JISCMail - DATA-PROTECTION Archives

Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

DATA-PROTECTION Archives

December 2009

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Get Password

Subject	From	Date	Size
Council worker suspended after disclosure of personal data about the vulnerable from social work files	chris pounder	Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:07:11 -0000	417 lines
Re: Postcodes request	Giles, Kevin	Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:56:17 -0000	734 lines
Are postcodes personal data?	chris pounder	Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:35:25 -0000	113 lines
Re: Postcodes request	Dinsdale, Peter	Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:31:18 -0000	180 lines
Re: Postcodes request	Matt Morrison	Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:26:29 +0000	159 lines
Re: Postcodes request	Matt Morrison	Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:22:58 +0000	204 lines
Re: Postcodes request	Scourfield, Brenda	Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:16:30 -0000	147 lines
Postcodes request	Matt Morrison	Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:59:08 +0000	68 lines
Re: Notification fee - Public Authority	Cotterill, Steve	Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:29:39 -0000	902 lines
Re: Notification fee - Public Authority[Scanned]	Bradshaw, Phillip	Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:26:45 -0000	506 lines
Re: Notification fee - Public Authority[Scanned]	Ronan Durnin	Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:15:25 -0000	710 lines
Re: Notification fee - Public Authority	Dinsdale, Peter	Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:09:16 -0000	796 lines
Notification fee - Public Authority	Cotterill, Steve	Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:00:52 -0000	206 lines
Workplace Consequences of Electronic Exhibitionism and Voyeurism	[log in to unmask]	Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:29:30 +0100	62 lines
Re: An ewasy New Year Resolution (Presentation attached this time!)[Scanned]	Ronan Durnin	Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:38:31 -0000	805 lines
Re: New year resolution attachment filtering[Scanned]	Ronan Durnin	Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:14:32 -0000	819 lines
Re: New year resolution attachment filtering	Simon Howarth	Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:05:35 -0000	576 lines
Re: more on councils and planning apps / possible dry xmas humour	Bradshaw, Phillip	Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:02:18 -0000	204 lines
more on councils and planning apps / possible dry xmas humour	Mark van Harmelen	Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:27:59 +0000	88 lines
Re: Section 33A of the DPA	Alan Stead	Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:48:20 +0000	225 lines
One last peice of humour - A promise	[log in to unmask]	Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:44:06 +0100	45 lines
Re: DP humour	Ibrahim Hasan	Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:43:28 +0000	412 lines
Re: An ewasy New Year Resolution (Presentation attached this time!)[Scanned]	Ronan Durnin	Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:37:58 -0000	639 lines
Re: Section 33A of the DPA	DREW Nic	Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:19:53 +0000	181 lines
Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?	Lawrence Serewicz	Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:12:06 +0000	366 lines
Re: New year resolution attachment filtering[Scanned]	Ronan Durnin	Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:08:55 -0000	511 lines
Section 33A of the DPA	Gordon Wanless	Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:05:38 +0000	98 lines
Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?	Scourfield, Brenda	Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:50:51 -0000	325 lines
Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?	Mark van Harmelen	Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:41:19 +0000	792 lines
New year resolution attachment filtering	Karen McCullagh	Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:27:36 -0000	270 lines
Setting mail preference for the holiday season	Ronan Durnin	Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:40:59 -0000	399 lines
An ewasy New Year Resolution (Presentation attached this time!)	Karen McCullagh	Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:13:08 -0000	363 lines
Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?	Maurice Frankel	Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:03:13 +0000	951 lines
An easy New Year Resolution	Karen McCullagh	Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:31:11 -0000	62 lines
DP humour	[log in to unmask]	Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:22:56 +0100	321 lines
Commissioner to be questioned by MPs over poor performance	chris pounder	Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:45:49 -0000	265 lines
Re: CCTV hacked	Simon Howarth	Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:39:49 -0000	600 lines
CCTV hacked	Ibrahim Hasan	Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:32:54 +0000	131 lines
Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?	Maurice Frankel	Thu, 17 Dec 2009 17:22:22 +0000	778 lines
Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?	Kevin Mulley	Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:47:07 +0000	90 lines
Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?[Scanned]	Ronan Durnin	Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:42:51 -0000	298 lines
Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?	Lawrence Serewicz	Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:41:53 +0000	682 lines
Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?	Lawrence Serewicz	Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:26:33 +0000	260 lines
Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?	Mark van Harmelen	Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:48:02 +0000	305 lines
Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?	Bradshaw, Phillip	Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:14:40 -0000	143 lines
Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?[Scanned]	Lawrence Serewicz	Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:53:30 +0000	166 lines
Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?	Maurice Frankel	Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:53:12 +0000	120 lines
Re: Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?[Scanned]	Ronan Durnin	Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:10:46 -0000	127 lines
Data protection question (back scanning old planning applications) proportionate?	Lawrence Serewicz	Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:30:32 +0000	80 lines
Re: Quiet	Bradshaw, Phillip	Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:37:35 -0000	62 lines
Re: Quiet	Tim Trent	Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:17:09 +0000	178 lines
Quiet	Brenda Scourfield	Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:14:46 +0000	30 lines
Re: Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction	Bradshaw, Phillip	Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:45:47 -0000	301 lines
Re: Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction	[log in to unmask]	Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:28:00 +0100	256 lines
Re: Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction	Bradshaw, Phillip	Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:08:33 -0000	137 lines
Re: Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction	[log in to unmask]	Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:36:55 +0100	109 lines
Re: Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction	Paul Ticher	Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:38:27 -0000	111 lines
Re: What to do if someone did not consent to a staff ID card photo?	Tim Trent	Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:46:13 +0000	214 lines
What to do if someone did not consent to a staff ID card photo?	Lawrence Serewicz	Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:37:38 +0000	852 lines
Re: Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction	Simon Howarth	Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:54:50 -0000	86 lines
Re: Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction	Bradshaw, Phillip	Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:40:22 -0000	138 lines
Re: Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction	Bradshaw, Phillip	Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:34:16 -0000	336 lines
Re: Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction	Lawrence Serewicz	Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:25:33 +0000	131 lines
Re: Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction	Giles, Kevin	Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:22:18 -0000	614 lines
Re: Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction	Tim Trent	Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:21:58 +0000	241 lines
Photos of Staff - Reasonable Work Instruction	Phil Bradshaw	Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:13:38 +0000	62 lines
Re: Notification Fees	Gibbs, Julie	Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:52:49 +0000	169 lines
Notification Fees	Bailey, Trish	Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:23:13 -0000	74 lines
school vetting rules: ISA safeguarding rules use the wrong criteria	chris pounder	Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:15:27 -0000	212 lines
Re: SAR about a SAR	Bradshaw, Phillip	Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:03:59 -0000	108 lines
SAR about a SAR	Matt Morrison	Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:22:49 +0000	60 lines
Re: DP Jokes. Was: Re: [data-protection] Surveillance society What about Children s Act 1989 s.83 a database by another name?	Simon Howarth	Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:31:18 -0000	349 lines
Re: school vetting rules	Roland Perry	Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:31:00 +0000	55 lines
school vetting rules	Ibrahim Hasan	Sun, 13 Dec 2009 10:54:38 +0000	92 lines
DP Jokes. Was: Re: [data-protection] Surveillance society What about Children s Act 1989 s.83 a database by another name?	[log in to unmask]	Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:02:15 +0100	310 lines
Re: Surveillance society What about Children's Act 1989 s.83 a database by another name?	Lawrence Serewicz	Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:55:40 +0000	846 lines
Re: Surveillance society	Tim Trent	Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:25:39 +0000	304 lines
Surveillance society	chris pounder	Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:18:43 -0000	272 lines
Re: Notification Fees	Alan Stead	Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:54:23 +0000	246 lines
Re: Notification Fees	<>	Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:28:44 +0000	153 lines
Re: Notification Fees	Bradshaw, Phillip	Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:54:42 -0000	88 lines
Notification Fees	Matt Cooper	Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:30:44 +0000	39 lines
Re: We're all "miscreants"	Tim Trent	Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:23:44 +0000	283 lines
Re: Subject access to risk log	Hawley, Graeme	Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:22:40 -0000	730 lines
Re: Subject access to risk log	<>	Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:14:21 +0000	161 lines
We're all "miscreants"	Mark van Harmelen	Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:05:16 +0100	76 lines
Re: Subject access to risk log[Scanned]	Ronan Durnin	Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:02:28 -0000	106 lines
Subject access to risk log	Graeme Hawley	Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:38:10 +0000	66 lines
Re: Facebook releases new privacy settings	Griffiths, Ian	Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:32:08 -0000	163 lines
Re: Facebook releases new privacy settings	Chris Bayliss (ITS)	Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:23:33 +0000	507 lines
Facebook releases new privacy settings	Tim Trent	Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:46:09 +0000	161 lines
Re: s.33 research exemption	Ibrahim Hasan	Wed, 9 Dec 2009 14:31:11 +0000	84 lines
FW: Information Commissioner urges organisations to give individuals more privacy choices online	chris pounder	Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:56:24 -0000	733 lines
Re: s.33 research exemption	Lawrence Serewicz	Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:41:12 +0000	118 lines
s.33 research exemption	Alison Ross-Dow	Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:23:49 +0000	45 lines
Full Electoral Register Use - ICO Guidance	Bailey, Trish	Wed, 9 Dec 2009 08:50:50 -0000	682 lines
Data processor agreement and the next step?	Bailey, Trish	Tue, 8 Dec 2009 11:07:21 -0000	449 lines
Prime Minister speaks: more FOI and more re-use and, by inference, less ID Card	chris pounder	Mon, 7 Dec 2009 14:21:45 -0000	231 lines
Fw: [data-protection] Tracing originator	[log in to unmask]	Fri, 4 Dec 2009 16:54:13 +0100	250 lines
Re: Tracing originator	Bradshaw, Phillip	Fri, 4 Dec 2009 15:17:44 -0000	80 lines
Tracing originator	[log in to unmask]	Thu, 3 Dec 2009 18:26:00 +0100	80 lines
Re: Publishing Pay scales	Bradshaw, Phillip	Wed, 2 Dec 2009 16:38:07 -0000	66 lines
Re: Publishing Pay scales	Dodgson, Paul	Wed, 2 Dec 2009 16:08:04 -0000	182 lines
Re: Viviane Reding picked reported as about to re-write EU data protection laws	Roland Perry	Wed, 2 Dec 2009 14:42:21 +0000	43 lines
Re: Information Commissioner's Office demystifies data protection	Wiper, Carl	Wed, 2 Dec 2009 12:06:35 +0000	126 lines
Re: Information Commissioner's Office demystifies data protection	Phil Bradshaw	Wed, 2 Dec 2009 11:38:18 +0000	44 lines
List Business - No longer a moderator/list owner	Scourfield, Brenda	Wed, 2 Dec 2009 10:21:13 -0000	350 lines
Re: Publishing Pay scales	Bradshaw, Phillip	Wed, 2 Dec 2009 10:16:22 -0000	80 lines
Re: List Business - No longer a moderator/list owner	Simon Howarth	Wed, 2 Dec 2009 09:57:14 -0000	590 lines
Re: Publishing Pay scales[Scanned]	Cotterill, Steve	Tue, 1 Dec 2009 15:09:15 -0000	423 lines
Re: Publishing Pay scales[Scanned]	Ronan Durnin	Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:39:59 -0000	364 lines
Re: Publishing Pay scales	Kirkup,Stewart (Corporate Resources)	Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:28:23 -0000	323 lines
Re: Publishing Pay scales	Lee Gardiner	Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:19:55 -0000	267 lines
Re: Publishing Pay scales	Broom, Doreen	Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:15:40 +0000	120 lines
Re: Publishing Pay scales	Lawrence Serewicz	Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:13:55 +0000	786 lines
Re: Publishing Pay scales	Scourfield, Brenda	Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:13:01 -0000	216 lines
Re: Publishing Pay scales	Lawrence Serewicz	Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:11:27 +0000	188 lines
Re: Publishing Pay scales	Tim Trent	Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:09:54 +0000	400 lines
Re: Publishing Pay scales	DREW Nic	Tue, 1 Dec 2009 12:58:58 +0000	140 lines
Publishing Pay scales	Kirkup,Stewart (Corporate Resources)	Tue, 1 Dec 2009 12:38:36 -0000	62 lines
About Logical Links in X-References.	[log in to unmask]	Tue, 1 Dec 2009 12:11:18 +0100	45 lines

DATA-PROTECTION Archives

December 2009

Options

Subject

From

Date

Size

JiscMail Tools

RSS Feeds and Sharing

Search Archives

Archives