JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DIS-FORUM Archives


DIS-FORUM Archives

DIS-FORUM Archives


DIS-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DIS-FORUM Home

DIS-FORUM Home

DIS-FORUM  2001

DIS-FORUM 2001

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Dyslexic graduate and psychometric t

From:

Richard Southorn <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Discussion list for disabled students and their support staff.

Date:

Wed, 28 Nov 2001 15:21:16 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (169 lines)

There have been cases with regard to dyslexia and the DDA. If people want to see whether dyslexia is covered in relation to tribunals, as opposed to the guidance which explicitly mentions severe dyslexia, then have a look at the case of Harling v CL Plastics Ltd. 

In this case, CL Plastics sought to argue that dyslexia was not a disability within the meaning of the DDA. The tribunal accepted that Mr Harling could only read only very short words, he was not able to read newspapers and his writing was similarly restricted. The tribunal found that his dyslexia was severe and had a substantial effect on his normal day to day activities and so was a disability.

Regards,

Richard Southorn
Senior Information and Research Officer
Employers' Forum on Disability
Nutmeg House
60 Gainsford Street
London
SE1 2NY
Tel: 020 7403 3020
Fax: 020 7403 0404



On Wednesday, November 28, 2001 3:10 pm, Baxter, Chris <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Hmm...
>StJohn was asking about test cases under the DDAas well, it is well known
>that cases are not being taken up under the DDA, this doesn't mean there
>aren't any. I think we should make best use of the DRC and the sooner the
>better, there shouldn't be a 'blanket' promise  or automatic assurance for
>anyone under the act anyway,  all cases should be individually scrutinised
>and the law analysed for appropriateness. I really do believe that given
>the outline of disability as the Act defines 'it' dyslexia could easily be
>included as it always has in employment.
>But don't let's fall out over it, cos we're not paid for that, DRC
>Commisioners are however, and very well paid too!
>
>Chris
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bernard Doherty [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>Sent: 28 November 2001 14:54
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: Dyslexic graduate and psychometric t
>
>
>Really Chris?  Anyone who was at the Skill/DRC SENDA conference in
>London earlier in the year will recall the outrage from the floor when
>the DRC legal advisers explained that there was no automatic assurance
>that people with learning difficulties would be covered.  I don't think
>that they have a vested interest in making it up, but if they would not
>be prepared to pursue a case, I don't know who would.  I haven't
>heard anything to suggest that the formal legal position has
>changed in the meantime, although I have heard a lot of advisers
>complaining about it and saying that it's not right.  Still, what I
>don't know etc, etc
>
>Regards, Bernard
>
>On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 14:06:55 -0000 "Baxter, Chris"
><[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> No, he said people who are dyslexic are not covered by the DDA, and they
>> are, whether it's part 2 or 4.
>> Well actually, he didn't SAY they weren't, he queried whether they were,
>> under the guidance given for 'who is disabled' I would say they are.
>> Chris
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bernard Doherty [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: 28 November 2001 13:55
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: Dyslexic graduate and psychometric t
>>
>>
>> Um, I think St John is referring to the difference between people
>> covered by the DSA and SENDA; people with dyslexia are among those who
>> might claim the former but not be covered by the latter.  SENDA is part
>> 4 of the DDA, but it is not directly concerned with employment;
>> however, the first couple of parts dealt with this stuff and are in
>> force and under these people with dyslexia can claim they have suffered
>> discrimination. Well, that should have cleared it up.
>>
>> Regards, Bernard
>>
>> On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 13:22:14 -0000 "Baxter, Chris"
>> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> > It is
>> > Chris
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Skeates,St.John DEAL Awards Tm
>> > [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> > Sent: 28 November 2001 12:17
>> > To: [log in to unmask]
>> > Subject: Re: Dyslexic graduate and psychometric t
>> >
>> >
>> > Is Dyslexia covered under DDA? I seem to remember it being a distinctly
>> > grey area (is that an oxymoron?)last time I did any DDA training - which
>> > admittedly was some time ago. I could be hopelessly wrong on that one
>> > (now there's an admission worth noting) but I'd be interested to know if
>> > there have been any test cases concerning Dyslexia and DDA.
>> >
>> > St.John Skeates
>> > Awards Section
>> > Bedfordshire County Council
>> >
>> >  -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Faye Langston [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> > Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:22 AM
>> > To: [log in to unmask]; Skeates,St.John DEAL Awards Tm
>> > Subject: Dyslexic graduate and psychometric testing
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Sorry if anyone feels this isn't relevant to disforum!
>> >
>> > I have had contact with one of our graduates who is currently temping
>> > for a large bank. In order to secure her job she has had to undertake a
>> > Psychometric test - which includes numerical and spelling questions. She
>> > has failed the test, but as a Dyslexic student feels she is being
>> > discriminated against due to the nature of the questions.
>> >
>> > She is fully able to complete her role, but cannot continue to work if
>> > she has failed the test. As Psychometric tests are more and more
>> > becoming the 'norm' for  a lot of large employers what can she do?? Is
>> > she possibly being discriminated against? Does anyone know of anyone she
>> > can contact to discuss this?
>> >
>> > THANKS
>> >
>> > Faye Langston
>> > Disabilities Welfare Co-ordinator
>> > Coventry University
>> >
>> > *********************************************************************
>> > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
>> > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
>> > are addressed.
>> >
>> > If you receive this e-mail by mistake, please advise the sender
>> immediately
>> > by using the reply facility in your e-mail software.
>> > Please also destroy and delete the message from your computer.
>> >
>> > Any modification of the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited
>> > unless expressly authorised by the sender.
>> > *********************************************************************
>>
>> ----------------------
>> Bernard Doherty
>> Senior Student Adviser
>> Anglia Polytechnic University
>> Tel: 01223 363271 x2434
>> Fax: 01223 363369
>> Minicom: 01223 576155
>>
>> [log in to unmask]
>
>----------------------
>Bernard Doherty
>Senior Student Adviser
>Anglia Polytechnic University
>Tel: 01223 363271 x2434
>Fax: 01223 363369
>Minicom: 01223 576155
>
>[log in to unmask]
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager