JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DIS-FORUM Archives


DIS-FORUM Archives

DIS-FORUM Archives


DIS-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DIS-FORUM Home

DIS-FORUM Home

DIS-FORUM  2001

DIS-FORUM 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Deaf students and extra time

From:

claire wickham <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Discussion list for disabled students and their support staff.

Date:

Fri, 2 Mar 2001 14:36:20 +0000

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (196 lines)

Yes Chris,

I totally agree.

So the answer might be additional support/tuition to remedy this,
although the downside of this would be that this hypothetical student
would have to devote extra time to studying, but then this is true
for many disabled students.

We are, I think, simply saying: "assess the need and look at the
individual; don't try to operate with global rules that assume that
all individuals with the label "deaf" have identical access
requirements."
ATB

Claire

On Fri, 2 Mar 2001 14:23:58 -0000 "Baxter, Chris"
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Claire
> It's a fab Friday afternoon topic......
> I believe there are a number of elements which affect performance in
> assessments:
> a) language competence
> b) current reading/cognition ability
> c) knowledge acquisition
> d) type of assessment
> at least, of these c is key in this particular instance as acquisition of
> information and knowledge can be impeded by hearing loss EVEN WHEN there are
> interpreters or speech to text.  I know as a user of both (thought I prefer
> interpreters) that there are times when things are missed, typing at the
> same speed someone is speaking for example is nigh on impossible, getting
> inflections and nuances right can be difficult, so that even with the 'best'
> support possible the hearing impaired candidate might be labouring on at a
> disadvantage.  Of course, if we are only speaking in terms of extra time
> then no this would not be appropriate or even useful.
>
> So, no to extra time, but yes to being disadvantaged (thus disabled) even
> with all the equipment and support!
>
> Pass the cup cakes
> Chris
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: claire wickham [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 2:12 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask] <fwd>
>
>
> Chris,
>
> As you rightly say, everyone is an individual.
>
> If there was an indivudal who was deaf but who had a reading age
> comensurate with their chronological age and their intellectual
> abilty and who accessed lectures via speed-text, and who
> demintarted no susbtantial deicif in speelling or writing speed would
> theree be a cse for extra time in exmas? (And if so, on what basis
> would this extra time be allocated?
>
> Or to put it another way, this indiviudal woul dstill have an
> impiarment (their hearing loss) but, in the context of HE, might not
> be disabled (at least in the case of acess to lectures,
> reading marteial and exams.)
>
> (This is a good Friday afternoon topic, isn't it?)
>
> ATB
>
> Claire
>
> On Fri, 2 Mar 2001 12:38:45 -0000 "Baxter, Chris"
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > Interesting Claire,
> > What do you define as genuinely bi lingual ? I consider myself to be bi
> > lingual but BSL is my second 'acquired' language.  Born hearing and raised
> > hearing (even though I probably wasn't) means English is my first language
> > but latterly due to improvements in my hearing loss (:o)) I access some
> > information more accurately through BSL, which in turn means I can miss
> > information in English.  It's a tough one, and my profile is quite unique,
> > as is everyone's, which makes generalising about extra time so difficult.
> > Hope this comes across as clearer than it seems to be in my head (!)
> > Sorry Skill's LEA awards officer day yesterday still spinning me!
> > Chris
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: claire wickham [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> > Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 12:25 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask] <fwd>
> >
> >
> > >To add to what Chris has rightly said re. Deaf students:
> > >
> > >Chris wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >>There is a huge difference between Deaf people and people from other
> > >>countries who speak different languages, and that is that people from
> > other
> > >>countries can hear, they can acquire English in the same way they could
> > >>acquire any other spoken language, through their ears, Deaf people
> cannot.
> > >>
> > >>Much has been written on the acquisition of language by Deaf people,
> > perhaps
> > >>some background reading might help.
> > >
> > >To which I would add:
> > >
> > >One of the issues is that while educators know how to teach English to
> > >hearing people, as a second language, hearing people do NOT know how to
> > >teach English to (profoundly) deaf children/adults. Hence the low
> > >literacy rates among Deaf people. Hearing society therefore
> > >disadvantages Deaf people by, albeit unintentionally, preventing access
> > >to written English.
> > >
> > >If we could solve this problem and could provide Deaf people with full
> > >access to written English, there would be no need for additional time,
> > >as Deaf students would then be in a similar position to other speakers
> > >of English as a second language. Until then, Deaf people are disabled by
> > >the hearing world.
> > >
> > >However, if there was Deaf student who was genuinely bilingual, would
> > >there then be a case for extra time? What do you think, Chris and
> > >others?
> > >
> > >Claire
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Claire Wickham
> > Director of Programmes, Research and Development
> > Access Unit for Deaf and Disabled Students
> > Union Building, University of Bristol,
> > Queen's Road, Clifton, Bristol BS8 1LN
> > Tel: 0117 954 5710 (voice)
> >      0117 954 5715 (textphone)
> > Fax: 0117 954 5714
> >
> > --- End Forwarded Message ---
> >
> >
> > ----------------------
> > Claire Wickham
> > Director: Programmes, Research and Development
> > Access Unit
> > University of Bristol
> > Union Building
> > Queen's Road
> > Clifton
> > Bristol BS8 1LN
> >
> > Tel: 0117 954 5710
> > Textphone: 0117 954 5715
> > Fax: 0117 954 5714
> >
> > [log in to unmask]
> >
>
> ----------------------
> Claire Wickham
> Director: Programmes, Research and Development
> Access Unit
> University of Bristol
> Union Building
> Queen's Road
> Clifton
> Bristol BS8 1LN
>
> Tel: 0117 954 5710
> Textphone: 0117 954 5715
> Fax: 0117 954 5714
>
> [log in to unmask]
>

----------------------
Claire Wickham
Director: Programmes, Research and Development
Access Unit
University of Bristol
Union Building
Queen's Road
Clifton
Bristol BS8 1LN

Tel: 0117 954 5710
Textphone: 0117 954 5715
Fax: 0117 954 5714

[log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager