgan

Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:14:14 +0100

43 lines

Re: Data Audit

Tim Trent

Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:10:20 +0100

67 lines

Re: Section 32

Ian Welton

Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:25:49 +0100

36 lines

Section 32

GRAHAM Susan

Wed, 14 Sep 2005 11:13:27 +0100

40 lines

Re: Mobile Phone "Scam" Warning - Perhaps not a scam after all !!

Graham Hadfield

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:52:20 +0100

35 lines

Re: Mobile Phone "Scam" Warning - Perhaps not a scam after all !!

Roland Perry

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:23:27 +0100

48 lines

Re: Mobile Phone "Scam" Warning - Perhaps not a scam after all !!

Martin Hoskins

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:07:44 +0100

287 lines

Re: Mobile Phone "Scam" Warning - Perhaps not a scam after all !!

Martin Hoskins

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:02:29 +0100

89 lines

Re: Mobile Phone "Scam" Warning - Perhaps not a scam after all !!

Mandi Barron

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 14:01:53 +0100

204 lines

Re: Mobile Phone "Scam" Warning - Perhaps not a scam after all !!

Roland Perry

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:48:28 +0100

37 lines

Re: Mobile Phone "Scam" Warning - Perhaps not a scam after all !!

Graham Hadfield

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:42:22 +0100

37 lines

Re: Mobile Phone "Scam" Warning - Perhaps not a scam after all !!

Roland Perry

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:06:39 +0100

55 lines

Mobile Phone "Scam" Warning - Perhaps not a scam after all !!

Martin Hoskins

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:28:37 +0100

117 lines

Re: FW: Employee record

<>

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 04:22:39 EDT

58 lines

Re: FW: Employee record

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:10:28 +0100

117 lines

Re: FW: Employee record

<>

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 04:08:05 EDT

60 lines

4th Annual Data Protection Conference

Lisa Braund

Tue, 13 Sep 2005 08:46:05 +0100

62 lines

Vacancy - EDRMS Project Manager

Nigel Wratten

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:29:44 +0100

80 lines

Re: T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:17:38 +0100

35 lines

FW: Employee record

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:33:54 +0100

273 lines

Re: Employee record

Tim Trent

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:23:26 +0100

105 lines

Re: Employee record

Jim Whitaker

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:04:29 +0100

73 lines

Re: T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Tim Trent

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:02:27 +0100

141 lines

Re: Employee record

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:00:00 +0100

196 lines

Re: T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

ALASDAIR WARWOOD

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 13:50:54 +0100

108 lines

Re: Employee record

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 13:46:19 +0100

34 lines

Re: Employee record

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 13:42:56 +0100

86 lines

Re: T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Tim Trent

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 13:36:02 +0100

74 lines

Re: T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 13:26:19 +0100

38 lines

Employee record

Scourfield, Brenda

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 13:24:04 +0100

27 lines

Re: T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Tim Trent

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 12:57:57 +0100

341 lines

Section 32

Ian Welton

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:53:27 +0100

34 lines

T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Devenish, Tom

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:22:19 +0100

298 lines

Dept of Work and Pensions

Jane Corrin

Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:08:13 +0100

36 lines

Re: Desperation an excuse for Data Protection? was T-Mobile

Lewis, Chris G.

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 14:47:30 +0100

46 lines

Re: Desperation an excuse for Data Protection? was T-Mobile

Ekin Caglar

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 14:46:09 +0100

39 lines

Re: T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Roland Perry

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 14:44:02 +0100

35 lines

Re: T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Chris Bayliss

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 14:16:42 +0100

42 lines

Re: Lapsed SARs?

Talbot Richard

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 13:33:57 +0100

115 lines

Re: Lapsed SARs?

Antoinette Carter

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 13:19:59 +0100

70 lines

Re: T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Antoinette Carter

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 13:07:46 +0100

141 lines

Re: Lapsed SARs?

Tim Trent

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 12:00:03 +0100

118 lines

Lapsed SARs?

Gerry Dane

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 11:41:17 +0100

43 lines

Re: T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Tim Trent

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 11:34:00 +0100

253 lines

Re: T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Edwina Withe

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 11:31:34 +0100

233 lines

Re: T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Tim Trent

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 10:15:26 +0100

145 lines

Re: T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Martin Hoskins

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 09:00:53 +0100

107 lines

Re: Obtaining Birth Certificates

<>

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 01:47:41 EDT

45 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Carl Johnson

Fri, 9 Sep 2005 00:13:02 +0100

296 lines

Re: T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Ian Welton

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 21:00:42 +0100

80 lines

Re: T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Tim Trent

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 17:51:31 +0100

117 lines

Re: Data Protection Staff Newsletter

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 17:31:51 +0100

202 lines

T-mobile - was Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Chris Bayliss

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 17:25:26 +0100

43 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 16:53:17 +0100

293 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Martin Hoskins

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 16:19:34 +0100

255 lines

(reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Alan Stead

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 16:00:09 +0100

395 lines

Seminar - Access to Information - 29 September at Buckfast Abbey

Carol Clarke

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 12:42:23 +0100

160 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 12:10:14 +0100

353 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Ian Welton

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 12:05:46 +0100

306 lines

Seniority and privacy

Mark Brookes

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 11:19:49 +0100

63 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Simon Howarth

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 10:08:29 +0100

349 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Tim Turner

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 10:05:38 +0100

292 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Ekin Caglar

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 09:58:17 +0100

250 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Simon Howarth

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 09:56:45 +0100

310 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Tim Trent

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 09:45:32 +0100

226 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Simon Howarth

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 09:00:46 +0100

169 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Graham Hadfield

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 08:05:42 +0100

27 lines

Re: Data Protection Staff Newsletter

Graham Hadfield

Thu, 8 Sep 2005 08:02:03 +0100

34 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Carl Johnson

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 20:51:26 +0100

111 lines

Re: Obtaining Birth Certificates

Roland Perry

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 20:20:44 +0100

37 lines

Re: Data Protection Staff Newsletter

Clementine Amawo

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 16:54:55 +0100

117 lines

Re: Data Protection Staff Newsletter

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 16:54:26 +0100

159 lines

Re: Data Protection Staff Newsletter

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 16:51:48 +0100

132 lines

Re: Obtaining Birth Certificates

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 15:47:14 +0100

152 lines

Re: Data Protection Staff Newsletter

Antoinette Carter

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 15:47:01 +0100

96 lines

Data Protection Staff Newsletter

Helen Bartram

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 15:20:37 +0100

64 lines

Re: [SPAM] - Re: [data-protection] (reply) Mobile phone scam warning - Email found in subject

Cotterill Steve

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 15:12:58 +0100

161 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

ALASDAIR WARWOOD

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 15:10:45 +0100

100 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Tim Trent

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 15:01:56 +0100

99 lines

Re: Obtaining Birth Certificates

Antoinette Carter

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 14:59:52 +0100

102 lines

Re: (reply) Mobile phone scam warning

Devenish, Tom

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 14:43:46 +0100

72 lines

Re: Obtaining Birth Certificates

Graham Hadfield

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 14:34:44 +0100

47 lines

Re: Mobile phone scam warning

Tim Turner

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 14:20:35 +0100

104 lines

Re: Obtaining Birth Certificates

<>

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 09:16:39 EDT

68 lines

Re: Obtaining Birth Certificates

Lewis, Chris G.

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 13:56:38 +0100

29 lines

Re: Obtaining Birth Certificates

Antoinette Carter

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 13:45:11 +0100

99 lines

Re: Obtaining Birth Certificates

Graham Hadfield

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 13:16:29 +0100

43 lines

Re: Fulfilling FoIA can break DPA

Lawrence Serewicz

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 12:55:48 +0100

166 lines

Re: Obtaining Birth Certificates

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 12:49:39 +0100

167 lines

Re: Obtaining Birth Certificates

Lewis, Chris G.

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 12:22:34 +0100

88 lines

Obtaining Birth Certificates

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 12:10:26 +0100

68 lines

Re: Mobile phone scam warning

Iain Harrison

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 09:26:22 +0100

139 lines

Re: Mobile phone scam warning

Lewis, Chris G.

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 09:10:56 +0100

51 lines

Re: Test data - retention of test results

Graham Hadfield

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 08:19:57 +0100

30 lines

Re: Mobile phone scam warning

Graham Hadfield

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 08:15:35 +0100

30 lines

Re: Mobile phone scam warning

Wilson, Stephen

Wed, 7 Sep 2005 07:59:29 +0100

126 lines

Mobile phone scam warning

Tom Devenish

Tue, 6 Sep 2005 23:10:50 +0100

49 lines

Re: reservations & data protection

Ian Welton

Tue, 6 Sep 2005 15:20:42 +0100

176 lines

Re: reservations & data protection

Antoinette Carter

Tue, 6 Sep 2005 12:52:11 +0100

80 lines

Re: reservations & data protection

Iain Harrison

Tue, 6 Sep 2005 12:50:51 +0100

98 lines

Re: reservations & data protection

Tim Trent

Tue, 6 Sep 2005 12:27:40 +0100

109 lines

reservations & data protection

Maureen Berry

Tue, 6 Sep 2005 12:07:07 +0100

44 lines

Re: Fulfilling FoIA can break DPA

Tim Turner

Tue, 6 Sep 2005 11:59:06 +0100

162 lines

Re: Fulfilling FoIA can break DPA

Tim Trent

Tue, 6 Sep 2005 11:57:46 +0100

150 lines

Re: Fulfilling FoIA can break DPA

Antoinette Carter

Tue, 6 Sep 2005 11:48:45 +0100

112 lines

Re: Test data - retention of test results

Ian Welton

Tue, 6 Sep 2005 11:33:06 +0100

112 lines

Fulfilling FoIA can break DPA

Tim Trent

Tue, 6 Sep 2005 11:06:21 +0100

86 lines

Fishing Trips

DREW Nic

Tue, 6 Sep 2005 10:27:28 +0100

99 lines

Re: Draft guidance on sharing information about young people - Consul tation

Graham Hadfield

Tue, 6 Sep 2005 09:01:35 +0100

35 lines

Re: Test data - retention of test results

Graham Hadfield

Tue, 6 Sep 2005 08:54:36 +0100

36 lines

Re: Child Data Sharing

Ibrahim Hasan

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 17:52:55 +0100

233 lines

Re: Test data - retention of test results

Ian Welton

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 17:14:10 +0100

114 lines

Re: Employer request

<>

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 09:19:29 EDT

66 lines

Re: Test data - retention of test results

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 13:59:32 +0100

38 lines

Re: Test data - retention of test results

Ian Welton

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 13:42:55 +0100

101 lines

Re: Test data - retention of test results

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 13:07:41 +0100

48 lines

Re: Employer request

Rob Dawson

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 12:33:03 +0100

117 lines

Re: Employer request

Lewis, Chris G.

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 12:13:24 +0100

24 lines

Re: Employer request

Charles Oppenhiem

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 12:07:26 +0100

557 lines

Re: Employer request

Tim Trent

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 12:07:00 +0100

555 lines

Re: Employer request

Rob Dawson

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 12:01:47 +0100

519 lines

Re: Employer request

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 11:43:48 +0100

123 lines

Re: Employer request

Tim Trent

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 11:43:11 +0100

415 lines

Re: Employer request

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 11:35:44 +0100

374 lines

Re: Employer request

Lawrence Serewicz

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 11:24:44 +0100

91 lines

Re: Employer request

Tim Trent

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 11:18:29 +0100

321 lines

Re: Employer request

Charles Oppenhiem

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 11:18:20 +0100

311 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] [data-protection] Employer request

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 11:14:48 +0100

83 lines

Re: Employer request

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 11:10:14 +0100

296 lines

Re: Employer request

Gerry Dane

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 11:09:40 +0100

307 lines

Re: Employer request

Tim Trent

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 11:08:21 +0100

281 lines

Re: Employer request

Charles Oppenhiem

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 11:07:43 +0100

248 lines

Re: Employer request

Tim Turner

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 10:57:11 +0100

248 lines

Re: Employer request

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 10:52:53 +0100

266 lines

Re: Employer request

Tim Trent

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 10:48:47 +0100

204 lines

Re: Test data - retention of test results

Ian Welton

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 10:21:35 +0100

88 lines

Re: Employer request

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 10:09:39 +0100

180 lines

Re: Employer request

Tim Trent

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 10:05:31 +0100

122 lines

Re: Employer request

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 09:47:14 +0100

100 lines

Re: Employer request

Tim Trent

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 09:37:10 +0100

102 lines

Employer request

Casillas, Mojgan

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 09:01:52 +0100

49 lines

Re: Test data - retention of test results

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 5 Sep 2005 08:21:42 +0100

46 lines

Re: Global TPS?

Charles Prescott

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 10:38:10 -0400

87 lines

Test data - retention of test results

Su Goulding

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 15:30:28 +0100

85 lines

Records Management Conference

Hetty Sun

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 15:09:58 +0100

53 lines

Re: Global TPS?

Roland Perry

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 14:46:25 +0100

39 lines

Re: "Do not re-employ" Lists

Roland Perry

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 14:40:35 +0100

51 lines

Re: Global TPS?

Charles Prescott

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 09:19:13 -0400

122 lines

Re: "Do not re-employ" Lists

Roland Perry

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 11:46:35 +0100

38 lines

Re: "Do not re-employ" Lists

Antoinette Carter

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 11:15:59 +0100

99 lines

Re: Global TPS?

Tim Turner

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 10:50:18 +0100

79 lines

Re: "Do not re-employ" Lists

Ian Welton

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 10:49:48 +0100

171 lines

Global TPS?

Duncan Smith

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 10:35:08 +0100

52 lines

Re: Draft guidance on sharing information about young people - Consul tation

Graham Hadfield

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 08:03:32 +0100

31 lines

Re: "Do not re-employ" Lists

<>

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 02:44:59 EDT

67 lines

Re: Potentially Violent List

<>

Fri, 2 Sep 2005 02:31:18 EDT

110 lines

Re: Child Data Sharing

Pounder Chris

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 16:48:18 +0100

183 lines

Re: Child Data Sharing

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 16:20:04 +0100

106 lines

Child Data Sharing

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 16:14:48 +0100

50 lines

Re: "Do not re-employ" Lists

Lewis, Chris G.

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 16:10:41 +0100

21 lines

Re: "Do not re-employ" Lists

Antoinette Carter

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 16:01:59 +0100

117 lines

Re: "Do not re-employ" Lists

Paul Ticher

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:57:00 +0100

87 lines

Draft guidance on sharing information about young people - Consul tation

Tim Turner

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:49:32 +0100

31 lines

Re: "Do not re-employ" Lists

Roland Perry

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:45:38 +0100

45 lines

Re: "Do not re-employ" Lists

Lewis, Chris G.

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:34:40 +0100

66 lines

"Do not re-employ" Lists

Antoinette Carter

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:27:35 +0100

45 lines

Re: Potentially Violent List

Roland Perry

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 13:11:42 +0100

65 lines

Re: Government consultation

Kirsty Gray

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 12:50:25 +0100

33 lines

Re: Potentially Violent List

Ian Welton

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 12:36:32 +0100

170 lines

Re: Potentially Violent List

Graham Hadfield

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 12:32:42 +0100

42 lines

Re: Potentially Violent List

Tim Turner

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 12:07:37 +0100

87 lines

Re: Potentially Violent List

Roland Perry

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 11:34:42 +0100

43 lines

Re: Potentially Violent List

Oakman Phil

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 11:15:30 +0100

124 lines

Re: Potentially Violent List

Tim Turner

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 11:00:56 +0100

157 lines

Government consultation

Smith, Tony

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 10:14:25 +0100

29 lines

Re: Potentially Violent List

<>

Thu, 1 Sep 2005 02:52:15 EDT

86 lines

Re: Potentially Violent List

Paul Ticher

Wed, 31 Aug 2005 17:41:38 +0100

283 lines

Re: Potentially Violent List

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:55:49 +0100

236 lines

Re: Potentially Violent List

Gibson, Martin

Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:55:29 +0100

232 lines

Re: Potentially Violent List

Julie Gibbs

Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:45:39 +0100

178 lines

Potentially Violent List

Steel, Rachael

Wed, 31 Aug 2005 09:27:59 +0100

80 lines

DATA PROTECTION UPDATE SESSIONS IN LONDON, GLASGOW AND MANCHESTER

Pounder Chris

Tue, 30 Aug 2005 12:11:49 +0100

86 lines

Re: Info Sharing Protocol

Stuart Lynch

Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:52:54 +0100

82 lines

Re: DP Qualifications

Stuart Lynch

Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:14:52 +0100

80 lines

Re: Maintaining e-mail distribution lists

Ian Welton

Sat, 27 Aug 2005 11:14:52 +0100

126 lines

Re: Maintaining e-mail distribution lists

Roland Perry

Fri, 26 Aug 2005 15:57:10 +0100

35 lines

Re: Maintaining e-mail distribution lists

Tinsley, Chris

Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:15:31 +0100

77 lines

Re: Maintaining e-mail distribution lists

Ekin Caglar

Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:02:30 +0100

88 lines

Re: Maintaining e-mail distribution lists

Roland Perry

Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:56:16 +0100

71 lines

Re: Silent calls - 'take an idea for a walk'

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:44:00 +0100

98 lines

Re: Maintaining e-mail distribution lists

Jason Campbell

Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:38:51 +0100

89 lines

Maintaining e-mail distribution lists

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:29:00 +0100

37 lines

Re: Silent calls - 'take an idea for a walk'

Ian Welton

Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:19:45 +0100

91 lines

Re: ICO e-mail alerts service

Roland Perry

Thu, 25 Aug 2005 13:07:06 +0100

33 lines

ICO e-mail alerts service

Ian Welton

Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:59:58 +0100

33 lines

FW: DP Qualifications

Jane Bartlett

Thu, 25 Aug 2005 10:19:30 +0100

88 lines

Re: DP Qualifications

Healy, Susan

Thu, 25 Aug 2005 10:13:22 +0100

111 lines

DP Qualifications

Casillas, Mojgan

Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:07:54 +0100

42 lines

Re: Silent calls - 'take an idea for a walk'

Roland Perry

Thu, 25 Aug 2005 07:55:44 +0100

39 lines

Re: Silent calls - 'take an idea for a walk'

Ian Welton

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 20:44:56 +0100

99 lines

Re: Silent calls - 'take an idea for a walk'

Roland Perry

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 18:16:34 +0100

39 lines

Re: Silent calls - 'take an idea for a walk'

Ian Welton

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 17:40:14 +0100

265 lines

Vacancy - FOI/DPA Officer

Nigel Wratten

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 14:12:49 +0100

63 lines

Re: Silent calls - 'take an idea for a walk'

Smith, Tony

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 14:10:33 +0100

218 lines

Re: Silent calls - 'take an idea for a walk'

Tim Turner

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:56:14 +0100

173 lines

Re: Silent calls - 'take an idea for a walk'

Graham Hadfield

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:49:39 +0100

32 lines

Re: Silent calls - 'take an idea for a walk'

Smith, Tony

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:34:37 +0100

137 lines

Thank you Re: [data-protection] traveller site information request

Lawrence Serewicz

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 10:13:37 +0100

47 lines

Re: Silent calls - 'take an idea for a walk'

Tim Turner

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 09:49:54 +0100

100 lines

salary grade for DP/FOI manager.

Casillas, Mojgan

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 09:46:09 +0100

42 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Roland Perry

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:42:20 +0100

43 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Roland Perry

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:42:05 +0100

35 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Roland Perry

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:41:58 +0100

56 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Roland Perry

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:41:17 +0100

32 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Roland Perry

Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:41:11 +0100

57 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Carl Johnson

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 17:10:27 +0100

235 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Duncan Smith

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:45:10 +0100

188 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Lewis, Chris G.

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:17:14 +0100

94 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Carl Johnson

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:12:51 +0100

130 lines

Re: Silent calls - 'take an idea for a walk'

Peter Dinsdale

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:09:56 +0100

86 lines

Silent calls - 'take an idea for a walk'

Duncan Smith

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:06:14 +0100

57 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Jason Campbell

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:05:48 +0100

413 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Duncan Smith

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:01:19 +0100

102 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Ian Welton

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 14:13:57 +0100

32 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Jeremy Kuper

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 11:31:11 +0100

38 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Andrew Cormack

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 11:20:03 +0100

366 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Carl Johnson

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:49:40 +0100

274 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Smith, Tony

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:15:27 +0100

223 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

David Wyatt

Tue, 23 Aug 2005 01:05:30 +0100

120 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Carl Johnson

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:52:08 +0100

208 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:47:03 +0100

183 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Carl Johnson

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:34:44 +0100

151 lines

Re: traveller site information request

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:29:35 +0100

128 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Smith, Tony

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 15:44:46 +0100

127 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Lewis, Chris G.

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 15:42:46 +0100

15 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Duncan Smith

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 15:38:16 +0100

101 lines

Re: traveller site information request

Edwina Withe

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:16:38 +0100

96 lines

traveller site information request

Lawrence Serewicz

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 12:42:14 +0100

58 lines

Re: Access to Chat Rooms

Roland Perry

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 11:36:50 +0100

40 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 10:55:28 +0100

53 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 10:35:54 +0100

137 lines

Access to Chat Rooms

Duncan Smith

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 10:12:38 +0100

70 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Nick Clark

Mon, 22 Aug 2005 10:08:54 +0100

132 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Christopher Spray

Sat, 20 Aug 2005 08:56:47 +0100

301 lines

NO MAIL

Mags McGinley

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 17:36:41 +0100

38 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Michael Jason Lord

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 15:53:22 +0100

275 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules righ t?

Tinsley, Chris

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 15:52:24 +0100

303 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Peter Dinsdale

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 15:30:51 +0100

265 lines

Re: [SPAM] - Re: [data-protection] Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right? - Email found in subject

Cotterill Steve

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 15:30:07 +0100

299 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Smith, Tony

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 15:19:03 +0100

237 lines

Re: Fairly Obtaining

Ian Welton

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:57:01 +0100

138 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Peter Dinsdale

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:47:49 +0100

182 lines

Re: [SPAM] - Re: [data-protection] Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right? - Email found in subject

Cotterill Steve

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:42:50 +0100

219 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Christopher Spray

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:38:03 +0100

102 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Smith, Tony

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:36:50 +0100

160 lines

Re:

Graham Lewis

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:28:05 +0100

252 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Tim Trent

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:10:22 +0100

172 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Andrew Cormack

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 14:01:41 +0100

156 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Tim Trent

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 13:22:04 +0100

98 lines

FW: [data-protection] Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules righ t?

John Hughes

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 13:16:09 +0100

106 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Nick Clark

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:51:12 +0100

53 lines

Re: Fairly Obtaining

Duncan Smith

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:37:51 +0100

75 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: [data-protection] Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Antoinette Carter

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:18:46 +0100

118 lines

Re: Fairly Obtaining

Ian Welton

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:01:38 +0100

183 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Graham Hadfield

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:18:34 +0100

28 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Tim Trent

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:04:48 +0100

79 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Tim Trent

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 11:02:15 +0100

111 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Graham Hadfield

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:36:32 +0100

45 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Smith, Tony

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:19:08 +0100

95 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Tim Trent

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:15:46 +0100

82 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:09:53 +0100

53 lines

Re: What breaches arise in this scenario - if any?

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:09:53 +0100

41 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Graham Hadfield

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 09:04:27 +0100

42 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Tim Trent

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 08:41:11 +0100

179 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Graham Hadfield

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 08:17:38 +0100

38 lines

Re: What breaches arise in this scenario - if any?

Roland Perry

Fri, 19 Aug 2005 06:38:41 +0100

37 lines

Re: What breaches arise in this scenario - if any?

Christopher Spray

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 22:33:31 +0100

95 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Roland Perry

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 19:26:04 +0100

55 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Carl Johnson

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:42:45 +0100

105 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Chris Bayliss

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:37:47 +0100

45 lines

Re: What breaches arise in this scenario - if any?

Roland Perry

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:27:34 +0100

63 lines

Re: Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Roland Perry

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:19:04 +0100

47 lines

What breaches arise in this scenario - if any?

Chris Spray

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:27:01 +0100

34 lines

Silent Calls - are the DMA's new rules right?

Tim Trent

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:10:00 +0100

61 lines

Re: Fairly Obtaining

Duncan Smith

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:54:08 +0100

131 lines

Information Notice - New Employees

<>

Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:10:03 +0100

54 lines

Re: lost documents

Rob Dawson

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 17:04:34 +0100

87 lines

Re: lost documents

Antoinette Carter

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 14:19:37 +0100

107 lines

lost documents

Casillas, Mojgan

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 13:55:59 +0100

41 lines

Re: lost documents

Jim Whitaker

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 13:52:23 +0100

82 lines

Re: Personnel records - SAR

Graham Hadfield

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 13:43:09 +0100

30 lines

Free Leaflets from DCA

Alan Stead

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:01:15 +0100

53 lines

Re: Redaction software

Shipway, Andy (Strategic Services, Corp Performance Policy & Info - Solihull MBC)

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:47:11 +0100

116 lines

Redaction software

David Powell

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:39:01 +0100

66 lines

Re: A side issue on "Fairly Obtaining"

Roland Perry

Tue, 16 Aug 2005 08:02:04 +0100

93 lines

Re: A side issue on "Fairly Obtaining"

Tim Trent

Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:54:21 +0100

301 lines

Re: A side issue on "Fairly Obtaining"

Jo Archer

Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:17:45 +0100

256 lines

Re: Fairly Obtaining

Ian Welton

Mon, 15 Aug 2005 14:17:42 +0100

142 lines

Re: A side issue on "Fairly Obtaining"

Tim Trent

Mon, 15 Aug 2005 12:45:09 +0100

203 lines

Re: A side issue on "Fairly Obtaining"

Hodgetts, Jonathan

Mon, 15 Aug 2005 12:31:34 +0100

132 lines

Re: A side issue on "Fairly Obtaining"

Tim Trent

Mon, 15 Aug 2005 12:13:14 +0100

134 lines

Re: A side issue on "Fairly Obtaining"

Hodgetts, Jonathan

Mon, 15 Aug 2005 11:56:38 +0100

79 lines

A side issue on "Fairly Obtaining"

Tim Trent

Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:44:17 +0100

58 lines

Re: Fairly Obtaining

Tim Trent

Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:29:58 +0100

85 lines

Fairly Obtaining

Ian Welton

Sun, 14 Aug 2005 21:04:14 +0100

32 lines

Re: Personnel records - SAR

Antoinette Carter

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:59:38 +0100

71 lines

Personnel records - SAR

Jansen, Hope

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 16:25:37 +0100

42 lines

The fascination of auto-replies

Tim Trent

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:45:09 +0100

78 lines

Re: SAR - Durant - Litigation

Michael Doherty

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:39:00 +0100

33 lines

Re: SAR - Durant - Litigation

ALASDAIR WARWOOD

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:38:18 +0100

64 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: [data-protection] SAR - Durant - Litigation

Tim Trent

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:35:20 +0100

227 lines

Re: SAR - Durant - Litigation

Michael Doherty

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:28:47 +0100

35 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: [data-protection] SAR - Durant - Litigation

Antoinette Carter

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:20:59 +0100

200 lines

Re: SAR - Durant - Litigation

Roland Perry

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:18:58 +0100

34 lines

Re: SAR - Durant - Litigation

ALASDAIR WARWOOD

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 13:52:47 +0100

174 lines

Re: SAR - Durant - Litigation

Antoinette Carter

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 13:44:51 +0100

145 lines

Re: SAR - Durant - Litigation

ALASDAIR WARWOOD

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 13:32:48 +0100

115 lines

Re: SAR - Durant - Litigation

Antoinette Carter

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:50:12 +0100

88 lines

SAR - Durant - Litigation

Rob Dawson

Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:18:08 +0100

54 lines

Re: Data protection and / or FOI Evaluation survey

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:30:31 +0100

48 lines

Info Sharing Protocol

Clementine Amawo

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:46:18 +0100

43 lines

Re: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Nick Clark

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:37:28 +0100

48 lines

Re: UOW SUSPECT: RE: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Holt, Mark

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:53:11 +0100

166 lines

Re: UOW SUSPECT: RE: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Mandi Barron

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:04:00 +0100

133 lines

Re: UOW SUSPECT: RE: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Roland Perry

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 11:53:00 +0100

70 lines

Re: UOW SUSPECT: RE: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Mandi Barron

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 11:24:55 +0100

234 lines

Re: UOW SUSPECT: RE: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Roland Perry

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:37:25 +0100

34 lines

Re: Tenants addresses

Shipway, Andy (Strategic Services, Corp Performance Policy & Info - Solihull MBC)

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:15:50 +0100

197 lines

Re: Tenants addresses

Healy, Susan

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:55:44 +0100

180 lines

Re: Tenants addresses

Lisa Braund

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:52:42 +0100

180 lines

Re: Tenants addresses

Alan Stead

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:42:21 +0100

119 lines

Tenants addresses

Sara-Jane Newbon

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:34:43 +0100

63 lines

Re: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Roland Perry

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 09:05:05 +0100

35 lines

UOW SUSPECT: RE: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Owen Parry

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 07:26:17 +0100

176 lines

Re: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Mary Liddell

Thu, 11 Aug 2005 06:49:15 +0100

178 lines

Re: Data protection and / or FOI Evaluation sur vey

Wiper, Carl

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:09:48 +0100

128 lines

Re: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Andrew Charlesworth

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:06:13 -0400

130 lines

Re: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Roland Perry

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:08:51 +0100

38 lines

Re: BT - Breach of DPA?

Carl Johnson

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:01:24 +0100

109 lines

Re: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Mandi Barron

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:57:05 +0100

206 lines

Re: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Andrew Charlesworth

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:32:24 -0400

143 lines

Re: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Andrew Charlesworth

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:09:32 -0400

135 lines

Re: [SPAM] - Re: [data-protection] data protection and dates of birth in the US. - Email found in subject

Cotterill Steve

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:19:44 +0100

142 lines

Re: data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Mary Liddell

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:17:27 +0100

85 lines

data protection and dates of birth in the US.

Jarvis Rachel

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 14:46:41 +0100

46 lines

Establishing authority to deal with a third party

Emma Bothamley

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 14:15:53 +0100

57 lines

Data protection and / or FOI Evaluation survey

Helen Bartram

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:41:06 +0100

60 lines

Concessionary Travel Card Application Form

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:36:49 +0100

58 lines

Re: BT - Breach of DPA?

ALASDAIR WARWOOD

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:27:45 +0100

78 lines

Re: Retention of security breach information

Roland Perry

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:22:27 +0100

41 lines

Retention of security breach information

datap

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:43:47 +0100

79 lines

Re: BT - Breach of DPA?

Graham Hadfield

Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:16:32 +0100

31 lines

BT - Breach of DPA?

Carl Johnson

Tue, 9 Aug 2005 19:51:26 +0100

43 lines

CCTV

Sara-Jane Newbon

Fri, 5 Aug 2005 13:56:30 +0100

59 lines

Re: Multiple Language Statements

Paul Ticher

Fri, 5 Aug 2005 10:22:29 +0100

72 lines

Re: Multiple Language Statements

Paul Baker

Fri, 5 Aug 2005 09:49:44 +0100

76 lines

Re: Multiple Language Statements

DREW Nic

Fri, 5 Aug 2005 08:38:42 +0100

102 lines

Multiple Language Statements

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Thu, 4 Aug 2005 21:56:38 +0100

35 lines

dissertations, copyright and PSI

Healy, Susan

Thu, 4 Aug 2005 08:39:34 +0100

78 lines

Re: Subject Access Fee

Bownes David (CEX)

Thu, 4 Aug 2005 08:04:53 +0100

88 lines

Subject Access Fee

Rob Dawson

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 17:09:12 +0100

45 lines

Re: dissertations and copyright

Mandi Barron

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 16:57:18 +0100

167 lines

Re: dissertations and copyright

Laurence Bebbington

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 16:44:20 +0100

123 lines

Re: An amazing story about an email gone wrong

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 16:42:57 +0100

96 lines

Re: dissertations and copyright

Antoinette Carter

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 16:33:46 +0100

80 lines

Re: dissertations and copyright

Antoinette Carter

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 16:31:42 +0100

490 lines

Re: dissertations and copyright

Graham Lewis

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 16:30:30 +0100

146 lines

Re: dissertations and copyright

Laurence Bebbington

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 16:14:37 +0100

54 lines

Re: dissertations and copyright

Mandi Barron

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 16:08:57 +0100

468 lines

Re: dissertations and copyright

Laurence Bebbington

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 15:55:26 +0100

397 lines

Re: An amazing story about an email gone wrong

Carl Johnson

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 15:07:53 +0100

104 lines

An amazing story about an email gone wrong

Robert Melville

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 14:42:28 +0100

73 lines

Re: The perils of e-mail

Robert Melville

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 13:09:12 +0100

71 lines

Re: The perils of e-mail

Robert Melville

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 13:05:07 +0100

48 lines

The perils of e-mail

Robert Melville

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 12:22:08 +0100

38 lines

Re: dissertations and copyright

Healy, Susan

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 10:45:13 +0100

168 lines

Re: dissertations and copyright

Mandi Barron

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 10:31:29 +0100

131 lines

dissertations and copyright

Healy, Susan

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 10:28:22 +0100

93 lines

Re: ICO good practice guide

Mandi Barron

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 10:00:49 +0100

219 lines

Re: ICO good practice guide

Rob Dawson

Wed, 3 Aug 2005 09:03:10 +0100

167 lines

ICO good practice guide

Ian Welton

Tue, 2 Aug 2005 16:59:20 +0100

30 lines

Re: ICO good practice guide

Rob Dawson

Tue, 2 Aug 2005 16:53:48 +0100

86 lines

Re: ICO good practice guide

Hitches, John F

Tue, 2 Aug 2005 16:50:06 +0100

50 lines

Re: Council Tax data sharing scheme

<>

Mon, 1 Aug 2005 03:37:17 EDT

85 lines

Council Tax data sharing scheme

Roland Perry

Mon, 1 Aug 2005 08:22:13 +0100

42 lines

Re: Severity Scales for ICT Breaches

Jethro R Binks

Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:28:03 +0100

47 lines

Re: Lost alumni

Mandi Barron

Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:07:08 +0100

80 lines

Re: Lost alumni

Roland Perry

Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:26:50 +0100

41 lines

Re: A Principle 8 question

Charles Prescott

Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:21:23 -0400

98 lines

Severity Scales for ICT Breaches

Steel, Rachael

Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:57:19 +0100

70 lines

Re: Results in the public domain

Lynzie Gadd, Examinations

Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:30:14 +0100

44 lines

Re: Lost alumni

Tim Trent

Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:25:06 +0100

157 lines

Re: Lost alumni

Antoinette Carter

Thu, 28 Jul 2005 10:03:38 +0100

134 lines

Re: Lost alumni

Tim Trent

Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:26:26 +0100

107 lines

Lost alumni

Pat Gannon-Leary

Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:16:37 +0100

42 lines

A Principle 8 question

Les Kingstone

Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:37:09 +0100

47 lines

Proposed Adoption

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:56:46 +0100

61 lines

Re: 'Tax Credit Act 2002 (Schedule 5)'

Alan Stead

Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:23:46 +0100

203 lines

Re: A FRiday question

Andrea Simmons

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 21:28:58 +0100

146 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] A FRiday question

Roland Perry

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 17:03:28 +0100

51 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] A FRiday question

Tim Trent

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 16:51:17 +0100

137 lines

FW: [data-protection] A FRiday question

John Hughes

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 16:46:14 +0100

102 lines

Re: A FRiday question

Tim Trent

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 16:40:10 +0100

72 lines

Re: A FRiday question

Lewis, Chris G.

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 16:39:04 +0100

45 lines

Disclosing to IR or CSA

Brenda Scourfield

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 15:09:24 +0100

24 lines

Re: 'Tax Credit Act 2002 (Schedule 5)'

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 14:54:00 +0100

148 lines

A FRiday question

Hitches, John F

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 14:50:29 +0100

53 lines

Re: Data matching - UKPS

Ian Welton

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:41:23 +0100

126 lines

Re: 'Tax Credit Act 2002 (Schedule 5)'

Julie Gibbs

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 13:14:17 +0100

90 lines

Re: Data matching - UKPS

Graham Hadfield

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 12:47:13 +0100

33 lines

Re: 'Tax Credit Act 2002 (Schedule 5)'

Roland Perry

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 12:21:22 +0100

41 lines

Re: Data matching - UKPS

Tim Turner

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 12:17:22 +0100

100 lines

Big Brother Awards 2005

Tim Trent

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 12:00:44 +0100

64 lines

Re: Data matching - UKPS

Tim Trent

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:28:01 +0100

60 lines

Re: Data matching - UKPS

Graham Hadfield

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:23:42 +0100

31 lines

Re: Data matching - UKPS

Tim Trent

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 11:05:05 +0100

116 lines

Data matching - UKPS

DREW Nic

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:53:50 +0100

80 lines

Re: 'Tax Credit Act 2002 (Schedule 5)'

Julie Gibbs

Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:14:42 +0100

112 lines

Re: Photographs and retention

Julie Gibbs

Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:45:26 +0100

132 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] [data-protection] Photographs and retention

Ian Welton

Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:33:49 +0100

145 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] [data-protection] Photographs and retention

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:41:22 +0100

156 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] [data-protection] Photographs and retention

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:28:10 +0100

105 lines

Re: Photographs and retention

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:58:57 +0100

200 lines

Re: Photographs and retention

Tim Trent

Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:52:03 +0100

142 lines

'Tax Credit Act 2002 (Schedule 5)'

Brenda Scourfield

Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:51:50 +0100

27 lines

Photographs and retention

datap

Thu, 21 Jul 2005 11:44:47 +0100

76 lines

Useful Website

Graham Hadfield

Thu, 21 Jul 2005 08:32:07 +0100

34 lines

Re: Credit card details

davidwyatt

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 21:57:27 +0100

107 lines

Re: Credit card details

Roland Perry

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 17:45:49 +0100

54 lines

Re: Credit card details

Tim Trent

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 17:22:13 +0100

113 lines

Credit card details

Fiona Musgrave

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 17:18:46 +0100

46 lines

'Tax Credit Act 2002 (Schedule 5)'

Brenda Scourfield

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 16:30:37 +0100

24 lines

Re: NROSH National Register of Social Housing

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 13:59:32 +0100

234 lines

Re: India and the 8th principle

Paul Ferguson

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 13:55:24 +0100

117 lines

Re: Data Export - Was India and the 8th principle

Tim Trent

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 12:54:49 +0100

144 lines

Re: India and the 8th principle

ALASDAIR WARWOOD

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 12:52:23 +0100

136 lines

Re: India and the 8th principle

Charles Prescott

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 07:31:17 -0400

85 lines

Re: India and the 8th principle

Charles Prescott

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 07:24:47 -0400

139 lines

E-payslips / self service HR systems

datap

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 12:21:12 +0100

75 lines

Re: Data protection in the movies

Maurice Frankel

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 11:37:31 +0100

52 lines

Re: India and the 8th principle

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 11:05:00 +0100

89 lines

India and the 8th principle

John Hughes

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 10:42:19 +0100

46 lines

Re: NROSH National Register of Social Housing

Lewis Bourne

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 10:25:20 +0100

181 lines

FW: [data-protection] Data protection in the movies

John Hughes

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 10:18:15 +0100

68 lines

Re: Data protection in the movies

Graham Hadfield

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:47:59 +0100

32 lines

Re: Data protection in the movies

Peter Burgess

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:39:28 +0100

57 lines

Re: Data protection in the movies

Robert Melville

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:27:00 +0100

55 lines

Re: Data protection in the movies

Julian Curmi

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 10:23:52 +0200

248 lines

Re: Data protection in the movies

Oakman Phil

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:21:34 +0100

55 lines

Data protection in the movies

Susan Graham

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:12:52 +0100

29 lines

Re: NROSH National Register of Social Housing

Alan Stead

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:10:45 +0100

130 lines

NROSH National Register of Social Housing

Susan Ferguson

Wed, 20 Jul 2005 08:52:02 +0100

70 lines

Credit Records - update

Mandi Barron

Tue, 19 Jul 2005 12:40:34 +0100

52 lines

Re: Credit records

Graham Hadfield

Tue, 19 Jul 2005 10:12:32 +0100

30 lines

Credit records

Mandi Barron

Tue, 19 Jul 2005 09:24:19 +0100

77 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Nick Clark

Mon, 18 Jul 2005 16:29:26 +0100

52 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Roland Perry

Sun, 17 Jul 2005 17:14:42 +0100

37 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Sat, 16 Jul 2005 18:50:26 +0100

32 lines

Data Protection in the UAE

Tim Trent

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 17:31:57 +0100

56 lines

Re: Up-to-date Data Protection Act

Caroline Dominey

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 15:59:50 +0100

238 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Ian Welton

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 15:23:42 +0100

214 lines

Next of Kin

Brenda Scourfield

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 15:18:30 +0100

26 lines

Re: Next of Kin

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:58:55 +0100

54 lines

Re: Next of Kin

Tim Turner

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:40:56 +0100

62 lines

Re: Next of Kin

Carl Johnson

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:38:20 +0100

63 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Su Beesley

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:34:29 +0100

117 lines

Next of Kin

Brenda Scourfield

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:30:56 +0100

25 lines

FW: VERY IMPORTANT POLICE MESSAGE - www.communitysafe.org

Hodgetts, Jonathan

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:25:00 +0100

105 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Carl Johnson

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:24:24 +0100

207 lines

FW: [data-protection] Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

John Hughes

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:22:41 +0100

206 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Julia Hudson

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:20:16 +0100

80 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Tim Trent

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:19:26 +0100

177 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Tim Trent

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:17:45 +0100

152 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Carl Johnson

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:14:52 +0100

152 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

datap

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:10:50 +0100

128 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Julia Hudson

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:09:18 +0100

46 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Roland Perry

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 14:04:39 +0100

47 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Oakman Phil

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 13:44:26 +0100

119 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Lewis Bourne

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 12:22:41 +0100

93 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Roland Perry

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 10:56:27 +0100

39 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Chris Bayliss

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 10:24:57 +0100

41 lines

Re: Legal Rights (was Monitoring of call, sms and emaildata)

Ian Welton

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 09:30:12 +0100

114 lines

Re: Legal Rights (was Monitoring of call, sms and emaildata)

<>

Fri, 15 Jul 2005 01:27:45 EDT

61 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Thu, 14 Jul 2005 23:01:01 +0100

158 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Carl Johnson

Thu, 14 Jul 2005 22:16:08 +0100

132 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Tim Trent

Thu, 14 Jul 2005 18:58:23 +0100

65 lines

Re: Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Carl Johnson

Thu, 14 Jul 2005 17:38:52 +0100

326 lines

Chris Lewis is correct - it is a SCAM

Pounder Chris

Thu, 14 Jul 2005 17:35:15 +0100

248 lines

IMPORTANT INFO REGARDING LONDON UNDERGROUND - STATEMENT BEING ISSUED FROM MET

Pounder Chris

Thu, 14 Jul 2005 17:15:50 +0100

187 lines

Re: Covert monitoring - 'other information'

Ian Welton

Thu, 14 Jul 2005 13:40:49 +0100

218 lines

Re: Legal Rights (was Monitoring of call, sms and emaildata)

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 14 Jul 2005 13:30:17 +0100

152 lines

Re: Legal Rights (was Monitoring of call, sms and email data)

Carl Johnson

Thu, 14 Jul 2005 12:03:28 +0100

144 lines

Legal Rights (was Monitoring of call, sms and email data)

<>

Thu, 14 Jul 2005 06:47:24 EDT

74 lines

Re: Advice needed - customers in conflict

Ken Allen

Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:43:41 +0100

29 lines

Re: Interesting query regarding CVs

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:21:18 +0100

32 lines

Re: Covert monitoring - 'other information'

Andrew Cormack

Thu, 14 Jul 2005 08:48:01 +0100

158 lines

Re: Advice needed - customers in conflict

Tim Turner

Thu, 14 Jul 2005 08:26:14 +0100

102 lines

Re: Covert monitoring - 'other information'

Ian Welton

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 16:16:41 +0100

157 lines

Re: Covert monitoring - 'other information'

Paul Ticher

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 16:07:09 +0100

129 lines

Re: Covert monitoring - 'other information'

Tim Trent

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 15:45:43 +0100

149 lines

Covert monitoring - 'other information'

Emma Bothamley

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 15:28:55 +0100

69 lines

Re: Advice needed - customers in conflict

Tim Trent

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 15:07:07 +0100

67 lines

Advice needed - customers in conflict

Graeme Hawley

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:45:44 +0100

35 lines

Re: Commissioner's Annual Report - News Release

Tim Trent

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:35:44 +0100

44 lines

Re: Monitoring of call, sms and email data

Carl Johnson

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:35:16 +0100

189 lines

Commissioner's Annual Report - News Release

Lisa Braund

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:23:02 +0100

159 lines

Re: Monitoring of call, sms and email data

Carl Johnson

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:21:15 +0100

112 lines

Re: Monitoring of call, sms and email data

<>

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 09:01:40 EDT

72 lines

Re: Monitoring of call, sms and email data

<>

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 08:52:41 EDT

44 lines

Re: Monitoring of call, sms and email data

Tim Trent

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 13:29:42 +0100

107 lines

Re: Interesting query regarding CVs

Ian Welton

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 11:40:03 +0100

206 lines

Re: Interesting query regarding CVs

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 10:54:03 +0100

228 lines

Re: Interesting query regarding CVs

Tim Turner

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 09:50:22 +0100

79 lines

Re: Interesting query regarding CVs

<>

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 04:49:53 EDT

88 lines

Re: Interesting query regarding CVs

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 09:48:11 +0100

179 lines

Re: Interesting query regarding CVs

Donald Henderson

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 09:46:32 +0100

176 lines

Re: Interesting query regarding CVs

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 09:46:18 +0100

257 lines

Re: Interesting query regarding CVs

Brenda Scourfield

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 09:32:28 +0100

28 lines

Re: Interesting query regarding CVs

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 09:14:07 +0100

132 lines

Re: Interesting query regarding CVs

<>

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 02:49:55 EDT

69 lines

Monitoring of call, sms and email data

Carl Johnson

Wed, 13 Jul 2005 07:35:48 +0100

70 lines

Re: Interesting query regarding CVs

Roland Perry

Tue, 12 Jul 2005 19:07:17 +0100

45 lines

Re: Interesting query regarding CVs

Tim Trent

Tue, 12 Jul 2005 15:51:39 +0100

154 lines

Re: Interesting query regarding CVs

Antoinette Carter

Tue, 12 Jul 2005 15:51:38 +0100

142 lines

Re: Interesting query regarding CVs

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Tue, 12 Jul 2005 15:36:35 +0100

100 lines

Re: Sensitive Data

Lisa Braund

Tue, 12 Jul 2005 14:19:01 +0100

97 lines

Sensitive Data

Les Kingstone

Tue, 12 Jul 2005 14:16:06 +0100

36 lines

PhD pre viva reports

Pat Gannon-Leary

Tue, 12 Jul 2005 14:10:51 +0100

41 lines

Re: Handling a SAR outside the Act

Tim Trent

Tue, 12 Jul 2005 13:22:21 +0100

264 lines

Re: Handling a SAR outside the Act

Tim Turner

Tue, 12 Jul 2005 13:12:03 +0100

201 lines

Re: Handling a SAR outside the Act

Antoinette Carter

Tue, 12 Jul 2005 12:52:20 +0100

164 lines

Re: Handling a SAR outside the Act

Tim Trent

Tue, 12 Jul 2005 12:28:02 +0100

112 lines

Re: Handling a SAR outside the Act

Jim Whitaker

Tue, 12 Jul 2005 12:21:55 +0100

80 lines

Re: Handling a SAR outside the Act

Hodgetts, Jonathan

Tue, 12 Jul 2005 12:17:23 +0100

132 lines

Re: Handling a SAR outside the Act

Donald Henderson

Tue, 12 Jul 2005 12:01:24 +0100

117 lines

Re: Handling a SAR outside the Act

Tim Trent

Tue, 12 Jul 2005 11:53:15 +0100

118 lines

Handling a SAR outside the Act

Hodgetts, Jonathan

Tue, 12 Jul 2005 11:48:34 +0100

49 lines

Re: Interesting query regarding CVs

Alan Redhead

Tue, 12 Jul 2005 11:42:16 +0100

141 lines

Interesting query regarding CVs

Paula owen

Tue, 12 Jul 2005 11:29:59 +0100

62 lines

Re: Reassuring! There IS a need for privacy officers!

Tim Trent

Tue, 12 Jul 2005 11:01:51 +0100

173 lines

Re: Parental permission

Gerry Dane

Tue, 12 Jul 2005 10:42:28 +0100

164 lines

A little entertainment

Carl Johnson

Tue, 12 Jul 2005 10:16:53 +0100

159 lines

Re: Parental permission

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 12 Jul 2005 10:14:40 +0100

149 lines

Re: Parental permission

Gerry Dane

Tue, 12 Jul 2005 09:59:55 +0100

116 lines

Re: Reassuring! There IS a need for privacy officers!

Jo Archer

Tue, 12 Jul 2005 09:34:30 +0100

179 lines

Re: Parental permission

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 12 Jul 2005 09:27:57 +0100

83 lines

Re: Reassuring! There IS a need for privacy officers!

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Tue, 12 Jul 2005 09:23:30 +0100

135 lines

Re: Parental permission

Ken Allen

Tue, 12 Jul 2005 08:56:21 +0100

30 lines

Re: Reassuring! There IS a need for privacy officers!

Tim Trent

Mon, 11 Jul 2005 21:14:17 +0100

132 lines

Re: Reassuring! There IS a need for privacy officers!

Charles Christacopoulos

Mon, 11 Jul 2005 21:06:31 +0100

101 lines

Reassuring! There IS a need for privacy officers!

Tim Trent

Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:51:32 +0100

90 lines

Re: Parental permission

Tim Trent

Mon, 11 Jul 2005 18:12:58 +0100

181 lines

Disclosure to Utilities

Brenda Scourfield

Mon, 11 Jul 2005 15:36:38 +0100

22 lines

Closing Down Sale (last advert from Keep IT Legal Ltd)

<>

Mon, 11 Jul 2005 09:39:38 EDT

69 lines

Re: New Teachers Information

<>

Mon, 11 Jul 2005 09:25:29 EDT

63 lines

Re: Data Protection Act

Maurice Frankel

Mon, 11 Jul 2005 14:08:37 +0100

238 lines

Re: Parental permission

Rob Dawson

Mon, 11 Jul 2005 11:55:19 +0100

130 lines

New Teachers Information

Louise Widd

Mon, 11 Jul 2005 11:51:44 +0100

31 lines

Re: Parental permission

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Mon, 11 Jul 2005 11:42:40 +0100

78 lines

Re: Parental permission

Donald Henderson

Mon, 11 Jul 2005 11:14:30 +0100

98 lines

Parental permission

Dr Jonathan Davies

Mon, 11 Jul 2005 09:56:39 +0100

44 lines

Re: Up-to-date Data Protection Act

Edwina Withe

Fri, 8 Jul 2005 11:00:52 +0100

257 lines

Up-to-date Data Protection Act

GRAHAM Susan

Fri, 8 Jul 2005 10:29:12 +0100

149 lines

Re: Data Protection Act

Tim Turner

Thu, 7 Jul 2005 12:13:41 +0100

167 lines

Re: DPA and Confidentiality

Paul Ticher

Thu, 7 Jul 2005 11:45:52 +0100

222 lines

Re: DPA and Confidentiality

<>

Thu, 7 Jul 2005 05:36:08 EDT

86 lines

Re: Non living individuals

Ken Allen

Thu, 7 Jul 2005 10:33:24 +0100

67 lines

Re: DPA and Confidentiality

Tim Trent

Thu, 7 Jul 2005 10:22:55 +0100

177 lines

Re: Unregistered Keepers

Ian Welton

Thu, 7 Jul 2005 10:07:56 +0100

169 lines

Re: DPA and Confidentiality

Peter Burgess

Thu, 7 Jul 2005 09:39:32 +0100

158 lines

Re: Data Protection Act

Paul Ticher

Thu, 7 Jul 2005 09:22:07 +0100

121 lines

Re: DPA and Confidentiality

Ken Allen

Thu, 7 Jul 2005 09:21:59 +0100

34 lines

Re: Unregistered Keepers

<>

Thu, 7 Jul 2005 01:55:43 EDT

66 lines

Re: DPA and Confidentiality

Paul Ticher

Wed, 6 Jul 2005 17:19:10 +0100

106 lines

Re: Data Protection Act

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 6 Jul 2005 16:37:40 +0100

195 lines

Re: DPA and Confidentiality

Rob Dawson

Wed, 6 Jul 2005 14:01:40 +0100

253 lines

Re: DPA and Confidentiality

Tim Trent

Wed, 6 Jul 2005 13:59:57 +0100

202 lines

Re: DPA and Confidentiality

Rob Dawson

Wed, 6 Jul 2005 13:46:58 +0100

171 lines

Re: Unregistered Keepers

Roland Perry

Wed, 6 Jul 2005 12:30:56 +0100

39 lines

Unregistered Keepers

This list is for those interested in Data Protection issues [[log in to unmask]]

Wed, 6 Jul 2005 11:30:01 +0100

30 lines

Re: Data Protection Act

Jim Whitaker

Wed, 6 Jul 2005 10:57:22 +0100

142 lines

Re: DPA and Confidentiality

Tim Trent

Wed, 6 Jul 2005 10:33:10 +0100

109 lines

DPA and Confidentiality

Nick Clark

Wed, 6 Jul 2005 10:19:51 +0100

46 lines

Re: Data Protection Act

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Wed, 6 Jul 2005 09:23:35 +0100

82 lines

Privacy caselaw

Ibrahim Hasan

Wed, 6 Jul 2005 09:21:23 +0100

39 lines

Data Protection Act

Caroline Dominey

Wed, 6 Jul 2005 09:16:47 +0100

47 lines

Re: Non living individuals

Graham Hadfield

Wed, 6 Jul 2005 09:02:02 +0100

31 lines

Email best practice guidance from DMA

Justice, Sally A

Tue, 5 Jul 2005 14:30:46 +0100

43 lines

Re: Accident Books

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 5 Jul 2005 10:27:51 +0100

86 lines

Re: Accident Books

Graham Hadfield

Tue, 5 Jul 2005 10:26:25 +0100

29 lines

Re: Accident Books

Tim Trent

Tue, 5 Jul 2005 10:08:36 +0100

106 lines

Accident Books

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 5 Jul 2005 09:56:07 +0100

52 lines

Re: Health records

GM Polato

Mon, 4 Jul 2005 16:37:04 +0100

45 lines

Torbay Council: Information & Security Manager Vacancy

Humberstone, Steve

Mon, 4 Jul 2005 14:51:57 +0100

74 lines

Health records

Brenda Scourfield

Mon, 4 Jul 2005 14:19:28 +0100

30 lines

Going on holiday and suspend your mail from Mailign Lists

Justice, Sally A

Fri, 1 Jul 2005 09:56:00 +0100

61 lines

Leave

Smith, Tony

Fri, 1 Jul 2005 09:45:40 +0100

32 lines

Re: Elected Members access to Departmental Computer Systems

Graham Hadfield

Fri, 1 Jul 2005 09:33:05 +0100

33 lines

Elected Members access to Departmental Computer Systems

<>

Fri, 1 Jul 2005 09:19:32 +0100

60 lines

FW: Data Protection presentation

Chris Brogan

Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:11:43 +0100

125 lines

Re: email requesting Subject Access Request

Ian Welton

Wed, 29 Jun 2005 12:42:03 +0100

186 lines

Re: email requesting Subject Access Request

<>

Wed, 29 Jun 2005 06:53:06 EDT

61 lines

Re: email requesting Subject Access Request

Tim Trent

Wed, 29 Jun 2005 11:41:37 +0100

98 lines

Re: email requesting Subject Access Request

Les Kingstone

Wed, 29 Jun 2005 11:27:14 +0100

70 lines

Re: email requesting Subject Access Request

Tim Trent

Wed, 29 Jun 2005 11:19:42 +0100

54 lines

Re: email requesting Subject Access Request

Les Kingstone

Wed, 29 Jun 2005 11:12:58 +0100

27 lines

Re: email requesting Subject Access Request

Tim Trent

Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:53:23 +0100

322 lines

Re: email requesting Subject Access Request

Donald Henderson

Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:36:52 +0100

270 lines

Re: email requesting Subject Access Request

Tim Trent

Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:28:01 +0100

222 lines

Re: email requesting Subject Access Request

Turner8

Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:23:44 +0100

193 lines

Re: email requesting Subject Access Request

Turner8

Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:22:39 +0100

198 lines

Re: email requesting Subject Access Request

Donald Henderson

Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:08:49 +0100

175 lines

Re: email requesting Subject Access Request

Tim Trent

Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:03:03 +0100

162 lines

Re: email requesting Subject Access Request

Clementine Amawo

Wed, 29 Jun 2005 09:52:34 +0100

175 lines

Re: email requesting Subject Access Request

Turner8

Wed, 29 Jun 2005 08:52:13 +0100

111 lines

Re: email requesting Subject Access Request

Graham Hadfield

Wed, 29 Jun 2005 08:02:43 +0100

29 lines

Re: email requesting Subject Access Request

Oakman Phil

Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:50:55 +0100

84 lines

Re: email requesting Subject Access Request

Tim Trent

Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:45:15 +0100

56 lines

Re: email requesting Subject Access Request

Donald Henderson

Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:41:51 +0100

83 lines

email requesting Subject Access Request

Brenda Scourfield

Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:06:29 +0100

28 lines

Re: Request for data

Barbara Booth

Tue, 28 Jun 2005 13:11:44 +0100

72 lines

consent form

Helen Bartram

Tue, 28 Jun 2005 12:16:25 +0100

62 lines

Conundrum

Sara-Jane Newbon

Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:21:26 +0100

69 lines

Re: Contract Statements

Ibrahim Hasan

Sun, 26 Jun 2005 23:15:59 +0100

28 lines

Re: Internal staff SAR

Ian Welton

Sun, 26 Jun 2005 10:12:19 +0100

237 lines

Re: Request for data

Smith, Tony

Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:31:46 +0100

86 lines

Re: Request for data

Iain Harrison

Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:02:03 +0100

97 lines

Re: Request for data

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:01:34 +0100

40 lines

Re: Request for data

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:49:56 +0100

102 lines

Re: Request for data

Bownes David (CEX)

Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:42:38 +0100

118 lines

Re: Request for data

Smith, Tony

Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:33:50 +0100

85 lines

Re: Internal staff SAR

<>

Fri, 24 Jun 2005 04:51:09 EDT

86 lines

Request for data

Barbara Booth

Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:37:09 +0100

54 lines

Re: Internal staff SAR

Ian Welton

Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:35:47 +0100

116 lines

Re: Internal staff SAR

Simon Macaulay

Thu, 23 Jun 2005 16:27:17 +0100

36 lines

Re: Internal staff SAR

Ian Welton

Thu, 23 Jun 2005 15:49:22 +0100

131 lines

Re: Internal staff SAR

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Thu, 23 Jun 2005 15:33:27 +0100

84 lines

Re: Internal staff SAR

Simon Macaulay

Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:47:24 +0100

38 lines

Re: Internal staff SAR

Lewis, Chris G.

Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:40:18 +0100

21 lines

Re: Internal staff SAR

Ian Welton

Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:34:29 +0100

93 lines

Internal staff SAR

Simon Macaulay

Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:22:09 +0100

32 lines

Invitation: Data Protection & the Retail Industry 2005: Morning Briefing

Paul Ferguson

Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:05:48 +0100

135 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] [data-protection] Internal staff SAR

Antoinette Carter

Thu, 23 Jun 2005 12:19:24 +0100

98 lines

Re: Internal staff SAR

Paul Ticher

Thu, 23 Jun 2005 11:22:55 +0100

78 lines

Re: Internal staff SAR

Tim Trent

Thu, 23 Jun 2005 11:21:43 +0100

65 lines

Internal staff SAR

Simon Macaulay

Thu, 23 Jun 2005 11:10:49 +0100

37 lines

Re: Sharing Consent Form

Paul Ticher

Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:16:29 +0100

195 lines

Re: Sharing Consent Form

Hilary Lawrenson

Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:34:14 +0100

146 lines

Sharing Consent Form

Helen Bartram

Tue, 21 Jun 2005 08:43:26 +0100

64 lines

Re: Information request

Ian Welton

Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:12:54 +0100

115 lines

Re: Information request

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:46:52 +0100

33 lines

Re: Information request

Mandi Barron

Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:24:57 +0100

102 lines

Information request

Casillas, Mojgan

Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:24:25 +0100

53 lines

Re: Recording of Care visits

Ian Welton

Mon, 20 Jun 2005 13:18:55 +0100

262 lines

Re: Recording of Care visits

Tim Turner

Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:36:41 +0100

149 lines

Re: Recording of Care visits

Lewis, Chris G.

Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:19:22 +0100

73 lines

Re: Recording of Care visits

<>

Mon, 20 Jun 2005 06:57:51 EDT

68 lines

Re: Recording of Care visits

Lewis, Chris G.

Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:53:50 +0100

94 lines

Re: Recording of Care visits

Donald Henderson

Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:43:58 +0100

103 lines

Re: Recording of Care visits

<>

Mon, 20 Jun 2005 05:33:37 EDT

50 lines

Re: Recording of Care visits

Lewis, Chris G.

Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:38:15 +0100

58 lines

Re: Recording of Care visits

Tim Turner

Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:38:10 +0100

72 lines

Re: Recording of Care visits

Bownes David (CEX)

Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:37:59 +0100

84 lines

Recording of Care visits

Paul Dodgson

Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:23:13 +0100

35 lines

Re: SI 2005 No 1515

Ibrahim Hasan

Fri, 17 Jun 2005 17:10:07 +0100

201 lines

Re: SI 2005 No 1515

Julie Gibbs

Fri, 17 Jun 2005 15:54:50 +0100

153 lines

Re: Non living individuals

Graham Hadfield

Fri, 17 Jun 2005 14:52:51 +0100

35 lines

Re: Consent for medical students to examine patients for teaching

Smith, Tony

Fri, 17 Jun 2005 14:03:54 +0100

157 lines

Re: Consent for medical students to examine patients for teaching

Paul Ticher

Fri, 17 Jun 2005 12:49:40 +0100

109 lines

Re: Consent for medical students to examine patients for teaching

Roland Perry

Fri, 17 Jun 2005 12:34:16 +0100

51 lines

Consent for medical students to examine patients for teaching

Anne Gadsden

Fri, 17 Jun 2005 12:08:44 +0100

52 lines

Re: Disclosure of Information

Roland Perry

Fri, 17 Jun 2005 09:34:34 +0100

41 lines

Re: SI 2005 No 1515

Healy, Susan

Fri, 17 Jun 2005 08:47:27 +0100

125 lines

Re: SI 2005 No 1515

Smith, Tony

Fri, 17 Jun 2005 08:46:30 +0100

170 lines

Disclosure of Information

Bridget Brook

Fri, 17 Jun 2005 08:34:24 +0100

34 lines

Durant update if interested

Pounder Chris

Thu, 16 Jun 2005 18:20:32 +0100

47 lines

Re: SI 2005 No 1515

Pounder Chris

Thu, 16 Jun 2005 18:18:35 +0100

142 lines

Re: SI 2005 No 1515

Edwina Withe

Thu, 16 Jun 2005 18:02:45 +0100

88 lines

Re: SI 2005 No 1515

Paul Ticher

Thu, 16 Jun 2005 17:44:35 +0100

90 lines

SI 2005 No 1515

Smith, Tony

Thu, 16 Jun 2005 17:16:59 +0100

56 lines

Re: Office of Public Sector Information

Smith, Tony

Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:45:40 +0100

97 lines

Re: Office of Public Sector Information

Paul Ticher

Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:43:21 +0100

68 lines

Re: Office of Public Sector Information

Healy, Susan

Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:36:31 +0100

76 lines

Office of Public Sector Information

Smith, Tony

Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:31:25 +0100

27 lines

Non living individuals

Healy, Susan

Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:16:16 +0100

137 lines

Non living individuals

Susan Ferguson

Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:06:35 +0100

80 lines

The glass consumer

Helen Bolton

Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:57:41 +0100

46 lines

Re: e-learning

Gemma Jones

Tue, 14 Jun 2005 11:59:55 +0100

152 lines

Re: e-learning

Tim Trent

Tue, 14 Jun 2005 11:23:55 +0100

93 lines

e-learning

Steel, Rachael

Tue, 14 Jun 2005 11:14:27 +0100

61 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Ian Welton

Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:45:44 +0100

247 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

<>

Mon, 13 Jun 2005 08:41:08 EDT

110 lines

Extracting Information From Databases

Healy, Susan

Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:38:55 +0100

110 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Tim Turner

Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:54:32 +0100

190 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:42:56 +0100

119 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

<>

Mon, 13 Jun 2005 06:47:44 EDT

63 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Disclosure or not?

Ian Welton

Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:23:19 +0100

556 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Lynne Skipsey

Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:37:38 +0100

723 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Disclosure or not?

davidwyatt

Sun, 12 Jun 2005 23:31:19 +0100

63 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Disclosure or not?

davidwyatt

Sun, 12 Jun 2005 23:12:56 +0100

407 lines

Re: Privacy filters

Ian Welton

Sun, 12 Jun 2005 11:04:56 +0100

101 lines

Re: That Citibank error

Ian Welton

Sun, 12 Jun 2005 10:54:12 +0100

140 lines

Re: That Citibank error

Saundra Kae Rubel

Sat, 11 Jun 2005 17:30:05 -0500

77 lines

Re: New DP Guidance from ICO - this time with links

Saundra Kae Rubel

Sat, 11 Jun 2005 17:23:57 -0500

53 lines

New DP Guidance from ICO

Gillian Whichelo

Sat, 11 Jun 2005 17:56:38 +0100

39 lines

Re: That Citibank error

davidwyatt

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 23:19:40 +0100

91 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Disclosure or not?

Roland Perry

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:41:51 +0100

32 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Disclosure or not?

Roland Perry

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 19:58:37 +0100

42 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Disclosure or not?

Roland Perry

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 19:54:20 +0100

38 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Disclosure or not?

Roland Perry

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 19:45:21 +0100

36 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Roland Perry

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 19:39:03 +0100

43 lines

Re: Extracting Information From Databases

Ian Welton

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 17:34:08 +0100

52 lines

Re: Extracting Information From Databases

Ben Cawley

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:24:09 +0100

226 lines

Re: Extracting Information From Databases

Ben Cawley

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:58:35 +0100

130 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Tim Trent

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:29:53 +0100

844 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Lewis, Chris G.

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:05:36 +0100

584 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Tim Trent

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:58:44 +0100

755 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Michael DOHERTY PSE 53852

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:47:45 +0100

669 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Lewis, Chris G.

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:47:44 +0100

468 lines

Re: Non living individuals

Smith, Tony

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:46:56 +0100

215 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: [data-protection] FW: [data-protection] Disclosure or not?

Margarita Rainford

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:41:23 +0100

722 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Tim Trent

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:32:57 +0100

557 lines

Photographs

datap

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:31:47 +0100

82 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] Re: [data-protection] FW: [data-protection] Disclosure or not?

Antoinette Carter

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:28:50 +0100

537 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Disclosure or not?

Tim Turner

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:16:11 +0100

471 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Disclosure or not?

Tim Trent

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:05:27 +0100

58 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Disclosure or not?

Lewis, Chris G.

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 13:52:19 +0100

23 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] [data-protection] FW: [data-protection] Disclosure or not?

Antoinette Carter

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 13:38:21 +0100

421 lines

Re: FoI Disclosures (was disclosure or not?)

Hawley, Graeme

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 13:32:56 +0100

586 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Disclosure or not?

Tim Trent

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 13:28:42 +0100

401 lines

FW: [data-protection] Disclosure or not?

John Hughes

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 13:23:27 +0100

360 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Antoinette Carter

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 13:21:22 +0100

306 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Redfern Catherine

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 13:19:31 +0100

567 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Margarita Rainford

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 13:09:30 +0100

429 lines

Re: FoI Disclosures (was disclosure or not?)

Tim Trent

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 13:05:41 +0100

349 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Hawley, Graeme

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 13:00:37 +0100

462 lines

Re: Phone Fraud - Warning from the Police - Beware of urban myths

Jethro R Binks

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:59:49 +0100

176 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

<>

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 07:56:03 EDT

64 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Disclosure or not?

Jethro R Binks

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:55:50 +0100

345 lines

Re: Non living individuals

Tim Turner

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:55:31 +0100

181 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Tim Trent

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:51:31 +0100

332 lines

Re: Phone Fraud - Warning from the Police - Beware of urban myths

Carl Johnson

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:47:33 +0100

149 lines

Re: Wonderful TICO quality control

Charles Prescott

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 07:46:16 -0400

237 lines

FW: [data-protection] Disclosure or not?

John Hughes

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:46:15 +0100

294 lines

Re: Wonderful TICO quality control

Tim Trent

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:44:47 +0100

238 lines

Re: Wonderful TICO quality control

Ian Welton

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:44:09 +0100

289 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Margarita Rainford

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:42:07 +0100

174 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Tim Trent

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:41:38 +0100

262 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Hawley, Graeme

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:40:16 +0100

334 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Tim Trent

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:38:30 +0100

206 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Jethro R Binks

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:35:05 +0100

183 lines

Re: Extracting Information From Databases

Donald Henderson

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:34:36 +0100

101 lines

Re: Extracting Information From Databases

Ben Cawley

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:26:23 +0100

49 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Tim Trent

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:25:51 +0100

148 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Antoinette Carter

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:20:38 +0100

78 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Lewis, Chris G.

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:18:28 +0100

84 lines

Re: Disclosure or not?

Tim Trent

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:14:50 +0100

81 lines

Re: Phone Fraud - Warning from the Police - Beware of urban myths

Antoinette Carter

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:14:25 +0100

133 lines

Disclosure or not?

John Hughes

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:08:47 +0100

45 lines

Re: Phone Fraud - Warning from the Police - Beware of urban myths

Tim Trent

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:51:22 +0100

100 lines

Phone Fraud - Warning from the Police - Beware of urban myths

Hitches, John F

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:48:36 +0100

86 lines

Re: Phone Fraud - 100% HOAX

Tim Trent

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:41:13 +0100

117 lines

Phone Fraud - Warning from the Police

Justice, Sally A

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:35:16 +0100

56 lines

Re: Phone Fraud - Warning from the Police

Tim Trent

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:35:00 +0100

95 lines

That Citibank error

Tim Trent

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:14:50 +0100

62 lines

Re: Wonderful TICO quality control

Tim Trent

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 10:10:53 +0100

188 lines

Re: Non living individuals

DREW Nic

Fri, 10 Jun 2005 09:58:35 +0100

134 lines

Re: Wonderful TICO quality control

Maurice Frankel

Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:52:35 +0100

125 lines

Re: Non living individuals

Tim Trent

Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:20:35 +0100

93 lines

Non living individuals

Susan Ferguson

Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:16:19 +0100

70 lines

Apologies for the spilt link.

Ian Welton

Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:10:25 +0100

39 lines

Articles of possible interest

Ian Welton

Thu, 9 Jun 2005 16:40:11 +0100

44 lines

Wonderful TICO quality control

Tim Trent

Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:24:53 +0100

75 lines

Extracting Information From Databases

Ben Cawley

Thu, 9 Jun 2005 13:33:16 +0100

36 lines

Audit Commission Report - ICT Fraud and Abuse.

Ian Welton

Thu, 9 Jun 2005 11:33:33 +0100

34 lines

Contract Statements

Steel, Rachael

Thu, 9 Jun 2005 10:50:03 +0100

62 lines

Re: DP/FOI

Tim Trent

Wed, 8 Jun 2005 17:07:02 +0100

119 lines

Re: DP/FOI

Casillas, Mojgan

Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:55:34 +0100

82 lines

DP/FOI

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:40:08 +0100

49 lines

Reporting Figures

Julie Gibbs

Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:24:09 +0100

39 lines

Re: Student use of personal data

Anne Thompson

Wed, 8 Jun 2005 11:50:04 +0100

128 lines

SAR and Legal Proceedings

Gillian Whichelo

Tue, 7 Jun 2005 14:06:11 +0100

30 lines

Re: Act now. Now that is spam!

Tim Trent

Tue, 7 Jun 2005 11:50:31 +0100

58 lines

Re: Act now. Now that is spam!

Roland Perry

Tue, 7 Jun 2005 09:49:52 +0100

83 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

Ian Welton

Tue, 7 Jun 2005 09:22:42 +0100

177 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

Ian Welton

Tue, 7 Jun 2005 09:22:42 +0100

157 lines

Re: Act now. Now that is spam!

Tim Trent

Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:49:57 +0100

74 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

Graham Hadfield

Tue, 7 Jun 2005 08:22:02 +0100

42 lines

Re: Act now. Now that is spam!

Charles Christacopoulos

Mon, 6 Jun 2005 22:42:41 +0100

134 lines

Re: Act now. Now that is spam!

Tim Trent

Mon, 6 Jun 2005 21:33:46 +0100

149 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

<>

Mon, 6 Jun 2005 15:46:04 EDT

78 lines

Act now. Now that is spam!

Charles Christacopoulos

Mon, 6 Jun 2005 19:10:03 +0100

57 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

Ian Welton

Mon, 6 Jun 2005 16:27:12 +0100

200 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

Smith, Tony

Mon, 6 Jun 2005 15:42:49 +0100

121 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

Ian Welton

Mon, 6 Jun 2005 15:13:16 +0100

96 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

<>

Mon, 6 Jun 2005 09:46:38 EDT

65 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:31:40 +0100

32 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

Ian Welton

Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:58:15 +0100

136 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 6 Jun 2005 09:08:28 +0100

55 lines

Re: Relevant filing system

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 6 Jun 2005 08:25:39 +0100

38 lines

Relevant filing system

Thomas Devenish

Mon, 6 Jun 2005 01:43:14 +0100

34 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

<>

Sat, 4 Jun 2005 08:31:25 EDT

65 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

<>

Sat, 4 Jun 2005 08:26:00 EDT

69 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

Ian Welton

Fri, 3 Jun 2005 15:36:34 +0100

170 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

Graham Hadfield

Fri, 3 Jun 2005 14:46:34 +0100

62 lines

Re: Notification

Tim Trent

Fri, 3 Jun 2005 14:18:15 +0100

92 lines

Re: Notification

Chris Brogan

Fri, 3 Jun 2005 14:03:33 +0100

69 lines

Notification

Sarah Henning

Fri, 3 Jun 2005 13:26:54 +0100

33 lines

Re: Student use of personal data

Jim Whitaker

Fri, 3 Jun 2005 12:46:56 +0100

73 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

Ian Welton

Fri, 3 Jun 2005 12:32:19 +0100

307 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

Lawrence Serewicz

Fri, 3 Jun 2005 10:55:07 +0100

200 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

Ian Welton

Fri, 3 Jun 2005 10:33:06 +0100

253 lines

Re: Student use of personal data

Ian Welton

Fri, 3 Jun 2005 10:33:06 +0100

212 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

Yuill, Allan

Fri, 3 Jun 2005 09:48:28 +0100

212 lines

FW: Student use of personal data

Hitches, John F

Fri, 3 Jun 2005 08:36:36 +0100

111 lines

Re: Student use of personal data

Chris Brogan

Fri, 3 Jun 2005 08:01:01 +0100

158 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

davidwyatt

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 21:07:08 +0100

131 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

<>

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 15:09:25 EDT

71 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

Ian Welton

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 19:21:16 +0100

317 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

Antoinette Carter

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 17:47:43 +0100

254 lines

Re: Student use of personal data

Samantha Hill

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 15:51:54 +0100

116 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

Lewis, Chris G.

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 15:48:19 +0100

22 lines

Re: Student use of personal data

Mary Liddell

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 15:35:54 +0100

120 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

Ian Welton

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 15:35:44 +0100

231 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 15:32:53 +0100

62 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

Tim Trent

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 15:23:55 +0100

246 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

Tim Turner

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 15:21:45 +0100

220 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

Tim Trent

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 15:15:58 +0100

186 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

Tim Turner

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 15:07:49 +0100

157 lines

Re: Planning Applications

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 15:06:56 +0100

215 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

Tim Turner

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 15:06:25 +0100

139 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

Oakman Phil

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 14:52:57 +0100

133 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

Antoinette Carter

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 14:38:55 +0100

105 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

<>

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 09:18:54 EDT

71 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

Ian Welton

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 13:27:54 +0100

174 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

Tim Turner

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 12:09:52 +0100

92 lines

Planning Applications

<>

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 06:29:03 EDT

96 lines

Student use of personal data

Hitches, John F

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 11:28:55 +0100

103 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

Lewis, Chris G.

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 10:49:51 +0100

59 lines

ICO- SARs and Legal Proceedings

Gillian Whichelo

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 10:46:56 +0100

33 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

Lawrence Serewicz

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 10:34:44 +0100

219 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Tim Trent

Thu, 2 Jun 2005 09:33:16 +0100

164 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Roland Perry

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 19:35:42 +0100

32 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Ekin Caglar

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 18:53:01 +0100

66 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Roland Perry

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 18:23:28 +0100

35 lines

Data protection and freedom of information consultancy

David Gunn

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 16:32:19 +0100

34 lines

Re: Access to Personal Statements

Graham Hadfield

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 15:36:15 +0100

31 lines

Re: Access to Personal Statements

Peter Dinsdale

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 15:19:36 +0100

108 lines

Reponse from OIC

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 15:17:29 +0100

42 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

Donald Henderson

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 15:15:07 +0100

153 lines

Access to Personal Statements

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 14:51:17 +0100

70 lines

IADIS Conference - more Qs than As

Duncan Smith

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 14:17:03 +0100

125 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

<>

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 09:10:42 EDT

68 lines

Re: Opinions sought - Planning Applications

Jim Whitaker

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 13:55:14 +0100

88 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Ekin Caglar

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 13:37:56 +0100

63 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Roland Perry

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 13:28:24 +0100

36 lines

Opinions sought - Planning Applications

<>

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 07:20:24 EDT

58 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Tim Trent

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 11:39:24 +0100

129 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Ekin Caglar

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 11:32:04 +0100

70 lines

Re: spam and email lists (and adverts)

Tim Trent

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 10:02:00 +0100

120 lines

Re: Lists held "remotely" - Who is the Data Controller

Tim Trent

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 10:00:09 +0100

131 lines

Re: spam and email lists (and adverts)

Lewis, Chris G.

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 09:58:05 +0100

75 lines

Re: spam and email lists (and adverts)

<>

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 04:51:47 EDT

85 lines

Re: Lists held "remotely" - Who is the Data Controller

Lewis, Chris G.

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 09:50:50 +0100

79 lines

Lists held "remotely" - Who is the Data Controller

Tim Trent

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 09:41:42 +0100

65 lines

Re: That conference. You are wrong to complain!

Tim Trent

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 09:29:42 +0100

64 lines

Re: spam and email lists (was "That conference. You are wrong to complain!")

Lewis, Chris G.

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 09:15:56 +0100

39 lines

Re: That conference. You are wrong to complain!

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 1 Jun 2005 08:27:01 +0100

290 lines

Re: That conference. You are wrong to complain!

Tim Trent

Tue, 31 May 2005 18:17:47 +0100

227 lines

That conference. You are wrong to complain!

Charles Christacopoulos

Tue, 31 May 2005 17:53:06 +0100

166 lines

Oops!

Tim Trent

Tue, 31 May 2005 17:25:04 +0100

31 lines

Re: WWW/Internet 2005 (2nd call extension): Call forPapers

Rob Dawson

Tue, 31 May 2005 17:24:39 +0100

43 lines

Re: WWW/Internet 2005 (2nd call extension): Call forPapers

Tim Trent

Tue, 31 May 2005 17:22:45 +0100

125 lines

Re: WWW/Internet 2005 (2nd call extension): Call forPapers

McKay, Pat

Tue, 31 May 2005 17:15:11 +0100

111 lines

Re: WWW/Internet 2005 (2nd call extension): Call forPapers

Lewis, Chris G.

Tue, 31 May 2005 17:02:34 +0100

58 lines

Re: WWW/Internet 2005 (2nd call extension): Call forPapers

Ekin Caglar

Tue, 31 May 2005 17:00:23 +0100

68 lines

Re: WWW/Internet 2005 (2nd call extension): Call forPapers

Lawrence Serewicz

Tue, 31 May 2005 16:52:49 +0100

39 lines

Re: WWW/Internet 2005 (2nd call extension): Call for Papers

Tim Trent

Tue, 31 May 2005 16:35:32 +0100

199 lines

Re: WWW/Internet 2005 (2nd call extension): Call for Papers

Ugonwa Ekweozor

Tue, 31 May 2005 16:19:31 +0100

164 lines

Re: WWW/Internet 2005 (2nd call extension): Call for Papers

Peter Dinsdale

Tue, 31 May 2005 16:10:53 +0100

112 lines

Re: WWW/Internet 2005 (2nd call extension): Call for Papers

Tim Trent

Tue, 31 May 2005 16:01:17 +0100

177 lines

Re: WWW/Internet 2005 (2nd call extension): Call for Papers

Lewis, Chris G.

Tue, 31 May 2005 15:53:33 +0100

80 lines

Re: WWW/Internet 2005 (2nd call extension): Call for Papers

Tim Trent

Tue, 31 May 2005 15:47:45 +0100

88 lines

WWW/Internet 2005 (2nd call extension): Call for Papers

Natália Reis

Tue, 31 May 2005 15:37:54 +0100

361 lines

Re: SARS - Access to assessment information

Ian Welton

Tue, 31 May 2005 15:27:30 +0100

217 lines

Re: SARS - Access to assessment information

Clementine Amawo

Tue, 31 May 2005 11:24:20 +0100

204 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Ian Welton

Mon, 30 May 2005 16:16:24 +0100

333 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Roland Perry

Sat, 28 May 2005 07:05:45 +0100

43 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Paul Ticher

Fri, 27 May 2005 16:50:49 +0100

263 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Paul Ticher

Fri, 27 May 2005 16:22:16 +0100

349 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Smith, Tony

Fri, 27 May 2005 16:15:47 +0100

219 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Tim Trent

Fri, 27 May 2005 15:52:59 +0100

312 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Paul Ticher

Fri, 27 May 2005 15:30:43 +0100

170 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Graham Lewis

Fri, 27 May 2005 15:30:32 +0100

281 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Peter Dinsdale

Fri, 27 May 2005 15:23:31 +0100

132 lines

Re: Data subject rights - deleting data

Tim Trent

Fri, 27 May 2005 15:12:24 +0100

86 lines

Data subject rights - deleting data

Sally Gibson

Fri, 27 May 2005 14:58:23 +0100

33 lines

Re: "Payslip Marketing"

Tim Trent

Fri, 27 May 2005 13:10:11 +0100

164 lines

Re: "Payslip Marketing"

Tim Trent

Fri, 27 May 2005 13:09:46 +0100

103 lines

Re: "Payslip Marketing"

Christopher Spray

Fri, 27 May 2005 12:52:41 +0100

80 lines

Re: "Payslip Marketing"

Sally Justice

Fri, 27 May 2005 12:00:52 +0100

141 lines

"Payslip Marketing"

Tim Trent

Fri, 27 May 2005 11:55:41 +0100

55 lines

Re: Discussion lists for students and educational purposes

davidwyatt

Thu, 26 May 2005 20:45:12 +0100

117 lines

Re: SARS - Access to assessment information

Julie Gibbs

Thu, 26 May 2005 17:07:09 +0100

102 lines

Re: Discussion lists for students and educational purposes

Paul Ticher

Thu, 26 May 2005 11:30:06 +0100

139 lines

Re: Discussion lists for students and educational purposes

Charles Christacopoulos

Thu, 26 May 2005 11:13:06 +0100

79 lines

Discussion lists for students and educational purposes

Pat Gannon-Leary

Thu, 26 May 2005 09:58:44 +0100

36 lines

Re: Marketing - DPA law vs. best practise

Duncan Smith

Wed, 25 May 2005 22:22:35 +0100

86 lines

Re: Advertising on the Forum

Tim Trent

Wed, 25 May 2005 19:05:40 +0100

112 lines

Re: Advertising on the Forum

Tinsley, Chris

Wed, 25 May 2005 16:09:11 +0100

84 lines

Re: Advertising on the Forum

Ekin Caglar

Wed, 25 May 2005 16:01:10 +0100

55 lines

Employment Practices DP Training Day - Exeter

Gill Smith

Wed, 25 May 2005 15:34:12 +0100

40 lines

Re: Advertising on the Forum

Lewis, Chris G.

Wed, 25 May 2005 11:42:57 +0100

21 lines

Re: Advertising on the Forum

Lewis, Chris G.

Wed, 25 May 2005 10:56:54 +0100

47 lines

Advertising on the Forum

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Wed, 25 May 2005 10:50:11 +0100

40 lines

ADV - DPA/RIPA/HRA awareness for CCTV operators/managers

<>

Wed, 25 May 2005 05:08:25 EDT

61 lines

SARS - Access to assessment information

Clementine Amawo

Wed, 25 May 2005 10:05:27 +0100

41 lines

Re: Request for Details of Fireworks Traders

Maurice Frankel

Tue, 24 May 2005 18:10:02 +0100

190 lines

Re: Request for Details of Fireworks Traders

Maurice Frankel

Tue, 24 May 2005 18:03:50 +0100

171 lines

Re: Sole Traders

<>

Tue, 24 May 2005 05:25:33 EDT

60 lines

Re: Sole Traders

davidwyatt

Mon, 23 May 2005 20:42:39 +0100

69 lines

New to DP

Casillas, Mojgan

Mon, 23 May 2005 15:26:31 +0100

34 lines

Re: Employee Investigation

<>

Mon, 23 May 2005 07:01:52 EDT

101 lines

Data Protection & FOI Officer Vacancy

Fatima Zohra

Mon, 23 May 2005 11:57:52 +0100

63 lines

Re: Sole Traders

Lewis, Chris G.

Mon, 23 May 2005 11:54:36 +0100

116 lines

Re: Sole Traders

<>

Mon, 23 May 2005 06:48:37 EDT

65 lines

Employee Investigation

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 23 May 2005 11:41:23 +0100

65 lines

Re: Sole Traders

Graham Lewis

Mon, 23 May 2005 11:26:03 +0100

141 lines

FW: [data-protection] Sole Traders

Mandi Barron

Mon, 23 May 2005 11:08:08 +0100

142 lines

Re: Sole Traders

<>

Mon, 23 May 2005 06:04:37 EDT

87 lines

Re: Sole Traders

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 23 May 2005 09:57:24 +0100

84 lines

Sole Traders

Brenda Scourfield

Mon, 23 May 2005 09:29:11 +0100

33 lines

Re: Recording disciplinary hearings

davidwyatt

Sat, 21 May 2005 14:14:39 +0100

102 lines

Re: Recording disciplinary hearings

Ian Welton

Fri, 20 May 2005 11:49:39 +0100

120 lines

Re: Recording disciplinary hearings

Andrew Charlesworth

Fri, 20 May 2005 11:48:43 +0100

77 lines

Recording disciplinary hearings

Pat Gannon-Leary

Fri, 20 May 2005 09:43:55 +0100

41 lines

Re: Electronic Electoral Register

<>

Wed, 18 May 2005 07:01:28 EDT

76 lines

Suggestions for Data Protection Audit

Andrew Horner

Wed, 18 May 2005 11:47:28 +0100

36 lines

Re: Electronic Electoral Register

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 18 May 2005 11:29:18 +0100

90 lines

Staff grievance request

Susan Ferguson

Wed, 18 May 2005 11:18:35 +0100

80 lines

Adv. Re-use of Public Sector data briefing.

Paul Simpkins

Wed, 18 May 2005 10:59:40 +0100

38 lines

Electronic Electoral Register

Brenda Scourfield

Wed, 18 May 2005 10:54:57 +0100

26 lines

Marketing - DPA law vs. best practise

Turner8

Tue, 17 May 2005 10:27:07 +0100

36 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Ian Welton

Mon, 16 May 2005 15:48:14 +0100

459 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Tim Trent

Mon, 16 May 2005 13:12:13 +0100

405 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Ian Welton

Mon, 16 May 2005 13:00:01 +0100

374 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Tim Trent

Mon, 16 May 2005 10:53:53 +0100

418 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Ian Welton

Mon, 16 May 2005 10:40:48 +0100

401 lines

Re: DATs - registration

Tim Trent

Mon, 16 May 2005 10:39:36 +0100

117 lines

Adv- Surveillance Law and RIPA course

Ibrahim Hasan

Mon, 16 May 2005 10:00:56 +0100

56 lines

Re: DATs - registration

Adam Warren

Mon, 16 May 2005 09:10:22 +0100

30 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Tim Trent

Mon, 16 May 2005 08:56:09 +0100

309 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Ian Welton

Sat, 14 May 2005 15:35:58 +0100

290 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

<>

Fri, 13 May 2005 15:15:49 EDT

59 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Tim Trent

Fri, 13 May 2005 17:52:57 +0100

184 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Roland Perry

Fri, 13 May 2005 16:24:21 +0100

40 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Ian Welton

Fri, 13 May 2005 15:52:07 +0100

157 lines

Re: Disproportionate Effort

Ian Welton

Fri, 13 May 2005 15:47:11 +0100

357 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Chris Brogan

Fri, 13 May 2005 15:41:59 +0100

114 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

<>

Fri, 13 May 2005 10:24:21 EDT

69 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Tim Trent

Fri, 13 May 2005 15:14:42 +0100

104 lines

Re: Disproportionate Effort

Tim Trent

Fri, 13 May 2005 15:12:24 +0100

279 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Smith, Tony

Fri, 13 May 2005 15:09:39 +0100

95 lines

Re: Disproportionate Effort

ianwelton

Fri, 13 May 2005 15:06:31 +0100

235 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Tim Trent

Fri, 13 May 2005 15:05:32 +0100

66 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Roland Perry

Fri, 13 May 2005 14:40:06 +0100

36 lines

Re: Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Tim Trent

Fri, 13 May 2005 13:54:23 +0100

122 lines

Accuracy of records - 'Gone Away'

Emma Bothamley

Fri, 13 May 2005 13:51:05 +0100

73 lines

Re: Disproportionate Effort

Tim Trent

Fri, 13 May 2005 13:32:11 +0100

187 lines

Re: DATs - registration

Tim Trent

Fri, 13 May 2005 13:29:58 +0100

58 lines

DATs - registration

Adam Warren

Fri, 13 May 2005 13:27:32 +0100

32 lines

Re: Disproportionate Effort

Turner8

Thu, 12 May 2005 09:50:19 +0100

126 lines

Re: Disproportionate Effort

Healy, Susan

Thu, 12 May 2005 09:43:58 +0100

96 lines

Disproportionate Effort

Turner8

Thu, 12 May 2005 08:37:24 +0100

34 lines

ISEB Qualifications

Sara-Jane Newbon

Wed, 11 May 2005 15:17:38 +0100

55 lines

Re: New company info on DP

Sally Justice

Tue, 10 May 2005 10:48:57 +0100

71 lines

Re: duty of care and telephone recording

Paul Ticher

Mon, 9 May 2005 22:26:48 +0100

116 lines

Re: A Monday morning question

Roland Perry

Mon, 9 May 2005 21:34:43 +0100

47 lines

Re: New company info on DP

Tim Trent

Mon, 9 May 2005 15:59:09 +0100

69 lines

New company info on DP

Sally Justice

Mon, 9 May 2005 15:46:21 +0100

46 lines

Re: A Monday morning question

Smith, Tony

Mon, 9 May 2005 14:41:13 +0100

105 lines

Re: A Monday morning question

ianwelton

Mon, 9 May 2005 13:55:03 +0100

70 lines

duty of care and telephone recording

PETER SELENIC

Mon, 9 May 2005 13:30:02 +0100

79 lines

Re: A Monday morning question

Jim Whitaker

Mon, 9 May 2005 12:51:51 +0100

120 lines

Re: A Monday morning question

Tim Trent

Mon, 9 May 2005 11:30:09 +0100

199 lines

Re: A Monday morning question

Jason Campbell

Mon, 9 May 2005 11:17:28 +0100

137 lines

Re: A Monday morning question

Tinsley, Chris

Mon, 9 May 2005 11:17:15 +0100

96 lines

Re: A Monday morning question

<>

Mon, 9 May 2005 06:05:32 EDT

78 lines

Re: A Monday morning question

Tim Trent

Mon, 9 May 2005 11:02:44 +0100

131 lines

A Monday morning question

Gwenan Owen

Mon, 9 May 2005 10:35:52 +0100

60 lines

Re: Collecting criminal record information on Learning Agreements

Ian Welton

Fri, 6 May 2005 14:13:37 +0100

129 lines

Collecting criminal record information on Learning Agreements

Helen Bartram

Thu, 5 May 2005 19:01:07 +0100

56 lines

Customer Satisfaction Letters

Jon Leonard

Thu, 5 May 2005 18:17:53 +0100

68 lines

Re: Criminal Record Checks

Ian Welton

Thu, 5 May 2005 14:45:49 +0100

120 lines

From the euobserver site

Smith, Tony

Thu, 5 May 2005 08:38:03 +0100

96 lines

Re: Criminal Record Checks

Roland Perry

Wed, 4 May 2005 14:57:47 +0100

46 lines

Criminal Record Checks

Chris Brogan

Wed, 4 May 2005 14:32:38 +0100

57 lines

Behavioural Problems - recording or details and reports

Helen Bartram

Wed, 4 May 2005 08:53:48 +0100

72 lines

Re: Information Sharing and Assessment

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Tue, 3 May 2005 16:18:34 +0100

73 lines

International Data Transfers Summit 2005

Paul Ferguson

Tue, 3 May 2005 14:15:20 +0100

86 lines

Re: Information Sharing and Assessment

Graham Hadfield

Tue, 3 May 2005 13:56:05 +0100

38 lines

Re: Information Sharing and Assessment

Tim Trent

Tue, 3 May 2005 13:06:08 +0100

100 lines

Information Sharing and Assessment

Gillian Whichelo

Tue, 3 May 2005 12:02:19 +0100

37 lines

Quick Guide to DPA and FOI Access requests

Sally Justice

Tue, 26 Apr 2005 16:28:01 +0100

43 lines

Retention of College Records

Yvonne Abrams

Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:35:04 +0100

29 lines

Re: Best Practice regarding handing complaints or queries on fees

Trevor Louth

Tue, 26 Apr 2005 08:55:02 +0100

321 lines

Re: Best Practice regarding handing complaints or queries on fees

Mandi Barron

Mon, 25 Apr 2005 16:07:17 +0100

269 lines

Re: Best Practice regarding handing complaints or queries on fees

Smith, Tony

Mon, 25 Apr 2005 15:30:42 +0100

104 lines

Best Practice regarding handing complaints or queries on fees

Helen Bartram

Mon, 25 Apr 2005 15:18:25 +0100

76 lines

Re: Political Candates Marketing Joe Public

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 25 Apr 2005 15:02:10 +0100

38 lines

Re: Political Candates Marketing Joe Public

Tim Turner

Mon, 25 Apr 2005 12:13:03 +0100

78 lines

Scope of UK DPA

davidwyatt

Fri, 22 Apr 2005 00:28:55 +0100

46 lines

Re: Subjective comments on a students record

Antoinette Carter

Thu, 21 Apr 2005 14:38:46 +0100

153 lines

Political Candates Marketing Joe Public

Les Kingstone

Thu, 21 Apr 2005 13:47:55 +0100

40 lines

Re: Unencrypted Data and Safe Harbor

Charles Prescott

Thu, 21 Apr 2005 08:03:08 -0400

157 lines

FW: [data-protection] Notification & unstructured personal data

Gillian Whichelo

Thu, 21 Apr 2005 11:28:43 +0100

105 lines

Re: I am in receipt of a letter from a Law Centre

Paul Ticher

Thu, 21 Apr 2005 11:01:56 +0100

124 lines

Notification & unstructured personal data

Gillian Whichelo

Thu, 21 Apr 2005 10:59:20 +0100

37 lines

Re: Subjective comments on a students record

Lewis, Chris G.

Thu, 21 Apr 2005 10:37:07 +0100

65 lines

Re: Subjective comments on a students record

Dan Hallam

Thu, 21 Apr 2005 10:25:47 +0100

120 lines

Re: Subjective comments on a students record

Lewis, Chris G.

Thu, 21 Apr 2005 10:19:35 +0100

116 lines

Re: Subjective comments on a students record

Lewis, Chris G.

Thu, 21 Apr 2005 10:17:22 +0100

90 lines

Re: Subjective comments on a students record

Mandi Barron

Thu, 21 Apr 2005 10:07:15 +0100

115 lines

Re: Subjective comments on a students record

Anne Gadsden

Thu, 21 Apr 2005 09:18:37 +0100

113 lines

Subjective comments on a students record

Dan Hallam

Thu, 21 Apr 2005 08:28:49 +0100

58 lines

Re: Unencrypted Data and Safe Harbor

DREW Nic

Thu, 21 Apr 2005 08:28:17 +0100

114 lines

Unencrypted Data and Safe Harbor

Shirley Myers

Wed, 20 Apr 2005 15:14:36 -0700

35 lines

WWW/Internet 2005 (2nd call): Call for Papers

Natália Reis

Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:02:44 +0100

145 lines

I am in receipt of a letter from a Law Centre

PETER SELENIC

Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:47:11 +0100

58 lines

Special Issue of ICES: Call for papers

CCSR

Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:41:53 +0100

37 lines

Re: Plagiarism Detection and DPA

Ian Welton

Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:12:37 +0100

187 lines

DPA and the DLHE

Mandi Barron

Wed, 20 Apr 2005 07:47:36 +0100

57 lines

Re: Plagiarism Detection and DPA

davidwyatt

Wed, 20 Apr 2005 01:37:36 +0100

139 lines

Legal Aspects of Online Learning Environments - Conference/Workshop - 1-2 June 2005, University of Warwick

John X Kelly

Tue, 19 Apr 2005 17:16:25 +0100

99 lines

Re: Receiving emails

Samantha Hill

Tue, 19 Apr 2005 14:37:47 +0100

76 lines

Re: Receiving emails

Roland Perry

Tue, 19 Apr 2005 14:37:02 +0100

47 lines

Re: Receiving emails

<>

Tue, 19 Apr 2005 09:22:40 EDT

50 lines

Re: Receiving emails

Ian Welton

Tue, 19 Apr 2005 10:58:35 +0100

65 lines

Re: Receiving emails

Roland Perry

Tue, 19 Apr 2005 10:15:34 +0100

33 lines

Receiving emails

Brenda Scourfield

Tue, 19 Apr 2005 09:07:23 +0100

23 lines

Re: Relevant Filing System and SAR

<>

Mon, 18 Apr 2005 12:27:18 EDT

56 lines

Re: Relevant Filing System and SAR

Samantha Hill

Mon, 18 Apr 2005 15:10:44 +0100

41 lines

Relevant Filing System and SAR

Clementine Amawo

Mon, 18 Apr 2005 15:00:56 +0100

27 lines

Re: Flights over US

Roland Perry

Mon, 18 Apr 2005 11:07:12 +0100

66 lines

Flights over US

Les Kingstone

Mon, 18 Apr 2005 10:34:35 +0100

33 lines

Re: Plagiarism Detection and DPA

<>

Mon, 18 Apr 2005 02:29:25 EDT

88 lines

Re: Plagiarism Detection and DPA

davidwyatt

Sat, 16 Apr 2005 01:47:25 +0100

142 lines

Re: Council Benefit Investigation Teams

Christopher Spray

Fri, 15 Apr 2005 18:29:35 +0100

142 lines

Adv - Disclosure of Personal Data

Ibrahim Hasan

Fri, 15 Apr 2005 11:19:22 +0100

61 lines

Re: Plagiarism Detection and DPA

Ian Welton

Fri, 15 Apr 2005 11:11:56 +0100

178 lines

Re: Plagiarism Detection and DPA

C.Oppenheim

Fri, 15 Apr 2005 10:47:58 +0100

154 lines

Re: Plagiarism Detection and DPA

Margarita Rainford

Fri, 15 Apr 2005 10:20:18 +0100

59 lines

Re: Plagiarism Detection and DPA

Margarita Rainford

Fri, 15 Apr 2005 10:09:57 +0100

107 lines

Re: Plagiarism Detection and DPA

Charles Christacopoulos

Fri, 15 Apr 2005 09:43:48 +0100

48 lines

Re: Plagiarism Detection and DPA

Jethro R Binks

Fri, 15 Apr 2005 08:59:22 +0100

70 lines

Re: Plagiarism Detection and DPA

Smith, Tony

Fri, 15 Apr 2005 08:52:37 +0100

35 lines

Re: Plagiarism Detection and DPA

<>

Fri, 15 Apr 2005 01:56:58 EDT

69 lines

Re: Plagiarism Detection and DPA

davidwyatt

Fri, 15 Apr 2005 00:01:12 +0100

107 lines

SAR Occupational Health

Tom Devenish

Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:25:30 +0100

32 lines

Consent to process clause

Susan Ferguson

Thu, 14 Apr 2005 09:59:08 +0100

89 lines

Re: Council Benefit Investigation Teams

Roland Perry

Thu, 14 Apr 2005 08:51:18 +0100

35 lines

Re: Plagiarism Detection and DPA

Roland Perry

Thu, 14 Apr 2005 08:48:10 +0100

36 lines

Re: Personnel Files

Turner8

Thu, 14 Apr 2005 08:36:55 +0100

162 lines

Plagiarism Detection and DPA

Paul Baker

Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:07:41 +0100

56 lines

Re: Council Benefit Investigation Teams

Paul Ticher

Wed, 13 Apr 2005 16:47:56 +0100

110 lines

Help with FOI software

Ekin Caglar

Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:50:34 +0100

52 lines

Re: Council Benefit Investigation Teams

Julie Gibbs

Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:43:38 +0100

139 lines

Re: Personnel Files

Paul Ferguson

Tue, 12 Apr 2005 16:59:14 +0100

133 lines

Re: Personnel Files

Turner8

Tue, 12 Apr 2005 16:27:14 +0100

112 lines

Council Benefit Investigation Teams

Hitches, John F

Tue, 12 Apr 2005 14:36:58 +0100

80 lines

Re: Personnel Files

Paul Ferguson

Tue, 12 Apr 2005 12:27:11 +0100

85 lines

Personnel Files

Tom Devenish

Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:51:44 +0100

35 lines

Data Protection Job Advert - Amended

<>

Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:07:55 EDT

29 lines

Data Protection Job Advert

<>

Fri, 8 Apr 2005 03:34:20 EDT

30 lines

Job descriptions for Information security role

Jon Leonard

Thu, 7 Apr 2005 09:35:22 +0100

68 lines

Request from THES for details of business expenses

G.M.Waters

Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:42:44 +0100

68 lines

Japan - new data protection law

Su Goulding

Wed, 6 Apr 2005 15:19:43 +0100

28 lines

Rehabilitation of Offenders

datap

Wed, 6 Apr 2005 14:05:18 +0100

90 lines

Re: Surveillance Law in Hollywood

<>

Wed, 6 Apr 2005 08:03:16 EDT

38 lines

Re: FOI - a cheap research tool for journalists?

Ian Welton

Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:02:40 +0100

297 lines

Re: FOI - a cheap research tool for journalists?

Antoinette Carter

Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:02:49 +0100

67 lines

Re: FOI - a cheap research tool for journalists ?

