It reminds me of the CQC naming debate that went on recently.
My concern is can you reveal the names of people who have accessed records (inappropriately or not).
I'm trying to think of the arguments they could bring that this was breaching *their* right to protection under the DPA.
Thinking this through, you could for example disclose the results of an audit log naming every person who had ever accessed a record. Presumably therefore for s.7 to apply, these audit logs, despite naming the individuals, are not their personal data and we can freely disclose them?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
Any queries about sending or receiving messages please send to the list owner
[log in to unmask]
Full help Desk - please email [log in to unmask] describing your needs
To receive these emails in HTML format send the command:
SET data-protection HTML to [log in to unmask]
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|