In message
<[log in to unmask]>,
at 10:18:38 on Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Tim Turner <[log in to unmask]>
writes
>More importantly, disclosure is not "necessary".
A very good point. DPA 29(3) is supposedly only for use when there's no
other way to proceed in the case, everything else has turned into a dead
end.
> Clarkson could ask the police to investigate the crime, and the bank
>would have no justification for not providing the information to the
>police.
Albeit I think the "information" in question (if it was ever collected)
is at the charity, not the bank.
--
Roland Perry
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
Any queries about sending or receiving messages please send to the list owner
[log in to unmask]
Full help Desk - please email [log in to unmask] describing your needs
To receive these emails in HTML format send the command:
SET data-protection HTML to [log in to unmask]
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|