On Mon, 07 Aug 2000 11:20:01 +0100 Leif Wilks
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> If the request is being made by the Faculty member on behalf
>of the Faculty then there is probably a legitimate
>interest justification for disclosing the information,
>since non-attendance by the representative will be
>prejudicial to the interests of the Faculty.
I agree with this. it's the sort of thing that should be on
the minutes anyway. refusing to give the information on dp
grounds seems a bit heavy handed, really.
Clare Coyne
University of Bristol
>
> Leif Wilks, DPO Kirklees MBC
>
> >>> Gil Richardson <[log in to unmask]> 08/07 10:24 am >>>
> Council, the Trustees of the College, meets 5 times a year. Members of
> Council represent the Faculties of the College. A member of the
> College/Faculty has requested (more of a demand really) the attendance
> record of the Council member representing the requesting member's Faculty be
> disclosed to him.
>
> We have declined on the grounds of DP provisions on disclosure - consent
> etc.
>
> Attendance records of Council Members (5 out of 5; 4 out of 5; say) are
> reported to the Trustees of the College via the Annual Report. We believe
> this to be the extent of the College requirement to disclose attendance
> records.
>
> I would be grateful for any comments/thoughts on this.
>
>
> Gil Richardson
> Senior Information Manager
> RCGP
>
> email: [log in to unmask]
> Website: www.rcgp.org.uk
> Tel: 0171 581 3232 ext 231
> Fax: 0171 225 3047
>
>
----------------------
Clare Coyne
[log in to unmask]
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|