[log in to unmask] on Friday, February 20, 2004 at 9:02 AM said:-
> Why even look at this exemption? No processing takes place,
> the authograph (not necessarily a signature, only an example
> of handwriting - sorry to be
> pedantic) may not even be recognisable and it is unlikely to
> be held in a structured filing system. As the judge said, it
> falls at the first hurdle.
Only providing that no consideration is given to the definitions at 1(1d)
and that for personal data.
To sustain the above stance would necessitate an assumption that any
controller would not be aware who an autograph belonged to.
Ian W
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at : -
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|