That's right.
It's the call to the TPS-listed number that's the issue. I've never
thought otherwise.
Roland Perry wrote:
> In message <[log in to unmask]>, at 17:01:36 on Fri, 7 Dec
> 2007, Roland Perry <[log in to unmask]> writes
>>> My only point is that regulation 30 of PECR requires you to have
>>> suffered
>>> "damage" before you can claim compensation. They wasted your time
>>> at work,
>>> but that may be a hard one to convince a court about. (A few phone
>>> calls etc.)
>>
>> And unless the work phone is also covered by TPS, the only actionable
>> call is surely the original one to his home. In the plain English
>> sense, the one to the work number was solicited (irrespective of
>> whether or not it was eventually found to be desirable).
>
> Sorry, I wasn't think quite straight there. The TPS status of the work
> phone isn't relevant if the call to it was solicited (and I don't
> think any possible deception changes that).
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
All archives of messages are stored permanently and are
available to the world wide web community at large at
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/data-protection.html
If you wish to leave this list please send the command
leave data-protection to [log in to unmask]
All user commands can be found at http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/help/commandref.htm
Any queries about sending or receiving messages please send to the list owner
[log in to unmask]
Full help Desk - please email [log in to unmask] describing your needs
To receive these emails in HTML format send the command:
SET data-protection HTML to [log in to unmask]
(all commands go to [log in to unmask] not the list please)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|