> I agree. What I was saying was that prior permission is not required, but
> that the data subject should be informed that such data is being
> collected,
> and the data subject has the right to inspect what is held on them.
>
> Incidentally, if the thief is an unknown person, (s)he is not an
> identified
> or identifiable person, and so such CCTV records are not subject to the
> Act.
>
[Blyth A J C (Comp)]
Having talked to a few people about how they plan to solve this
problem. The solution that they are planning to use is to place change the
conditions of employment (with the agreement of the employees), and to place
notices around buildings saying that CCTV is in operating and that in
entering this area you are agreeing to certain conditions.
Andrew
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|