In a message dated 10/11/05 09:52:13 GMT Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
> What is the groups view on references when requested as part of a staff
> personal file?
-------
If the references are held in a manual file it is very likely they would
*not* have to be revealed if you really wanted to keep them from the employee.
Bear with me. (Don't worry, it's just a stuffed one!)
Unless personnel files are held in a highly-structured manner, they will be
exempt from subject access after the Durant case. We must remember that the
CoA went beyond explaining that the file in that case was not even personal
data, and described what they thought was meant by "structure" in a manual file.
My interpretation is that if the documents in one person's file are in a
different order to those in another person's file, there is likely to be no
structure. So, say for example there are no indeces on the file and finding the
references is a matter of picking up the file and leafing through it, the file is
likely to be exempt from subject access. If, on the other hand, the
references are always at the back of a personnel file - the references could be part
of a structured system.
Now we all know that this in essence means that the majority of manual files
(except for housing, social work & education records) will be exempt from
subject access. Many people feel that the Durant case is wrong and might be
redundant once the European beaurocrats get their heads round it, but for the
moment it is the law of the land and (along with Johnson) could/should be observed.
There is one caveat, however, and that is that agreements between public
sector employers and the unions may dictate that a personnel file is made
available on request (within 7 days, I believe) and that redactions are agreed with
the TU. I am not saying in the particular case that the person is in the union
or that the national agreement has not been overridden by a local arrangement
but I am suggesting you look at that area before making a decision on the
matter.
My own view? If you have nothing to hide, show them the references. If you
do have something to hide or you would rather protect the source, refuse. It
is unlikely the person would take you to court to try to force disclosure.
Possession is everything.
My company policy? All references are open - outgoing and incoming - and
referees are told this when we write to them. It concentrates the mind, ensures
they don't say anything they cannot substantiate and if they do make a genuine
mistake the prospective candidate can challenge the reference and we can have
it sorted long before we even think about setting them on.
What would I do if I was the employee? I would insist on disclosure of all
documents related to me, including references, I would quote the old advice
from the ICO, I would even contact the referees thamselves to ask if they kept a
copy of what they sent. I would complain to the ICO if I did not get the
references, then I would look at my bank balance and see if I could afford to take
you to court without the help of the ICO. Of course I wouldn't have that
sort of cash available and you'd get away with it.
Ian B
Ian Buckland
Keep I.T. Legal Ltd
(Reg: 3822335)
Please Note: The information given above does not replace or negate the need
for proper legal advice and/or representation. It is essential that you do not
rely upon any advice given without contacting your solicitor. If you need
further explanation of any points raised please contact Keep I.T. Legal Ltd at
the address below:
55 Curbar Curve
Inkersall, Chesterfield
Derbyshire S43 3HP
Tel: 01246 473999
Fax: 01246 470742
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at : -
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
Any queries about sending or receiving message please send to the list owner
[log in to unmask]
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|