So according to the newspaper "A spokeswoman for Slough said the decision to
seek permission to appeal to the Supreme Court was taken by its insurers
Zurich Municipal". So Slough are not wanting to Appeal but are being forced
to by its Insurers. What a load of tosh!
Also Slough has to convince the Supreme Court to look at it - so it might
not get there!
My comments on Hawktalk
(http://amberhawk.typepad.com/amberhawk/2011/01/privacy-issues-smart-meterin
g-violent-warning-markers-and-undertakings.html) (after the Smart Meter
comments).
Chris
Newspaper quote on
http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article
&id=5622%3Aslough-defamation-claim-could-go-all-the-way-to-supreme-court&cat
id=56%3Alitigation-articles&q=&Itemid=24
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
Any queries about sending or receiving messages please send to the list owner
[log in to unmask]
Full help Desk - please email [log in to unmask] describing your needs
To receive these emails in HTML format send the command:
SET data-protection HTML to [log in to unmask]
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^