JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


data-protection@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION  November 2011

DATA-PROTECTION November 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Are police really charging for s.29(3)? Is this possible? (long post)

From:

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Lawrence Serewicz <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 4 Nov 2011 18:44:42 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (121 lines)

Good stuff thanks
Not sure it works in s29 (3) cases because of 3 (1) (d)
Is the information going to be published relating to s29 (3)? Also if a crime rather than unlawful.  I can fail to pay the parking meter. This is unlawful, but it is not a crime.  Remember that 29 (3) is about *criminal* activity real or alleged.

I think the SI works in many areas and serves a purpose however I am uncertain that it would apply in this case for these reasons.

Happy to learn otherwise and very glad to be reminded of this SI.

Best

Lawrence

Lawrence W. Serewicz
Principal Information Management Officer
Room 4/140
Durham County Council
DH1 5UF
0191-372-8371


----- Original Message -----
From: Doherty Michael (EAST KENT HOSPITALS UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST) <[log in to unmask]>
To: Lawrence Serewicz
Sent: Fri Nov 04 18:22:59 2011
Subject: RE: [data-protection] Are police really charging for s.29(3)?  Is this possible? (long post)

Hello Lawrence,

Still at work, so not a lenghty reply, as there will be beer at the end of the tunnel. The Schedule 3 condition is provided by the Data Protection (Processing of Sensitive Personal Data) Order 2000. It's the first condition.

Regards,

md
Michael Doherty
Information Governance Manager
East Kent Hospitals University Foundation Trust
Kent & Canterbury Hospital
Ethelbert Road
Canterbury
CT1 3NG

Tel (direct dial): 01227 783142
________________________________________
From: This list is for those interested in Data Protection issues [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Lawrence Serewicz [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 04 November 2011 17:55
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [data-protection] Are police really charging for s.29(3)?  Is this possible? (long post)

Dear All
Thanks for the posts on this thread. Four things that puzzles me about the thread (There is a lot that puzzles me, but that is for another post :) ).

First, I write to the police requesting that they supply the information, which is personal information and therefore exempt under the FOIA.  However, I ask that they consider s.29 (3) as an exemption to those data protection rights of the individual i.e. non-disclosure.  If they agree, are they then responding to an FOI request?  If so, are they required to provide the information for free?  My request is in writing, it is stating what I want, and I am giving them the exemption for the data protection act, which would override any concerns about personal information.

I would be asking the police to explain under which regime are they disclosing information to me for a fee.  It cannot be under the Data Protection Act because I am not requesting the information about myself. What s.29 (3) is doing is allowing them to disclose the information and overcome the DPA restrictions. Therefore, they are either disclosing under the EIR or FOIA. I would guess the FOIA.  If it were neither, then it would need to be clarified.  They could state that they are not providing it under either regime, but they would have to explain why my request for information is being processed in this way for a fee.

Perhaps I have over analyzed this issue, but it looks like FOIA to me and they have no basis to impose a fee unless they have clearly explained by they are charging such a fee. If the fee is not in the fees and charges on their publication scheme, then there could be an argument to have them provide it for free.

Second, there is a subtle problem to this transaction.  The Police are not sharing the information; they are providing it in exchange for a fee.  As such, they have sold personal information to the applicant.  As such, the transaction creates a different relationship than if they shared the information, with an expectation of confidence for the handling of personal information.  Perhaps this is a going to astray, but there has to be something to the fact that they are selling the information rather than sharing it or disclosing it.

Third, I think there is a deeper problem to s.29 (3) requests. Perhaps this is beyond this scope of this question, but it needs to be considered. If I come to the police and I cite s.29 (3) with the claim that  I need the personal information because the person is alleged to have committed a crime, is that information now sensitive personal information?   Sensitive personal information has as one of its categories "the commission or *the alleged commission* by the data subject of any offence."  If I have cited an offence, which I may require from now on to be sure that I am processing s.29(3), I need to consider what condition from schedule 3 is in place perhaps 3.6, but these would need to explained so that schedule 3 can be met.  The s.29 (3) does not invalidate the need to meet schedule 2 or schedule 3. ["exempt from the first data protection principle (except to the extent to which it requires compliance with the conditions in schedule 2 and schedule 3)] In that scenario, how does the data controller, the police, satisfy itself that I am able to obtain this sensitive personal information (as it relates to an alleged criminal activity) to defend my legal rights?  However, it raises a very deep and disturbing question relating to the police selling s.29 (3) information.

Finally, the most brutally obvious question emerges. How do I request personal information relating to a crime or a potential crime from the police and they provide it? Why are they not investigating the crime or the alleged crime? I am struggling to understand a police force that is charging people £75 to obtain personal information under s.29 (3) prevention of crime and they are not investigating that crime for alleged crime?  Does that strike anyone else as strange?

I would be grateful to hear from others on these points and quite happy to be corrected on these issues. I think s.29(3) is perhaps being used in a way that is not entirely in line with the legislation and what it intended.

Best,

Lawrence


Help protect our environment by only printing this email if absolutely necessary. The information it contains and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are only intended for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may be unlawful for you to use, share or copy the information, if you are not authorised to do so. If you receive this email by mistake, please inform the person who sent it at the above address and then delete the email from your system. Durham County Council takes reasonable precautions to ensure that its emails are virus free. However, we do not accept responsibility for any losses incurred as a result of viruses we might transmit and recommend that you should use your own virus checking procedures.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
     All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
      available to the world wide web community at large at
      http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
     If you wish to leave this list please send the command
       leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
 Any queries about sending or receiving messages please send to the list owner
              [log in to unmask]
  Full help Desk - please email [log in to unmask] describing your needs
        To receive these emails in HTML format send the command:
         SET data-protection HTML to [log in to unmask]
   (all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

********************************************************************************************************************

This message may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient please inform the
sender that you have received the message in error before deleting it.
Please do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance on its contents:
to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

Thank you for your co-operation.

NHSmail is the secure email and directory service available for all NHS staff in England and Scotland
NHSmail is approved for exchanging patient data and other sensitive information with NHSmail and GSi recipients
NHSmail provides an email address for your career in the NHS and can be accessed anywhere
For more information and to find out how you can switch, visit www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/nhsmail

********************************************************************************************************************


Help protect our environment by only printing this email if absolutely necessary. The information it contains and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are only intended for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed. It may be unlawful for you to use, share or copy the information, if you are not authorised to do so. If you receive this email by mistake, please inform the person who sent it at the above address and then delete the email from your system. Durham County Council takes reasonable precautions to ensure that its emails are virus free. However, we do not accept responsibility for any losses incurred as a result of viruses we might transmit and recommend that you should use your own virus checking procedures.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
     All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
      available to the world wide web community at large at
      http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
     If you wish to leave this list please send the command
       leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
 Any queries about sending or receiving messages please send to the list owner
              [log in to unmask]
  Full help Desk - please email [log in to unmask] describing your needs
        To receive these emails in HTML format send the command:
         SET data-protection HTML to [log in to unmask]
   (all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager