If the reports are true, whatever the outcome, Letwin is probably
attempting to ensure that all the constituents correspondence he is
reported to have thrown in the bin was being dealt with fully and meets
the full expectations of his constituents. Only in that way could he
hope to present an argument to them that throwing their letters into a
public waste bin is not the same as posting them to his office. (I'll
forgo the out-basket jokes.)
A strict conclusion that the DP
principles cannot be considered to have been breached in the British
law would provide really damning evidence that the UK DPA is hugely
deficient and how nonsensically organisationally focused Durant was.
Imagine trying to tell somebody that their name, address, and opinions
or complaint are not defined as personal data, and yet the IC has to
apply a strict interpretation given the legal precedence - or does he.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
Any queries about sending or receiving messages please send to the list owner
[log in to unmask]
Full help Desk - please email [log in to unmask] describing your needs
To receive these emails in HTML format send the command:
SET data-protection HTML to [log in to unmask]
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|