JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


data-protection@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION  March 2016

DATA-PROTECTION March 2016

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Section 29 Exemption

From:

"Clarke, Dawn" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Clarke, Dawn

Date:

Tue, 8 Mar 2016 16:17:09 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (66 lines)

I have to say that I would likely accept a S.29 request only from those organisations with a statutory or public function to undertake criminal investigations/prosecutions. So this could include local authorities, Trading Standards, HSE etc. Insurance companies have no such statutory function, and to my knowledge don't carry out a prosecution, they report fraudulent claims to the police, whatever they might tell you. As you say, their most likely reason for requesting the information is to decide whether or not to pay out on the claim and therefore not S.29. You could look at using S.35 legal proceedings, or the legitimate interest condition, but in both cases you will likely be looking to contact the data subject/3rd party for their consent or views before making a decision.

Dawn Clarke


________________________________
From: This list is for those interested in Data Protection issues [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Chris Brogan [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 08 March 2016 14:48
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [data-protection] Section 29 Exemption

Many thanks for the comments so far especially Phil Bradshaw's reference to Hansard.
On reflection my question was badly worded. So let me see if I can do better this time.
The background to this can be tracked back to Lord Norton's question that I referenced in my previous posting. Section 29 in the Bill was causing concern to Non Law Enforcement investigators. It was unclear if they could make a request under Section 29. This fog of uncertainty has continued and was discussed on numerous occasions with ICO officials at gatherings of non law enforcement investigators. I was privy to a very robust discussion at the end of the first Masters Degree Course in Information Rights run by Northumbria University. It was generally felt and supported by a few ICO officials who were on the course that it didn't apply to non law enforcement investigators. Elizabeth France on a number of occasions said that if you suspected that a crime had taken place you should report it to the police. The Police on numerous occasions said that they would need some evidence that a crime had taken place before they would consider investigating the matter.
It would seem that anyone can make a request to a DC under the section 29 exemption. It is up to the DC to decide whether to release the data.
Now my question should have been. If the DC has to satisfy the criteria imposed by section 29 before releasing how can he do that if the request is made by a non law enforcement investigator acting on behalf of a client say insurance company, credit card company. This investigator cannot necessarily provide the assurances needed to the DC.
He can tell the DC what his client has told him. The DC needs to be assured that the data provided will be processed in accordance with the DPA. The investigator is acting on his client's instructions he is not in a position to dictate to the client what to do with the data that he has obtained. There is also the question, for another time, that if the investigator is DP then why is he making the request?

I posed this question to one of the solicitors at the ICO some years ago. Amongst other comments the answer included a warning that if the person/organisation making a section 29 request had no intention of ever prosecuting the matter that was being investigated then the ICO would take a very dim view of it. Many insurance companies allow their contracted investigator to make Section 29 requests and have no intention of ever prosecuting. They just want to be in a position to rebut the claim. They often during that rebuttal use the info obtained by a section 29 request. Other organisations use investigators who in turn make these requests. If your organisation use external investigators that could be a problem for you.
For what it is worth I would advise a client to never release data to a contracted non law enforcement investigator. Rather insist that his client make the request.

Chris Brogan
________________________________

All archives of messages are stored permanently and are available to the world wide web community at large at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html

Selected commands (the command has been filled in below in the body of the email if you are receiving emails in HTML format):

 *   Leaving this list: send leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]&BODY=LEAVE%20data-protection>
 *   Suspending emails from all JISCMail lists: send SET * NOMAIL to [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]&BODY=SET%20*%20NOMAIL>
 *   To receive emails from this list in text format: send SET data-protection NOHTML to [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]&BODY=SET%20data-protection%20NOHTML>
 *   To receive emails from this list in HTML format: send SET data-protection HTML to [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]&BODY=SET%20data-protection%20HTML>

All user commands can be found at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm and are sent in the body of an otherwise blank email to [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

Any queries about sending or receiving messages please send to the list owner [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

(Please send all commands to [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> not the list or the moderators, and all requests for technical help to [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>, the general office helpline)

________________________________

________________________________
Internet communications are insecure, therefore City College Norwich (CCN) does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of CCN.

This email and any files sent with it are intended only for the named recipient and may be confidential. If you are not the named recipient please email the sender immediately then delete this message. You should not disclose the content, distribute or retain any copies of this message.

City College Norwich, Ipswich Rd., Norwich, Norfolk. NR2 2LJ.


--

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
     All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
      available to the world wide web community at large at
      http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
     If you wish to leave this list please send the command
       leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
 Any queries about sending or receiving messages please send to the list owner
              [log in to unmask]
  Full help Desk - please email [log in to unmask] describing your needs
        To receive these emails in HTML format send the command:
         SET data-protection HTML to [log in to unmask]
   (all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager