There are a number of issues relating to the Post Graduate
DSA and one of them is that it often falls woefully short
of being adequate. There seems to be a particularly
problematic combination, such as a visual impairment and
Post Grad funding, leaving the assessment's recommendations
a compromise, or trade-off, between non medical personal
assistance or equipment. For students that progress from a
degree onto a Masters there is often equipment that will
have a further one-year shelf life. However, for students
returning to study after a break this is often not the
case. Why is only roughly 30% of the 1st year funding at
undergraduate level available at post-grad level. Can
anyone explain the formula for deciding this figure?
----------------------
Kevin Partington
[log in to unmask]
|