Tim Turner

Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:01:08 +0100

121 lines

Re: FOI - a cheap research tool for journalists?

Lawrence Serewicz

Wed, 6 Apr 2005 11:15:56 +0100

64 lines

Re: FOI - a cheap research tool for journalists?

Roland Perry

Wed, 6 Apr 2005 11:01:56 +0100

40 lines

Re: Section 29

Smith, Tony

Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:56:53 +0100

104 lines

Re: FOI - a cheap research tool for journalists?

Lewis, Chris G.

Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:30:25 +0100

60 lines

Re: FOI - a cheap research tool for journalists?

Roland Perry

Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:28:20 +0100

36 lines

Re: FOI - a cheap research tool for journalists?

Michael Jason Lord

Wed, 6 Apr 2005 09:59:21 +0100

211 lines

Re: Surveillance Law in Hollywood

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Wed, 6 Apr 2005 09:40:21 +0100

30 lines

Re: Internal Audit Access

Graham Hadfield

Wed, 6 Apr 2005 08:15:19 +0100

37 lines

Re: Section 29

davidwyatt

Wed, 6 Apr 2005 01:26:18 +0100

69 lines

Re: FOI - a cheap research tool for journalists?

davidwyatt

Wed, 6 Apr 2005 00:48:04 +0100

127 lines

Re: Section 29

<>

Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:55:06 EDT

58 lines

Re: Email Disclosure

Paul Ferguson

Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:45:05 +0100

105 lines

Email Disclosure

Bridget Brook

Tue, 5 Apr 2005 13:55:46 +0100

37 lines

Re: FOI - a cheap research tool for journalists?

Ian Welton

Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:47:52 +0100

92 lines

Re: Internal Audit Access

Ian Welton

Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:47:52 +0100

100 lines

Section 29

Brenda Scourfield

Tue, 5 Apr 2005 12:06:51 +0100

25 lines

Internal Audit Access

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:46:02 +0100

53 lines

Re: FOI - a cheap research tool for journalists?

<>

Tue, 5 Apr 2005 05:59:51 EDT

74 lines

Expressions of opinion

Donald Henderson

Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:53:19 +0100

65 lines

Re: FOI - a cheap research tool for journalists?

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:30:57 +0100

77 lines

Re: Defense cousel right to victim's personal data

Michael Doherty

Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:57:17 +0100

32 lines

Re: FOI - a cheap research tool for journalists?

Lawrence Serewicz

Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:55:28 +0100

43 lines

Re: FOI - a cheap research tool for journalists?

Lewis, Chris G.

Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:42:09 +0100

80 lines

FOI - a cheap research tool for journalists?

John Hughes

Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:39:54 +0100

53 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Surveillance

Mary Liddell

Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:30:34 +0100

167 lines

FW: [data-protection] Surveillance

John Hughes

Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:28:17 +0100

125 lines

Re: Surveillance Law in Hollywood

Tim Turner

Tue, 5 Apr 2005 08:53:09 +0100

87 lines

Re: Surveillance Law in Hollywood

Michael Doherty

Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:16:24 +0100

29 lines

Re: Surveillance Law in Hollywood

Roland Perry

Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:36:15 +0100

36 lines

Re: Surveillance Law in Hollywood

Ward, Ciaran

Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:16:03 +0100

155 lines

Re: Surveillance Law in Hollywood

datap

Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:12:23 +0100

81 lines

Re: Surveillance Law in Hollywood

Mary Liddell

Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:05:11 +0100

90 lines

Surveillance Law in Hollywood

Ibrahim Hasan

Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:01:15 +0100

61 lines

Re: Defense cousel right to victim's personal data

Alan Stead (Nottingham City Council)

Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:20:30 +0100

127 lines

Re: Defense cousel right to victim's personal data

Kirsty Gray

Mon, 4 Apr 2005 13:43:13 +0100

57 lines

Re: Data Protection and FOI Fees

Graham Hadfield

Mon, 4 Apr 2005 13:27:48 +0100

25 lines

Re: Data Protection and FOI Fees

Kirsty Gray

Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:58:44 +0100

90 lines

Defense cousel right to victim's personal data

Clementine Amawo

Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:45:56 +0100

57 lines

Re: "Dumpster-diving" - is it illegal?

Kirsty Gray

Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:38:33 +0100

43 lines

Population of a CRM System

Steel, Rachael

Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:05:50 +0100

70 lines

Re: "Dumpster-diving" - is it illegal?

Chris Brogan

Sat, 2 Apr 2005 17:27:45 +0100

170 lines

Re: "Dumpster-diving" - is it illegal?

Lewis, Chris G.

Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:32:40 +0100

152 lines

Re: "Dumpster-diving" - is it illegal?

Ian Welton

Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:31:37 +0100

122 lines

Re: "Dumpster-diving" - is it illegal?

Michael Doherty

Fri, 1 Apr 2005 15:55:58 +0100

29 lines

Re: "Dumpster-diving" - is it illegal?

Paul Ferguson

Fri, 1 Apr 2005 15:49:06 +0100

77 lines

Re: "Dumpster-diving" - is it illegal?

Lewis, Chris G.

Fri, 1 Apr 2005 15:36:14 +0100

74 lines

"Dumpster-diving" - is it illegal?

Su Goulding

Fri, 1 Apr 2005 15:22:46 +0100

36 lines

UPDATE Session additions - new interpretation of lawful processing

Pounder Chris

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:14:20 +0100

88 lines

SAR - is it personal data or not?

Emma Bothamley

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:05:28 +0100

94 lines

NHS Database

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:16:46 +0100

62 lines

NHS Database

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 14:16:46 +0100

45 lines

Re: Covert Monitoring of Staff

Paul Ferguson

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:00:29 +0100

406 lines

Re: Covert Monitoring of Staff

<>

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 05:18:13 EST

66 lines

Re: Covert Monitoring of Staff

Lewis, Chris G.

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:15:26 +0100

360 lines

Re: Covert Monitoring of Staff

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:10:16 +0100

312 lines

Re: Covert Monitoring of Staff

Lewis, Chris G.

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:07:27 +0100

265 lines

Re: Covert Monitoring of Staff

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:04:39 +0100

221 lines

Re: Covert Monitoring of Staff

Lewis, Chris G.

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:00:56 +0100

171 lines

Re: Covert Monitoring of Staff

Lewis, Chris G.

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:56:56 +0100

98 lines

Re: Covert Monitoring of Staff

Lewis, Chris G.

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:53:47 +0100

96 lines

Covert Monitoring of Staff

Sara-Jane Newbon

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:50:56 +0100

56 lines

Principle enquiry

Ian Welton

Sun, 27 Mar 2005 12:11:27 +0100

80 lines

WWW/Internet 2005: Call for Papers

Natália Reis

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:39:30 +0000

140 lines

Privacy,Technology and the Law - JISC Legal Briefing Day

Betty Willder

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:21:14 +0000

63 lines

Vacancy in Records Management

e a dodds@durham ac uk

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 13:42:18 +0000

58 lines

A little bit DP, a little bit FOI (for music lovers) or the XYZ affair(forthe diplo historians)

Lawrence Serewicz

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:34:58 +0000

68 lines

Re: business contact details

Ian Welton

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:27:08 -0000

196 lines

Re: business contact details

Tim Trent

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:04:26 -0000

142 lines

Re: Passing on official details

Ian Welton

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:54:24 -0000

86 lines

Re: business contact details

Lewis, Chris G.

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:46:18 -0000

123 lines

business contact details

Tim Trent

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:39:30 -0000

74 lines

Re: Passing on official details

Lewis, Chris G.

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:29:54 -0000

209 lines

Re: Passing on official details

Tim Trent

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:23:30 -0000

173 lines

Re: Passing on official details

<>

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 05:12:03 EST

76 lines

Re: Passing on official details

Lewis, Chris G.

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:04:35 -0000

145 lines

Re: Passing on official details

Tim Trent

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 09:57:05 -0000

108 lines

Passing on official details

Turner8

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 08:52:33 -0000

40 lines

Re: Interview notes

Ian Welton

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:39:32 -0000

95 lines

Re: Interview notes

Roland Perry

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 16:12:51 +0000

41 lines

Current url or set of forms

Tim Trent

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:42:08 -0000

55 lines

Re: Interview notes

Smith, Tony

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:17:20 -0000

73 lines

Re: Bad Law? (was Interview notes)

Roland Perry

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:53:06 +0000

34 lines

Re: Interview notes

Roland Perry

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 13:50:29 +0000

45 lines

Re: Bad Law? (was Interview notes)

Tim Trent

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:20:01 -0000

132 lines

Re: Bad Law? (was Interview notes)

Graham Lewis

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:52:11 -0000

99 lines

Re: Bad Law? (was Interview notes)

Tim Trent

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:31:01 -0000

51 lines

Re: Interview notes

Ian Welton

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:27:07 -0000

109 lines

Re: Bad Law? (was Interview notes)

Ian Welton

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:06:48 -0000

189 lines

Re: Interview notes

Smith, Tony

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:02:40 -0000

68 lines

Reminder for those of you going away over the Easter Holidays

Sally Justice

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:56:45 +0000

57 lines

Re: Interview notes

Roland Perry

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:52:45 +0000

37 lines

Re: Bad Law? (was Interview notes)

Lewis, Chris G.

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:40:14 -0000

106 lines

Re: Bad Law? (was Interview notes)

Ian Welton

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:49:01 -0000

114 lines

Bad Law? (was Interview notes)

<>

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 13:21:55 EST

64 lines

Re: Interview notes

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 16:21:49 -0000

29 lines

Re: Interview notes

Ian Welton

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:51:08 -0000

607 lines

Re: Interview notes

Laurence Bebbington

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:23:49 +0000

606 lines

Flow chart for DPA and FOI

Sally Justice

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 13:51:32 +0000

32 lines

Something just struck me

Tim Trent

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 13:26:12 -0000

50 lines

Re: Interview notes

Tim Trent

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 13:24:16 -0000

538 lines

Re: Interview notes

Tim Trent

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 13:21:52 -0000

604 lines

Re: Interview notes

Laurence Bebbington

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 12:53:07 +0000

488 lines

Re: Interview notes

Tim Trent

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 12:31:58 -0000

442 lines

Re: Interview notes

Tim Trent

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 12:20:00 -0000

476 lines

Re: Interview notes

Smith, Tony

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 12:18:39 -0000

465 lines

Re: Interview notes

Lewis, Chris G.

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 12:10:10 -0000

435 lines

Re: Interview notes

Tim Trent

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 12:08:08 -0000

403 lines

Re: Interview notes

Graham Lewis

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 12:04:51 -0000

402 lines

Re: Interview notes

Lewis, Chris G.

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 11:57:46 -0000

391 lines

Re: Interview notes

Tim Trent

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 11:55:52 -0000

360 lines

Re: Interview notes

Lewis, Chris G.

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 11:45:19 -0000

322 lines

Re: Interview notes

Tim Trent

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 11:43:55 -0000

278 lines

Re: Interview notes

Ian Welton

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 11:35:33 -0000

266 lines

Re: Interview notes

Tim Trent

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:08:51 -0000

185 lines

Re: notify

Tim Trent

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:06:01 -0000

184 lines

"Protective Markings" for documents

Anne Gadsden

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 09:56:40 +0000

57 lines

Re: Interview notes

Stuart Lynch

Sat, 19 Mar 2005 16:35:50 -0000

160 lines

Re: notify

Ian Welton

Sat, 19 Mar 2005 10:05:56 -0000

161 lines

Re: notify

Tim Trent

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 21:14:09 -0000

98 lines

Re: Data Protection and FOI Fees

Andrew Charlesworth

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 19:40:31 +0000

257 lines

Re: notify

<>

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:18:28 EST

59 lines

Re: Data Protection and FOI Fees

Paul Ticher

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 16:44:39 -0000

232 lines

Re: Data Protection and FOI Fees

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 16:20:53 -0000

218 lines

Re: Data Protection and FOI Fees

Mandi Barron

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 16:06:31 -0000

246 lines

Re: Data Protection and FOI Fees

Paul Ticher

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 16:05:17 -0000

187 lines

Re: CCTV from third parties

Michael Doherty

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 15:11:15 +0000

26 lines

Re: Data Protection and FOI Fees

Edwina Withe

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 15:04:01 +0000

201 lines

Re: Data Protection and FOI Fees

Gerry Dane

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:58:20 -0000

156 lines

Re: Interview notes

Atkinson, C.

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:50:19 -0000

113 lines

Re: Data Protection and FOI Fees

Antoinette Carter

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:35:44 -0000

111 lines

Re: Apologies for the Shotgun

Jim Whitaker

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:32:03 -0000

109 lines

Re: Data Protection and FOI Fees

Smith, Tony

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:11:49 -0000

85 lines

Re: Interview notes

Edwina Withe

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:03:12 +0000

69 lines

Re: Data Protection and FOI Fees

Leoni, Rudi

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:42:26 -0000

110 lines

Re: Interview notes

Tim Trent

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:41:54 -0000

129 lines

Re: Interview notes

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:11:40 -0000

70 lines

Re: notify - another referemce

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:09:26 -0000

143 lines

Re: notify - another referemce

Graham Lewis

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:06:57 -0000

141 lines

Re: notify - another referemce

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 12:58:20 -0000

100 lines

Re: Data Protection and FOI Fees

Ian Welton

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 12:41:14 -0000

109 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] [data-protection] notify

Ian Welton

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 12:26:45 -0000

146 lines

Re: notify

Talbot Richard

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 12:24:54 -0000

146 lines

Re: notify

Tim Trent

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 12:14:36 -0000

60 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] [data-protection] notify

Margarita Rainford

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 12:09:22 +0000

94 lines

Interview notes

Doug Colyer

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:30:16 -0000

35 lines

Apologies for the Shotgun

Tim Trent

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 09:46:06 -0000

55 lines

FOI and DP Fee Policy

Helen Bartram

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 08:36:51 +0000

33 lines

Re: notify

Ian Welton

Thu, 17 Mar 2005 14:36:42 -0000

68 lines

Re: [Maybe Spam] [data-protection] notify

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:57:11 -0000

55 lines

Data Protection and FOI Fees

Helen Bartram

Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:45:05 +0000

59 lines

Re: notify

Paul Ferguson

Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:37:14 +0000

88 lines

Re: notify - another referemce

Pounder Chris

Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:10:33 -0000

73 lines

CCTV from third parties

Sara-Jane Newbon

Thu, 17 Mar 2005 11:45:09 -0000

58 lines

notify

Smith, Tony

Thu, 17 Mar 2005 11:17:47 -0000

29 lines

Guidance notes for the release of information

Jim Whitaker

Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:30:00 -0000

58 lines

Article 29 DP WP - Data protection: New guidelines on payment card fraud prevention databases

Ian Welton

Sun, 13 Mar 2005 11:35:47 -0000

43 lines

Re: Unborn child - DPA living individual

Ian Welton

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:24:31 -0000

154 lines

request for conference speaker/session presenter

Oneill, Tricia

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 11:09:27 -0000

67 lines

Re: Unborn child - DPA living individual

Lewis, Chris G.

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:22:12 -0000

92 lines

Re: Unborn child - DPA living individual

Roland Perry

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:01:57 +0000

37 lines

Re: Unborn child - DPA living individual

datap

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 09:30:16 +0000

335 lines

Belgium Registrations

Saundra Kae Rubel

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 21:34:44 -0600

64 lines

Re: Unborn child - DPA living individual

Ian Welton

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:04:47 -0000

97 lines

Re: Unborn child - DPA living individual

GM Polato

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:51:00 +0000

260 lines

Data Controller V Data Processor

Chris Brogan

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:26:05 -0000

64 lines

Re: Unborn child - DPA living individual

Lewis, Chris G.

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:11:29 -0000

255 lines

Re: Unborn child - DPA living individual

DREW Nic

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:06:05 -0000

227 lines

Re: Unborn child - DPA living individual

Martin Hoskins

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 15:00:33 -0000

195 lines

Re: Unborn child - DPA living individual

C.Oppenheim

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:59:44 -0000

151 lines

Re: Unborn child - DPA living individual

Lewis, Chris G.

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:58:17 -0000

188 lines

Re: Unborn child - DPA living individual

Young, Janette

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:47:19 -0000

164 lines

Re: Unborn child - DPA living individual

Lewis, Chris G.

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:42:50 -0000

114 lines

Re: Unborn child - DPA living individual

Lewis, Chris G.

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:39:53 -0000

83 lines

Unborn child - DPA living individual

DREW Nic

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:37:27 -0000

117 lines

Re: Identity Theft - Nightmare scenario

Saundra Kae Rubel

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:52:50 -0600

79 lines

Re: Last CFP: IADIS Cognitive Performance Support 2005 Conference (14th March)

Charles Christacopoulos

Mon, 7 Mar 2005 18:03:25 +0000

41 lines

Re: Last CFP: IADIS Cognitive Performance Support 2005 Conference (14th March)

Tim Trent

Mon, 7 Mar 2005 17:42:43 -0000

270 lines

Re: Last CFP: IADIS Cognitive Performance Support 2005 Conference (14th March)

Antoinette Carter

Mon, 7 Mar 2005 17:36:20 -0000

218 lines

Re: Last CFP: IADIS Cognitive Performance Support 2005 Conference (14th March)

Tim Trent

Mon, 7 Mar 2005 17:33:19 -0000

98 lines

Re: Last CFP: IADIS Cognitive Performance Support 2005 Conference (14th March)

Charles Christacopoulos

Mon, 7 Mar 2005 17:31:23 +0000

62 lines

Re: Last CFP: IADIS Cognitive Performance Support 2005 Conference (14th March)

Lewis, Chris G.

Mon, 7 Mar 2005 17:16:12 -0000

180 lines

Re: Last CFP: IADIS Cognitive Performance Support 2005 Conference (14th March)

Tim Trent

Mon, 7 Mar 2005 17:14:05 -0000

168 lines

Last CFP: IADIS Cognitive Performance Support 2005 Conference (14th March)

Natália Reis

Mon, 7 Mar 2005 16:53:30 +0000

118 lines

Re: Use of National Insurance number

Arthur Howell

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:04:07 -0000

85 lines

Re: Identity Theft - Nightmare scenario

ALASDAIR WARWOOD

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 15:23:29 -0000

233 lines

Re: Identity Theft - Nightmare scenario

Cliff Hoy

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 15:20:29 -0000

524 lines

Re: Identity Theft - Nightmare scenario

Hitches, John F

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 15:16:47 -0000

56 lines

Re: Identity Theft - Nightmare scenario

Roland Perry

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 15:12:01 +0000

39 lines

Re: Identity Theft - Nightmare scenario

Roland Perry

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 15:08:45 +0000

42 lines

Re: Identity Theft - Nightmare scenario

Carter, Antoinette (KIS)

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 14:46:11 -0000

202 lines

Re: Identity Theft - Nightmare scenario

Charles Prescott

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 09:26:29 -0500

138 lines

Re: Identity Theft - Nightmare scenario

Talbot Richard

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 14:21:17 -0000

130 lines

Re: Identity Theft - Nightmare scenario

Hitches, John F

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:57:50 -0000

59 lines

Re: Disclosing school reports

Tinsley, Chris

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:54:19 -0000

285 lines

Re: Identity Theft - Nightmare scenario

Roland Perry

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:32:29 +0000

41 lines

Re: Identity Theft - Nightmare scenario

Tim Trent

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:26:12 -0000

84 lines

Re: Disclosing school reports

carey clifford

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:13:58 -0000

272 lines

Re: Identity Theft - Nightmare scenario

Roland Perry

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:13:03 +0000

39 lines

Re: Identity Theft - Nightmare scenario

Tim Trent

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:17:23 -0000

109 lines

Re: Disclosing school reports

Trevor Louth

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:13:50 +0000

342 lines

Re: Disclosing school reports

Dan Hallam

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:44:27 -0000

284 lines

Re: Identity Theft - Nightmare scenario

ALASDAIR WARWOOD

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:28:51 -0000

72 lines

Re: Disclosing school reports

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 10:29:25 -0000

230 lines

Re: Disclosing school reports

Tinsley, Chris

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 10:14:11 -0000

232 lines

Re: Disclosing school reports

Arthur Howell

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 09:49:31 -0000

259 lines

Re: Identity Theft - Nightmare scenario

Roland Perry

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 09:35:01 +0000

68 lines

Re: Identity Theft - Nightmare scenario

Jethro R Binks

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 09:23:25 +0000

174 lines

Re: Identity Theft - Nightmare scenario

Tim Trent

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 09:16:38 -0000

144 lines

Re: Identity Theft - Nightmare scenario

Roland Perry

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 09:13:22 +0000

43 lines

Re: Identity Theft - Nightmare scenario

Jethro R Binks

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 09:06:36 +0000

113 lines

Identity Theft - Nightmare scenario

Tim Trent

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 08:10:04 -0000

90 lines

Re: Use of National Insurance number

Roland Perry

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 20:14:31 +0000

34 lines

Unsubscribe advice please

Matthew Nunn

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 14:12:50 +0000

30 lines

Re: Disclosing school reports

Tinsley, Chris

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:33:32 -0000

139 lines

Re: Disclosing school reports

Donald Henderson

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:07:17 -0000

91 lines

Re: Use of National Insurance number

DREW Nic

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:50:27 -0000

129 lines

Re: Disclosing school reports

Tim Trent

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:45:32 -0000

79 lines

Disclosing school reports

Carey Clifford

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:29:47 +0000

45 lines

Use of National Insurance number

Arthur Howell

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:15:11 -0000

54 lines

FW: Student data and local councils

Doug Colyer

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 14:39:32 -0000

114 lines

FW: Student data and local councils

Doug Colyer

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 12:02:28 -0000

107 lines

SAR within Social Services

Tom Devenish

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 15:36:22 +0000

43 lines

Glasgow/Manchester/Leeds/London - DP FOI & DP Courses (ISEB)

