Interesting discussion. Having followed it I still think the answer here is relatively straightforward.
If they simply ask to see the files to look for credibility evidence - refuse. Not been justified and disproportionate.
If they can point to some specific matter where they think we may have real evidence of the subject having misled us I may well be persuaded it comes within s29(1)(b) - prosecution of offenders and may disclose that - but not the full file.
Finally I am intrigued at the suggestion that it may be appropriate to let them read the file. If they have not persuaded me that it is reasonable to disclose the file, how can I let them read it which is just another form of disclosure?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
Any queries about sending or receiving messages please send to the list owner
[log in to unmask]
Full help Desk - please email [log in to unmask] describing your needs
To receive these emails in HTML format send the command:
SET data-protection HTML to [log in to unmask]
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|