Scenario:
Council starts eviction proceedings against tenant from a council property. Tenant appoints legal advice service on his behalf. Solicitor for legal advice service asks Council for all records on tenant (giving letter of authority from tenant) including rent payments / arrears, anti-social bahviour / noise reports, Housing benefit / council tax benefit records etc.
Would you
a) treat it as Solicitor putting in SAR on behalf of client and charge £10; or
b) Consider it under s35 and not charge. (Or maybe you would, does anyone on here?)
Then, if a SAR, would you withhold all/some due to ongoing eviction / legal proceedings (Management planning exemption) and state they would get relevant info as part of that process in due course? Or if s35 would you refuse as it could prejudice the Council's case presently?
Could refusal to release info at this stage be used to defend any possession proceedings brought by a Council on the basis of an adverse review decision?
In general, do other organisations give information to solicitors for free under s35 rather than charging £10 SAR if they are acting on behalf of clients? Or do you process as a SAR if they don't claim s35 themselves?
Lynn
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
Any queries about sending or receiving messages please send to the list owner
[log in to unmask]
Full help Desk - please email [log in to unmask] describing your needs
To receive these emails in HTML format send the command:
SET data-protection HTML to [log in to unmask]
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|