Hi all,
Just happened across an interesting case looking at disproportionate effort in SAR searches - case reference 0LS50198 dated 24/04/2012, Keith Martin Elliott vs Lloyds TSB (etc).
Paragraph 17 of the transcript seems to me to be an overt contradiction of the ICO's well-known view that disproportionate effort only becomes an issue in SAR cases where the single act of supplying info to a data subject. Parag 17(3) in particular seems to cut straight through the (to me, at least) extremely narrow definition of 'supply' that the ICO has traditionally pinned his colours to.
Any thoughts?
Reggards,
Owen
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
Any queries about sending or receiving messages please send to the list owner
[log in to unmask]
Full help Desk - please email [log in to unmask] describing your needs
To receive these emails in HTML format send the command:
SET data-protection HTML to [log in to unmask]
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|