JISCMail - DATA-PROTECTION Archives

Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

DATA-PROTECTION Archives

June 2012

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		DATA-PROTECTION Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Get Password

Subject	From	Date	Size
Re: Disclosure to the Police	Baines, Jonathan	Fri, 1 Jun 2012 09:43:12 +0100	557 lines
Re: Disclosure to the Police	Phil Bradshaw	Fri, 1 Jun 2012 11:06:15 +0200	668 lines
Cookies; Subject Access	Marchini, Renzo	Fri, 1 Jun 2012 05:26:51 -0400	316 lines
£325k CMP for NHS Trust	Baines, Jonathan	Fri, 1 Jun 2012 10:44:28 +0100	245 lines
Re: £325k CMP for NHS Trust	Baines, Jonathan	Fri, 1 Jun 2012 10:52:14 +0100	432 lines
Re: £325k CMP for NHS Trust	chris pounder	Fri, 1 Jun 2012 11:16:49 +0100	698 lines
Independant Safeguarding Authority	Brenda Scourfield	Fri, 1 Jun 2012 11:23:13 +0100	34 lines
Re: £325k CMP for NHS Trust	<>	Fri, 1 Jun 2012 11:25:23 +0100	546 lines
Re: £325k CMP for NHS Trust	Baines, Jonathan	Fri, 1 Jun 2012 11:33:32 +0100	975 lines
Council Tax Valuation Band Changes - Claims Companies	Cotterill, Steve	Fri, 1 Jun 2012 11:51:59 +0100	232 lines
Re: Cookies; Subject Access	Baines, Jonathan	Fri, 1 Jun 2012 12:20:08 +0100	599 lines
Re: Cookies; Subject Access	Ian Griffiths	Fri, 1 Jun 2012 12:40:12 +0100	93 lines
publishing court judgements (what are the DPA justifications?) (is my logic sound?)	Lawrence Serewicz	Fri, 1 Jun 2012 12:03:17 +0000	843 lines
Re: Council Tax Valuation Band Changes - Claims Companies	Phil Bradshaw	Fri, 1 Jun 2012 14:08:40 +0200	342 lines
Re: Cookies; Subject Access	Marchini, Renzo	Fri, 1 Jun 2012 08:42:08 -0400	143 lines
Re: Cookies; Subject Access	Ian Griffiths	Fri, 1 Jun 2012 13:55:55 +0100	158 lines
Re: publishing court judgements (what are the DPA justifications?) (is my logic sound?)	Maurice Frankel	Fri, 1 Jun 2012 19:02:04 +0100	316 lines
Re: Independent Safeguarding Authority	Rob Dawson	Fri, 1 Jun 2012 19:34:53 +0000	79 lines
Emails - should they be treated like other personal data?	Brian Morgan	Sat, 2 Jun 2012 16:13:39 +0100	55 lines
Re: Emails - should they be treated like other personal data?	Phil Bradshaw	Sat, 2 Jun 2012 20:34:36 +0200	193 lines
Principle 7 - Data Processing	Phil Bradshaw	Sun, 3 Jun 2012 18:55:04 +0100	39 lines
Re: publishing court judgements (what are the DPA justifications?) (is my logic sound?)	Phil Bradshaw	Sun, 3 Jun 2012 20:43:18 +0200	618 lines
Re: Emails - should they be treated like other personal data?	Phil Bradshaw	Mon, 4 Jun 2012 09:55:04 +0100	60 lines
New databreach	<>	Mon, 4 Jun 2012 10:04:30 +0100	127 lines
Re: Principle 7 - Data Processing	Paul Ticher	Wed, 6 Jun 2012 10:11:51 +0100	92 lines
Re: Principle 7 - Data Processing	Chris Tinsley	Wed, 6 Jun 2012 10:23:23 +0100	144 lines
Re: Principle 7 - Data Processing	Marchini, Renzo	Wed, 6 Jun 2012 05:57:37 -0400	100 lines
Another Day Another Fine	Ibrahim Hasan	Wed, 6 Jun 2012 10:59:47 +0100	121 lines
Re: Another Day Another Fine	Simon Howarth	Wed, 6 Jun 2012 11:20:04 +0100	347 lines
Re: publishing court judgements (what are the DPA justifications?) (is my logic sound?)	Lawrence Serewicz	Wed, 6 Jun 2012 11:08:20 +0000	228 lines
UK health body fined £325,000	Mike Gater	Wed, 6 Jun 2012 15:47:12 +0100	58 lines
Re: Council Tax Valuation Band Changes - Claims Companies	Cotterill, Steve	Thu, 7 Jun 2012 15:09:04 +0100	680 lines
Notification for Safeguarding Childrens Board	Michelle Peel	Fri, 8 Jun 2012 09:23:48 +0100	61 lines
Re: publishing court judgements (what are the DPA justifications?) (is my logic sound?)	Maurice Frankel	Fri, 8 Jun 2012 13:10:40 +0100	374 lines
Email Disclaimers	Mike Burgess	Fri, 8 Jun 2012 13:49:08 +0100	289 lines
Re: Email Disclaimers	Simon Howarth	Fri, 8 Jun 2012 14:19:05 +0100	550 lines
Re: Email Disclaimers	Baines, Jonathan	Fri, 8 Jun 2012 14:53:40 +0100	909 lines
Re: Email Disclaimers	Mike Burgess	Fri, 8 Jun 2012 15:30:40 +0100	663 lines
Re: Email Disclaimers	Paul Ticher	Fri, 8 Jun 2012 16:06:24 +0100	271 lines
Re: publishing court judgements (what are the DPA justifications?) (is my logic sound?)	Lawrence Serewicz	Fri, 8 Jun 2012 15:43:39 +0000	250 lines
Hawktalk: Swiss court concludes that Street View is subject to some data protection rules	chris pounder	Sun, 10 Jun 2012 12:20:13 +0100	227 lines
Re: Email Disclaimers	Phil Bradshaw	Sun, 10 Jun 2012 14:32:26 +0200	309 lines
Re: Email Disclaimers	Ben Plouviez	Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:29:33 +0100	462 lines
Re: Hawktalk: Swiss court concludes that Street View is subject to some data protection rules	Lemon, Stephen	Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:28:13 +0100	392 lines
Re: Hawktalk: Swiss court concludes that Street View is subject to some data protection rules	Baines, Jonathan	Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:57:07 +0100	528 lines
Inspection of Old Electoral Registers	Hannah Tessyman	Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:18:50 +0100	241 lines
Re: Hawktalk: Swiss court concludes that Street View is subject to some data protection rules	Jonathan Baines	Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:27:32 +0100	30 lines
Re: Inspection of Old Electoral Registers	chris pounder	Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:57:26 +0100	452 lines
S29 and the armed forces?	Dunster, Jon	Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:07:36 +0100	379 lines
Re: S29 and the armed forces?	<>	Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:12:24 +0100	226 lines
Re: S29 and the armed forces?	Chris Brogan	Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:54:20 +0100	512 lines
Re: S29 and the armed forces?	Scourfield, Brenda	Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:00:19 +0100	871 lines
Re: S29 and the armed forces?	Andrew Cormack	Tue, 12 Jun 2012 06:52:02 +0000	112 lines
Re: S29 and the armed forces?	Roland Perry	Tue, 12 Jun 2012 08:13:49 +0100	41 lines
Re: S29 and the armed forces?	Harrison, Iain	Tue, 12 Jun 2012 08:37:25 +0000	759 lines
Statistical Data	Brenda Scourfield	Tue, 12 Jun 2012 09:54:24 +0100	44 lines
Re: Statistical Data	Phil Bradshaw	Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:44:04 +0200	161 lines
Communications Data Bill	Ibrahim Hasan	Tue, 12 Jun 2012 12:50:36 +0100	91 lines
Internet Trolls	Ibrahim Hasan	Tue, 12 Jun 2012 12:54:11 +0100	84 lines
ICO event on the future of European data protection law - summary report now available	chris pounder	Tue, 12 Jun 2012 12:54:22 +0100	164 lines
Smart Meters	Ibrahim Hasan	Tue, 12 Jun 2012 12:55:55 +0100	81 lines
Photos	<>	Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:22:33 +0100	88 lines
Glasgow Council data loss - 38,000 bank details evidently	chris pounder	Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:46:59 +0100	185 lines
Hey	Sarah Henning	Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:57:09 +0100	27 lines
Re: Statistical Data	Phil Bradshaw	Tue, 12 Jun 2012 21:53:14 +0200	210 lines
data loss from florists	Richard Birmingham	Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:37:16 +0100	31 lines
FOI and DP Job Vacancy	Ibrahim Hasan	Wed, 13 Jun 2012 18:00:29 +0100	107 lines
Comms Data	<>	Thu, 14 Jun 2012 07:51:44 +0100	155 lines
When will the new EC data protection regulation come into force?	Hodge, Alex DCR	Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:38:36 +0100	334 lines
Re: When will the new EC data protection regulation come into force?	Baines, Jonathan	Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:43:06 +0100	564 lines
Re: When will the new EC data protection regulation come into force?	Marchini, Renzo	Fri, 15 Jun 2012 06:45:23 -0400	927 lines
Re: When will the new EC data protection regulation come into force?	Lynn Wyeth	Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:49:33 +0100	38 lines
Re: When will the new EC data protection regulation come into force?	Lowry Jamie	Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:53:43 +0000	735 lines
Scotland data breach	<>	Fri, 15 Jun 2012 12:08:03 +0100	34 lines
encrypted cameras?	Richard Birmingham	Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:43:29 +0100	28 lines
Re: encrypted cameras?	Phil Bradshaw	Mon, 18 Jun 2012 12:00:42 +0200	140 lines
fyi: Restriction on Local Authority surveillance	chris pounder	Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:02:13 +0100	39 lines
Re: ISEB DP vs. CIPP is one better than the other?	Trish-louise Bailey	Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:21:47 +0100	325 lines
Re: ISEB DP vs. CIPP is one better than the other?	Moore, Craig	Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:42:39 +0100	540 lines
Re: ISEB DP vs. CIPP is one better than the other?	Lawrence Serewicz	Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:58:27 +0000	233 lines
Re: ISEB DP vs. CIPP is one better than the other?	<>	Mon, 18 Jun 2012 12:01:49 +0100	444 lines
FW: ISEB DP vs. CIPP is one better than the other?	Chris Brogan	Mon, 18 Jun 2012 12:26:38 +0100	461 lines
Re: ISEB DP vs. CIPP is one better than the other?	Trish-louise Bailey	Mon, 18 Jun 2012 12:49:10 +0100	271 lines
ISEB v CIPP	Trish-louise Bailey	Mon, 18 Jun 2012 12:52:32 +0100	77 lines
Changes to local authority surveillance powers	<>	Mon, 18 Jun 2012 12:58:20 +0100	35 lines
Re: ISEB DP vs. CIPP is one better than the other?	Trish-louise Bailey	Mon, 18 Jun 2012 13:07:16 +0100	277 lines
Belfast Trust Fined	Ibrahim Hasan	Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:45:59 +0100	132 lines
Re: Scottish FOI Qualification	Simon Macauley	Tue, 19 Jun 2012 14:03:31 +0000	515 lines
Possibly an interesting discussion.	Ian Welton	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:03:01 +0100	36 lines
Good news: Dumfries and Galloway Council plans new data policy	chris pounder	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:08:48 +0100	232 lines
Re: Possibly an interesting discussion.	Simon Howarth	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:39:45 +0100	74 lines
Another D & G Breach	Broom, Doreen	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:47:43 +0100	164 lines
Re: Good news: Dumfries and Galloway Council plans new data policy	Baines, Jonathan	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:49:50 +0100	540 lines
Re: When the dead rise – Do they ever die.	Simon Macauley	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 10:53:55 +0000	846 lines
Re: When the dead rise – Do they ever die.	Simon Macauley	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:00:27 +0000	451 lines
Re: When the dead rise – Do they ever die.	Simon Howarth	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:31:01 +0100	613 lines
DPA Section 29	Jane Holden	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:34:57 +0100	54 lines
Re: DPA Section 29	Scourfield, Brenda	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:39:18 +0100	143 lines
Re: DPA Section 29	Baines, Jonathan	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:01:27 +0100	126 lines
Third party data	Brenda Scourfield	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:07:01 +0100	30 lines
Re: DPA Section 29	Phil Bradshaw	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 13:33:07 +0200	238 lines
Re: Third party data	Phil Bradshaw	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 13:37:32 +0200	144 lines
Subject Access Requests - complaints	Broom, Doreen	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:54:36 +0100	296 lines
Do I have to provide copies of documents in response to an SAR?	Jaines, Amy	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:10:39 +0100	268 lines
Re: Do I have to provide copies of documents in response to an SAR?	Phil Bradshaw	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:28:12 +0200	585 lines
Re: Do I have to provide copies of documents in response to an SAR?	Jane Holden	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:30:58 +0100	611 lines
Re: Do I have to provide copies of documents in response to an SAR?	SHQ - Gardiner, Lee	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:42:45 +0100	539 lines
Re: Subject Access Requests - complaints	Scourfield, Brenda	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:51:09 +0100	777 lines
Re: Subject Access Requests - complaints	Jane Holden	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:51:12 +0100	494 lines
Re: Subject Access Requests - complaints	<>	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:01:36 +0100	96 lines
Re: Subject Access Requests - complaints	Phil Bradshaw	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:28:47 +0200	375 lines
Re: Subject Access Requests - complaints	Baines, Jonathan	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:46:44 +0100	914 lines
Re: Do I have to provide copies of documents in response to an SAR?	Lawrence Serewicz	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:22:53 +0000	704 lines
Re: Subject Access Requests - complaints	Dunster, Jon	Fri, 22 Jun 2012 11:34:27 +0100	690 lines
Re: Subject Access Requests - complaints	Baines, Jonathan	Fri, 22 Jun 2012 11:43:49 +0100	105 lines
Re: Subject Access Requests - complaints	Paul Ticher	Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:05:42 +0100	118 lines
Re: Subject Access Requests - complaints	Phil Bradshaw	Fri, 22 Jun 2012 14:51:06 +0200	280 lines
data protection directive evidence parliament	chris pounder	Sun, 24 Jun 2012 14:10:41 +0100	154 lines
Communications Data Bill	Ibrahim Hasan	Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:31:54 +0100	88 lines
Hawktalk: Expect 1,000 objections by Member States to the EU's Data Protection Regulation.	chris pounder	Tue, 26 Jun 2012 01:57:52 +0100	248 lines
Court ruling - Lord(?) v Home Office	Simon Howarth	Tue, 26 Jun 2012 08:47:59 +0100	289 lines
Re: Court ruling - Lord(?) v Home Office	Simon Howarth	Tue, 26 Jun 2012 09:27:06 +0100	418 lines
Re: Court ruling - Lord(?) v Home Office	Powell, Andrew	Tue, 26 Jun 2012 08:28:20 +0000	776 lines
Re: do I have to provide copies of documents in response to an SAR?	Jaines, Amy	Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:08:50 +0100	267 lines
Re: do I have to provide copies of documents in response to an SAR?	Jaines, Amy	Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:25:24 +0100	660 lines
Re: do I have to provide copies of documents in response to an SAR?	Jane Holden	Tue, 26 Jun 2012 13:00:10 +0100	391 lines
Blind people and CCTV	Chris Tinsley	Wed, 27 Jun 2012 08:57:45 +0100	296 lines
Model Data Processing Agreement?	Michelle Peel	Wed, 27 Jun 2012 17:01:28 +0100	83 lines
DP query re research data on people with amputations	Stephenson Matthew	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 11:32:24 +0000	350 lines
Re: Model data processing agreement?	GRAHAM Susan	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:19:12 +0100	130 lines
Which DPA para actually states you cannot look at your own data	Gudge, Teresa	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:25:07 +0100	176 lines
Re: DP query re research data on people with amputations	Simon Howarth	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:40:08 +0100	676 lines
Re: DP query re research data on people with amputations	Bill Dunn	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:43:04 +0100	46 lines
Re: DP query re research data on people with amputations	Chris Brogan	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:49:07 +0100	86 lines
Re: Which DPA para actually states you cannot look at your own data	Simon Howarth	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:49:16 +0100	587 lines
Re: Which DPA para actually states you cannot look at your own data	Bill Dunn	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:50:37 +0100	40 lines
Re: Which DPA para actually states you cannot look at your own data	Scourfield, Brenda	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:55:36 +0100	674 lines
Re: DP query re research data on people with amputations	Simon Howarth	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:58:41 +0100	94 lines
FW: Which DPA para actually states you cannot look at your own data	Gudge, Teresa	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:13:11 +0100	571 lines
Re: FW: Which DPA para actually states you cannot look at your own data	Jane Holden	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:18:09 +0100	886 lines
Re: Which DPA para actually states you cannot look at your own data	Phil Bradshaw	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:21:37 +0200	346 lines
Use of Live (personal) data used within training database	Mike Gater	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:22:29 +0100	61 lines
Re: Use of Live (personal) data used within training database	Baines, Jonathan	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:32:15 +0100	143 lines
Re: Which DPA para actually states you cannot look at your own data	Chris Tinsley	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:33:29 +0100	670 lines
Re: Which DPA para actually states you cannot look at your own data	Bill Dunn	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:34:54 +0100	28 lines
Re: Use of Live (personal) data used within training database	Simon Howarth	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:39:12 +0100	134 lines
Re: Use of Live (personal) data used within training database	Jane Holden	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:39:52 +0100	134 lines
RIPA and councils	<>	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:41:28 +0100	36 lines
Re: Use of Live (personal) data used within training database	Baines, Jonathan	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:42:10 +0100	190 lines
Re: Use of Live (personal) data used within training database	Peter Dinsdale	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:50:40 +0000	215 lines
Re: Use of Live (personal) data used within training database	Baines, Jonathan	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:55:40 +0100	266 lines
Re: Use of Live (personal) data used within training database	Phil Bradshaw	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:58:56 +0200	280 lines
Re: DP query re research data on people with amputations	chris pounder	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:17:25 +0100	48 lines
Re: Use of Live (personal) data used within training database	Simon Howarth	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:18:03 +0100	93 lines
Hospital pays £325K fine (with discount one assumes(	chris pounder	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:21:33 +0100	173 lines
Re: DP query re research data on people with amputations	Simon Howarth	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:35:04 +0100	85 lines
Re: Hospital pays £325K fine (with discount one assumes(	Baines, Jonathan	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:41:13 +0100	463 lines
Re: Use of Live (personal) data used within training database	Mike Gater	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:42:56 +0100	47 lines
Re: Hospital pays £325K fine (with discount one assumes(	Lawrence Serewicz	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:32:45 +0000	325 lines
Re: Model Data Processing Agreement?	Paul Ticher	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 18:49:54 +0100	123 lines
Re: Hospital pays £325K fine (with discount one assumes(	Simon Howarth	Fri, 29 Jun 2012 09:34:31 +0100	691 lines
Re: Hospital pays £325K fine (with discount one assumes(	KPG Professional Services	Fri, 29 Jun 2012 09:36:31 +0100	856 lines
Re: Hospital pays £325K fine (with discount one assumes(	Simon Howarth	Fri, 29 Jun 2012 09:37:20 +0100	692 lines
Re: Use of Live (personal) data used within training database	KPG Professional Services	Fri, 29 Jun 2012 09:40:49 +0100	194 lines
Re: Model Data Processing Agreement?	Bill Dunn	Fri, 29 Jun 2012 10:33:11 +0100	36 lines
FW: Blind people and CCTV	Chris Tinsley	Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:21:05 +0100	476 lines
Re: FW: Blind people and CCTV	KPG Professional Services	Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:28:50 +0100	492 lines
Re: FW: Blind people and CCTV	Phil Bradshaw	Fri, 29 Jun 2012 13:29:00 +0200	629 lines
Friday question	Paul	Fri, 29 Jun 2012 17:07:25 +0100	271 lines
Re: Friday question	Phil Bradshaw	Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:33:21 +0200	332 lines
Re: Friday question	Simon Howarth	Fri, 29 Jun 2012 22:49:35 +0100	473 lines
Re: Friday question	Claire Morrissey	Sat, 30 Jun 2012 01:42:39 +0100	372 lines
Re: Friday question	Phil Bradshaw	Sat, 30 Jun 2012 10:28:16 +0200	135 lines
Re: Friday question	Ray Cooke	Sat, 30 Jun 2012 09:54:00 +0100	370 lines
Re: Friday question	Phil Bradshaw	Sat, 30 Jun 2012 11:34:18 +0200	165 lines

DATA-PROTECTION Archives

June 2012

Options

Subject

From

Date

Size

JiscMail Tools

RSS Feeds and Sharing

Search Archives

Archives