JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


data-protection@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION  2002

DATA-PROTECTION 2002

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

FW: employee contract clause

From:

Donald Harris <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Donald Harris <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 17 Jul 2002 21:07:12 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (112 lines)

Moira,

Here's my two pence from across the big pond.

I agree with everything said to date.  Cindy Burnes is on target raising the
issue of the limited value of consent in the employment context.  The
Article 29 Working Party has a long paper on processing in the employment
context (see the Sept 1 2001 paper at
http://europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/en/dataprot/wpdocs/wpdocs_2001.htm
), containing some very strong restrictions on the role of consent in the
workplace.  Since the paper reflects the thinking of the OIC, I recommend
giving it a careful read.

One way of dealing with the fact that the conditions required for consent
are mostly absent in the employment context is to reposition what you call
"consent" to "an acknowledgment of notice".  You are, after all, required to
give employees notice concerning the purposes and uses of information
collected from them, so the sign-off you refer to could be re-described as
such an acknowledgment.

Even as a notice statement, however, it seems deficient, in its brevity,
generality ("administration and business management purposes") and omission
of reference to other information that should be provided, such as reference
to the organization's privacy policy, a point of contact for inquiry and
complaints, data subject access and correction rights, safeguards that will
be employed, and so forth.  The requirements of fair information practice,
as well as the 1998 DP Act, cannot be adequately met with such uninformative
short paragraphs.

As for the issue of responsibility, I believe it confuses things to mix a
"consent/acknowledgment" statement with a confidentiality agreement.  The
former is addressed to a data subject; the latter to a data user.
Responsibilities can and should be placed upon data users, but again not in
a one sentence statement such as your HR section proposes.  This does not
mean that the organization is less accountable than before, since both
organizations AND data users are responsible parties.  What the
responsibilities of data users are needs to be spelled out, however, both
for the sake of the user's peace of mind and to ensure effective privacy
protection in the organization.

Don

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Dr. Donald F. Harris
President, HR Privacy Solutions, Ltd.
1202 Lexington Avenue, Suite 318
New York, NY 10028
Phone/Fax:  (212)396-1184
E-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Website: www.hrprivacy.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

-----Original Message-----
From: This list is for those interested in Data Protection issues
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Moira Forbes
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 5:12 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: employee contract clause


Dear All,

My HR section have requested my approval of the following statement:

"From time to time xxx may process Personal Data and sensitive Personal
Data about you which is covered by the Data Protection Act 1998 for
administration and business management purposes. Processing will take place
in accordance with the provisions of the Data Protection Act 1998. By
signing this contract you acknowledge that you are providing xxx with
consent to these uses.

It is your responsibility to ensure that where, in the course of your
employment with xxx, you process data covered by the Data Protection 1998,
you comply with this legislation."


Initially I thought it was fine, but now I wonder whether it removes the
individual's right to give explicit and informed consent to sensitive
personal data. I realise the Act allows HR sections to process certain
sensitive data in the course of their work (eg sickness records) but is
this statement a step too far? I also wonder about the terminology "your
responsibility to ensure" with no reference to the employer providing
training/guidance etc -  or am I being too picky?

Comments would be most welcome.

Thanks

Moira

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
       All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
      available to the world wide web community at large at
      http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
      If you wish to leave this list please send the command
       leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
            All user commands can be found at : -
    www.jiscmail.ac.uk/user-manual/summary-user-commands.htm
  (all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
       All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
      available to the world wide web community at large at
      http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
      If you wish to leave this list please send the command
       leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
            All user commands can be found at : -
    www.jiscmail.ac.uk/user-manual/summary-user-commands.htm
  (all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager