In message <[log in to unmask]>, at
20:05:12 on Mon, 23 Aug 2004, GM Polato <[log in to unmask]> writes
>The explanation may lie in the Race Relations
>(Amendment) Act 2000 and the statutory duty to promote
>race equality. This cannot be done without monitoring
>the ethnicity of pupils and, ideally, checking the
>correspondence between the school's intake and the
>local Census population.
Of less concern where I live, as the intake isn't selective and appears
to be on the basis of a strict catchment area only. You either live in
the right place, or you don't; race is irrelevant.
>That said, the school may need to redraw its forms to
>furnish some explanation.
I think it should.
>Incidentally, the school does not appear to be asking
>about language. I find that fascinatingly intriguing.
No, they also asked "Language at home" and "Religion". The former could
be understood to allow them to prepare better for pupils whose first
language isn't English, and the latter leads onto their next two
questions about participation in assemblies and RE classes.
--
Roland Perry
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at : -
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|