Dear all
I have been rereading the Durant judgement and noted that LJ Auld, in
reference to S7 SARs stated ...
"Nor is to assist him, for example, to obtain discovery of documents that
may assist him in litigation or complaints against third parties. "
It struck me that where a Data Controller receiving a SAR was aware that
the request for data would, could or may be used in litigation and not for
checking compliance with the DPA or privacy etc the Data Controller
could refuse access.
Comments please.
--
Thank you and kind regards
Opinions are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of my employer
Rob Dawson
Institutional Compliance Officer
University of Chester
Parkgate Road
Chester
CH1 4BJ
[log in to unmask]
Chichester House 002
Tel: 01244 392892
Fax: 01244 392821
http://www.chester.ac.uk/
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at : -
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
Any queries about sending or receiving message please send to the list owner
[log in to unmask]
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|