Pounder Chris

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 12:50:10 -0000

61 lines

HE records management positions

Peter Garrod

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 09:32:01 -0000

53 lines

Apology

Graham Hadfield

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 08:51:31 +0000

32 lines

Re: Interesting DP response

Smith, Tony

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:06:47 -0000

197 lines

Re: Interesting DP response

Tim Trent

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:54:54 -0000

154 lines

Re: Interesting DP response

Tim Turner

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:49:00 -0000

118 lines

Re: Interesting DP response

Roland Perry

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:26:08 +0000

52 lines

Interesting DP response

Tim Trent

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:58:02 -0000

62 lines

Re: Identity of a data subject or requirement f or further information to locate requested information

Donald Henderson

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:43:07 -0000

90 lines

Student data and local councils

Sally Justice

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:14:46 +0000

43 lines

Re: Bus passes

<>

Sat, 26 Feb 2005 03:35:28 EST

77 lines

Re: Identity of a data subject or requirement f or further information to locate requested information

Roland Perry

Sat, 26 Feb 2005 07:48:25 +0000

39 lines

Re: Identity of a data subject or requirement f or further information to locate requested information

Tim Trent

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:16:11 -0000

306 lines

Re: Bus passes

Jim Whitaker

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:34:50 -0000

68 lines

Re: Bus passes

Tim Trent

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:34:22 -0000

162 lines

Re: Bus passes

Paul Ticher

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:31:34 -0000

73 lines

Re: Bus passes

DREW Nic

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:17:53 -0000

107 lines

Bus passes

Brenda Scourfield

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:11:07 +0000

27 lines

Re: Identity of a data subject or requirement f or further information to locate requested information

Smith, Tony

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:01:04 -0000

327 lines

Re: Identity of a data subject or requirement f or further information to locate requested information

Tim Trent

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:38:17 -0000

418 lines

Re: Identity of a data subject or requirement f or further information to locate requested information

Paul Dodgson

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:34:18 -0000

386 lines

Amendments to the Data Protection Act 1998

Tim Trent

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:45:59 -0000

71 lines

Re: No US DP Laws

Ian Welton

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:44:10 -0000

320 lines

Re: Identity of a data subject or requirement f or further information to locate requested information

Tim Trent

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:36:42 -0000

341 lines

Re: Identity of a data subject or requirement for further information to loca...

Tim Trent

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:31:19 -0000

79 lines

Re: Identity of a data subject or requirement f or further information to locate requested information

Bownes David (CEX)

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:24:36 -0000

305 lines

Re: Identity of a data subject or requirement for further information to loca...

<>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:24:05 EST

55 lines

Re: Identity of a data subject ...

<>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:21:20 EST

67 lines

Re: Identity of a data subject or requirement for further ...

<>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:15:16 EST

59 lines

Re: Identity of a data subject or requirement for further information to locate reques

Tim Trent

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:14:46 -0000

178 lines

Re: No US DP Laws

Tim Trent

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:11:35 -0000

249 lines

Re: Identity of a data subject or requirement for further information to locate reques

Jon Leonard

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:10:25 +0000

121 lines

Re: No US DP Laws

Ian Welton

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:08:12 -0000

230 lines

Re: Identity of a data subject or requirement f or further information to locate requested information

Tim Trent

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:02:50 -0000

251 lines

Re: Identity of a data subject or requirement f or further information to locate requested information

George Ross

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:47:48 +0000

43 lines

Re: Identity of a data subject or requirement f or further information to locate requested information

Smith, Tony

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:46:43 -0000

215 lines

Re: Identity of a data subject or requirement f or further information to locate requested information

Bownes David (CEX)

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:46:33 -0000

205 lines

Re: Identity of a data subject or requirement f or further information to locate requested information

Tim Trent

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:40:03 -0000

158 lines

Re: Identity of a data subject or requirement for further information to locate requested information

Tim Trent

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:28:48 -0000

80 lines

Re: Identity of a data subject or requirement f or further information to locate requested information

Bownes David (CEX)

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:26:27 -0000

114 lines

Identity of a data subject or requirement for further information to locate requested information

Bownes David (CEX)

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:17:51 -0000

48 lines

Re: No US DP Laws

Tim Trent

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:29:39 -0000

159 lines

Re: No US DP Laws

Ian Welton

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:19:40 -0000

139 lines

Re: "Disproportionate Effort"

Tinsley, Chris

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:12:53 -0000

94 lines

Re: No US DP Laws

Roland Perry

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 06:09:14 +0000

48 lines

Re: No US DP Laws

Tim Trent

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:10:42 -0000

123 lines

Re: No US DP Laws

Tim Trent

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:04:44 -0000

101 lines

No US DP Laws

Brenda Scourfield

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:48:14 +0000

42 lines

Re: How far away is this...?

Ian Welton

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:22:46 -0000

128 lines

Re: FOI - Disclosure of Council Tax Information

Smith, Tony

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:13:06 -0000

100 lines

FW: [data-protection] How far away is this...?

John Hughes

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:58:15 -0000

138 lines

Re: FOI - Disclosure of Council Tax Information

Edwina Withe

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:48:50 +0000

93 lines

Access to education records in Scotland

David Powell

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:48:07 +0000

58 lines

Re: How far away is this...?

Carl Johnson

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:43:14 -0000

85 lines

Re: FOI - Disclosure of Council Tax Information

Tim Turner

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:40:34 -0000

103 lines

FOI - Disclosure of Council Tax Information

Yuill, Allan

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:21:48 -0000

55 lines

Re: "Disproportionate Effort"

Tim Trent

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:33:33 -0000

144 lines

[Fwd: Home Office Monitoring of Students]

Sally Justice

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:05:19 +0000

82 lines

Re: How far away is this...?

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:04:56 -0000

36 lines

Re: "Disproportionate Effort"

<>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 03:49:03 EST

78 lines

How far away is this...?

Carl Johnson

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 02:15:05 -0000

58 lines

Re: "Disproportionate Effort"

Charles Christacopoulos

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 20:09:49 +0000

92 lines

Re: "Disproportionate Effort"

Tim Trent

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:44:31 -0000

118 lines

"Disproportionate Effort"

Tim Trent

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 18:24:34 -0000

54 lines

Re: Videoing on private property

Smith, Tony

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:05:54 -0000

172 lines

Re: Disclosure of contact details to a credit card company

Smith, Tony

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 08:49:15 -0000

132 lines

Re: Videoing on private property

Chris Brogan

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:20:06 -0000

155 lines

Re: Disclosure of contact details to a credit card company

Chris Brogan

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:01:19 -0000

105 lines

Disclosure of contact details to a credit card company

John Hughes

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:11:03 -0000

52 lines

Re: Videoing on private property

Ian Welton

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:17:00 -0000

79 lines

Re: Videoing on private property

Smith, Tony

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:35:15 -0000

98 lines

Re: Videoing on private property

Oakman Phil

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:25:18 +0000

69 lines

Re: Videoing on private property

Paul Ticher

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:21:15 -0000

72 lines

Re: Videoing on private property

Chris Brogan

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:05:44 -0000

68 lines

Videoing on private property

Jenny Sparling

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:42:00 -0000

40 lines

FW: EU 7th DP report for years 2002-2003 corrected link appended

Ian Welton

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:34:42 -0000

52 lines

EU 7th DP report for years 2002-2003

Ian Welton

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:27:58 -0000

40 lines

For those with an interest in RFID technology

Ian Welton

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:57:01 -0000

42 lines

APRIL:DP DAY UPDATE SESSION IN LONDON, MANCHESTER AND GLASGOW

Pounder Chris

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:01:33 -0000

54 lines

Re: release of personal details to insurance companies

Christopher Spray

Sat, 19 Feb 2005 15:07:36 -0000

184 lines

Re: Passing data to another company

<>

Sat, 19 Feb 2005 02:39:39 EST

65 lines

Re: Passing data to another company

Tim Trent

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:59:21 -0000

202 lines

Re: Passing data to another company

David Aspinall

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:50:14 -0000

173 lines

Re: Passing data to another company

Chris Brogan

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:07:13 -0000

135 lines

Re: Passing data to another company

Carter, Antoinette (CCM)

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:03:10 -0000

137 lines

Re: Passing data to another company

David Aspinall

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 12:32:21 -0000

109 lines

Re: Graham Hadfield/IT/RCBC is out of the office.

Roland Perry

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:30:39 +0000

46 lines

Re: Passing data to another company

Carter, Antoinette (CCM)

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:16:07 -0000

63 lines

Constitution Unit, DCA and ICO to host FOI Live 2005 on 16 June

Sarah Holsen

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:13:59 +0000

73 lines

Re: Data Protection & Timetables

Ian Welton

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:12:40 -0000

208 lines

Re: Graham Hadfield/IT/RCBC is out of the office.

Smith, Tony

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:54:57 -0000

63 lines

Passing data to another company

Turner8

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:23:47 -0000

34 lines

Graham Hadfield/IT/RCBC is out of the office.

Graham Hadfield

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 01:00:47 +0000

27 lines

Re: release of personal details to insurance companies

davidwyatt

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 00:35:09 -0000

140 lines

Re: DP Teaching Aids - Videos

DPCS Associates

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 22:23:06 -0000

107 lines

Re: Data Protection & Timetables

Robert (Bob) Waixel

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 16:58:25 +0000

134 lines

Re: 'pure' research

Smith, Tony

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 16:53:38 -0000

317 lines

Re: 'pure' research

Ian Welton

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 16:32:58 -0000

277 lines

Re: 'pure' research

Tim Trent

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 15:11:17 -0000

210 lines

Anonymised research data - Was - RE: 'pure' research

Ian Welton

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:54:11 -0000

293 lines

Re: 'pure' research

Smith, Tony

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:04:05 -0000

204 lines

Re: 'pure' research

Tim Trent

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:22:57 -0000

162 lines

Re: 'pure' research

Ian Welton

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:14:52 -0000

121 lines

Re: DP Teaching Aids - Videos

ALASDAIR WARWOOD

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:54:47 -0000

93 lines

Re: DP Teaching Aids - Videos

Tinsley, Chris

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:02:15 -0000

76 lines

Re: 'pure' research

Ian Barker

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:54:02 -0000

196 lines

Re: release of personal details to insurance companies

Smith, Tony

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:52:44 -0000

88 lines

FW: [data-protection] DP Teaching Aids - Videos

John Hughes

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:38:48 -0000

66 lines

Re: 'pure' research

Tim Trent

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:24:33 -0000

81 lines

'pure' research

Okey, Andrew

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:21:12 -0000

58 lines

DP Teaching Aids - Videos

Clementine Amawo

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:09:23 +0000

29 lines

Personal FOI experience

Cliff Hoy

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:04:14 +0000

49 lines

Re: Burglars beware

Roland Perry

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 08:45:17 +0000

37 lines

Re: Burglars beware

Jethro R Binks

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 08:41:44 +0000

45 lines

Re: release of personal details to insurance companies

Les Kingstone

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 08:29:58 +0000

50 lines

Re: Burglars beware

Roland Perry

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 08:27:31 +0000

37 lines

Re: release of personal details to insurance companies

Roland Perry

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 06:25:48 +0000

37 lines

Data Protection & Timetables

Caroline Dominey

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 16:02:09 +0000

49 lines

Re: release of personal details to insurance companies

Paul Ticher

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:34:11 -0000

210 lines

Re: release of personal details to insurance companies

Charles Prescott

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:12:18 -0500

200 lines

Re: Data Transfers - Contractual Clauses

Naana Agyei-Ampadu

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:13:48 +0000

114 lines

Re: release of personal details to insurance companies

Smith, Tony

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 12:01:37 -0000

164 lines

Re: Data Transfers - Contractual Clauses

Lillina Taranto

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 03:39:43 -0800

90 lines

Re: To SAR or not to SAR

Tim Trent

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 11:32:01 -0000

183 lines

Data Transfers - New Contractual Clauses

Gerry Dane

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 11:14:34 -0000

53 lines

Data Transfers - Contractual Clauses

Gerry Dane

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:54:43 -0000

36 lines

Re: release of personal details to insurance companies

Martin Hoskins

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:53:42 -0000

120 lines

Re: To SAR or not to SAR

ALASDAIR WARWOOD

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:42:16 -0000

92 lines

Re: To SAR or not to SAR

Roland Perry

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:27:51 +0000

54 lines

Re: To SAR or not to SAR

Martin Hoskins

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:19:16 -0000

131 lines

To SAR or not to SAR

Tim Trent

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:02:10 -0000

62 lines

release of personal details to insurance companies

Jim Dunbar

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:47:34 -0000

68 lines

Re: Importing data

Ian Welton

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 20:14:26 -0000

91 lines

Re: Obtaining forwarding addresses

Roland Perry

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:34:55 +0000

34 lines

Re: Burglars beware

Roland Perry

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:32:30 +0000

34 lines

Re: Burglars beware

Charles Christacopoulos

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 17:49:15 +0000

54 lines

Re: Burglars beware

Roland Perry

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 17:38:59 +0000

37 lines

Re: Obtaining forwarding addresses

<>

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:43:13 EST

66 lines

Importing data

Sarah Henning

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:18:59 +0000

34 lines

Re: Obtaining forwarding addresses

Roland Perry

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:42:55 +0000

47 lines

Re: Obtaining forwarding addresses

Roland Perry

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 12:44:30 +0000

52 lines

Re: Obtaining forwarding addresses

Ian Welton

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:38:35 -0000

161 lines

Re: Obtaining forwarding addresses

Smith, Tony

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:22:40 -0000

139 lines

Re: Obtaining forwarding addresses

<>

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 05:11:38 EST

84 lines

Re: Obtaining forwarding addresses

Charles Prescott

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:07:36 -0500

106 lines

Re: Obtaining forwarding addresses

Roland Perry

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 17:58:12 +0000

56 lines

Re: Obtaining forwarding addresses

ALASDAIR WARWOOD

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:46:24 -0000

110 lines

Re: Obtaining forwarding addresses

Tim Wright

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:28:30 +0000

35 lines

Obtaining forwarding addresses

Burns, Margaret

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:13:36 -0000

79 lines

Re: Marketing and Credit Card transactions

<>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 08:04:35 EST

54 lines

Re: Sensitive Data? Exemption?

Tim Trent

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 15:28:57 -0000

120 lines

Sensitive Data? Exemption?

Tim Trent

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 15:25:30 -0000

96 lines

Re: Sharing data across a Group

Ian Welton

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 12:19:02 -0000

167 lines

Re: Marketing and Credit Card transactions

Roland Perry

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 06:48:51 +0000

38 lines

Marketing and Credit Card transactions

davidwyatt

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 00:21:05 -0000

51 lines

Sharing data across a Group

davidwyatt

Sat, 12 Feb 2005 23:54:54 -0000

45 lines

Re: People finding services

<>

Sat, 12 Feb 2005 05:20:15 EST

59 lines

FOI/DP/RM job vacancy at University of Edinburgh

GRAHAM Susan

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 19:01:35 -0000

56 lines

Re: People finding services

Chris Brogan

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:28:24 -0000

76 lines

Re: Friday artwork - Was - RE: Ownership of letters

Paul Ticher

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 16:08:54 -0000

173 lines

Friday artwork - Was - RE: Ownership of letters

Ian Welton

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 16:02:10 -0000

135 lines

Re: Ownership of letters

C.Oppenheim

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:20:58 -0000

161 lines

Ownership of letters

Graeme Hawley

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 14:56:28 +0000

76 lines

People finding services

Peter Burgess

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:46:22 -0000

33 lines

Internal Disciplinary Hearings

Lawrence Serewicz

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:37:59 +0000

41 lines

Re: CRM and CTAX again!!

Ibrahim Hasan

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 09:45:58 -0000

151 lines

Re: CRM and CTAX again!! (ER data)

<>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 04:21:37 EST

62 lines

Re: CRM and CTAX again!!

<>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 04:15:56 EST

88 lines

Preparing a File for release

Sarah Streetley

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 15:54:09 +0000

40 lines

Re: FOI applications

Kirsty Gray

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 15:44:45 +0000

63 lines

Generic DPA Statement

Paul Dodgson

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 14:48:23 +0000

57 lines

Ownership of letters - author or recipient?

Graeme Hawley

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 14:30:37 +0000

35 lines

Implications Principle 1 lawfulness?

Ian Welton

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:34:32 -0000

29 lines

Re: CRM and CTAX again!!

Tim Trent

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:52:54 -0000

100 lines

Re: CRM and CTAX again!!

Tim Trent

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:44:40 -0000

77 lines

CRM and CTAX again!!

Jane Corrin

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:40:44 +0000

36 lines

Re: Student records from liquidated company

Paul Ticher

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:05:13 -0000

122 lines

Student records from liquidated company

Owen Parry

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 10:42:45 -0000

56 lines

Re: FOI and DPA Fees

Peter Dinsdale

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 10:13:34 +0000

106 lines

Re: FOI and DPA Fees

Roland Perry

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:58:57 +0000

56 lines

Re: FOI and DPA Fees

Peter Dinsdale

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:25:07 +0000

82 lines

Information Manager Vacancy

Rachel Woodcock

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:03:07 -0000

63 lines

Re: FOI and DPA Fees

Roland Perry

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 08:54:18 +0000

38 lines

Debt Collection Agencies

Mary Liddell

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 08:51:59 -0000

31 lines

Re: FOI and DPA Fees

Peter Dinsdale

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 08:15:58 +0000

119 lines

FOI

davidwyatt

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 00:10:30 -0000

44 lines

FOI applications

davidwyatt

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 00:00:58 -0000

48 lines

FOI and DPA Fees

davidwyatt

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 22:43:38 -0000

58 lines

Burglars beware

Roland Perry

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 07:00:37 +0000

30 lines

Filming Council Meetings

Sara Jane Newbon

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 16:19:40 -0000

47 lines

FOI query

GRAHAM Susan

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 15:07:55 -0000

50 lines

Re: NHS Fraud

Kirsty Gray

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:25:01 +0000

58 lines

Re: FoI Query

Maurice Frankel

Sun, 6 Feb 2005 19:44:58 +0000

104 lines

Re: FoI Query

Stuart Lynch

Sun, 6 Feb 2005 17:25:47 -0000

62 lines

Re: FoI Query

DPCS Associates

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 17:45:50 -0000

54 lines

FoI Query

Les Kingstone

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 15:41:10 +0000

26 lines

Re: Student status - Pension Provider

<>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:23:51 EST

81 lines

Student status - Pension Provider

S.T.Allely

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 13:23:33 +0000

66 lines

Privacy, Technology and the Law - Briefing Day

John X Kelly - JISC Legal

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:39:04 +0000

56 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Christopher Spray

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 10:20:35 -0000

403 lines

Re: NHS Fraud

Emma Bothamley

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:18:03 +0000

170 lines

Re: NHS Fraud

Doug Colyer

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 15:47:50 -0000

67 lines

NHS Fraud

Jackie Leesons

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 15:19:32 +0000

28 lines

Re: Land Register Online

Ian Welton

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:14:01 -0000

98 lines

Re: Land Register Online

Roland Perry

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:20:16 +0000

38 lines

2nd CFP ext.:IADIS Security and Privacy in Computing Systems 2005 Conference

Natália Reis

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 12:52:26 +0000

143 lines

Re: Land Register Online

Ian Welton

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 12:24:59 -0000

98 lines

Re: FW: Reporting students to Home Office

Antoinette Carter

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 12:07:00 -0000

326 lines

Re: FW: Reporting students to Home Office

Mary Liddell

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:36:55 -0000

286 lines

Education and Skills -Electoral Reform Services Grammar Schools

Jane Corrin

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:36:51 +0000

34 lines

Re: Land Register Online

Roland Perry

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:36:05 +0000

42 lines

Re: FW: Reporting students to Home Office

Antoinette Carter

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:31:19 -0000

253 lines

FW: Reporting students to Home Office

Rushall, Martin

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:52:26 -0000

182 lines

Re: Child Support Agency

Doug Colyer

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:16:14 -0000

245 lines

Re: Land Register Online

Ian Welton

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:51:41 -0000

116 lines

Re: Child Support Agency

Leesons Jackie

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:47:10 -0000

208 lines

Re: Child Support Agency

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:32:49 -0000

161 lines

Re: From PM's office

Tim Trent

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:31:03 -0000

73 lines

From PM's office

Smith, Tony

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:26:37 -0000

44 lines

Re: Child Support Agency

DREW Nic

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 08:42:51 -0000

118 lines

Re: Land Register Online

Karen Blakeman

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 18:01:26 +0000

41 lines

Re: Child Support Agency

Doug Colyer

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 17:09:26 -0000

118 lines

Re: Child Support Agency

Leesons Jackie

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 16:53:37 -0000

90 lines

Re: Land Register Online

Smith, Tony

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 16:48:42 -0000

73 lines

FW: [data-protection] Child Support Agency

John Hughes

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 16:44:12 -0000

122 lines

Re: Land Register Online

Ian Welton

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 16:34:48 -0000

93 lines

Re: Land Register Online

Tim Trent

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 16:16:14 -0000

72 lines

Land Register Online

Teresa Gudge

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 16:12:35 +0000

36 lines

Ethical dilemmas?

Ian Welton

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:24:01 -0000

40 lines

Child Support Agency

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:23:48 -0000

55 lines

Re: I win too many holidays!

Tim Trent

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 13:41:50 -0000

74 lines

Re: I win too many holidays!

Roland Perry

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:25:54 +0000

37 lines

I win too many holidays

Antoinette Carter

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:21:00 -0000

34 lines

Re: I win too many holidays!

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:14:10 -0000

81 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:54:56 -0000

371 lines

Re: I win too many holidays!

Ian Welton

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 15:07:29 -0000

181 lines

Re: I win too many holidays!

Roland Perry

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 14:39:16 +0000

48 lines

Re: I win too many holidays!

Tim Trent

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 14:32:00 -0000

118 lines

HESA Destinations of Leavers from HE (DLHE) longitudinal survey

Anne Deverell

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 14:31:16 -0000

87 lines

Re: I win too many holidays!

Ian Welton

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 14:16:45 -0000

93 lines

Re: I win too many holidays!

Roland Perry

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 13:42:36 +0000

45 lines

Re: I win too many holidays!

Ian Welton

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 13:37:00 -0000

87 lines

Re: Recording ethnicity

Ian Welton

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 13:10:07 -0000

151 lines

Re: I win too many holidays!

Roland Perry

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 13:09:40 +0000

43 lines

Re: Unsolicited mailing from political party

Roland Perry

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 13:05:19 +0000

123 lines

Re: Recording ethnicity

GM Polato

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 12:51:03 +0000

25 lines

Re: Recording ethnicity

Tim Trent

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 12:28:05 -0000

87 lines

Re: Recording ethnicity

GM Polato

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 12:16:15 +0000

41 lines

Re: Unsolicited mailing from political party

Tim Trent

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 12:09:10 -0000

87 lines

National ID Card Article

Tim Trent

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 12:05:19 -0000

53 lines

Re: I win too many holidays!

Tim Trent

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 12:00:13 -0000

80 lines

Re: Recording ethnicity

Ian Welton

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 11:36:52 -0000

154 lines

Re: I win too many holidays!

Alistair Boley

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 11:27:44 -0000

76 lines

Re: Recording ethnicity

<>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 05:50:14 EST

66 lines

Re: Recording ethnicity

Ian Welton

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 10:29:48 -0000

153 lines

I win too many holidays!

Turner8

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 10:19:12 -0000

35 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Ian Welton

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:57:03 -0000

401 lines

Re: Recording ethnicity

<>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 04:37:09 EST

73 lines

Re: Unsolicited mailing from political party

Jethro R Binks

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:34:40 +0000

86 lines

Re: Recording ethnicity

Paul Ticher

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:26:59 -0000

86 lines

Re: Recording ethnicity

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS)

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:17:19 +0000

71 lines

Re: Recording ethnicity

Graham Hadfield

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 08:22:08 +0000

30 lines

Recording ethnicity

Paul Dodgson

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 08:16:48 +0000

32 lines

Re: Unsolicited mailing from political party

Roland Perry

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 06:37:19 +0000

59 lines

Re: Unsolicited mailing from political party

Roland Perry

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 06:23:12 +0000

91 lines

Re: Unsolicited mailing from political party

Tim Trent

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 21:14:00 -0000

119 lines

Re: Unsolicited mailing from political party

Charles Prescott

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:11:30 -0500

93 lines

Re: Unsolicited mailing from political party

Tim Trent

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 20:45:05 -0000

75 lines

Re: Unsolicited mailing from political party

Roland Perry

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 20:40:02 +0000

46 lines

Re: Unsolicited mailing from political party

Tim Trent

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 20:32:06 -0000

98 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 18:50:54 -0000

321 lines

Re: Unsolicited mailing from political party

Andrew Charlesworth

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 18:36:46 +0000

67 lines

Unsolicited mailing from political party

Warren, Adam

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:50:33 -0000

51 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Paul Ticher

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:19:11 -0000

284 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

<>

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 12:11:51 EST

65 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Tinsley, Chris

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:31:35 -0000

417 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Ian Welton

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:24:37 -0000

407 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Tinsley, Chris

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:12:26 -0000

318 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Scourfield, Brenda

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:58:36 -0000

268 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Scourfield, Brenda

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:54:17 -0000

228 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:50:10 -0000

219 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:42:46 -0000

64 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Tinsley, Chris

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:39:55 -0000

175 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Sarah Westwood

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:35:25 +0000

160 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Smith, Tony

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:32:46 -0000

119 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Antoinette Carter

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:28:28 -0000

91 lines

Re: You have got to be kidding!

Mary Liddell

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:24:11 -0000

100 lines

Re: Disclosure to father

Trevor Louth

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:22:29 +0000

65 lines

Disclosure to father

Brenda Scourfield

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:38:19 +0000

25 lines

Re: You have got to be kidding!

Roland Perry

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:24:35 +0000

31 lines

Re: You have got to be kidding!

Ian Welton

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:06:18 -0000

87 lines

Re: You have got to be kidding!

C.Oppenheim

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:00:46 -0000

72 lines

Re: You have got to be kidding!

Tim Trent

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 12:48:40 -0000

57 lines

You have got to be kidding!

Les Kingstone

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 12:37:03 +0000

30 lines

Re: Friday puzzler (for HE folks)

Adrian Beney

Mon, 31 Jan 2005 10:06:55 +0000

77 lines

Adv- Access to Communications Data

Ibrahim Hasan

Sun, 30 Jan 2005 12:08:29 -0000

67 lines

Re: Did he really hack the DEC website?

Roland Perry

Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:15:51 +0000

97 lines

Re: Did he really hack the DEC website?

Ian Welton

Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:01:28 -0000

173 lines

Re: Did he really hack the DEC website?

Carl Johnson

Sat, 29 Jan 2005 11:55:32 -0000

225 lines

Re: Did he really hack the DEC website?

Roland Perry

Sat, 29 Jan 2005 07:17:24 +0000

128 lines

Did he really hack the DEC website?

Carl Johnson

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 21:20:20 -0000

109 lines

Re: Section 29 and Private Investigators

Smith, Tony

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 17:21:58 -0000

193 lines

Re: Section 29 and Private Investigators

Ian Welton

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 16:53:23 -0000

158 lines

FW: Section 29 and Private Investigators

Chris Brogan

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:53:39 -0000

83 lines

Friday puzzler (for HE folks)

Okey, Andrew

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 12:29:08 -0000

60 lines

Re: Section29 and private investigators

Burns, Margaret

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:22:45 -0000

250 lines

Re: Private investigator

Ian Welton

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:11:09 -0000

139 lines

Re: franchise business

Ian Welton

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:09:01 -0000

252 lines

Re: Third party permission to disclose

Scourfield, Brenda

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:32:04 -0000

105 lines

Re: Third party permission to disclose

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:22:32 -0000

90 lines

Re: Third party permission to disclose

Charles Christacopoulos

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:15:42 +0000

47 lines

Re: Private investigator

<>

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 05:14:19 EST

66 lines

Third party permission to disclose

Brenda Scourfield

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:03:20 +0000

27 lines

Re: Private investigator

Cotterill Steve

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:59:16 -0000

167 lines

Re: Private investigator

<>

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 04:55:36 EST

72 lines

Re: Private investigator

GRAHAM Susan

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:54:06 -0000

116 lines

Re: Private investigator

Smith, Tony

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:51:57 -0000

105 lines

Private investigator

GRAHAM Susan

Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:41:30 -0000

76 lines

Re: franchise business

Tim Trent

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 21:06:09 -0000

256 lines

Re: franchise business

KAREN SADLER

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 18:17:03 -0000

221 lines

Re: franchise business

Tim Trent

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 17:59:41 -0000

168 lines

Re: franchise business

Ian Welton

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 17:16:46 -0000

138 lines

Re: franchise business

Tim Trent

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:14:00 -0000

101 lines

franchise business

KAREN SADLER

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 15:21:03 -0000

43 lines

Re: Section29 and private investigators

Ian Welton

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 15:15:20 -0000

145 lines

Re: Section29 and private investigators

Ian Welton

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 15:11:42 -0000

235 lines

Re: Section29 and private investigators

<>

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:52:32 EST

95 lines

Re: Section29 and private investigators

Carl Johnson

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 14:18:55 +0000

164 lines

Re: Section29 and private investigators

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 14:14:15 -0000

168 lines

Re: Section29 and private investigators

Ian Welton

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 14:05:36 -0000

130 lines

Re: Section29 and private investigators

Carl Johnson

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:21:28 +0000

99 lines

Re: Section29 and private investigators

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:17:58 -0000

80 lines

Re: Section29 and private investigators

Ian Welton

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 12:46:55 -0000

50 lines

Re: Function creep

Pounder Chris

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 12:11:52 -0000

91 lines

Function creep

DREW Nic

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:56:50 -0000

42 lines

Re: Section29 and private investigators

<>

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 06:30:51 EST

65 lines

Re: Section29 and private investigators

Graham Hadfield

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:16:06 +0000

34 lines

Section29 and private investigators

Alison Aiton

Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:04:33 +0000

42 lines

Re: Legal Privilege

Ian Welton

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 16:40:24 -0000

99 lines

Re: Legal Privilege

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS)

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:24:10 +0000

59 lines

Legal Privilege

Ian Welton

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:19:42 -0000

33 lines

Re: Data Sharing Protocols

Ian Welton

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:33:22 -0000

244 lines

Re: Data Sharing Protocols

Paul Ticher

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:59:10 -0000

129 lines

Re: Data Sharing Protocols

<>

Wed, 26 Jan 2005 04:14:40 EST

69 lines

Examination marks

Ian Welton

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:15:18 -0000

29 lines

Re: Pending Trays / FOI

Ian Welton

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:19:03 -0000

284 lines

Re: Pending Trays / FOI

Peter Dinsdale

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:09:55 +0000

315 lines

Re: Pending Trays / FOI

Rachel Woodcock

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:37:55 -0000

284 lines

Re: Pending Trays / FOI

datap

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:22:40 +0000

236 lines

Re: Pending Trays

Turner8

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 08:38:10 -0000

151 lines

Data Sharing Protocols

Tom Devenish

Tue, 25 Jan 2005 08:29:04 +0000

38 lines

Re: Pending Trays

Roland Perry

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:22:49 +0000

65 lines

Re: Pending Trays

Ian Welton

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:44:00 -0000

173 lines

Re: Pending Trays

Smith, Tony

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:13:09 -0000

128 lines

Re: Subject Access Request

Sara Jane Newbon

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:23:00 -0000

83 lines

Re: Subject Access Request

Burns, Margaret

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:21:02 -0000

154 lines

Subject Access Request

Hope Jansen

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:00:45 +0000

35 lines

Re: Medical Records form

Ian Welton

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 13:34:05 -0000

639 lines

Re: Pending Trays

Ian Welton

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 13:34:05 -0000

186 lines

Re: Medical Records form

Roland Perry

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 13:20:48 +0000

39 lines

Re: Medical Records form

Roland Perry

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 13:17:14 +0000

38 lines

Re: Pending Trays

<>

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 07:03:36 EST

56 lines

Re: Medical Records form

Tim Trent

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:56:03 -0000

500 lines

Re: Medical Records form

<>

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 06:52:13 EST

57 lines

Re: Pending Trays

Carter, Antoinette (CCM)

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:51:30 -0000

121 lines

Re: Medical Records form

Carter, Antoinette (CCM)

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:49:16 -0000

483 lines

Re: Medical Records form

Tim Trent

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:32:50 -0000

444 lines

Re: Pending Trays

Ian Welton

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:31:00 -0000

97 lines

Re: Medical Records form

Paul Ticher

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:30:38 -0000

188 lines

Re: Medical Records form

Tim Trent

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:29:48 -0000

557 lines

FW: [data-protection] Pending Trays

Carter, Antoinette (CCM)

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:28:38 -0000

68 lines

Re: Medical Records form

Ian Welton

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:27:24 -0000

424 lines

Re: Pending Trays

Ian Welton

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:16:44 -0000

118 lines

Re: Medical Records form

Jon Leonard

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:07:06 +0000

525 lines

Re: Medical Records form

Ian Welton

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:03:32 -0000

164 lines

Re: Medical Records form

Tim Trent

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:00:09 -0000

134 lines

Re: Pending Trays

Paul Ticher

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:58:33 -0000

66 lines

Re: Medical Records form

<>

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 05:38:34 EST

97 lines

Pending Trays

Ian Welton

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:30:43 -0000

30 lines

Re: Medical Records form

Tim Trent

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:13:38 -0000

159 lines

Medical Records form

Jon Leonard

Mon, 24 Jan 2005 09:19:21 +0000

97 lines

CFP: IADIS Security and Privacy in Computing Systems 2005 Conference

Natália Reis

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 15:40:34 +0000

142 lines

Re: Functions under any enactment - Children Leaving Care Act

Ian Welton

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 14:41:06 -0000

189 lines

Re: Functions under any enactment - Children Leaving Care Act

Smith, Tony

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 14:26:34 -0000

148 lines

Re: Functions under any enactment - Children Leaving Care Act

Ian Welton

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 13:40:43 -0000

120 lines

Functions under any enactment - Children Leaving Care Act

S.T.Allely

Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:45:54 +0000

55 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Back-up

Roland Perry

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 19:19:57 +0000

39 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Back-up

David Aspinall

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 18:29:02 -0000

186 lines

Email Retention

Jackie Leesons

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 17:41:01 +0000

24 lines

Re: Back-up

Roland Perry

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:56:55 +0000

40 lines

Re: Back-up

Jim Whitaker

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:47:33 -0000

166 lines

Re: Back-up

Roland Perry

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:45:54 +0000

62 lines

Re: Back-up

Ian Welton

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:44:26 -0000

99 lines

Re: Back-up

Carter, Antoinette (CCM)

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:30:36 -0000

126 lines

Re: Back-up

Tim Trent

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:29:51 -0000

84 lines

Re: CCTV etc.

Ian Welton

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:24:01 -0000

109 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Back-up

Tim Trent

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:15:10 -0000

170 lines

Re: Back-up

Leesons Jackie

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:13:39 -0000

47 lines

Re: CCTV etc.

Smith, Tony

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:12:25 -0000

127 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Back-up

Burns, Margaret

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:08:06 -0000

116 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Back-up

Roland Perry

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:57:19 +0000

51 lines

Re: Back-up

Tim Trent

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:17:33 -0000

243 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Back-up

Tim Trent

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:57:16 -0000

64 lines

Re: Back-up

Paul Ticher

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:54:25 -0000

197 lines

Re: Back-up

Tim Trent

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:32:21 -0000

151 lines

Re: CCTV etc.

Roland Perry

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:31:29 +0000

38 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Back-up

Roland Perry

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:31:07 +0000

35 lines

Re: Back-up

Roland Perry

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:24:09 +0000

45 lines

FW: [data-protection] Back-up

Burns, Margaret

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:17:11 -0000

120 lines

Re: CCTV etc.

Ian Welton

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:15:31 -0000

100 lines

Re: Back-up

Carter, Antoinette (CCM)

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:12:56 -0000

88 lines

Re: Back-up

Paul Ticher

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:30:15 -0000

88 lines

Back-up

chd201

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:14:06 +0000

44 lines

CCTV etc.

Smith, Tony

Thu, 20 Jan 2005 10:38:49 -0000

27 lines

FW: [data-protection] Educational Records

Tinsley, Chris

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 10:41:17 -0000

88 lines

Re: Educational Records

Charles Christacopoulos

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 10:09:23 +0000

42 lines

Re: Educational Records

Trevor Louth

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 09:34:50 +0000

87 lines

Re: Educational Records

Tim Trent

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 09:20:43 -0000

72 lines

Educational Records

chd201

Mon, 17 Jan 2005 09:14:00 +0000

45 lines

Re: Marriage and data protection issues

ianwelton

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:37:04 -0000

142 lines

Re: Welfare report

Turner8

Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:04:26 -0000

67 lines

Re: Marriage and data protection issues

Ian Mansbach

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:11:12 -0000

90 lines

Re: Marriage and data protection issues

Kirsty Gray

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 15:05:51 +0000

42 lines

Re: Deceased Clients

Kirsty Gray

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 14:40:08 +0000

54 lines

Re: Special Education Needs - processing sensitive data as part of the Statementing process

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:00:31 -0000

119 lines

FOI problem with jiscmail?

Pounder Chris

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:34:21 -0000

76 lines

Special Education Needs - processing sensitive data as part of the Statementing process

Jim Dunbar

Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:33:18 -0000

82 lines

Remote/home working policies

GRAHAM Susan

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:10:53 -0000

39 lines

FW: Resources about FOI Act - FYI

Smith, Tony

Tue, 11 Jan 2005 11:09:13 -0000

25 lines

Re: Request for Assistance

Adrian Chase

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:28:53 +0000

142 lines

Request for Assistance

Chris Brogan

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 11:29:49 -0000

48 lines

Re: Marriage and data protection issues

Michael Doherty

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:51:49 +0000

33 lines

Deceased Clients

Tom Devenish

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:31:18 +0000

34 lines

Marriage and data protection issues

Julie Bee

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:16:24 +0000

45 lines

[Fwd: Scottish Information Commissioner produces new guidance online]

Sally Justice

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:00:49 +0000

80 lines

Data Protection Manuals

Tom Devenish

Mon, 10 Jan 2005 08:05:59 +0000

31 lines

Remote/Home working Policies

Steel, Rachael

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:50:05 -0000

51 lines

Re: Training

Lisa Braund - Privacy & Data Protection

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:19:04 -0000

119 lines

Training

Sarah Henning

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:32:29 +0000

51 lines

Re: Training

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:10:41 -0000

139 lines

Re: Training

Talbot Richard

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:09:16 -0000

103 lines

Re: Training

Tim Trent

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:49:48 -0000

64 lines

Re: Training

Fiona Musgrave

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:45:31 -0000

87 lines

Training

Sarah Henning

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:27:19 +0000

33 lines

Conferment lists

Hitches, John F

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:11:16 -0000

53 lines

Re: DPA/FOI query - schools information

Tim Turner

Fri, 7 Jan 2005 08:30:21 -0000

93 lines

Re: CCTV in Hotel

Simon Howarth (WSL)

Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:18:16 -0000

116 lines

Re: DPA/FOI query - schools information

Roland Perry

Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:57:34 +0000

34 lines

CCTV in Hotel

Paul Ticher

Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:49:47 -0000

84 lines

Welfare report

Paul Ticher

Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:49:06 -0000

85 lines

DPA/FOI query - schools information

Rosemary McLure

Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:37:57 +0000

34 lines

Re: CCTV in Hotel

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS)

Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:52:50 +0000

91 lines

Re: Welfare report

Turner8

Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:48:38 -0000

102 lines

Re: Welfare report

Donald Henderson

Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:43:04 -0000

80 lines

Re: CCTV in Hotel

George Ross

Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:37:31 +0000

36 lines

Welfare report

Turner8

Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:33:56 -0000

36 lines

Re: CCTV in Hotel

Tim Turner

Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:30:29 -0000

82 lines

Re: CCTV in Hotel

Tim Trent

Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:29:40 -0000

64 lines

CCTV in Hotel

Stephen John

Thu, 6 Jan 2005 12:08:30 +0000

34 lines

Request for Informaiton flow chart

Sally Justice

Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:48:57 +0000

42 lines

Online Application - Sensitive Personal Data

Tim Trent

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 11:22:30 -0000

70 lines

Carelessness and lack of attention to detail

Tim Trent

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 11:08:03 -0000

64 lines

Petitions

Watson, Patrick

Tue, 4 Jan 2005 10:45:30 -0000

49 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager