Alison Aiton on 15 June 2004 at 09:20 said:-
> We've had a request from the police in Australia for details
> of a former
> student's academic record.
The request should have been routed via INTERPOL and the local police, where
agreed processes would validate the necessity of any international request
and associated actions?
If section 29 were used to legitimate any disclosure to the local police the
resultant trans border data flow implications would seem to rest with the
local police and INTERPOL, who should have experience in these matters.
Ian W
> -----Original Message-----
> From: This list is for those interested in Data Protection
> issues [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Alison Aiton
> Sent: 15 June 2004 09:20
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: police request
>
>
> Dear all
>
> We've had a request from the police in Australia for details
> of a former
> student's academic record. I've confirmed that the person
> requesting the
> information is who they say they are.
>
> As far as I can make out, Australia is not approved by the
> EU. Is this the
> case?
>
> and
>
> can I use Section 29? [it's a fraud investigation]
>
> Cheers
> Alison
>
>
>
> -
> Alison Aiton
> Business Improvements
> Butts Wynd
> University of St Andrews
>
> Tel: 01334 463528
> email: [log in to unmask]
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at : -
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|