Ian Buckland wrote:
> I agree that the Act does not require an opt-in but it
> expressly forbids assumed consent therfore those organisations that use
the
> "opt-out" method will have to interpret non-responses as non-consents.
Where does it expressly forbid assumed consent? The third schedule refers to
"explicit consent", the second schedule just to "consent". I have always
assumed that the lack of "explicit" in the second schedule means that
"assumed" may be assumed...
--
Tim Wright
IT Security Manager
Fuji Bank, London
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|