JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DIS-FORUM Archives


DIS-FORUM Archives

DIS-FORUM Archives


DIS-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DIS-FORUM Home

DIS-FORUM Home

DIS-FORUM  August 2009

DIS-FORUM August 2009

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

FW: Summer 2009 Disability Studies Quarterly Goes Live!

From:

"Lissner, Scott" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Lissner, Scott

Date:

Sun, 2 Aug 2009 14:54:02 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (180 lines)

Hardly escapism for by the pool on vacation but.... Some very worthwhile
reading and free for the download.

 

 

 

L. Scott Lissner,
University ADA Coordinator
Associate, John Glenn School of Public Affairs
Lecturer, Knowlton School of Architecture, Moritz College of Law &
Disability Studies
Office Of The Provost, The Ohio State University
1849 Cannon Drive
Columbus, OH 43210-1266

(614) 292-6207(v); (614) 688-8605(tty)
(614) 688-3665(fax); Http://ada.osu.edu

 

] On Behalf Of Brenda Brueggemann
Sent: Sunday, August 02, 2009 2:14 PM
Subject: Summer 2009 Disability Studies Quarterly Goes Live!

 

THE SUMMER 2009 ISSUE OF DISABILITY STUDIES QUARTERLY IS NOW LIVE ONLINE
AT: http://www.dsq-sds.org/issue/current


As an appetizer for this super-size issue, here is the introduction
summarizing the delectable contents:

It's time to turbo charge your mouse, your screen reader, your puff
stick - and your mind: the Summer 2009 issue of DSQ is here! This is no
light (lite?) summer reading, rather we believe that this issue
illustrates the extraordinary academic growth and rich
interdisciplinarity that characterize the current field of Disability
Studies (DS) as it is also chronicled in the issue's opening article, "A
Multinational Review of English Language Disability Studies Degrees and
Courses."

In that survey, Pamela Cushing and Tyler Smith's data on the status and
offerings of Disability Studies in the English-speaking academic world
is impressive in its scope, analysis, and implications -- so much so
that we have also encouraged leading Disability Studies scholars from
various disciplines and sites in the English-speaking Disability Studies
landscape to respond to this survey in five brief forum commentaries
that accompany the original article. It is our belief that the diversity
of the style and content of those commentaries is but further evidence
of the range and robustness of our field.

And if those commentaries weren't enough, the other nine (9) articles in
this issue also further illustrate - in bold, colorful, and skilled
strokes - the interdisciplinary and intellectual prosperity of our field
today. In the first peer reviewed article, "Admission: Madness and
(Be)coming Out Within and Through Spaces of Confinement," situated in
the field of Art Education - an academic area still rarely traversed
with Disability Studies work - Jennifer Eisenhauer offers a
double-pronged critical and creative commentary on her own recent
gallery exhibition. Eisenhauer's essay explores what she articulates as
"(be)coming out" (based on Deleuze and Guattari's concepts), a
problematic she believes is particularly relevant for those with
nonvisible disabilities and for representations of mental illness.

Situated in the primary discipline of history, where a considerable
amount of Disability Studies scholarship has already taken place, Sarah
D. Phillips still travels to a relatively unknown place in her article,
"There Are No Invalids in the USSR!" A Missing Soviet Chapter in the New
Disability History." Phillips' comprehensive and engaging investigation
presents an overview of disability rights issues in the context of state
socialism in the former Soviet Union and asks us to reconsider
assumptions about the evolution of "disability rights" outside the West.


Situated in a more traditional setting for the study of "disability"
(the classroom), Joan M. Ostrove, Gina A. Oliva, and Abigail Katowitz
catalogue and analyze some "Reflections on the K-12 Years in Public
Schools: Relations with Hearing Teachers and Peers from the Perspective
of Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Adults." In general terms, their study
explores how members of systematically disadvantaged groups describe
their interactions with members of dominant groups. More specifically,
they analyze written accounts from 60 deaf and hard-of-hearing adults to
highlight their most positive experiences and negative reflections
growing up in relation to their (mostly hearing) teachers and peers in
"mainstreamed" educational settings.

Also set in a classroom space, while additionally crossing into the
often contested terrain of the relationship between
religion/spirituality and disability, Nadjwa Norton's article also
considers both teacher and peer interactions around disability and
around a child/student with a disability. In "Gabe's Stories:
Intersecting Spirituality with Speech-Related (Dis)ability," Norton
employs a multicultural feminist critical narrative inquiry to
illustrate how one Puerto Rican/Black working class male draws on his
spirituality to negotiate his speech-related disability.

Anchored in the heart of English studies - an area Cushing and Smith
suggest is one of significant growth in Disability Studies programs,
courses, dissertations in the last decade - Sara Schotland analyze the
complex nature of, and response to, gender and disability in Victorian
fiction, specifically that of Charles Dickens. In "Who's That in Charge?
It's Jenny Wren, 'The Person of the House,'" Schotland focuses on Jenny
Wren, the dolls' dressmaker in Our Mutual Friend (1864-5). The
(disabled) character of Jenny Wren, Schotland argues, creates a unique
and constructive life, "overcoming" her infirmities as she reclaims a
reproductive future and creates a vision of the disabled woman as
beautiful.

Writing within another Humanities field, that of Philosophy, Melinda
Rosenberg investigates the implications of John Stuart Mill's
libertarian principles for political claims relating to disability. In
"Harm, Liberty, and Disability" Rosenberg invites us to consider the
presumed (and false) "harm" of disability in discourses related to human
and civil rights and liberty.

Situated in the discipline of Social Work, Lightman et al. draw on
interviews with eight (8) respondents in Toronto, all of whom applied
for, but were denied, long-term assistance because they were considered
in some way "not disabled enough." In "'Not Disabled Enough': Episodic
Disabilities and the Ontario Disability Support Program," they examine
the tension between the ways episodic disabilities are embodied versus
the manner in which "disability status" is legislatively constructed.
They conclude with strategies for addressing the wider spectrum of the
"not disabled enough" disability experience for policy.

Also operating with an applied approach to disability/studies, Leonard
Jason et al. examine " Types of Fatigue Among Individuals with ME/CFS."
Based on the development and administration of a 22-item fatigue
questionnaire given to 130 persons diagnosed with ME/CFS and 251
controls, their findings suggest that individuals with ME/CFS experience
different types of fatigue than those reported in general populations
when "fatigue" and daily performance are discussed.

In the ninth peer-reviewed article, Sara Newman employs a
cross-disciplinary rhetorical analysis to trace shifting and contested
definitions of Tourette Syndrome in recent Democractic policy debates.
In "Irreconcilable Differences? Tourette Syndrome, Disability, and
Definition in Democratic Policy Debates," Newman applies an explicit
model for arguing and advocating with definitions (as they relate to
disability generally but also to Tourette Syndrome more specifically)
while she also examines how an advocacy organization has participated in
civic deliberations about disability law in the public schools.

This issue also features five astonishingly diverse book reviews as even
further evidence of the extent and depth of new work in our field. These
days we are clearly "dressed to impress." So put on your sunscreen, pull
up a chair at the DSQ beach, and prepare to be dazzled (though not
burnt) by the brilliance of our field in this long and sunny issue.



--
Brenda Jo Brueggemann

Professor, English
Associate Faculty: Comparative Studies
Associate Faculty: Women's Studies
Coordinator, Disability Studies Program
Faculty Leader, American Sign Language

Co-Editor, Disability Studies Quarterly




--
Brenda Jo Brueggemann

Professor, English
Associate Faculty: Comparative Studies
Associate Faculty: Women's Studies
Coordinator, Disability Studies Program
Faculty Leader, American Sign Language

Co-Editor, Disability Studies Quarterly

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager