JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DIS-FORUM Archives


DIS-FORUM Archives

DIS-FORUM Archives


DIS-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DIS-FORUM Home

DIS-FORUM Home

DIS-FORUM  2004

DIS-FORUM 2004

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Students with English as an Additional Language and Educational Psychologist's assessments

From:

David Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Discussion list for disabled students and their support staff.

Date:

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 09:09:53 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (111 lines)

Whereas there is no obligation to arrive at a diagnosis of dyslexia even
though a student feels that should be the outcome of a diagnostic
assessment, there is an obligation to arrive at a diagnostic decision in
a professional manner.

I suspect that the ed psych in this instance is unfamiliar with
assessing students with English as a second language.  At least 10% of
the students I see have English as a second language and I do administer
both the Vocabulary and Information subtests.  This is because they both
provide important information.  In many cases- but not all -  there is a
distinctive pattern in that, of the three verbal reasoning subtests, the
highest score is for Similarities [probably the most important of the
three as it provides a measure of conceptual understanding], the lowest
score is for Vocabulary, and the middle score is for Information.

For example, one student I saw achieved a percentile of 75 on
Similarities, 50 on Information, and just 7 on Vocabulary.

Provided the score for Similarities is above average, there is a good
chance of a student being able to grasp a number of concepts in HE even
if he/she lacks the vocabulary to express the quality of his/her
thinking, provided the gap between Similarities and Vocabulary is not
too large.

If nothing else, the Vocabulary score provides information on the extent
to which a student will be need to rely on a dictionary. [In many cases
the scatter of 'right' responses on the Vocabulary subtest is also
revealing as there can be a greater understanding of more complex words
than many everyday conversational words.]

If I have any doubts about a student's ability to think conceptually I
also administer the Comprehension subtest as well.  In other words, a
professional assessment should be as inclusive as possible.

In the case of a student with ESL, this obligation should also include a
very detailed life history as this can provide a rich source of
information.

In my experience students with ESL are the students who are most likely
to have been overlooked as school children [either in their own country,
or, for children who grow up in a family within the UK where English is
not the first language within the family home].  A diagnostic assessment
is more challenging, but it should not beyond the professional
competence of those who offer a diagnostic service.

I would be very concerned about a repeat assessment as scores on some
subtests [primarily the non-verbal ones] may well be higher the second
time around.  The use of an interpreter is also a problem as you lose
control of the assessment [I have used an interpreter just once].  In
addition, if you need the services of an interpreter there are real
questions then about whether that person has achieved the level of
English to be an independent student in higher education.

It may be useful to see whether another ed psych might be prepared to
administer those subtests that were not administered.  Secondly, if the
personal history is of poor quality, this should also be taken [this can
easily take about an hour in its own right].

If the diagnostic outcome is the same at least there will be a greater
confidence in the outcome.  At the moment it seems as it this confidence
is totally lacking.


David Grant, PhD., Chartered Psychologist
dyslexia diagnosis - a specialist service for students
3 Rosebank Road
Hanwell
London W7 2EW

Tel: 020 8579 1902

e-mail: [log in to unmask]


-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion list for disabled students and their support staff.
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of L.Thompson
Sent: 10 February 2004 14:33
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Students with English as an Additional Language and Educational
Psychologist's assessments

Dear all

I recently screened a student with English as an additional language and
referred him to the Educational Psychologist that we usually use (after
consultation with the EP and his agreement that he felt he could offer a
fair assessment).

The report has come back and states that the student does not have
dyslexia, and is in the low average/below average range of ability (the
vocabulary and information sub-tests were not administered).  The
student is unhappy and does not agree with this outcome and feels
strongly that he has dyslexia.

I was wondering if anyone else offers either EP assessment in the
student's first language or provides an interpreter or has any other
procedures in place.  I am unsure whether to offer a second assessment
with one of these options in place.

Many thanks

Louise Thompson
Asst Disability Adviser
Equality and Diversity Office
Humphrey Booth House
University of Salford

0161 295 2041
[log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager