JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DIS-FORUM Archives


DIS-FORUM Archives

DIS-FORUM Archives


DIS-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DIS-FORUM Home

DIS-FORUM Home

DIS-FORUM  2002

DIS-FORUM 2002

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Advice needed

From:

Matt Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Discussion list for disabled students and their support staff.

Date:

Fri, 5 Jul 2002 15:05:25 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (110 lines)

My first post......I feel there is a dis-agreement between the Data
protection act (1998) and SENDA in this case. I took advice from a barrister
at an academic registrars conference recently on a similar subject.

He stated that if a specific student asked for no provisions to be in place,
although the university knew of the disability and offered advice/provisions
in terms of teaching or exams, then under the (superseding) Data Protection
Act, you could not provide information on a persons condition/disability to
any other person (even within an institution). Therefore, if a student asks
for no information disclosure, then the institution is exempt and does NOT
have to provide any special arrangements (during or after an exam).

Matt

----------------------------
Matt Evans
SEAC Examinations Officer
Room 7.29
James Clerk Maxwell Building
57 Waterloo Road
London
SE1 8WA

Tel: +44 (0) 20 7848 3390
Fax: +44 (0) 20 7848 3379
----------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: "Smith, Tony" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 2:19 PM
Subject: Re: Advice needed


I suspect that you would find that your policy is going to be illegal for
next academic year when the Disability Discrimination Act comes into force.
You may wish to contact the Disability Rights Commission for guidance (see
http://www.drc-gb.org/drc/default.asp ).

Tony

-----Original Message-----
From: Val Harrington [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 05 July 2002 13:49
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Advice needed


We state that we cannot make retrospective decisions when
awarding grades so if the university was unaware at the time of the
exam that a student  had dyslexia this rule would apply and
mitigating circumstances would not be considered.  However if it is
clear that there are problems with understanding a paper (for
whatever reason) increasingly our tutors are calling in students for
a viva voce, occasionally we have recommended  this instead of a
written paper.

About half our dyslexic students who've  requested support in
exams now use a word processor.

Gillian



On 5 Jul 2002, at 12:23, Elaine Shillcock wrote:

Date sent:              Fri, 5 Jul 2002 12:23:27 +0100
Send reply to:          "Discussion list for disabled students and their
support staff."              <[log in to unmask]>
From:                   Elaine Shillcock <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:                Advice needed
To:                     [log in to unmask]

Can anybody offer any advice about this problem in relation to
SENDA?

A student with dyslexia has writing difficulties which result in his
writing becoming illegible under time pressure.  The student doesn't
tell anybody that he has dyslexia, but when his examination scripts
are marked, they are illegible.  The department is advised to contact
the student and to ask him to come into the University to transcribe
his papers so that they can be marked.  At this point, the student
declares he has dyslexia and produces an ed. psych report.
Allowances
are made, the student's papers are transcribed etc.

However, the student doesn't want any adaptations or other
considerations (including extra time in future exams).  Would the
University,  having offered the student extra time in any future
exams
(which he has refused to take) be expected to still go to quite a lot
of trouble after the examination periods to get the student to return
and have his papers transcribed, or would it be reasonable to say to
the student that unless he uses extra time, which may alleviate his
difficulty, that this would not be an option?

There would be no hesitation in offering the services of a scribe, or
having papers transcribed if they were still illegible after extra
time had been used.

Thanks in advance

Elaine
Disabilities Adviser
University of Luton
Park Square
Luton
LU1 3JU
t: 01582 489342
f: 01582 489349

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager