JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for DATA-PROTECTION Archives


DATA-PROTECTION Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Archives


data-protection@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION Home

DATA-PROTECTION  February 2008

DATA-PROTECTION February 2008

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Can share brokers insist on seeing your personal transaction data in your bank account?

From:

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Nigel Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:43:22 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (208 lines)

The following is largely self-explanatory.

Summary: I am trying to update the bank account data (direct debit 
mandate) held by my broker who is a mainly internet based business. I 
don't use this company that much,
They will not accept a change to my direct debit mandate unless I send 
them **originals** of my old and new bank account statements, and they 
freely admit they will copy and store the personal financial data 
contained therein. My response to this was to close my account and to 
make the following points ..

Any comments anyone?


--

29^th February 2008


Head of Compliance

Sxxxxxxxe
xxx
E14 xxxx






Dear Sir or Madam,

*Account number xxxxxxx*

You lost a customer of many years standing today.

Despite the very small nature of the account, I would submit that is not 
a good thing for your business to lose any customer.


*The background*

Some months ago, I closed a personal bank account. It turns out that 
this was the account for which you previously held a direct debit 
authority. As I had not bought or sold shares in several years, it was 
only upon reviewing my account with you recently I discovered you held 
out-of-date bank details.


I telephoned, and was advised by your company to complete an updated 
Direct Debit mandate form which I downloaded from your website, fully 
completed in all particulars, and sent to you.

By return I receive a demand from you to send you my personal, original 
bank statements (although such demand is not contained on the direct 
debit form). These statements contain personal and private data which 
have no relevant to our relationship. You also told me I must send 
statements for both old and new bank accounts, and no statement may be 
less than 3 months old.

I spoke to your representative Mr West who insisted that all-original 
documents were required by the Financial Services Authority 
moneylaundering rules.

He told me that the purpose for which this was being demanded was to 
'verify that the name on the bank account was my name', and that 
original bank statements were required as I 'could make up my own using 
a computer'.

My current bank encourages its customers not to receive paper statements 
at all (although I do at the moment)and to use their internet banking 
facilities. (My old bank account was closed many months again and no 
statements exist that are less than 3 months old). I asked to speak to a 
Compliance Manager.

Your Mr yyyyy (expressed as being Mr xxxxx's supervisor) refused to 
speak with me.

Mr xxxx informed me(by relaying messages from Mr yyyyy) that your Head 
of Compliance would not discuss the matter with me as he does not deal 
with complaints from customers which must be directed to the Complaints 
Team. (You must have a lot of complaints if you have a special Team for 
them!).

He also informed me that Mr Wilson was too busy to talk to me as he was 
on other calls. In view of this, I asked to escalate this to the next in 
line. Your Mr zzzzzz  Head of Operations repeated the demand for the 
abovementioned original bank statements. He suggested that I 'black out' 
any information which I did not want xxxxxx to have but that the 
documents must be original bank statement. No rule of statute or common 
law can require me to choose between supplying you with excessive data 
or defacing my originals. That is Hobson's Choice, and either choice 
results in an infringement of my Art. 8 Convention rights. In your 
position as Registered Compliance Officer (and the person responsible 
under the FSA licence for knowing this, please supply me with referenced 
authority for any FSA regulation requiring this. No such rule can exist 
as it would be unlawful under the provisions of the HRA 1998.

_*There is no way I will deface my original documents and you have no 
right to suggest it!*_

Mr Greenwood then put me on hold,. I gave up after being on hold for 
approximately 15 minutes (my phone has a timer).

I called back, and was told I should expect a call from a Mr xyzzy. He 
must have been expected to have telepathic powers, since at no time were 
my telephone contact details taken, so I left my phone number.

Mr xyzzzy rang back. He confirmed that your company intends to stand by 
its demand for original bank statements and upon receipt thereof would 
store my personal and private transaction information (in the form of a 
photocopy of the statements) despite such transaction data being 
entirely unrelated to our business dealings.

*He further confirmed that your company's only purpose in requiring a 
copy of old and new bank account statements was to verify the new bank 
account was in the name of the xxxx account holder.* (How does the old 
bank account statement do that?)

He also confirmed that your company is prepared to use different methods 
where the customer concerned does not receive paper statements from his 
bankers (i.e. where they use internet banking) This proves that your 
request in any event is unnecessary.

_Under the Data Protection Act 1998, the information you are asking for 
is entirely excessive for the stated purpose_. A requirement regarding 
verification of name of bank account cannot require me to supply you 
with the details of personal transactions on that account which do not 
relate to you and which you then store.

In the current climate on heightened awareness of Data Protection 
issues, there is no way in which I am prepared to send you original bank 
statements, whether of my old or new account. The reasons include:

    *

      Such documents are valuable, at risk of loss and put me to the
      risk of information and/or identity theft if put in the post. You
      confirmed to me that you did sometimes lose such originals.

    *

      Furthermore the data contained in the information which you intend
      to collect is excessive for the purpose you stated, which when all
      is said and done is merely a change to the direct debit mandate on
      my account.

    *

      *You do not need the transaction data on my statements for any
      purpose whatsoever. *To refuse to change my direct debit mandate
      until I provide documents containing data unrelated to your
      purpose is a gross intrusion into my financial privacy.

    *

      *You do not need this information to verify me as a customer under
      'KYC' regulations*. You have already done that. I have previously
      fulfilled all your identification requirements including passport,
      address proof, inside leg measurement and the like.

Let's get real. All we are trying to do here is merely to set up a 
replacement direct debit authority.

Your procedures are excessive, unlawful under the Data Protection Act, 
as well as being intrusive and bureaucratic.

In view of your renewed insistence on receiving this excessive personal 
data, I shall writing to the Data Protection Commissioner asking him to 
conduct a Formal Assessment of your company's data protection regime, 
especially in the light of the originally expressed statement (by Mr xxx 
) that a compliance manager would not speak with me (although following 
my escalation, you did, in fact telephone me an hour or so later).

The customer service issues revealed in the above statements are 
entirely a matter for you to deal with and I do not require a response 
on that. As I do not intend to do further business with you, it is not 
my concern if you alienate more customers. That is entirely a matter for 
you. I really don't care anymore.

_*Please close my account with immediate effect. *_

I hereby give you notice that you must repay the balance of my account 
within 7 days.

Please also send me paper copies of all the data contained in my account 
file (to which I am entitled under s.29 DPA 98) in order that I may have 
access to all relevant data for my records after my access to your 
online system has ceased.


Yours sincerely

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
     All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
      available to the world wide web community at large at
      http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
     If you wish to leave this list please send the command
       leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
 Any queries about sending or receiving messages please send to the list owner
              [log in to unmask]
  Full help Desk - please email [log in to unmask] describing your needs
        To receive these emails in HTML format send the command:
         SET data-protection HTML to [log in to unmask]
   (all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager