As with the others this is in my view clearly controller - controller. Within the relationship there is a broad discretion under Art 26 as to how responsibilities are allocated.
Having sad that as a barrister (or indeed any professional controller) I would not accept the sort of absolute control you seek. I can see that causing conflicts with professional responsibilities (e.g. if there is a formal complaint against the barrister) You also have to factor in Art 26(3).
Usual approach would be to do due diligence then provide for referral and co-operation and require all parties to fully comply with their legal ethical and professional obligations as a controller
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/subscribers/subscribercommands.html
Any queries about sending or receiving messages please send to the list owner
[log in to unmask]
Full help Desk - please email [log in to unmask] describing your needs
To receive these emails in HTML format send the command:
SET data-protection HTML to [log in to unmask]
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|