 |
 |
On Mon, 07 Aug 2000 11:20:01 +0100 Leif Wilks <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > If the request is being made by the Faculty member on behalf >of the Faculty then there is probably a legitimate >interest justification for disclosing the information, >since non-attendance by the representative will be >prejudicial to the interests of the Faculty. I agree with this. it's the sort of thing that should be on the minutes anyway. refusing to give the information on dp grounds seems a bit heavy handed, really. Clare Coyne University of Bristol > > Leif Wilks, DPO Kirklees MBC > > >>> Gil Richardson <[log in to unmask]> 08/07 10:24 am >>> > Council, the Trustees of the College, meets 5 times a year. Members of > Council represent the Faculties of the College. A member of the > College/Faculty has requested (more of a demand really) the attendance > record of the Council member representing the requesting member's Faculty be > disclosed to him. > > We have declined on the grounds of DP provisions on disclosure - consent > etc. > > Attendance records of Council Members (5 out of 5; 4 out of 5; say) are > reported to the Trustees of the College via the Annual Report. We believe > this to be the extent of the College requirement to disclose attendance > records. > > I would be grateful for any comments/thoughts on this. > > > Gil Richardson > Senior Information Manager > RCGP > > email: [log in to unmask] > Website: www.rcgp.org.uk > Tel: 0171 581 3232 ext 231 > Fax: 0171 225 3047 > > ---------------------- Clare Coyne [log in to unmask] %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%