On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 22:26:52 +0100, Roland Perry
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>It rather depends on whether or not the police were telling the truth
>when they said there was a gas leak [1]. What evidence, or
>certification, did they present that this was actually the case?
Either there's a leak & a public safety issue = kick the door down!
Or they're scamming for information that they are not lawfully entitled to
receive and weren't even confident about asking under S.29.
After all, the landlord could live anywhere - were they going to wait to
get access till s/he came back from Caymen Islands tax haven with the spare
keys?
I'd think that potentially disclosure was unlawful - particularly with
restrictions on secondary use of CT data. Or have I've just got a very
jaundiced view of the Police!
Regards, Kirsty.
Kirsty E Gray
Data Protection Officer
Commission for Social Care Inspection
Note: comments for discussion and debate only and do not necessarily
reflect the corporate position of CSCI nor constitute legal advice.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at : -
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|