JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


January 2007


View:

Show Author | Hide Author

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject

From

Date Sorted by Date, Most Recent First

Size

all families have a right to privacy

PETER SELENIC

Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:48:57 -0000

249 lines

Fwd: Re: [data-protection] Fishing expeditions!

NICHOLAS LANDAU

Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:38:14 +0000

145 lines

Fishing expeditions!

Kevin Broadfoot

Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:33:11 +0000

34 lines

Re: Example of breach in the news

NICHOLAS LANDAU

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:30:55 +0000

150 lines

Re: Training in the appropriate application of exemptions

Ian Welton

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:21:42 -0000

103 lines

Re: Example of breach in the news

Kevin Broadfoot

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:04:07 +0000

40 lines

Example of breach in the news

datap

Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:35:55 +0000

164 lines

Advanced warning re our DP UPDATE SESSIONS in March

POUNDER Chris

Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:16:50 -0000

313 lines

Re: B4U, the outcome

Tim Trent

Mon, 29 Jan 2007 12:09:57 -0000

585 lines

Re: B4U, the outcome

Edwina Withe

Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:51:36 +0000

186 lines

Re: B4U, the outcome

Tim Trent

Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:24:03 -0000

76 lines

Re: B4U, the outcome

Edwina Withe

Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:01:02 +0000

177 lines

Re: B4U, the outcome

Paul Dodgson

Mon, 29 Jan 2007 10:45:05 -0000

89 lines

Re: B4U, the outcome

POUNDER Chris

Mon, 29 Jan 2007 10:40:08 -0000

104 lines

Re: B4U, the outcome

Griffiths, Ian

Mon, 29 Jan 2007 10:32:21 -0000

48 lines

FW: [data-protection] Training in the appropriate application of exemptions

Doherty Michael

Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:07:50 -0000

103 lines

Training in the appropriate application of exemptions

Ian Welton

Sat, 27 Jan 2007 15:47:34 -0000

43 lines

Re: Job opportunity - King's College London

Roland Perry

Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:49:36 +0000

41 lines

Re: Job opportunity - King's College London

Jan Booth

Fri, 26 Jan 2007 13:18:59 -0000

214 lines

Re: Job opportunity - King's College London

Nigel Roberts

Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:55:28 +0000

185 lines

Re: Job opportunity - King's College London

Tim Trent

Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:44:29 -0000

282 lines

B4U, the outcome

Tim Trent

Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:28:42 -0000

219 lines

Job opportunity - King's College London

Jan Booth

Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:14:08 +0000

66 lines

Data Protection starter courses

POUNDER Chris

Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:54:10 -0000

41 lines

Data Protection Policy Statements

Mark Brookes

Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:52:32 +0000

58 lines

FW: [data-protection] Survey Results Notice

Tim Trent

Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:44:05 -0000

106 lines

Survey Results Notice [DATA-PROTECTION]

JISCmail Survey System

Fri, 26 Jan 2007 00:10:00 GMT

45 lines

Re: Occupational Helath Records

Les Kingstone

Thu, 25 Jan 2007 16:10:47 +0000

79 lines

FW: New guidance from ICO - working with potentially violent members of the public

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS)

Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:53:40 +0000

59 lines

Occupational Helath Records

Sarah Henning

Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:26:36 +0000

78 lines

Re: New guidance from ICO - working with potentially violent members of the public

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS)

Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:25:46 +0000

86 lines

Re: New guidance from ICO - working with potentially violent members of the public

Ian Welton

Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:50:05 -0000

54 lines

Data Protection Policy Statements

Mark Brookes

Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:53:58 +0000

56 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressure

Andrew Cormack

Thu, 25 Jan 2007 08:03:31 +0000

237 lines

Re: New guidance from ICO - working with potentially violent members of the public

Simon Richardson

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:32:32 +0000

52 lines

Re: ICO Newsletters

Scourfield, Brenda

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:29:03 -0000

168 lines

Re: ICO e-newsletters

Watts, Clare (C.)

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:17:15 -0000

60 lines

Re: New guidance from ICO - working with potentially violent members of the public

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:16:28 -0000

173 lines

Re: New guidance from ICO - working with potentially violent members of the public

Paul Ticher

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:13:17 -0000

117 lines

Re: New guidance from ICO - working with potentially violent members of the public

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS)

Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:50:31 +0000

71 lines

Re: New guidance from ICO - working with potent ially violent members of the public

Doherty Michael

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:00:06 -0000

479 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to raise blood pressur e

Griffiths, Ian

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:19:54 -0000

40 lines

Re: New guidance from ICO - working with potentially violent members of the public

Paul Ticher

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:15:06 -0000

118 lines

Re: ICO Newsletters

Robert Dawson

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:03:56 +0000

114 lines

Re: ICO Newsletters

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:53:17 -0000

49 lines

Re: ICO e-newsletters

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:50:45 -0000

112 lines

Re: ICO e-newsletters

Iain Harrison

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:47:36 +0000

81 lines

Re: ICO e-newsletters

Chris Brogan

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:47:03 -0000

68 lines

Re: ICO e-newsletters

simon howarth

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:42:24 +0000

53 lines

ICO e-newsletters

Brenda Scourfield

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:40:07 +0000

26 lines

Re: ICO e-newsletters

RONAN DURNIN

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:39:36 -0000

68 lines

New guidance from ICO - working with potentially violent members of the public

Jane Bartlett

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:05:33 -0000

155 lines

Council Tax Data

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:39:02 -0000

314 lines

FOI/DP Secondment Opportunity at the Scottish Parliament

Susan Mansfield

Mon, 22 Jan 2007 18:19:44 +0000

52 lines

Re: DP Clause in Contract Agreement

Paul Ticher

Mon, 22 Jan 2007 12:26:41 -0000

114 lines

Re: DP Clause in Contract Agreement

Nick Landau

Mon, 22 Jan 2007 12:15:21 -0000

122 lines

Re: DP Clause in Contract Agreement

Simon Howarth

Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:37:55 -0000

77 lines

Re: DP Clause in Contract Agreement

Nick Landau

Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:34:10 -0000

86 lines

DP Clause in Contract Agreement

Julie Gibbs

Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:12:41 +0000

51 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressur e

Roland Perry

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:03:56 +0000

43 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to raise blood pressur e

Roland Perry

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 19:00:24 +0000

39 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to raise blood pressur e

Roland Perry

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:58:34 +0000

186 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to raise blood pressure

Roland Perry

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:51:48 +0000

38 lines

Information Governance Manager Vacancy

Kirsty Gray

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:55:36 +0000

46 lines

Re: NHS Info Sharing Principles - was School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressure

Simon Howarth

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:21:47 -0000

189 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] NHS Info Sharing Principles - was School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressure

Simon Howarth

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 16:18:08 -0000

144 lines

Re: NHS Info Sharing Principles - was School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressure

Nick Landau

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:47:39 -0000

147 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressu re

Doherty Michael

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:43:21 -0000

283 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressu re

Tim Turner

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:37:05 -0000

236 lines

Re: Surveys

Tim Trent

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:16:47 -0000

198 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressu re

Scourfield, Brenda

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:08:41 -0000

189 lines

FW: [data-protection] NHS Info Sharing Principles - was School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressure

Hughes2 John (RJ6) MHC-TR Manager

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:03:06 -0000

101 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressure

RONAN DURNIN

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:00:34 -0000

143 lines

NHS Info Sharing Principles - was School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressure

Simon Richardson

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:54:55 +0000

66 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressure

Tinsley, Chris

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:53:47 -0000

134 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressure

Griffiths, Ian

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:51:01 -0000

123 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressure

Tim Turner

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:48:27 -0000

90 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressure

Ian Welton

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:39:27 -0000

103 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressure

Griffiths, Ian

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:34:24 -0000

40 lines

Re: Council Tax advice

Nigel Roberts

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:31:51 +0000

142 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressure

Nick Landau

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:26:37 -0000

394 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressure

RONAN DURNIN

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:21:28 -0000

53 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressure

Griffiths, Ian

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:20:59 -0000

51 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to raise blood pressure

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS)

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:15:28 +0000

57 lines

Re: Surveys

Griffiths, Ian

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:13:33 -0000

175 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressure

Brenda Scourfield

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:12:30 +0000

41 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressure

Tinsley, Chris

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:59:28 -0000

326 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressure

Nick Landau

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:55:41 -0000

74 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressure

Edwina Withe

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:28:32 +0000

444 lines

Re: Council Tax advice

Nick Landau

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:04:46 -0000

386 lines

Re: Council Tax advice

Tim Trent

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:00:09 -0000

225 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressure

Chris Brogan

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:55:00 -0000

291 lines

Re: Council Tax advice

Nick Landau

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:53:14 -0000

80 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressure

Nick Landau

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:49:19 -0000

292 lines

Re: Council Tax advice

J.S.M.Whitaker

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:48:26 -0000

95 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressure

Blewitt, David

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:35:31 -0000

249 lines

Re: Surveys

Tim Trent

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:35:10 -0000

127 lines

Council Tax advice

Alan Stead

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:13:54 -0000

59 lines

Re: Surveys

Griffiths, Ian

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:02:38 -0000

98 lines

Re: Surveys

Tim Trent

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:00:31 -0000

70 lines

Re: Surveys

Tim Trent

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:59:47 -0000

498 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressure

Griffiths, Ian

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:47:46 -0000

204 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressure

Blewitt, David

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:39:30 -0000

172 lines

Re: Surveys

Nick Landau

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:51:51 -0000

372 lines

Re: Surveys

Griffiths, Ian

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:44:07 -0000

44 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressu r e

Griffiths, Ian

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:42:18 -0000

242 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressu r e

Scourfield, Brenda

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:38:59 -0000

183 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressur e

Nick Landau

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:38:08 -0000

168 lines

Surveys

Tim Trent

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:37:16 -0000

243 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressur e

Lee Gardiner

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:31:57 -0000

117 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to raise blood pressur e

Griffiths, Ian

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 10:25:58 -0000

74 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to raise blood pressure

Griffiths, Ian

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:57:05 -0000

45 lines

Re: Safe harbor / harbour

FINCHAM LUCY

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:46:23 -0000

117 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to raise blood pressur e

Scourfield, Brenda

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:41:44 -0000

99 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to raise blood pressure

Roland Perry

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:28:14 +0000

46 lines

Re: Secondary use of Council Tax

Ibrahim Hasan

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:06:05 -0000

221 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressure

Tinsley, Chris

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 08:30:25 -0000

138 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressure

Tim Turner

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 08:28:47 -0000

97 lines

New Survey Notice [DATA-PROTECTION]

JISCmail Survey System

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:48:26 GMT

47 lines

Survey Results Notice [DATA-PROTECTION]

JISCmail Survey System

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:10:00 GMT

45 lines

Re: Secondary use of Council Tax

Paul Dodgson

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:08:24 -0000

240 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressure

Griffiths, Ian

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:33:23 -0000

47 lines

Re: Safe harbor / harbour

Simon Richardson

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:24:35 +0000

89 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressure

Tinsley, Chris

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:54:35 -0000

142 lines

Re: Secondary use of Council Tax

Alan Stead

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:49:52 -0000

184 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to raise blood pressure

Ekin Caglar

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:42:06 -0000

68 lines

Re: Secondary use of Council Tax

Tim Turner

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:40:50 -0000

107 lines

Serious Organised Crime Bill

Jane Bartlett

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:21:10 -0000

191 lines

Secondary use of Council Tax

Alan Stead

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:19:13 -0000

70 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to raise blood pressur e

Griffiths, Ian

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:48:26 -0000

154 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to raise blood pressur e

Scourfield, Brenda

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:36:05 -0000

98 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to raise blood pressure

Nick Landau

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:30:54 -0000

48 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to raise blood pressure

Jeremy Harmer

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:12:54 -0000

37 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to raise blood pressure

Roland Perry

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:33:23 +0000

48 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressure

Gibson, Martin (ITU)

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 09:38:22 -0000

171 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to r aise blood pressure

Tim Turner

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 08:42:34 -0000

96 lines

Re: Pupil Access to Education Records

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:40:10 -0000

160 lines

Re: Pupil Access to Education Records

Paul Ticher

Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:01:22 -0000

109 lines

Re: School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to raise blood pressure

Jeremy Harmer

Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:58:08 -0000

48 lines

Re: Pupil Access to Education Records

Paul Ticher

Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:56:54 -0000

145 lines

Re: Safe harbor / harbour

Tim Trent

Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:41:33 -0000

103 lines

School fingerprinting: Warning: likely to raise blood pressure

Lloyd M J B (ISeLS)

Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:34:31 +0000

32 lines

Re: Safe harbor / harbour

Nick Landau

Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:11:31 -0000

98 lines

Safe harbor / harbour

Lucy Fincham

Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:53:47 +0000

43 lines

Pupil Access to Education Records

Catherine Lantsbery

Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:31:26 +0000

60 lines

Re: Signatures

Paul Ticher

Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:39:33 -0000

75 lines

Re: Signatures (minor correction)

Tim Turner

Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:01:51 -0000

263 lines

Re: Signatures (minor correction)

Nick Landau

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:34:24 -0000

285 lines

Re: Signatures (minor correction)

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:52:12 -0000

227 lines

Re: Signatures (minor correction)

Tim Turner

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 13:03:02 -0000

157 lines

Re: More Information Sharing

Ian Welton

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 12:43:58 -0000

132 lines

Re: Confidential Survey and drug taking

Tim Trent

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 12:03:19 -0000

135 lines

Re: Signatures (minor correction)

Nick Landau

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:32:57 -0000

90 lines

Re: Signatures

Nick Landau

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:30:47 -0000

61 lines

Signatures

Brenda Scourfield

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:17:55 +0000

32 lines

Re: Confidential Survey and drug taking

Gadsden Anne (RNL) NCAH NHS Trust

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:42:29 -0000

364 lines

Re: Confidential Survey and drug taking

Nick Landau

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:39:45 -0000

190 lines

Re: Confidential Survey and drug taking

Lynzie Gadd

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:29:37 -0000

149 lines

Re: Confidential Survey and drug taking

Simon Howarth

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 09:44:15 -0000

104 lines

Re: POST-SCRIPT: [data-protection] Information Sharing and the ID Card database?

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 09:34:12 -0000

290 lines

Re: Confidential Survey and drug taking

Nick Landau

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 18:22:57 -0000

97 lines

Re: Confidential Survey and drug taking

Paul Dodgson

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:14:15 -0000

135 lines

Re: Confidential Survey and drug taking

Tim Trent

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:10:54 -0000

91 lines

Confidential Survey and drug taking

Kevin Berwick

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 15:48:01 +0000

53 lines

Girl Guide Association - Data Protection

Nick Landau

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 13:03:28 -0000

35 lines

Re: More Information Sharing

Roland Perry

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:44:47 +0000

55 lines

Re: More Information Sharing

Roland Perry

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:38:35 +0000

38 lines

POST-SCRIPT: [data-protection] Information Sharing and the ID Card database?

POUNDER Chris

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:34:49 -0000

234 lines

Re: More Information Sharing

Tim Turner

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:19:36 -0000

137 lines

Re: More Information Sharing

Nick Landau

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:19:12 -0000

58 lines

Re: More Information Sharing

Robert (Bob) Waixel

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:17:43 +0000

131 lines

Information Sharing and the ID Card database?

POUNDER Chris

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:00:23 -0000

200 lines

Re: More Information Sharing

Roland Perry

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 11:00:23 +0000

64 lines

Re: More Information Sharing

Nick Landau

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 10:37:02 -0000

85 lines

Re: More Information Sharing

Nick Landau

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 10:28:30 -0000

68 lines

Re: More Information Sharing

Tim Turner

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 10:18:23 -0000

103 lines

Re: More Information Sharing

Roland Perry

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 10:17:55 +0000

37 lines

Re: More Information Sharing

Simon Howarth

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 09:41:37 -0000

32 lines

Re: More Information Sharing

Tim Trent

Mon, 15 Jan 2007 07:43:28 -0000

160 lines

Re: More Information Sharing

Nick Landau

Sun, 14 Jan 2007 12:34:41 -0000

127 lines

More Information Sharing

Ibrahim Hasan

Sun, 14 Jan 2007 09:48:00 -0000

456 lines

New Survey Notice [DATA-PROTECTION]

JISCmail Survey System

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:18:34 GMT

47 lines

Re: Fines for travelling without a ticket; name and shame

Jethro R Binks

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:33:26 +0000

52 lines

Re: Fines for travelling without a ticket; name and shame

Roland Perry

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:27:14 +0000

51 lines

Re: +AFs-data-protection+AF0- Private Eye releasing possible unique patient information

Nick Landau

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:31:05 -0000

198 lines

Access to public information could soon be free - just placed on BBC news site

Simon Howarth

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:24:28 -0000

291 lines

Re: Private Eye releasing possible unique patient information

Edwina Withe

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:18:30 +0000

341 lines

Re: Private Eye releasing possible unique patient information

Nick Landau

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:16:08 -0000

790 lines

Re: Private Eye releasing possible unique patient information

Carter, Antoinette (MCS)

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:08:49 -0000

718 lines

Re: Fines for travelling without a ticket; name and shame

Nick Landau

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:02:27 -0000

57 lines

Re: Fines for travelling without a ticket; name and shame

Hitches, John F

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:42:26 -0000

37 lines

Re: Private Eye releasing possible unique patient information

Simon Howarth

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:40:36 -0000

497 lines

Re: Fines for travelling without a ticket; name and shame

Roland Perry

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:36:43 +0000

36 lines

Re: Fines for travelling without a ticket; name and shame

Nick Landau

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:23:40 -0000

267 lines

Re: Fines for travelling without a ticket; name and shame

Iain Harrison

Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:46:37 +0000

212 lines

Re: Litter Louts

Nick Landau

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:22:57 -0000

105 lines

Re: Litter Louts

Roland Perry

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:32:28 +0000

46 lines

Private Eye releasing possible unique patient information

Nick Landau

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:11:43 -0000

167 lines

Re: Disclosure

Nick Landau

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:02:00 -0000

221 lines

Re: Disclosure

Ian Welton

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:29:26 -0000

65 lines

Re: Disclosure

Roland Perry

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:17:00 +0000

45 lines

Re: Disclosure

Lee Gardiner

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:40:16 -0000

178 lines

Re: Disclosure

Lee Gardiner

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:37:35 -0000

149 lines

Re: Disclosure

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:43:36 -0000

104 lines

Re: ID Cards

Tim Turner

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:27:23 -0000

128 lines

Re: Disclosure

Roland Perry

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:36:32 +0000

46 lines

Re: Disclosure

Roland Perry

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:29:15 +0000

45 lines

ID Cards

Scourfield, Brenda

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:28:58 -0000

51 lines

The Data Protection Act 1998 and Statute Law Database

Paul Dodgson

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:05:06 -0000

86 lines

Re: Email blunder

Tinsley, Chris

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:21:46 -0000

338 lines

Re: Email blunder

Nick Landau

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:13:02 -0000

298 lines

Re: Email blunder

Nick Landau

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:52:31 -0000

343 lines

Re: Email blunder

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:45:14 -0000

285 lines

Re: Email blunder

Scourfield, Brenda

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:41:15 -0000

281 lines

Re: Email blunder

Nick Landau

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:27:56 -0000

203 lines

Re: Email blunder

Scourfield, Brenda

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:05:44 -0000

143 lines

Re: Email blunder

Nick Landau

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:04:17 -0000

106 lines

Email blunder

Tim Turner

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:06:31 -0000

150 lines

Re: Disclosure

Ian Welton

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 12:25:00 -0000

274 lines

Re: Fines for travelling without a ticket; name and shame

Nigel Roberts

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:41:42 +0000

213 lines

Re: Fines for travelling without a ticket; name and shame

Lee Gardiner

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:36:26 -0000

175 lines

Re: Fines for travelling without a ticket; name and shame

Iain Harrison

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:32:00 +0000

129 lines

Re: Fines for travelling without a ticket; name and shame

Tim Trent

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:27:53 -0000

131 lines

Re: Fines for travelling without a ticket; name and shame

Scourfield, Brenda

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:25:36 -0000

163 lines

Re: Fines for travelling without a ticket; name and shame

Nigel Roberts

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:22:43 +0000

122 lines

Re: Fines for travelling without a ticket; name and shame

Jane Bartlett

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:20:58 -0000

151 lines

Re: Fines for travelling without a ticket; name and shame

Iain Harrison

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:14:14 +0000

96 lines

Privacy of Ms. Middleton - BBC News Article.

Simon Howarth

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:58:40 -0000

33 lines

Home Office - neglected Foreign Criminal Convictions NOT entered onto PNC vs DP Principle 4

Robert (Bob) Waixel

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:18:35 +0000

83 lines

Re: Fines for travelling without a ticket; name and shame

Nick Landau

Wed, 10 Jan 2007 01:10:49 -0000

87 lines

Fines for travelling without a ticket; name and shame

POUNDER Chris

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 23:44:17 -0000

63 lines

Re: Litter Louts

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:55:34 -0000

502 lines

Re: Litter Louts

Peter Burgess

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:50:23 -0000

452 lines

Re: Litter Louts

Antoinette Carter

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:16:46 -0000

523 lines

Re: Disclosure

Nigel Roberts

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:15:19 +0000

44 lines

Re: Disclosure

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 16:00:57 -0000

202 lines

Re: Disclosure

Ian Welton

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:47:15 -0000

166 lines

LLM INFORMATIONI RIGHTS LAW AND PRACTICE

Claire Bessant

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:59:53 +0000

54 lines

Re: Email footers, Websites etc

Blewitt, David

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 12:01:45 -0000

419 lines

E-mail - Beware!!

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 11:09:26 -0000

118 lines

Re: Litter Louts

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:19:17 -0000

382 lines

Re: Litter Louts

Nick Landau

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:11:17 -0000

150 lines

Re: Litter Louts

Scourfield, Brenda

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 09:56:32 -0000

295 lines

Re: Litter Louts

Tim Turner

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 09:49:39 -0000

477 lines

Adv - Training Courses

Ibrahim Hasan

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 09:31:21 -0000

445 lines

Re: Litter Louts

Bownes David (CEX)

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 09:17:09 -0000

294 lines

Litter Louts

Broom, Doreen

Tue, 9 Jan 2007 09:11:16 -0000

145 lines

Re: Disclosure

Tim Trent

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:04:31 -0000

683 lines

Guernsey DP case!! (and it's not even Friday)

Kevin Broadfoot

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 17:47:33 +0000

86 lines

Re: Disclosure

Nick Landau

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:16:26 -0000

660 lines

Re: Disclosure

Nick Landau

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:14:00 -0000

688 lines

Re: Disclosure

Scourfield, Brenda

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:02:00 -0000

621 lines

Re: Disclosure

Tinsley, Chris

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:54:54 -0000

642 lines

Re: Disclosure

Nick Landau

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:49:59 -0000

548 lines

Re: Disclosure

Tim Turner

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 14:16:28 -0000

505 lines

Re: Are 3rd party interview notes personal data ?

Carter, Antoinette (MCS)

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:54:11 -0000

514 lines

Re: Disclosure

Tim Trent

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:12:07 -0000

472 lines

Re: Are 3rd party interview notes personal data ?

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:59:19 -0000

487 lines

Re: Are 3rd party interview notes personal data ?

Bownes David (CEX)

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:53:50 -0000

166 lines

Re: Disclosure

Scourfield, Brenda

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:51:23 -0000

403 lines

Re: Partner Institutions

Paul Ticher

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:45:05 -0000

86 lines

Re: Partner Institutions

Nick Landau

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:44:34 -0000

70 lines

Re: Are 3rd party interview notes personal data ?

<>

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:34:39 +0000

237 lines

Partner Institutions

Caroline Dominey

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:16:34 +0000

41 lines

Re: Disclosure

Nick Landau

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:04:20 -0000

374 lines

Re: Disclosure

Nigel Roberts

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:39:43 +0000

237 lines

Re: Disclosure

Tim Turner

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 10:27:38 -0000

212 lines

Re: Disclosure

Alan Stead

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:31:57 -0000

212 lines

Re: Disclosure

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:31:22 -0000

116 lines

Re: Ordering leaflets from TICO

Broom, Doreen

Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:30:26 -0000

110 lines

Re: Disclosure

Nigel Roberts

Sun, 7 Jan 2007 11:01:48 +0000

65 lines

Re: Ordering leaflets from TICO

Chris Spray

Sun, 7 Jan 2007 09:55:23 -0000

59 lines

Re: Disclosure

Nick Landau

Sat, 6 Jan 2007 21:48:35 -0000

128 lines

Re: Disclosure

Roland Perry

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 18:52:29 +0000

37 lines

Re: Disclosure

Nigel Roberts

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 17:57:04 +0000

88 lines

Re: Disclosure

Andrew Cormack

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:16:10 -0000

156 lines

Re: Danger to the public (was Disclosure)

Andrew Cormack

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:06:46 -0000

455 lines

Re: Disclosure

Nigel Roberts

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 16:06:07 +0000

95 lines

Re: Disclosure

Tim Turner

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 15:14:19 -0000

572 lines

Re: Disclosure

Tim Trent

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 15:13:27 -0000

322 lines

Re: Disclosure

Nick Landau

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 15:01:08 -0000

285 lines

Re: Ordering leaflets from TICO

Lee Gardiner

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:57:27 -0000

75 lines

Re: Ordering leaflets from TICO

Jane Bartlett

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:56:14 -0000

106 lines

Re: Disclosure

Scourfield, Brenda

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:50:55 -0000

346 lines

Re: Ordering leaflets from TICO

Nick Landau

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:48:47 -0000

65 lines

Ordering leaflets from TICO

Brenda Scourfield

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:44:33 +0000

39 lines

Re: Disclosure

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:29:14 -0000

669 lines

New Survey Notice [DATA-PROTECTION]

JISCmail Survey System

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:11:08 GMT

47 lines

Re: Disclosure

Tim Trent

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 14:08:20 -0000

502 lines

Re: Disclosure

Tim Turner

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 13:58:13 -0000

311 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Disclosure

Nick Landau

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 13:19:36 -0000

197 lines

Re: FW: [data-protection] Disclosure

Sneddon, James

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 12:50:32 -0000

336 lines

FW: [data-protection] Disclosure

Hughes2 John (RJ6) MHC-TR Manager

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 12:38:32 -0000

302 lines

Disclosure

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 12:35:56 -0000

151 lines

Re: Are 3rd party interview notes personal data ?

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 10:06:35 -0000

475 lines

Re: Are 3rd party interview notes personal data ?

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 10:01:43 -0000

365 lines

Re: Are 3rd party interview notes personal data ?

Lee Gardiner

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 10:01:02 -0000

424 lines

Re: Are 3rd party interview notes personal data ?

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 09:55:23 -0000

428 lines

Re: Are 3rd party interview notes personal data ?

Lee Gardiner

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 09:53:05 -0000

382 lines

Re: Are 3rd party interview notes personal data ?

Julie Gibbs

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 09:52:07 -0000

349 lines

Re: Are 3rd party interview notes personal data ?

Ibrahim Hasan

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 09:47:30 -0000

403 lines

Re: Are 3rd party interview notes personal data ?

Broom, Doreen

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 09:25:49 -0000

339 lines

Re: Are 3rd party interview notes personal data ?

Tim Turner

Fri, 5 Jan 2007 08:25:14 -0000

254 lines

Re: Are 3rd party interview notes personal data?

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 17:22:27 -0000

199 lines

Re: Email footers, Websites etc

Andrew Cormack

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 17:11:38 -0000

77 lines

Re: Are 3rd party interview notes personal data?

Paul Ticher

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 16:57:44 -0000

126 lines

Re: Are 3rd party interview notes personal data?

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 16:50:28 -0000

773 lines

Re: Are 3rd party interview notes personal data?

Alison Aiton

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 16:46:24 +0000

92 lines

Re: Are 3rd party interview notes personal data?

Julie Gibbs

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 16:34:10 -0000

646 lines

Re: Are 3rd party interview notes personal data?

Broom, Doreen

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 16:15:19 -0000

356 lines

Are 3rd party interview notes personal data?

<>

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 16:09:52 +0000

110 lines

Re: Email footers, Websites etc

Nick Landau

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 12:52:07 -0000

162 lines

Re: Roll on 2007

Robert Dawson

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 11:25:16 +0000

84 lines

Re: Email footers, Websites etc

Simon Howarth

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 10:48:09 -0000

125 lines

Re: Email footers, Websites etc

Roland Perry

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 10:40:23 +0000

39 lines

Re: Email footers, Websites etc

Jethro R Binks

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 10:24:23 +0000

152 lines

Re: Email footers, Websites etc

Tim Turner

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 10:24:05 -0000

89 lines

Re: Email footers, Websites etc

Roland Perry

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 10:23:29 +0000

56 lines

Re: Email footers, Websites etc

Nick Landau

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 10:20:16 -0000

56 lines

Re: Email footers, Websites etc

Nick Landau

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 10:17:24 -0000

160 lines

Re: Email footers, Websites etc

Simon Howarth

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 10:14:09 -0000

104 lines

Re: Email footers, Websites etc

Roland Perry

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 10:07:10 +0000

41 lines

Re: Email footers, Websites etc

Simon Howarth

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 10:01:50 -0000

117 lines

Re: Email footers, Websites etc

Phil Gregg

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 09:52:31 +0000

86 lines

Re: Email footers, Websites etc

Phil Gregg

Thu, 4 Jan 2007 09:46:45 +0000

42 lines

Re: Email footers, Websites etc

Nick Landau

Wed, 3 Jan 2007 14:32:43 -0000

288 lines

Re: Email footers, Websites etc

Nick Landau

Wed, 3 Jan 2007 13:18:43 -0000

708 lines

Re: Email footers, Websites etc

Tim Turner

Wed, 3 Jan 2007 12:52:30 -0000

363 lines

Re: Email footers, Websites etc

Graham Donelan

Wed, 3 Jan 2007 12:44:42 +0000

237 lines

Re: Email footers, Websites etc

Broom, Doreen

Wed, 3 Jan 2007 12:34:39 -0000

524 lines

FW: [data-protection] Email footers, Websites etc

Hughes2 John (RJ6) MHC-TR Manager

Wed, 3 Jan 2007 12:30:30 -0000

347 lines

Email footers, Websites etc

Tim Trent

Wed, 3 Jan 2007 12:13:26 -0000

233 lines

Re: "Unauthorised" access to "public" website

Griffiths, Ian

Wed, 3 Jan 2007 09:42:43 -0000

103 lines

Re: Possible Housing benefit fraud

Griffiths, Ian

Wed, 3 Jan 2007 09:21:18 -0000

115 lines

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager