JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DIS-FORUM Archives


DIS-FORUM Archives

DIS-FORUM Archives


DIS-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DIS-FORUM Home

DIS-FORUM Home

DIS-FORUM  2002

DIS-FORUM 2002

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: book scanner

From:

claire wickham <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Discussion list for disabled students and their support staff.

Date:

Tue, 5 Nov 2002 13:35:46 +0000

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (282 lines)

ATW budget should cover all you need: some of my staff have
had more than your projected expense for equipment.
Do contact me off list if you would like to discuss this
further, as we are dealing with the same ATW team!

ATB

Claire

On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 13:02:06 +0000 "Toseland, Evelyn"
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Dear Andrew, Claire, Peter, David, Ian,
> Many thanks to all of you for your input.
> Yes, he is going to get help under Access to Work but the RNIB asessor had never seen or heard
> of a book scanner! He asked a colleague who mentioned one which is now out of production, so we
> said we would lok further.
> I have no idea how much AtW budget per person ... but the prices I saw on the Net seemed
> very high.
> Yes, a scanning pen would be difficult for him to use and probably no faster than reading
> directly from the book.
> I will collate these and go back to the RNIB tech with the suggestions.
>
> Evelyn Toseland
> ;)
>
> >
> > Date:    Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:05:18 -0000
> > From:    Andrew Hodgson <[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: Re: book scannes
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The best advise I can give you on this is to try and get out to
> > see the equipment running - get demos, go to drop in days etc.
> > This is the best way of getting the equipment you want and can use.
> >
> > I will explain the equipment I have:
> >
> > For reading books, I have some sight and can see a CCTV, but find
> > a reader is the best option.  This is mainly because after a while
> > my eyes get very tired, and reading becomes very painful.  I also
> > have a Kurzweil reading system, which is the Kurzweil 1000
> > package.  This consists of an Epson scanner (which is important as
> > the scanner has to be fast in order to process information
> > quickly), and the software that runs on the pc.
> >
> > I have found that while this works with sheets very well, books
> > are difficult for a few reasons:-
> > 1.  The flatbed scanner is not usually big enough to take the book
> > on the scanner surface;
> > 2.  It is difficult to find specific pages and to find specific
> > chapters in the book; indexes do not scan well because of their
> > tabular layout.
> >
> > As for screen readers, I use Jaws for Windows, which I moved to
> > using after using a cheaper alternative for a considerable time.
> > I would say that this is one of the best screen readers,
> > especially when using it on the Internet.
> >
> > Sight and sound sell all these - their website is
> > www.sightandsound.co.uk.
> >
> > Don't hesitate to get back if you need more help.
> >
> > Andrew.
> >
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > Date:    Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:11:52 +0000
> > From:    claire wickham <[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: Re: book scannes
> >
> > Evelyn,
> >
> > You describe this person as "a researcher"...is he/she employed as a
> > researcher, because if so, ATW will fund the most appropriate equipment
> > and you do not have to seek cheap alternatives.
> >
> > ATB
> >
> > Claire
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~>
> >
> > Date:    Wed, 30 Oct 2002 12:33:23 +0000
> > From:    Peter Hill <[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: Re: book scannes
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Sitting next to my ConoScan N67OU, I wondered how close to the binding
> > of a page I could scan, if the scanner were placed on a box allowing
> > half of the book to hang down the side of the scanner(this would
> > overcome the obvious difficulty of trying to lay an open book flat on
> > the scanner and having to sit on it so that the text close to the spine
> > of the book can be recognised).
> >
> > I didn't place the scanner on a box but placed a ruler across the
> > machine and 'scanned' it. The scanner will read to within 22mm of the
> > edge of the scanner.  This is fine for a few texts but, unfortunately,
> > many have margins as small as 12mm - so the scanner would miss a lot of
> > text.  Oh well - back to sitting on the scanner.
> >
> > Seriously:  the CanoScan is a lightweight machine that does scan close
> > to the edge.  I wonder if there are any that scan closer still.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Peter Hill
> >
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > Date:    Wed, 30 Oct 2002 21:08:35 +0000
> > From:    David Grant <[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: Re: book scannes - scanning pens the answer?
> >
> > For students who make use of bound research journals, where even xeroxing i=
> > s
> > a problem because of the size of the volume and the tightness of the
> > binding, I recommend that a student be provided with a Quicklink Scanning
> > pen.  [Available from iANSYST, cost of =A3130 includes VAT].
> >
> >
> > This handheld device enables a student to scan across lines of text and sav=
> > e
> > it to memory.  This can then be uploaded into a PC and read aloud using Rea=
> > d
> > & Write
> >
> >
> > Given the necessity for students to make use of the research literature I'm
> > a little surprised that this device is not a 'standard' recommendation.
> > There may be all sorts of reasons why not, but the dislike of some dyslexic
> > students for printed material cannot be the sole reason - can it?
> >
> >
> > David
> >
> >
> > David Grant, PhD., Chartered Psychologist
> > dyslexia diagnosis - a specialist service for students
> > 3 Rosebank Road
> > Hanwell
> > London W7 2EW
> >
> > Tel: 020 8579 1902
> >
> > e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> >
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > Date:    Wed, 30 Oct 2002 23:07:31 -0000
> > From:    Ian <[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: Re: book scannes - scanning pens the answer?
> >
> > Scanning pens seem to me to be a 'better than nothing' solution (but I'm
> > happy to be proved wrong there). They aren't that easy to use as a method
> > of taking more than brief information even if you can see what you are
> > doing, especially if you have fine motor problems and/or difficulties
> > keeping your place in the text.
> >
> > The 'Reading Edge' was designed to solve the problem of fitting big books
> > on scanners. It is a piece of equipment designed for blind or partially
> > sighted (or 'print impaired') people to use. It's a stand-alone unit that
> > reads books aloud and doesn't need a a PC, although you can connect one
> > to it. It's very expensive (beyond the realms of DSA) so should be
> > considered as a useful resource for a central university library to
> > provide - this is where these huge reference-only journals are usually
> > located anyway. they've had one at Uni of Central Lancs for years now and
> > probably a few other university libraries too.
> >
> > See the following for more information - the image shows how the design
> > might help with scanning huge volumes.
> > http://www.telesensory.com/products2-2-2.html
> >
> > Not sure who supplies this in the UK at the moment.
> >
> > Hope this is useful,
> > Ian Francis
> >
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> >
> > On 30 Oct 2002 at 22:17, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 21:08:35 +0000, you wrote:
> > >
> > > >For students who make use of bound research journals, where even xeroxi=
> > ng is
> > > >a problem because of the size of the volume and the tightness of the
> > > >binding, I recommend that a student be provided with a Quicklink Scanni=
> > ng
> > > >pen.  [Available from iANSYST, cost of =A3130 includes VAT].
> > >
> > > This would not be practical for a visually impaired person.
> > >
> > > Andrew.
> > > --
> > > Andrew Hodgson, Bromyard, Herefordshire, UK.
> > > Email: [log in to unmask]
> > >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Date:    Wed, 30 Oct 2002 23:09:29 +0000
> > From:    Andrew Hodgson <[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: Re: book scannes - scanning pens the answer?
> >
> > On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 23:07:31 -0000, you wrote:
> >
> > >Scanning pens seem to me to be a 'better than nothing' solution (but I'm
> > >happy to be proved wrong there). They aren't that easy to use as a =
> > method
> > >of taking more than brief information even if you can see what you are
> > >doing, especially if you have fine motor problems and/or difficulties
> > >keeping your place in the text.
> >
> > Except that when VI people scan in they tend to scan rhemes of data
> > into the computer at a time; furthermore, if the pen veers off the
> > line when scanning, the results are dreadful.
> > >
> > >The 'Reading Edge' was designed to solve the problem of fitting big =
> > books
> > >on scanners. It is a piece of equipment designed for blind or partially
> > >sighted (or 'print impaired') people to use. It's a stand-alone unit =
> > that
> > >reads books aloud and doesn't need a a PC, although you can connect one
> > >to it. It's very expensive (beyond the realms of DSA) so should be
> > >considered as a useful resource for a central university library to
> > >provide - this is where these huge reference-only journals are usually
> > >located anyway. they've had one at Uni of Central Lancs for years now =
> > and
> > >probably a few other university libraries too.
> >
> > There are other newer products at the following urls:
> >
> > Pulsedata: <www.pulsedata.com> - follow the UK link and agency
> > products.
> > Modern world data: www.modern-world-data.com - Reading machine with
> > hard drive and floppy drive.
> > www.techno-vision.co.uk: Less expensive reading machine with floppy
> > drive.
> >
> > In all cases I would prefer the PC based system, being that it can do
> > far more superior tasks than a stand allone unit could do, and is in
> > most cases simpler than a stand allone unit to use.
> >
> > Andrew.
> > >
> > >See the following for more information - the image shows how the design
> > >might help with scanning huge volumes.
> > >http://www.telesensory.com/products2-2-2.html
> > >
> > >Not sure who supplies this in the UK at the moment.
> > >
> > >Hope this is useful,
> > >Ian Francis
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
> Evelyn Toseland
> Webmaster
> Faculty of Applied Sciences
> University of the West of England
> Email: [log in to unmask]
>

----------------------
Claire Wickham
Director: Access Unit - Short Courses and Outreach
University of Bristol
Union Building
Queen's Road
Clifton
Bristol BS8 1LN

Tel: 0117 954 5710
Textphone: 0117 954 5715
Fax: 0117 954 5714

[log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager