Hi Mick
Michael Trott wrote:
> Well, that might be but I think the view is that the supplier's Service Level
> Agreement was handed to QAG and that training and perhaps even dyslexia/study
> support support might come under that umbrella too. They are all related, in
> fact more is often spent on training than the assessment and more is often
> spent on dyslexia/study support than equipment, training and assessment put
> together.
>
> QAG is not inviting itself into every area. It has been asked to look at some
> areas and others turn out to have an obvious connection. It would seem silly
> to look at the assessment and then equipment without looking at the other
> areas coming out of the assessment.
If you feel that Needs Assessments, Equipment, training and
dyslexia/study support should come under scrutiny, which areas will QAG
*not* be looking into? If it does look into dyslexia/study support,
what sort of issues might it focus on?
Regards
Peter Hill
>
> Part of this is to scrutinise the separation that should exist between the
> various activities - assessment and 'downstream' activities such as training,
> equipment and support. Part, is to make sure that the service serves the
> interests of the students. Part, is to ensure that each offers good value for public
> money.
>
> As I understand it, the Round Table might eventually either disolve or meet
> less often. QAG was a working group that met much more regularly and will
> eventually be formed into a legal body, perhaps similar to the QCA.
>
> Mick Trott
>
>
>
--
Peter Hill
01905 391547
[log in to unmask]
www.study-pro.com
|